Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the novel Crime and Punishment the author, Fyodor Dostoevsky, places each of the main characters specifically to serve as a foil for Raskolnikov, the protagonist. The meaning of Raskolnikov’s name is split which serves as parallel to his split personality. Sonia serves as just one of many foils to his personality. Sonia is the part of his personality that is remorseful and ashamed of the crime he has committed. Another part of Raskolnikov’s character can be seen in Svidrigailov. Svidrigailov is the part that is immoral and corrupt.
After killing Lizaveta, Raskolnikov feels a sense of guilt and disappointment. He begins to realize maybe he is not above society, and that he is not the great savior he believes he is. Sonia has betrayed
…show more content…
and destroyed herself according to Raskolnikov, and this is why he turns to Sonia for guidance and help. “And your worst sin is that you have destroyed yourself and betrayed yourself for nothing” said Raskolnikov to Sonia (Dostoevsky 321). At this point in the novel the foil between both characters becomes apparent. Similar to how Sonia destroyed herself, Raskolnikov also destroyed himself when he murdered Lizaveta. In Raskolnikov’s eyes he believes that Lizaveta had value and did not deserve to die which is why he destroyed himself. Raskolnikov goes on to say “Let us go together I’ve come to you, we are both accursed, let us go our way together!” (Dostoevsky 328). As part of Sonia’s role in guiding Raskolnikov, she challenges his nihilistic view. Raskolnikov thinks to himself questioning her faith “What held her up—surely not depravity” (Dostoevsky 322). Sonia says “What should I be without God” (Dostoevsky 322). In Sonia’s eyes without God she would a prostitute and a sinner, but because she has confessed her sins and they have been absolved she is not. Svidrigailov is a despicable man that has treated people awfully, and then there is Raskolnikov who has also treated women with similar disrespect.
Svidrigailov has been suspected to have chase after and take advantage of women. Svidrigailov goes as far as saying “That in my own house I persecuted a defenceless girl and ‘insulted her with my infamous proposals” (Dostoevsky 279). He has also been suspected of raping another innocent and defenseless girl, and the abuse goes so far that she ends up hanging herself. The narrator states “ … and with this woman Svidrigaïlov had for a long while close and mysterious relations. She had a relation, a niece I believe, living with her, a deaf and dumb girl of fifteen, or perhaps not more than fourteen … one day the girl was found hanging in the garret” (Dostoevsky 297). Svidrigailov justifies his actions by believing that the deaf girl is inferior to him and his reproductive person. Much like how Raskolnikov justifies his actions in killing the pawnbroker as she was inferior and had no value.Then the most terrible suspicions is of how Svidrigailov murdered his wife and his servant. The rumors suggest that the servant Philip who died of ill treatment and the Marfa was beaten to death. Raskolnikov has murdered innocent people just like Svidrigailov. Svidrigailov states in a conversation “I, too, am a man et nihil humanum …(Dostoevsky 279). Both characters have the same view on nihilism and treat people poorly, and which also why
Svidrigailov is a foil for Raskolnikov even though Raskolnikov is questioning his beliefs. Sonia is the remorseful side of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov is the immoral side. While Raskolnikov has not repented his sin he is still remorseful much like Sonia is of her own sins. Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov both believe their actions are morally ok because the women they took hurt were invaluable and worthless. Together both characters are one potion to Raskolnikov’s many personalities exemplifying the foil in this novel.
Svidrigailov is one of the most unfathomable characters in Crime and Punishment. As the novel goes on, Svidrigailov’s pursuit of Dunya progresses into sheer harassment. After eavesdropping on Raskolnikov’s confession to Sonya, he uses his newly acquired information to lure Dunya into his room. Svidrigailov proceeds to promise help to Raskolnikov if she will give him her hand in marriage. He then threatens to rape her when she tries to run away. Right when Svidrigailov appears to be purely evil, he surprises us all when his rational side kicks in and allows Dunya to leave. Although he may seem to be the cold-hearted villain of the book, his good deeds cannot go unnoticed. It cannot be forgotten that he is willing to give Dunya the three thousand rubbles in his wife’s will and offers ten thousand rubbles to help Dunya because he thinks her marriage will be a disadvantage to her in the end. Once Katerina Ivanonva dies, Svidrigailov also promises to pay for the funeral arrangements and to provide for the children, who will be sent to an orphanage. Although...
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
The main character in Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov, has nihilistic ideas, which ultimately lead to his own suffering. Raskolnikov, an impoverished student, conceives of himself as being an extraordinary man who has the right to commit any crime. He believes that as an extraordinary man that he is beyond good and evil. Since he does not believe in God, he cannot accept any moral laws. To prove his theory, he murders an old pawnbroker and her step sister. Besides, he rationalizes that he has done society a favor by getting rid of the evil pawnbroker who would cheat people. Immediately after the murders, he begins to suffer emotionally. Raskolnikiv “[feels] a terrible disorder within himself. He [is] afraid of losing his control…” (Dostoevsky 95). He becomes ill and lies in his room in a semi-conscious state. As soon as he is well and can walk again, he goes out and reads about the crime in all the newspapers of the last few days. The sheer mention of the murder...
Although the novel begins by focusing on the crime itself, the majority of the book discusses Raskolnikov's struggle through denial and redemption after the murder has been committed. His own "greatness" leads to his denial of God, and his attempt to suppress his conscience causes insanity and sickness. However these negative consequences force him to acknowledge his rectitude and realize his need for confession.
First, Dostoevsky gives the reader the character, Raskolnokov. He is the main character, whom Fyodor uses to show two sides of people their admirable side and their disgusting side. He loves Raskolnokov, which is why Fyodor uses Raskolnokov’s point of view throughout the whole novel. Personally, Fyodor dislikes some of his qualities but understands that all people are plagued with some bad traits, and that Raskolnokv is trying to make emends for some of his wrong doings, i.e. the murder of the pawnbroker and her sister. He knows that what he did was wrong and is willing to suffer for his crime, and he does throughout the whole book with his constant depression. Dostoesky believes in punishment for your crimes, this is why he shows Raskolnokov suffering through most of the novel, to show his great love for penance. Dostoevsky likes the kind giving nature of people; this is why he portrays the main character as a kind, gentle, and giving, person. Often, Raskolnokov thinks only of others benefits such as when he helped Katerina by giving her all his money for Marmelodov, as well as his caring about what happens to his sister with her marriage to Luzhin. Raskolnokov hates Luzhin’s arrogant and pompous attitude, which reflects Dostoevsky’s animosity of the same qualities in people in the real world.
In Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskalnikov undergoes a period of extreme psychological upheaval. By comparing this death and rebirth of Raskalnikov's psyche to the story of the resurrection of Lazarus, Dostoevsky emphasizes not only the gravity of his crimes, but also the importance of acceptance of guilt.
Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment begins with Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov living in poverty and isolation in St. Petersburg. The reader soon learns that he was, until somewhat recently, a successful student at the local university. His character at that point was not uncommon. However, the environment of the grim and individualistic city eventually encourages Raskolnikov’s undeveloped detachment and sense of superiority to its current state of desperation. This state is worsening when Raskolnikov visits an old pawnbroker to sell a watch. During the visit, the reader slowly realizes that Raskolnikov plans to murder the woman with his superiority as a justification. After the Raskolnikov commits the murder, the novel deeply explores his psychology, yet it also touches on countless other topics including nihilism, the idea of a “superman,” and the value of human life. In this way, the greatness of Crime and Punishment comes not just from its examination of the main topic of the psychology of isolation and murder, but the variety topics which naturally arise in the discussion.
Sonia and Raskolnikov are two characters that interact with each other in the novel, Crime and Punishment. They interact on multiple levels, sharing several likenesses. Both of these characters are at-times self-sacrificing, both are struggling for meaning in a dreary existence, and both are generally unhappy people, but brighten and seem to enjoy each other's presence--even when Raskolnikov is berating her religion. What is self-sacrifice, for which these characters and so many people around the world engage in? It is a desire to help those around us more than we wish to help ourselves. This is not normal human state, although it can be brought about easily by societal pressures, and sometimes even political societies can compel this attitude. Sonia practices a form of altruism for her family however. She acquires a yellow card and takes her body off to the moral slaughter by sacrificing it to others for money--money that will go to her starving, poor family. Though not his predominant state of mind or action, Raskolnikov does have temporal tendencies towards self-sacrifice. It seems that part of his state of mind when considering the murder of the pawnbroker is that he will be helping society as a whole--definitely a motive that comes from outside the self. Sonia and Raskolnikov share many characteristics that make them an interesting encounter for each other. A tendency to self-sacrifice for one, and a life of it for another, provides for an amalgam of psychological likenesses which help the characters relate.
In Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky, Raskolnikov kills two innocent people, and the crime leads him to a mental illness and a death of his soul. Sonya plays a major role in Raskolnikov’s spiritual awakening. Raskolnikov sins and repents and Sonya contributes significantly to the outcome of Raskolnikov’s future.
One of the most profound and obvious changes in Raskolnikov’s character can be seen in the newfound appreciation for other people and human relationships he discovers at the end of the novel. When the reader is first introduced to Raskolnikov, Dostoevsky quickly makes it apparent that he has little to no regard for others, writing on the very first page that Raskolnikov was “so completely absorbed in himself, and isolated from his fellows that he dreaded meeting, not only his landlady, but anyone at all” (1). Indeed, in Raskolnikov’s mind, “to be forced to listen to [the landlady’s] trivial, irrelevant gossip […] and to rack his brains for excuses, to prevaricate, to lie” is the most loathsome thing imaginable (1). His disdain toward other people is so great that the mere thought of interacting with anyone for any length of time repulses him. On some occasions...
In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky uses the character of Sonia Marmeladov, whose first name means wisdom, not solely to illustrate God's mercy toward a fallen woman but to have her redeem both herself and Raskolnikov through God's mercy. As in the parable given by Father Zosima on his death bed in The Brothers Karamazov, Raskolnikov's initial connection to Sonia in Book I functions as his "stalk of grain" which keeps him from being completely severed from God's grace. Just as the old woman in the parable was without merit except for the fact she gave the beggar a stalk of grain, Raskolnikov lacks merit after his murderous deed exce...
Raskolnikov murders an old pawnbroker woman for seemingly no reason at all. His sister and mother move to St. Petersburg following his sister's engagement to a man whom Raskolnikov was extremely displeased. Raskolnikov undergoes severe mental trauma, and falls ill after the killing. The reader isn't sure why Raskolnikov killed the woman, indeed it appears that Raskolnikov didn't know himself. He is surrounded by friends and his family and draws in other characters to him during his illness. He befriends a woman, Sofya Seymonavitch, who prostitutes herself to support her mother and her drunken father. As the police come closer onto his trail Raskolnikov faces serious threats to his sister from her two suitors, one of which tries to rape her and kills himself after he finds that he can't bring himself to. At the end Raskolnikov gives himself up, and gives his family into the care of his friend Rauzumihin, who marries Raskolnikov's sister Douina. Dostoyevsky exposes the darkest sides of human nature in with characters that are completely human. The tale Dostoyevsky weaves is a murder mystery, with the murderer and all the facts of the murder known in the very first pages of the book.
Raskolnikov commits his initial crime out of arrogance. "The old hag is nothing.... I killed not a human being," he says. (245) Raskolnikov feels that he has justification for killing the pawn broker. He thinks that the woman has no reason to live. He believes that the woman is less than a human, and that he is a superior being. Raskolnikov thinks that he has a right to kill.
Nonetheless, she is still subject to the effects of his indecisiveness. Her meek and redemptive demeanor makes her the perfect victim. For instance, Sonya does little to actively change Raskolnikov’s ways when she becomes aware of his crimes. Instead, she is drawn into his atrocities. She says to him, “‘what have you done — what have you done to yourself?’” and that “‘there is no one — no one in the whole world now so unhappy as you!’” (323). Despite her close relationship to one of Raskolnikov’s murder victims, she finds it within herself to share the pain together, “to suffer together, and … bear [their crosses together]” (332) even though Sonya already suffers because of her extreme poverty and her occupation as a prostitute. In consequence, Raskolnikov’s actions affect not only himself but also the one whom he depends on the most. Indeed, his dependence on Sonya isolates himself from the rest of society also results in both of their
Due to his murder, he had no concern or care for anyone. By killing two women and taking their lives away how could Raskolnikov possess sincere feelings for anyone? Raskolnikov’s lack of care influences how he views his family: “I hate them, I feel a physical hatred for them” (276). Raskolnikov has entirely lost love. If he has deep hatred towards those people most dear to him, then he must greatly lack love. But by Sonia’s actions, Raskolnikov is able to once again feel love. Sonia genuinely loves him. When confessing about the murder, Raskolnikov learns “how great [is] her love for him” (417). He begins to understand how Sonia feels and this realization strikes remorse in him. He becomes upset with himself because “he had made her more miserable” (420). Here Raskolnikov is concerned about Sonia. Earlier Raskolnikov had no feelings for anyone, but now he begins to regret his actions and feels bad about making her cry. Sonia’s deep love for him radiates off of herself and affects Raskolnikov which makes him feel compassion towards her. He begins to understand Sonia’s feelings and intentions even more when he returns for her cross: “ Raskolnikov at that moment felt and knew once for all that Sonia was with him forever and would follow him to the ends of the earth” (521). Raskolnikov recognizes how true and perpetual Sonia’s love and concern for him is and will be. Her love gives him hope for a bright future and thus he starts