Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does Mary shelley present the emotions of the creature
Analysis of the novel frankenstein
Developmental theorists and their theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When babies are born, the first thing they comprehend is the ability to breathe; they do not understand their name, how to communicate, or right from wrong, they are a blank slate which they then learn new information everyday through their guidance and experiences, this concept is called Tabula Rasa. Tabula Rasa was developed by the philosopher John Locke, he wrote the book An Essay Concerning Human Understanding which outlined his viewpoints on how the human mind operates. From Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein, we see that people begin as blank slates and develop themselves through experiences, because they don’t have an opinion about things to give them emotion, they haven’t experienced anything good or bad, and they have no upbringing …show more content…
by any older people. When babies are born, they don’t yet have preconceived thoughts concerning how they should react to certain situations, they react by pure instinct of the little they have already observed, these thoughts come later after they have had the action repeated enough to find out if they enjoy or dislike it.
In Mary Shelly’s book, Frankenstein when the creature was first created, Victor spoke that, “His jaws opened, he muttered some inarticulate sounds, while a grin wrinkled on his cheeks”(Shelly 48). When the creature was created, he had no hatred to anyone, when he came to see his creator he tried to communicate with him and grinned as a sign of compassion but when Victor shuns him away he then begins to feel his animosity towards the human race. As he began to be rejected more and more he began to turn into an uneducated angry being, the argument could have been made that if Victor would have sat down and educated his creature and showed compassion that the creature may have turned out just a nice and slightly abnormal being. John Locke formed the idea of Tabula Rasa, which is the idea that at birth the mind is a blank slate, “Locke argued that people acquire knowledge from the information about the objects in the world that our senses bring. People begin with simple ideas and then combine them into more complex ones”(age-of-the-sage 1). The blank slate theory makes great sense, people often make the counter-argument that kids are always like their parents but that simply …show more content…
isn’t true; they resemble their parents because they are raised by them, however, people who don’t grow up with their parents may not resemble them in personality at all. When kids are being molded by their guiding figures they first learn simple things, such as how to communicate and the difference between right and wrong, from these things they use their experiences to create their personality. When beings are born, they have no opinion about the world or the people in it or even themselves yet, so it is impractical to believe that someone who doesn’t even know how to walk on their own two feet yet can have a vast knowledge that comprises a human’s personality. In most experiences, the outcome of the event whether good or bad tends to shape people’s views on that activity, so as babies gain experience they would therefore build their personality supporting the blank slate theory. It has been said that, “From experience: in that, all our knowledge is founded; and from that it ultimately derives itself”(Hewett 1). This quote derived from John Locke’s writing explains that we aren’t born with knowledge but rather from birth we begin to soak up mass amounts of information like a little intellectual sponge. One example to look at is that babies aren’t born knowing how to speak english, that is an acquired skill that they learn from the repeated experience of people talking around them, the same way the creature learned to speak, he didn’t know how until observing the family for a long time. Locke later elaborates that, “We are born with a variety of faculties that enable us to receive and process information and to manipulate it once we have it, but what we don’t have is innate knowledge or ideas”(Hewett 1). Locke means that while we are born with the capability to process information we are not born with the information itself. The human brain is split into many sections or regions each responsible for different things such as emotion, reaction, and storage of memories, there is no region where there are preset personality traits. In sum, the human brain has the capability to take what it sees like frequently said words and incorporate it into knowledge that it can use later, but it is not born with a set personality for the being, that is developed through the experiences it intakes. Throughout our whole life we have teachers, people to give us their experience and knowledge of things they know, we don’t have that knowledge prior to learning it which is why we need our elders to give us experience; our first teachers are our parents which mold us into the people we are today. Locke discussed how the human mind cannot comprehend an idea until someone has put the idea in their head saying, “To the contrary that an idea cannot be said to be ‘in the mind’ until one is conscious of it”(Britannica: John Locke 1). Parents raise children by passing down what they have learned through their experiences in life, therefore, the parents and teachers experiences raise the children by passing the knowledge to them. The human mind according to Locke is equivalent to a sponge, it can soak up information but can’t clean anything from straight out of the package. Locke compares the mind to paper saying, “the human mind before ideas have been imprinted on it by the reaction of the senses to the external world of objects”(Britannica: Tabula 1). Suppose that experience is an english teacher and we are the students writing a paper, as the teacher teaches us more about grammar techniques and vocabulary we begin to assemble a more thorough and superior paper. The whole schooling system is proof that the mind that is a blank slate, if people were born with preconceived knowledge or personality there would be no point for schooling to give people knowledge to figure out who they are and who they want to be. In sum, we need the upbringing of older figures whether they are teachers, parents, or coaches because a mind is a blank slate which has not yet absorbed the experience and ideas which they are bestowing upon them. In close, the human mind is a blank slate, when babies are born, they have no opinion about the environment around them, they have no experience, and have not been brought up by any elders.
Humans are experience based creatures, we learn from our mistakes, kids are not born with their knowledge. Blank slate, means that people can be whatever they want to be, they have no
destinies.
In The Big Field, author Mike Lupica explores the theme, "Success uses motivation as fuel." Lupica portrays this theme through the main character, Hutch. Throughout the entire book, Hutch, a young boy that has just recently joined a highly talented baseball team, displays moments that exemplify this main theme. Hutch and his team have a chance to play in the stadium of the Miami Marlins, a Major League Baseball team, as long as they can keep winning games and advancing through a challenging tournament; however, Hutch's favorite position on the field, shortstop, the position located between 2nd and 3rd base, has already been filled on the team. Unfortunately, Hutch gets a demotion from shortstop, to second base, the position located between 1st base and 2nd base. Although Hutch was disappointed and melancholy about the switch in position, he was even more upset about the downgrading of leadership, since the
Piaget believed that a child’s development is neither intrinsic (learning based on interest) or extrinsic (learning from an outside force, such as a parent). He believed that a child develops based on his or hers interactions in the environment (Mooney 2000). Piaget created four stages of cognitive development, some of which can be seen in the film “Cheaper by the Dozen”. A few examples of characters that display Piaget’s theory are the twins, who are in the preoperational stage and lack the concept of conservatism, and the mastermind, who is in the concrete operational stage and show's the concept of decentralism. These characters will have Piaget’s theory applied to them in the following paragraphs.
In Volume 1 and 3 of Frankenstein, Victor’s reason for creating the “monster” changes drastically; however, ultimately leading to the same consequence of suffering and depression. Through this change in Victor, Shelley argues that all humans have an instinctive notation of right from wrong and learn from their mistakes. Victor left his friends and family to go to college; when there, he had no friends and social life. His top and only priority was his schoolwork; he read all he can about the sciences, especially chemistry and anatomy. When finished with his studies, Victor is ready to start his creation when he confirms his proceedings aloud, “Winter, spring, and summer, passed away during my labours; but I did not watch the blossom or the expanding leaves-sights which before always yielded me supreme delight, so deeply was I engrossed in my occupation. The leaves of that year had withered before my work drew near to a close; and now every day shewed me more plainly how well I had succeeded.
As humans, we all embody different qualities and characteristics that make us unique. I might find someone with completely opposite traits than me, and the contrasts between us may become apparent. In East of Eden, John Steinbeck introduces many such contrasts, most notably good versus evil and fate versus free will. He creates characters to represent these contrasts, some at the extreme ends of the spectrum, and some in the areas in between. The most significant of these characters are Cal and Aron Trask. Throughout the second part of the novel, the brothers visibly clash. We are not really introduced to them until Chapter 24, but their differences are greatly stressed from that point on. Steinbeck uses these characters to show the contrast
In Frankenstein, everyone treats Victor’s creation like a monster, including Frankenstein himself. This leads to the creation accepting that title and going on a murder spree. His creation says “When I reflect on his crimes and malice, my hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation” (69). Victor’s creation shows that he did not ask to be created, and his existence is miserable.
Victor Frankenstein describes his creation as a ‘fiend of unparalleled barbarity.’ The noun ‘barbarity’ connotes cruelty and someone who is monstrous; this shows how Frankenstein sees the creature as the ultimate symbol of a savage. Furthermore the use of the adjective “unparalleled” suggests that Frankenstein thinks that no one will ever be equal the levels of brutality that the creature exhibits. Victor indulges in a determined, almost compulsive hyperbole that distances himself and demonizes his creation. In the process Victor comes to identify himself with "the whole human race" against the anomalous alien being he would cast out from it. However throughout the novel the creature is an eloquent and rational character whereas Victor Frankenstein relies on passion bursts of rage often fainting in the process. Lee Sterrenburg writes “The monster speaks like a philosophe, while Victor rages in Romantic agony” , Mary Shelley uses these differences to blur the boundaries between the civilised and savage.as we are able to see that the creature is someone who we are able to sympathise with ; society has made him a fiend, it is not innate this is from a theory formulated by french philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau called the Tabula Rasa . M.A. Goldberg writes "
“I now hasten to the more moving part of my story. I shall relate events that impressed me with feelings which, from what I was, have made me what I am” (Shelley 92). Frankenstein’s Creature presents these lines as it transitions from a being that merely observes its surroundings to something that gains knowledge from the occurrences around it. The Creature learns about humanity from “the perfect forms of [his] cottagers” (90). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein offers compelling insights into the everlasting nature versus nurture argument. Her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote, “Treat a person ill, and he will become wicked.” Shelley believes that the nurture of someone, or something, in the Creature’s case, forms them into who they become and what actions they take. While this is true for Frankenstein’s Creature, the same cannot be said about Victor Frankenstein.
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
When Frankenstein is at Ingolstadt, he “has a void of the soul'; so profound that he subverts Nature to fill it (qtd. in Renfroe, 2). He conceives, “A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me'; (Shelley, 32). Frankenstein decides to make a creature, to defy the powers of Nature and God -- a poor decision that ruins the rest of his life. When Victor finally succeeds in his quest to possess Nature, “horror and disgust'; fill his heart upon viewing his new creation (qtd. in Renfroe, 2). He sought companionship by capturing Nature and creating someone to honor him for giving them life; but it backfired and he sealed his fate to the wrath of his creature.
When Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein is analyzed, critics comes to a conclusion about Victor Frankenstein's creation. The creature invokes the most sympathy from the readers than any other character in the novel. Because he is abandoned by society which manipulates the creature to do evil things despite his good heart. Therefore Shelley's message throughout the novel is that a person is not born evil, they are made evil.
Although the Creature later went on to commit crimes, he was not instinctively bad. Victor’s Creature was brought into this world with a child-like innocence. He was abandoned at birth and left to learn about life on his own. After first seeing his creation, Victor “escaped and rushed downstairs.” (Frankenstein, 59) A Creator has the duty to teach his Creature about life, as well as to love and nurture him. However, Victor did not do any of these; he did not take responsibility for his creature. One of the first things that the creature speaks of is that he was a “poor, helpless, miserable wretch; I knew, and could distinguish, nothing; but feeling pain invade me on all sides, (he) sat ...
The question “What makes us who we are?” has perplexed many scholars, scientists, and theorists over the years. This is a question that we still may have not found an answer to. There are theories that people are born “good”, “evil”, and as “blank slates”, but it is hard to prove any of these theories consistently. There have been countless cases of people who have grown up in “good” homes with loving parents, yet their destiny was to inflict destruction on others. On the other hand, there have been just as many cases of people who grew up on the streets without the guidance of a parental figure, but they chose to make a bad situation into a good one by growing up to do something worthwhile for mankind. For this reason, it is nearly impossible to determine what makes a human being choose the way he/she behaves. Mary Shelley (1797-1851) published a novel in 1818 to voice her opinions about determining personality and the consequences and repercussions of alienation. Shelley uses the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau to make her point. Rousseau proposed the idea that man is essentially "good" in the beginning of life, but civilization and education can corrupt and warp a human mind and soul. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (hereafter referred to as Frankenstein), Victor Frankenstein’s creature with human characteristics shows us that people are born with loving, caring, and moral feelings, but the creature demonstrates how the influence of society can change one’s outlook of others and life itself by his reactions to adversity at “birth”, and his actions after being alienated and rejected by humans several times.
“Frankenstein” by Mary Shelly explores the concept of the body, life, ‘the self’ and most of importantly humanity, which is repeatedly questioned throughout the novel. The definition of humanity is the quality of being humane or in other words someone that can feel or possess compassion. Despite all the facts against the “monster” in “Frankenstein” he is indeed what one would consider being human. Humanity isn’t just about ones physical appearance but also includes intellect and emotion. Some people argue that the “monster” is not a human for he was not a creature that was born from “God” or from a human body. That being said, the “monster” is not only able to speak different languages, he can also show empathy - one of many distinct traits that set humans apart from the animals. Both the “monster” and his creator, Victor, hold anger and feel a sense of suffering throughout the novel. Victor is a good person with good intentions just like most individuals, but makes the mistake of getting swept up into his passion of science and without thinking of the consequences he creates a “monster”. After completing his science project, he attempts to move forward with his life, however his past – i.e., the “monster” continues to follow and someone haunt him. While one shouldn’t fault or place blame on Frankenstein for his mistakes, you also can’t help but feel somewhat sympathetic for the creature. Frankenstein just wants to feel accepted and loved, he can’t help the way he treats people for he’s only mimicking how people have treated him, which in most cases solely based on his appearance. Unlike most of the monsters we are exposed to in films past and present, the character of the “monster” ...
In Frankenstein, Victor is extremely excited about his creation, but once the monster becomes animated with life, he is horrified and abandons his work. Dr. Frankenstein, upon seeing the reality of what he had created, had a moment of realization, ? . . . when those muscles were rendered capable of motion, it became a thing such as Dante could not have conceived? (Shelley 57). In the previous quotation, we, the reader, see Victor?s utter shock and abandonment of the project. When Victor notices the creature?s muscles twitching, his eyes are opened to what he has really done: ?Oh! No mortal could support the horror of that countenance? (Shelley 57). He had not thought about the consequences of creating a being, only the actual task.
Victor Frankenstein is originally a happy character that loves to learn and read a large variety of books. He was a fiery individual who sought to understand all knowledge; regardless of how practical the information was. Evidence of this is when his father tells him not to worry about fictional writers like Cornelius Agrippa. Yet, Frankenstein states, “But here were books, and here were men who had penetrated deeper and knew more. I took their word for all that they averred, and I became their disciple” (21). Frankenstein embodies the movement in science to understand everything, and that is not necessarily a good thing (Storment 2). Frankenstein only understands that this train of thought is bad when he reaches the pinnacle of knowledge and produces the creature. The fruits of Frankenstein’s labor end up costing him the lives of his friends and family, as well as his own sanity. The feeling of guilt thrives in Frankenstein because he knows his work was the direct cause of the chaos in his life. In Frankenstein’s case, his goal of total enlightenment led to his pitiful demise. Frankenstein’s creature was not originally a monster. He is born with good intentions and is a gentle- although atrocious looking- being until he learns of the sins of the human race. The ultimate factor in the creature’s progression from harmless to