Survivor's Guilt In The Moral Logic By Nancy Sherman

438 Words1 Page

Many people argue about whether or not people should or should not feel survivor's guilt. Survivor's guilt is when someone feels guilty for surviving a traumatic event. Some people believe survivors of life and death situations should feel guilt, others feel that they should not. Survivors of life and death situation should feel survivor guilt.

One reason that survivors of life and death situations should feel survivor's guilt is because survivor's guilt is an indicator of strong/good morals. In the “Moral Logic…” by Nancy Sherman is an editorial article about what matters morally to yourself. “Who I am, in terms of my character and relationships, and just what I, matters morally.” This shows that whatever you do it matters morally to you. This proves people should feel survivor's guilt because feeling guilty is apart …show more content…

Feeling guilty can lead to a need of moral repair. “What Prior feels are feelings of guilt, and not simply regret that things didn’t work out differently. He feels the awful weight of self indictment, the empathy with the victim and survivors, and the need to make moral repair. ( paragraph 13 “Moral Logic…”) This shows that regretting things that turn out differently is caused by healing. This proves that moral repair is apart of the healing process.

However, some people might argue survivors of life and death situations should not feel survivor's guilt. They believe this because recurring nightmares can keep you from never forgetting the traumatic event that occurred. They are mistaking because sharing in pain means the survivors cared. “The anguish of guilt, its sheer pain is a way of sharing the same of the ill fate. It is a form of empathic distress.(paragraph 8 “Moral Logic… “) This proves that the survivors shared the same pain with the ones that didn’t survive. This proves survivors of life and death situations cared about

Open Document