Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Trifles by Susan Glaspell
Theme of Susan Glaspell's Trifles
A literary review of susan glaspell trifles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of Trifles by Susan Glaspell
Susan Glaspell wrote the play “Trifles” and she wrote a short story version of the play called “A Jury of Her Peers”. Susan Glaspell, in full Susan Keating Glaspell, (born July 1, 1876, Davenport, Iowa, U.S.—died July 27, 1948, Provincetown, Mass.), American dramatist and novelist who, with her husband, George Cram Cook, founded the influential Provincetown Players in 1915. Glaspell graduated in 1899 from Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa. In college she had published a few short stories in the Youth’s Companion and had worked as college correspondent for a local newspaper, and on graduating she became a reporter for the Des Moines Daily News. In 1901 she returned to her native Davenport to devote herself to writing; her stories, mainly …show more content…
The play can’t be as descriptive, but it does give the audience a visual representation of what is going on. “His neck. Choked the life out of him.” (566). The play gives a more visual representation of the dead bird. The description is based off what the actors are saying for the most part. “[Rubbing his hands]: “This feels good. Come up to the fire, ladies.” (558). Giving less information is the normal for a play. Sight is needed to see the exact positioning of the cast. However, the short story gives good descriptions but is not able to show visuals of what the story is describing. “Look at it! Its neck, look at its neck! Its all, other side to.” (578). The bird has its neck broken by something and they start to believe that the cat did it, but the cat couldn’t simply break the bird’s neck. Though it can’t give visuals due to it being a short story it makes up for it by being able to describe the incident farther. “The women stood close together by the door. Young Henderson, the county attorney, turned around and said, “Come up to the fire, ladies.” (568). Short stories can give farther description as to where the characters are situated in the house. Though the reader cannot see where the characters are they can visualize in their mind everything about the story. Visualizing what is being read helps the story come to life and normally aids in a person’s ability to be entertained by the …show more content…
Mrs. Hale feels the same way in both the play and the short story. “I stayed away because it weren’t cheerful.” (577). Mrs. Hale says the same thing in both versions as well as did the other characters. Though the characters are transferred from play to short story the dialogue remains the same. Glaspell made sure to make the character the same even when transferring from play to short story. Many times, characters are changed when being transferred from one format to another. The changes are normally very small when transferred from play to short story or short story to play. Though they say the same thing they both have their own way of showing the emotion behind the words. The play allows for people to be able to hear the actors’ voices and tones. The short story gives more description allowing the audience to make the voices in their heads. “I wish you’d seen Minnie Foster when she wore a white dress with blue ribbons and stoop up there in the choir and sang.” (566). Description of the girl in the dress is much better in the short story than the play. “The picture of that girl, the fact that she had lived neighbor to that girl for twenty years, and had let her die for lack of life, was suddenly more than she could bear.” (579). Mrs. Hale is showing how she is showing remorse after the years of not coming to visit with the girl. The play is not able to
Hale’s radical change takes place throughout the play in three stages and throughout the play contributes greatly. He is the model by which the townspeople follow, though they are behind him they do eventually take his stance on the trials. His conformity and inward questioning are quintessential examples of what every story needs: the unsure character.
	At the time in Act Two that Hale enters there is a presence of guilt about him,
Hale was in search of the truth, no matter what outcome occured. Now they are both trying to achieve the same thing, postponement for justice. The juxtaposition of the motives of the characters adds to the contrasts tone. The irony and changes in the story causes chaos in the
The conversations that Hale has demonstrate the evolution of his mindset. In Act II, Hale is traveling around the town, going house-to-house, searching for accused women to warn them that their names have been mentioned in the court. Soon, Hale finds himself standing at the Proctor home. At this moment, Hale sees a different perspective on the entire situation.
In school, you often read research and then at home you watch television. Reading is more associated with educational purposes, and television with entertainment. When I read the play, it felt real. I was reading interviews with real people, about real events. The book, because of its strong grasp of reality, then made the events more powerful because the felt more like reality. When watching the movie, the mind can easily disconnect by thinking it is just a movie. It does not enhance the fact the everything being seen in the movie actually happened. Although it is actors on the screen, they are representing real people, who experience the sadness and trauma of the events. Emotions are also easier to be read than seen. When reading, one’s brain creates the tone. Words are associated with tones, so when reading a very intense sentence, the mind makes the dialogue more dramatic. Thus, making the reading more climatic. When the police play the tape of Aaron McKinney after he was arrested, he gives a detailed description of what he did and why he did it. In the movie, Aaron relays the details with a hint of despair, in my head Aaron gave the same responses but with a more sinister tone. To me this had a greater effect than the movie. It made me more agitated at Aaron, instead of the movie trying to produce more guilt. Emotions are what make watching and reading so enjoyable, and in the play, emotions
Hale takes this job to a personal level when the the crisis takes a turn for the worse. He pleads with the people convicted of witchcraft to confess. He feels he is responsible for their lives because his purpose was to rid the town of witchcraft, not innocent lives. He beholds himself a failure when he cannot convince the accused to confess. His well justified pride is broken. He came into this village like a bride groom to his beloved, bearing gifts of high religion; the very crowns of holy law I brought, and what I touched with my bright confidence, it died; and where I turned the eye of my great faith, blood flowed up. He urges Elizabeth not ot let her pride interfere with her duty as a wife, as it did with his own duty.
Reverend Hale’s presence in Act Three is resigned, he is positive that he and the court are incorrect and he just wants to right the wrongs done and prevent more wrongs from being committed. Hale’s acquiescence is shown first by a stage direction where he is hesitant to respond to Deputy Governor Danforth’s question and shown again by the quote “Your Honor. I cannot think you may judge the man on such evidence” which shows his disbelief and his disagreement with the court’s decisions. Reverend Hale voices his disagreement with the court’s actions by saying “Is every defense an act upon the court? Can no one” And is instantaneously shot down and silenced. He then reiterates his fears by talking about the fear of the courts in the country, and saying “But it does not follow that everyone accused is part of it”. Mr. Hale repeatedly tries to appeal to Danforth and the court, one example of this is the quote “I have this morning signed away the soul of Rebecca Nurse, Your Honor, Ill not conceal it, my hand shakes yet as with a wound! I pray you, sir, this argument let lawyers present it to you.” Hale is defeated for a while but is brought back into the act by him saying “Excellency, it is a natural lie to tell; I beg you, stop now before another is condemned! I may shut my conscience to it no more - private vengeance is working through this
Susan Glaspell wrote many literary pieces in the early 1900s. Two, in particular, are very similar in theme, which is the play Trifles and the short story “A Jury of Her Peers”. The Trifles was written in 1920 and “A Jury of Her Peers” was written in 1921, a short story, adapted from the play. Susan Glaspell was born in Davenport, IA July 1, 1876 as a middle child and the only daughter. In college, she wrote for her school paper, The Drake, and after Glaspell graduated, she started working for the Des Moines News. She got the idea for the play and short story, after she covered a murder about a woman on a farm.
The play’s major conflict is the loneliness experienced by the two elderly sisters, after outliving most of their relatives. The minor conflict is the sisters setting up a tea party for the newspaper boy who is supposed to collect his pay, but instead skips over their house. The sisters also have another minor conflict about the name of a ship from their father’s voyage. Because both sisters are elderly, they cannot exactly remember the ships name or exact details, and both sisters believe their version of the story is the right one. Although it is a short drama narration, Betty Keller depicts the two sisters in great detail, introduces a few conflicts, and with the use of dialogue,
Glaspell, Susan. "Trifles." Plays by Susan Glaspell. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, Inc., 1920. Reprinted in Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry and Drama. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia Eds. New York: Harper Collins Publisher, 1995.
Susan Glaspell’s most memorable one-act play, Trifles (1916) was based on murder trial case that happened in the 1900’s. Glaspell worked as a reporter, where she appointed a report of a murder case. It was about a farmer, John Hossack who was killed while he was asleep in bed one night. His wife claimed that she was asleep next to him when the attack occurred. No one believed in her statement, she was arrested and was charged on first degree murder.
Glaspell, Susan. "Trifles." Plays by Susan Glaspell. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, Inc., 1920. Reprinted in Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry and Drama. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia Eds. New York: Harper Collins Publisher, 2004.
In the play Trifles, Susan Glaspell brings together three women through a crime investigation in the late nineteenth century. Glaspell uses symbolism, contrast of sexes, and well-constructed characters to show that justice for all equally important to finding the truth.
Although both authors claim their stories are true, and thereby that their characters are realistic, there seems to be a gap between the authors' claims and the "reality" of the characterization. This question is closely connected to the fact that both novels belong to the earliest English novels. There was no fixed tradition that the authors worked in; instead the novel was in the process of being established. The question arises whether the two works lack a certain roundness in their narrators.
Mrs. Hale proclaims, “All the rest of [the quilt] has been [sewed] so nice and even. And look at this! It’s all over the place! Why, it looks like she didn’t know what she was about.” Immediately, the two women realize that their interpretation of the quilt could implicate Mrs. Wright.