Symbolism In The Epic Of Gilgamesh

813 Words2 Pages

Controlling Wild Ones: Creations of Masculinity in Ancient Mesopotamia Little did the world know before the mid-1800s that an expansive, detailed work of literature from the Third Dynasty of Ur was about to be discovered. Described as the world’s first great work of literature, The Epic of Gilgamesh is normally thought an applicable document to portray the first inklings of humanity. As history tells any careful reader, clearly this is not the case. The Epic of Gilgamesh and the characters within the epic poem are instead descriptive representations of a certain time period documented once for lore. This instance and the epic story brings forth many questions: what does it mean to be a god? A friend? Most importantly, what does it mean …show more content…

In order to lessen the fear of that power being used for crude purposes, Gilgamesh enacts a civilizing campaign of Enkidu. The prostitute sent to seduce Enkidu is done with the intent that “the wild beasts that shared his life in the hills will reject him” (Gilgamesh 64). Though meaning the literal animals of the forest Enkidu originally lived with, this line may also serve a metaphorical purpose as well. The “wild beasts” or thoughts of pure animal reason also are assumed to leave Enkidu’s mind and Enkidu realizes “wisdom was in him, and the thoughts of a man were in his heart” (Gilgamesh 65). Gilgamesh’s own creation appears to have been done with civilizing intent. After all, Gilgamesh is decidedly two-thirds god and one-third man (Gilgamesh 61). However, Gilgamesh’s motivations lead him to take actions to the detriment of his people. This is particularly true in regards to leadership. Previous to discovering Enkidu, it appears Gilgamesh’s actions are thoughtless towards his own people including enforcing the doctrine of prima nocta (Gilgamesh 68). After learning that everlasting life is not his destiny, Gilgamesh takes his own self-aggrandizing actions and reverses them. These motivations direct him to enact his great building projects. As the civilizing of Enkidu was defined in the parameters of participating in social …show more content…

Masculinity is defined in the context of defeating non-human powers. For if the creatures can’t be humans, they can’t be civilized. Humbaba is described as “an evil” whose name literally means “hugeness” and “a ferocious giant” (Gilgamesh 71). Though Enkidu can see some merit in not attacking the protector of the forest, Gilgamesh’s motivation is attacking things that are not man or of the gods. His desire to be remembered is coupled with a deep need to conquer another land. The physicality of these Gods are also decidedly non-human and non-worthy. Though Ishtar sends a Bull of Heaven to destroy Gilgamesh, the holiness of the animal does not create a qualm for Gilgamesh. He willingly asks Enkidu to “thrust [his] sword between the nape and the horns” (Gilgamesh 88). Their motivations are quite simple, the bull’s snorts alone create cracks were hundreds of people fall to their deaths (Gilgamesh 88). The landscape is quickly changed, and arguably not for the better with numerous amounts of death. Thus, the Bull of Heaven and Humbaba are vilified as wild characters. It doesn’t go unnoticed that Gilgamesh and Enkidu take up these battles together. The expectation of the two working together could easily applied to the rest of society: the city had to otherize these supernatural beings in order to maintain their civilization and defend it from

Open Document