Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Overuse of smartphones
Mary Shelley and the industrial revolution
The effects of smartphones in our life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Addicted to Technology Technology has made numerous evolutions throughout history by having someone creating it to later becoming something more powerful than intended. A demonstration of this malpractice of technology is viewed in the novel Frankenstein when the author, Mary Shelley, introduces a character named Victor Frankenstein, who is so eager to create life that during his process he never analyze the consequences that it brings to him. After he creates what he calls a “monster” instead of assuming responsibility, he ends up leaving it behind where the monster has to learn to interact with people he never seen before. However, his appearance makes it difficult for people to accept him into their society since they never seen a creation …show more content…
In Frankenstein, Victor experiences with this distraction when he “engaged, heart and soul, in one pursuit...caused me also to forget those friends who were so many miles absent, and whom I had not seen for so long a time”(Shelly ). Victor’s eager to produce life was so high that he forgot the people who cared about him back home and dedicated all his time to finish his masterpiece. Shelley portraits the distraction of technology by having Victor isolate himself from the rest of the world until he finishes his invention. Just like technology was a distraction in Shelley’s novel, it also distracts people very often which makes them not finish a task or cause an accident because they were so busy on their phones that they did not notice the person in front of them. Pamela Hill Nettleton, author of the article The Sound of Silence, points out a study done by Microsoft where they observed digital users and concluded that they“ crave continual new stimuli, have trouble filtering out distractions, and struggle to focus on a single task” (Nettleton 20). The reason for this is because people tend to multitask, but instead they lack to finish one task because whatever was on their technology they got so involved into it, that it was hard for them to leave the device alone. As new technology comes out, the more we get drawn into a device and the more distracted. …show more content…
As Mary Shelley argues in her novel about the monstrosity of technology, she also includes health problems by having Victor becoming ultimately ill after finishing his creation. During his experiment, Victor’s ambition to accomplish his experiment was so tremendous that he would work restless day and nights. After his friend Henry encounter him one day, Henry noticed how ill Victor was, so he decided to be his nurse until he fully recovered. Once Victor recovered from his sickness, he confessed to Henry that “his disorder indeed owed its origin to some uncommon and terrible event”(Shelley 39). Shelley is demonstrating the effect of what technology can do when becoming too fascinated with it. In this case, Victor’s eager to solve the mystery of the creation of life made him become very ill to the point where if Henry never found him, his life would have been at risk. Not only does this “craving” or “addiction” to technology happen during Shelley’s period, but in modern day people are more likely to encounter health problems; one example would be obesity becoming one of the top concerns. This issue is commonly view in children because they are mostly lured into getting addicted to technology, a.k.a the television. As authors of the article, Childhood Obesity: causes and consequences points out that “each additional hour of television per day increased the
To begin our analysis, I will look to how Mary Shelley positions Victor Frankenstein's motivations to create life against natural laws within the ideas of individualism, as Victor can correlate directly to the educated human at the center of Enlightenment, Industrialism, and Romanticism values. With the burgeoning interest in scientific discovery during the Industrial Revolution "transform[ing] British culture" and "changing the world"(Lipking 2065), many concepts of society were also changed, which Shelley looked to explore through Victor's actions. Rooted in the scientifically curious spirit of Industrial England, Victor's attempt to create life can show many examples of how an importance of the individual acquisition of knowledge and accomplishment can disrupt society. Victor's...
Since the beginning of time man has been infatuated with the idea of pushing the human body to its limits by the use of science. The Space program is the best example of science helping humans accomplish things never before thought possible. In the age of technology and scientific advancement ideas that once seemed like science fiction, for example people walking on the moon, are now a reality. In order to push human development, ethics and morals have been pushed to the side. Necessary evils have been accepted as part of science without a second thought. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, plays God by creating a monster out of body parts and bringing it to life. When Frankenstein realizes the full extent to what he’s done, he abandons the monster leaving it confused and lonely. The monster then
The theme of creation in "Frankenstein" touches on the notion of how modern science plays God. This is illustrated through the attempt of replicating a human by means of science, using the main character Victor as the god-figure. Unfortunately, Victor Frankenstein did not consider the effect his creation would have on the outside world and, more importantly, his internal self and his creation.
Monsters, in myths and legends, are ugly beasts with vicious tendencies and overbearing powers who bring suffering and agony to those who cross their paths, regardless of intention. However, the same cannot be said for Mary Shelley's monster, the Creation. Victor Frankenstein's lab experiment emphasizes the danger of not taking responsibility for one's own actions and knowledge, by being an instrument of Victor's suffering.
In today’s world of genetically engineered hearts and genetically altered glowing rats, the story of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, seems as if it could be seen in the newspapers in our near future. The discoveries seen in modern science, as well as in the novel, often have controversy and negative consequences that follow them, the biggest of which being the responsibility the creator of life has to what has been created. Victor Frankenstein suffers from a variety of internal and external conflicts stemming from the creation of his monster, which in return also experiences similar problems. Shelley uses these tumultuous issues to portray the discrepancies between right and wrong, particularly through romanticism and the knowledge of science.
In Shelley's Frankenstein, it's interesting to use the text to ask the question, whose interest's lie at the heart of science? Why is Victor Frankenstein motivated to plunge the questions that bringing life to inanimate matter can bring? Victor Frankenstein's life was destroyed because of an obsession with the power to create life where none had been before. The monster he created could be seen as a representation of all those who are wronged in the selfish name of science. We can use Shelley's book to draw parallels in our modern society, and show that there is a danger in the impersonal relationship that science creates between the scientist and his work. It seems to me that Shelley was saying that when science is done merely on the basis of discovery without thought to the affect that the experimentation can have, we risk endangering everything we hold dear.
There is always change in the world that either changes the world in a good way or may go bad. When it comes to technology, it is always the creator that makes technology good or bad. In the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the main character Victor Frankenstein creates a creature using galvanism, but as soon as he completes his life long dream he sees how horrid the creature is and abandons it to live and face the outside world alone. This causes the creature to become Victor's worst nightmare. It was Victors actions that caused the chaos, because of his mis usage of science and actions.
native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his
Over two centuries ago, Mary Shelley created a gruesome tale of the horrific ramifications that result when man over steps his bounds and manipulates nature. In her classic tale, Frankenstein, Shelley weaves together the terrifying implications of a young scientist playing God and creating life, only to be haunted for the duration of his life by the monster of his own sordid creation. Reading Shelley in the context of present technologically advanced times, her tale of monstrous creation provides a very gruesome caution. For today, it is not merely a human being the sciences are lusting blindly to bring to life, as was the deranged quest of Victor Frankenstein, but rather to generate something potentially even more dangerous and horrifying with implications that could endanger the entire world and human population.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment. Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise.
Analysis of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Analyzing a book can be a killer. Especially when it contains tons of subtle little messages and hints that are not picked up unless one really dissects the material. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a prime example.
Frankenstein and Science & nbsp; & nbsp; Science is the knowledge gained by a systematic study, knowledge which then becomes facts or principles. In the systematic study the first step is observation, the second step hypothesis, the third step experimentation to test the hypothesis, and lastly the conclusion whether or not the hypothesis holds true. These steps have been ingrained into every student of science, as the basic pathway to scientific discovery. This pathway does not hold as to the good or evil intention of the experiment. Though, there are always repercussions of scientific experiments.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein was a literary piece that touched on many different issues, not only in her time, but also today. The creation of life in Frankenstein was Shelley’s symbolic warning to the new industrialized era. “It also [can] be seen to be warning about the dangers of uncontrolled application of technology and its use without proper morality” (Brachneos). The warning in Frankenstein applies today more than ever because of the creation of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and computers that “think for themselves” The two are connected in a sense. Some would argue that Victor, the character that created the monster wanting to play od, is like the programmers of AI computers today.
By attempting to create life and messing with the natural order of the world, Victor loses his connection to the earth and eventually ends up as a shell of what he once was. No matter how hard he tried to redeem himself, he could no longer be one with nature. The creature that Victor creates by using the malicious techniques of science actually starts out to nature than Victor himself. The Creature recognizes the wonders of nature and finds temporary happiness in his closeness to the world. He turns away the peace given to him by nature just to satisfy his desire for revenge, and becomes a broken being. Mary Shelley demonstrates in Frankenstein what happens if someone strays too far from nature. Shelley purposely shows the destructive nature of science in her novel to highlight the strife that her society was going through. Her society, disillusioned by war and the devastation that new technologies caused, wanted to go back to their roots in nature, and her novel pushes at that idea. Shelley’s example of Victor’s and the Creature’s downfall warns us of the dangers and temptations of science. Even now, people are constantly enraptured by the possibilities that science and technology offer, while neglecting their duties towards nature and the
Shelley reminds us that these breakthroughs in science can also be a good thing. “Wealth was an inferior object, but what glory would attend the discovery if I could banish disease from the human frame and render man invulnerable to any but a violent death!” (Shelley 26) I believe here Shelley is quietly reassuring us that science can be a positive thing. With the death of her child and her mother, I think that Mary Shelley has a longing desire to have the power to bring back the dead, to save her loved ones through the use of science. I am all for everything about science. Moving forward I want flying cars and I want there to be pigs that grow human organs. I want disease to be eradicated by scientists working day in and day out to come up with cures and vaccines. I believe Shelley writes this novel to tell us to make sure we our ethical with our advancements and discoveries. But we can do both, we can have these wonderful abilities through science and be ethical at the same time and it will make for a much safer