Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay of the cherry orchard
Research paper topic on the cherry orchard
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay of the cherry orchard
The Cherry Orchard (Вишнëвый сад) is the last play written by Russian Playwright Anton Chekhov when he was already suffering from tuberculosis, in the years 1903-4. Premiered at the Moscow Art Theatre in January 1904, the play initially written as a comedy, was also portrayed as a tragedy. The play depicts a story of a Russian aristocratic woman, by the name of Mrs. Lyuba Ranevsky, who returns with her family to her estate, which includes a large and well known cherry orchard, just before it is sold to pay off her debts. As the play advances the orchard acts as the central plot device in the play. The orchard is the massive, over-shadowing presence at the play's center of gravity; For some, the cherry orchard symbolizes the past both good and bad, and in turn, the individual memories that each character associated with it; for others it represents Russia, and and for characters such as Lopakhin, it presents an opportunity to make money and become wealthy by dividing it into plots of land. In this essay I am going to discuss how the title ‘The Cherry Orchard’ acts as a symbol for the aspirations and dreams of the main characters, as symbol of the past, in particular of a lost paradise, and also as a symbol for the social, political and economic change in Russia at the end of the twentieth century. The Cherry Orchard acts as a symbol of both the past and future aspirations for different characters in Chekhov’s play. Varying by both age and by class, for some characters the cherry orchard is a glorified symbol of what once was, and others of troubled and punishing times. the young tend to view the orchard in a negative light, for example Trofimov and Anya, who connect with the cherry orchard to that of repression and abuse towards th... ... middle of paper ... ...hard is not only symbolic to each of the characters in the play, but it also has a symbolic meaning towards Chekhov himself as it perhaps symbolizes Chekov’s own childhood. When Chekhov was still a student at the Taganrog gymnasium, his father was forced to close his store because of the loss of business in Taganrog largely due to the installment of a railroad through the nearby city of Rostov. (S.Baehr, 1999) Like with the loss of the Cherry Orchard and the home of Ranevsky and her family, this displacement showed him first hand how progress and historical change can alter lives. Chekhov was strongly troubled by the sale of his home, and just as he reflects this loss of residence in his literary works of Uncle Vania and Three Sisters, in his final play, The Cherry Orchard the title can be seen as very symbolic to Chekhov’s life as it symbolizes Chekhov’s own past.
In this essay I will be comparing two playwrights, A Raisin in the Sun and A Doll’s House, to one another. I will also compare the two to modern time and talk about whether or not over time our society has changed any. Each of these plays has a very interesting story line based in two very different time eras. Even though there is an 80 year time gap the two share similar problems and morals, things you could even find now in the year of 2016. In the following paragraphs I will go over the power of time and what we as a society have done to make a change.
In describing the setting, the general locale is the prison in the coldest part of Russia- Siberia, geographically but socially depicting the social circumstances in the prison, but draws analogies to the general social, political and economic circumstances of Russia during the Stalinist era (form 1917 revolution up to 1955). The symbolic significance of the novel and the film (genres) reflects experiences, values and attitudes of the Russian society. The genres reflect the origins of the Russian social disorders and massive counts of political misgivings which watered down real communism in Russia. We are constantly reminded of the social and cultural heritage and originality of Russian ethnic groups through those different levels of meanings
“Nevsky Prospect” gives us a view of the city of St. Petersburg. The majority of the story takes place on Nevsky Prospect, which appears to be a central place in St. Petersburg. This location gives readers insight into the daily lives and different types of people of the city. Being the center of the commercial and cultural life of the city, it attracts people from different classes and countries. People from all walks of life convene there to go about their daily activities, and immigrants find themselves there for like reasons. A view of Nevsky Prospect becomes provides a window into a miniature version of St. Petersburg.
Eugenia Collier’s “Marigolds” is a memoir of a colored girl living in the Great Depression. The story does not focus on the troubles society presents to the narrator (Elizabeth), but rather is focused on the conflict within her. Collier uses marigolds to show that the changes from childhood to adulthood cause fear in Elizabeth, which is the enemy of compassion and hope.
A general air of superficiality invades the production. Why? Unless done with reality, the play loses its “tam” (Yiddish for taste), fringes on mockery of the way of life being depicted, and weakens the accomplishment of the author’s purpose.
Chekhov was born in Taganrog, Russia in 1860 to a woman named Yevgeniya and a man named Pavel. His father, who shares the name of the bishop, is described as being “severe” and sometimes went as far as to chastise Chekhov and his siblings (Letters
The first images of the garden are seen through the exaggerated imagination of a young child. “” are as “ as flowers on Mars,” and cockscombs “ the deep red fringe of theater curtains.” Fr...
... destroy and reinstate the bonds of family and Russian nationalism. Turgenev explores hoe this generational divide interacts with the division among classes and how the powers of the aristocracy affects the younger generation and feminine identity. Throught these interactions the power of love as redemption is seen in the relationship between Arkady and Katya as well as Anna and Bazarov. The women in Fathers and Sons symbolize the diversity found within the same class and generational margins these women challenge the men they encounter and cease power over their relationships. The struggle for power, between the sexes is dependent upon the roles and social standings of the perspective character. The female characters whether aristocratic or dependent, “mothers” or “daughters” find power in their gender and utilize their womanly intellect to find eventual resolve.
It seems as though Pyotr and Alexeich both represent different aspects of Chekhov’s father, and Chekhov himself is Anna. Chekov’s father was aloof from his family and came from a lower class background; like Modest Alexeich, Chekhov’s father also fawned at the feet of his social superiors. Chekhov, in contrast, was an unconventional boy. He eventually broke from his family’s lower class position and became a doctor; however, throughout his school and career he performed additional odd jobs to earn money he could send to his father. Also like Anna, Chekhov loved to be with people (Payne xiii, xvii-xxi). Comparing the two, then, it would seem as if Chekhov identifies with Anna as she struggles to find her social identity and wrestles with her desires and the needs of those she loves. This tone gives the story a melancholy mood and leads to a bittersweet conclusion. The ending seems happy for Anna, yet the reader is left to wonder what the ending represents. Did her father and husband receive the dues for their behavior? Are Anna’s actions a normal product of the transformation from youth to adulthood, or did she come to completely discard respect and
In this light, this paper will be a discussion of the life and work of John Ernst Steinbeck, who is more popularly known as John Steinbeck. In examining Steinbeck’s life, it will also evaluate his work, specifically regarding a short story entitled “The Chrysanthemums”.
In addition, Chekhov also utilizes allegory, imagery and symbolism. The Geisha, for example, serves as an a...
“She had wandered, without rules or guidance, in a moral wilderness: as vas, as intricate and shadowy, as the untamed forest” (180). Nature plays an essential part in this American Romance novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter. The forest is a prominent factor symbolizing many ideas about nature’s relationship with man, as an individual and a society. The narrator does so by simply narrating about events and characters before, during and after the forest scenes. The narrator also displays the people’s feelings towards the forest and nature in general. The forest as a symbol helps the book develop the literary devices of theme, mood, and irony in The Scarlet Letter.
... story but it also reflects Russian society. This, however, isn’t why many Russians still continue to hold this piece of literature as central to their culture. Although, it tells of their heritage and society, it is the simple genius of the structure of the novel of –14-line stanza form-and his lyrics, which are complex and meticulous but are written with such ease that they appear effortless, simple, and natural.
Anton Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard projects the cultural conflict of the turn of the twentieth century of Russia. With a historical allusion, Chekhov exhibited the changing Russia with "slice of life" in his play. The Cherry Orchard is not only a depiction of Russian life but also an understatement of changing traditional value. Cultural conflict itself is an abstraction. To explain it, it is the traditional culture that is unable to resist the invading one. In the play, each character has his or her own personality, which symbolizes their individual social levels of Russian society. But these characters distinguish themselves into two sides, which are conservators and investors; therefore, they conflict each other in opinion. The following developments will begin with an outlook of The Cherry Orchard to acknowledge the basic concept of the play. The second part is culture in change that explains historical background of modern Russia. Third by a contrasting method, the main idea of this part is an illustration of conflict. And, in the fourth section, explaining symbolic meaning of The Cherry Orchard is an approach to highlight the conflict. Finally, the prospective development of different groups of characters is another contrast that echoes their attitudes in the beginning.
“To whom shall I tell my grief?” Grief must receive closure. Grief has the power to make the strongest person helpless. For an individual to share their grief they receive a sense of compassion instead of endlessly searching for answers. In the short story “Misery”, Anton Chekhov effectively shows the desperation of communication through the character Iona Potapov and his mare. Chekhov illustrates the difficulty Iona faces to communicate his sufferings to the various people he speaks to as a sleigh driver. He accomplishes this through his style of writing, imagery, and the events that take place in the story.