More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology's impact on relationships
Technology's impact on relationships
Technology's impact on relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With recent advancements in technology (e-mail, phone, text, social media, and video conference), couples can manage and maintain their relationship with a simple touch of a button. Foremost, communication through technology is important to couples involved in long-distance relationships (LDRs), as the demand for relational development requires constant attention.
The term “long-distance relationship” can often carry a negative association for those seeking love. There is a perception that geographical distance will prevent a strong and happy relationship from developing; however, it does not deter all couples from staying together. LDRs are identified by several factors, including: distance, the length of a relationship, and time living apart. Reasons why couples (married or dating) find themselves in LDRs include career, college, military deployment, and/or preference.
In LDRs, relational dialectics contribute to the future or demise of an existing or developing relationship. To some, the benefit of living apart from their partner allows the individual to establish autonomy within the relationship while allowing a connection to their partner through communication. However, additional effort may be required to guarantee assurances to the partner who desires more security and closeness. Moreover, couples in LDRs have the freedom to attain privacy while also providing open communication when required by the situation. Therefore, it is pertinent to identify these trends in relational dialectics through four studies examining LDRs.
I became inquisitive about LDRs when a co-worker disclosed her husband lived in New York. I found their living arrangement interesting. She claimed it was not necessarily an obligation to live apart,...
... middle of paper ...
...ence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication, 63, 556-577.
Maguire, K. C. (2007). “Will it ever end?”: A (re) examination of uncertainty in college student long-distance dating relationships. Communication Quarterly, 55, 415-432.
Reis, H. T. & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationship (pp. 367-389). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Sahlstein, E. (2010). Communication and distance: The present and future interpreted through the past. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 106-114.
Sidelinger, R. J., Ayash, G., Godorhazy, A., & Tibbles, D. (2008). Couples go online: Relational maintenance behaviors and relational characteristics use in dating relationships. Human Communication, 11, 341-356.
To sum up Erikson’s psychosocial stages, Intimacy vs. Isolation is present in adults eighteen and up, according to Erickson. When an adolescent begins to share things with someone they would not share with anyone else, they have successfully demonstrated open intimacy. DJ was able to become extremely intimate with her high school sweet heart Steve, and further depict Erickson’s Intimacy vs. isolation as they spoke of a long-term relationship together. The ability to achieve these relationships further demonstrates the secure attachment and ability to hold close
Physically communicating and connecting with a person will never compare to texting or any social media. There comes a time where as human beings we need someone physically here with us whether we need advice, support, or just someone to express our feelings to. In Ashton Kutcher’s article “Has Texting Killed Romance?” Kutcher discusses how romance has changed because of technology updates and how it has hindered relationships.
From walkmans to CD players to iPods, technology has evolved over the succession of the years; humans have taken extensive steps towards a technological transformation that has revolutionized the manner in which several individuals communicate with one another. Likewise, various humans have opted for more modern methods to connect and contact their loved ones such as speaking on a cell phone, video chatting, e-mailing, instant messaging, and conversing through social media. With these contemporary methods of communication, global interaction has now been facilitated and easily accessible; conversing with individuals from across the world is as transparent and prompt as speaking with individuals within the same city. Nonetheless, these technological
The dimensions of relationships are classified as: interdependence, ideology and conflict. It is said the more interdependent the couple is, “…the higher the level of companionship, the more time they spend together, and the more they organize their space to promote togetherness and interaction” (Berkowitz and Fitzpatrick 1964). Ideological matters like are viewed differently from individuals and couples. “The beliefs, standards, and values individuals hold concerning their relationship and family are a major factor guiding not only the interactions with the spouse but also the judgments individuals make about these interactions and their outcomes” (Berkowitz & Fitzpatrick 1964). Conflict distinguishes perception towards being open to conflict between individuals and couples. “Couples vary as to their willingness to engage in conflict and their degree of assertiveness with one another” (Berkowitz & Fitzpatrick
“Habits in relationships,” “build their relationship,” “strengthen a relationship,” are all examples of how Wortham uses it to show the importance of technology between two people. Many couples work different hours, which could lead to them not seeing as often as they would like or need. Technology is an excellent way to keep in touch with people, whether that be your significant other or a distant family member. Building and stabilizing a relationship can be difficult face-to-face, imagine trying to do so when you live two hours apart. Technology lets couples regularly speak on everyday
Rosenthal, D. A., Gurney, R. M., & Moore, S. M. (1981). From trust on intimacy: A new inventory for examining erikson's stages of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10(6), 525-537.
New York: New York University Press, 1998. 173-188. Print. The. Cupach, William R., and Brian H. Spitzberg. "The Evolution of Relationships, Intimacy" and Intrusion; The Pursuit of Ordinary Relationships.
Chen, An. "Design for Long Distance Relationships." Proquest. University of Nevada: Reno -- Library, n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2014.
There is “approximately 3.6 million married U.S. Americans involved in a long distance relationship in 2006” and “4 to 4.5 million U.S. college couples in a long distance relationship (LDR)” (Hassenzahl, 2012,p. 2). There are many challenges that couples in long distance relationship face, for instance, lack of face- to- face communication, and physical closeness. Couples in LDRs are also prone to experiencing extreme idealization, for instance, experiencing false ideals due to distance and not spending physical and quality time in their relationship. Recent study found that when those in long-distance dating relationships moved to a proximal relationship, they were likely to terminate the relationship (Beebe et al, 2011, p. 286). In other words, the transition from LDRs to geographical close relationship (GCR) may come to rapid termination of the relationship. This may happen because couples who live far apart obtains fewer information about their significant other. However, high idealization leads to high satisfaction in LDRs which increase longevity. “Couples in long-distance premarital relationships had less communication but surprisingly greater satisfaction and higher expectation for the likelihood of marriage than those in proximal, or geographically close, relationships” (Beebe et al, 2011, p. 286). My personal interest to the topic is based on by experience. Before my husband and I were married; we had a long distance relationship. Both of us are in the Military and in different branches we were always miles apart. Despite the long distances between us, we still manage to make our love flourish through communication. Now that my husband and I are married and are now geographically close to each other, we are learning more...
One could argue that the effects of social networking sites could make an individual more inwards due to the lack of direct social contact. As the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine suggests (in Sigman, 2009) “Social networking encourages us to ignore the social networks that form in our non-virtual communities”. However as Lewis & West (2009) found, Facebook seems to have the opposite effect and encourages an individual to be more social in some ways due to the structure of the site as it is less direct than a phone call and with no monetary costs attached to it, but always with the ability to communicate with multiple people at one time with other individuals about to respond to a message and view others responses. If a person does become inward and slightly withdrawn from society through Facebook, then most likely they may have possessed these traits already as Dwyer’s research of behaviour offline suggests that even “some people will always be more inclined to socialise than others” (2000). This maybe due to their own personality traits rather than the effects of Facebook on an individual. As Amichai-Hamburger & Vinitzky discovered in their 2010 study, introverted individuals seem to transfer their pattern of behaviour from offline to online, which is reflected in the smaller volume of ‘Facebook Friends’ in comparison with those with extroverted personalities. As was stated earlier by Ross (2009), Facebook’s structure is mainly offline to online therefore those who are introverted in reality and have trouble forming friendships offline, will have fewer friends who can be added as ‘Facebook friends’ so their lack of social circle size is not a result of Facebook, it merely highlights it.
Social networking can connect strangers across the world. As the evolution of communication continues, technology progresses and social networking grows. Social networks like Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook have grown to have billions of users. In fact in today’s society, it is necessary or nearly expected to use one if not all of these technological communication networks. The increasing use of social networking has had both a negative and positive effect on communication in relationships. The purpose of this literary analysis is to answer if social networks are helpful or harmful to relationships.
Because I have no expertise when it comes to relationships, I sought answers from my friend Christina Duong, who is maintaining a 3 year relationship 400 miles away from her boyfriend, Alex. Ever since she was young, Christina grew up with the stigma that women
There are many problems related to the internet but I will focus on one that is very important which is relationships on social media. Social media might cause many people to feel lonely and make that the people break up or cause damages in any relationships because those people are not able to socialize or interact with people around them. Social media is harmful tool the we have to use with caution because sometimes it helps you, but sometimes it goes against you, especially Facebook and Twitter. Information sharing and relationships on social media are problems that need to be addressed for many reasons. Some of these reasons are the people who are active on social media, interact and socialize with
In short distance relationships, couples see each other daily and force them to have face to face conversations daily. In fact, some go to the same school or work in the same place. This sounds great, however after so many conversations, the