“We often take responsibility for what we can reasonably be held responsible for” (Sherman 154). In Sherman’s editorial “The Moral Logic of survival guilt,” she establishes the claim that being characterized by survival guilt is often the result of blaming yourself for something that is out of your control. Survivors of traumatic events take responsibility along with the guilt they feel, especially in cases where a life was lost (Sherman 154). This idea can be applied to Murakami’s short story, “The Seventh Man.” When the narrator fails to save his best friend K. from a typhoon, he spends the rest of his life taken over by guilt and fear. However, there are numerous reasons that prove why the seventh man should forgive/absolve himself …show more content…
for his failure to save his friend. Because K.
was portrayed as a younger and weaker child, the seventh man felt entrusted to protect and take care of him. As a result, he only felt more culpable for K.’s death. The seventh man believes he should have acted differently, but that thinking is unreasonable. If he had acted differently, it wouldn’t have changed K’s ending, they both would have been swallowed by the wave. After a traumatic event, people often think about what the should or could have done differently, however, they fail to take into account that their reaction time is delayed and their decisions are swayed under pressure due to overwhelming fear and shock. In the seventh man’s case, he truly wanted to save K., but he was so overcome with fear that he couldn’t make his body do what he wanted it to do. The event was so devastating that his mind was playing tricks on him. He honestly believed he saw his friend K. reaching out to him from inside the wave, and as a result, the narrator sacrificed 40 years of his life regretting and blaming himself for K.’s …show more content…
death. In the crash course video on moral luck, a scenario was given with two drunk drivers. A and B are neighbors who drive the same car, go to the same party, get equally drunk, and take the same route home. The only difference is that A left earlier than B and made it home safely. B on the other hand, was unable to stop due to the alcohol when a child ran in front of him. It all comes down to luck when determining who is more responsible (Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy). This scenario can be related to the one in “The Seventh Man.” The narrator and K both chose to go to the beach knowing there would be a storm soon. The seventh man was lucky he wasn’t the one hit by the wave because he could have been the victim just as easily as K. was. Some may say the seventh man was capable of saving K. if he put more effort into it. In “The Seventh Man”, the narrator says “As clearly as I knew what I ought to be doing, I found myself running the other way” (Murakami 138). Since “ought implies can”, “you are not morally responsible for things that are out of your control” (Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy). In other words, if you ought to do something, then you can do it. By the seventh man saying “I ought to” (Murakami 138), he is also saying “I can”. The narrator himself even said “I knew that I could have saved K. if I had tried” (Murakami 140). So if the seventh man could have saved K., why did he not? Others may also argue that if the seventh man were to forgive himself and “not feel the guilt is” being “numb to those pulls,” with the pulls being “the desire or obligation to help frustrated by the inability, though no fault of one’s own, to do so” (Sherman 154-155). If the narrator did not feel any guilt for K.’s death, it would damage seventh man’s good character. “Many of the feelings that express character are not about what one has done or should have done, but rather about what one deeply cares about” (Sherman 154). If the seventh man were to not care about K.’s death or his failure to save him, K. would be forgotten. However, what these claims do not say is that the seventh man doesn’t want to forgive himself because he does not want to forget K.
“Feelings of guilt and responsibility tangle with feelings of having betrayed fellow soldiers” (Sherman 155). By forgiving himself, the narrator believes he will betray K, but in reality, the situation was out of his hands. As stated in “The Moral Logic of Survival Guilt,” “Who I am, in terms of my character and relationships, and not just what I do, matters morally” (Sherman 154). This means that even though the seventh man may have not acted in the most heroic way, he still meant well. Although his warning was ineffective, the seventh man still tried to save K. It takes a great deal of courage and strength to take action in a moment of fear. Being at such a young age, the seventh man was most likely not taught how to react in a life or death situation like this. With so much pressure being put on him, it was his natural instinct to get to safety. This does not make him a bad person, he just responded to basic
instinct. In conclusion, the seventh man cannot be blamed for K.’s death, and he should forgive himself. Wasting the rest of his life swallowed by guilt is not any better than being killed by the typhoon. The situation was out of his control and any further attempts to save K. would have only resulted in both their deaths. What truly/really matters is that although unsuccessful, the seventh man tried to save K.
Conversely, the narrator might believe later on that he knew the wave was coming, at the time he most likely did not actually know that this wave was going to be so threatening and large in size. The subjective guilt that the narrator feels while telling his story is quite possibly tricking the narrator into believing that he knew the wave was coming, so he could have a valid reason for thinking he could have done more to save
Hiding from those who would find him and carry out the wrath of vengeance upon him, the protagonist plans his escape. About to dive in the rancid water and swim for it, a body in the shallows abruptly stops him. The bloated and decomposing corpse pulls the narrator back from his adrenaline-induced frenzy. After a few moments, he settles and reflects, “I thought about him, fog on the lake, insects chirring eerily, and felt the tug of fear, felt the darkness opening up inside me like a set of jaws. Who was he, I wondered, this victim of time and circumstance bobbing sorrowfully in the lake at my back” (193). The narrator can almost envision himself as the man whose corpse is before him. Both deceased from mysterious causes, involved in shady activities, and left to rot in the stagnant lake water, and never to be discovered by the outside world. This marks the point where the main character is the closest he has ever been to death. Although he makes it out alive, the protagonist and his outlook on life are forever changed.
First, the seventh man should not feel guilty because he did not ask K to go along with him. The Seventh man only told him where he was going. By going with the seventh man K put himself into the situation. In the Seventh by man by Haruki Murakami, the seventh man yelled out to K warning him about the oncoming danger. He screamed as loud as he could and it was K’s fault for not listening. This means the seventh man did everything possible to help K without putting himself in danger. Along with the yelling, there was a loud rumbling noise which
Everybody alive has experienced the feeling of guilt, or at least will at some point. Usually, this feeling is quite healthy for our consciousness, helping us distinguish between what is right and wrong by our own moral principles and values. However, guilt holds quite a power to really disturb the mind. This theme of the relationship between guilt and sanity is common throughout literature, and patterns to how this is expressed through texts are very evident. Four texts which I will discuss this theme through is Macbeth by William Shakespeare, Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, The Tell-Tale Heart by Edgar Allan Poe, and The Animals’ version of Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood.
Thereby, the two works that is Macbeth and The Kite Runner not only present before the humanity, the immense power and potency of guilt, but also emphatically reveal the eventual consequences of the guilt traceable to an evil act or an act of cowardice or betrayal. These two works expose the psychology of guilt in a very vivid and threadbare manner, which explains their appeal and the human interest they accrue.
First and foremost you must understand what the seventh man is going through. What he is going through is called survivor guilt. Survivor’s guilt is really common with soldiers that are returning from war with a feeling of guilt because they are coming home alive while their buddies aren’t. “Survivor’s guilt being perhaps the kind most familiar to us. In war, standing here rather than there can save your life but not your buddies. It’s flukish luck, but you feel responsible” (para 2, The Moral Logic of Survivor's Guilt). Survivor’s guilt mostly happens when there’s an accident where there is little to no culpability with the death of that person or people like what happened with the seventh man. “I knew that I could have saved K. if I had tried. I probably could have run over and dragged him out of the reach of the wave “ (para 41 The Seventh Man). The seventh
After years of fighting bullying their son Ty commited suicide after getting sent home for 3 days for standing up for himself. He later took his life at the age of 11. Kirk, his dad, promised his son earlier than on father day he would get rid of bullying in the world. His son’s death prevailed him to constructing the “Stand for the Silent”. Even after the loss of his son, he found a positive way to help others, just like the seventh man is doing by sharing his story.
Imagine blaming yourself for the death of someone close, the guilt weighing down on your shoulders… You know it wasn’t your fault but you can’t shake the feeling that you could’ve done something to avert the situation. Drowning in disbelief that you survived yet they didn’t. This is known as survivors guilt. In the story “The Seventh Man” the narrator undergoes survivors guilt when he was unable to save his best friend K.. The narrator of “The Seventh Man” should forgive himself for his failure to save K., if he tried any harder to save K he might've died as well. It wasn’t his fault that K. was unable to hear him, therefore the narrator of “The Seventh Man” shouldn’t be at fault nor accuse himself.
Fear is a part of everyone’s life, but it is how it is handled that makes all the difference. In the story “The Seventh Man” by Haruki Murakami, a tragedy consumes a young boy and stays with him for many years. As the story continues, the narrator eventually realizes that he has to face his fear in order to lead a normal life. In “The Seventh Man”, Murakami develops the theme that one should face his or her fear with the use of similes, imagery, and symbolism.
The survivor takes the responsibility for the death of their loved one is caused by survivor's guilt. “The Seventh Man” by Haruki Murakami is a short story about a boy losing his best friend during a storm and he goes through a tragic time. The text states “ I stayed away from my home town for over forty years.”(Murakami pg.141) This shows that he had to stay away for many years to get over his guilt. This proves survivors should not feel survivor's guilt.
Guilt is a result of sin, and sin is a result of misaction. In the novel, The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini, the protagonist, Amir, goes on a journey to redeem himself for his sins. When Amir was 12, he witnessed his best friend, Hassan, get raped in an alley. Instead of standing up for his friend, Amir ran away in selfishness and cowardice. The guilt of his choice plagues Amir for the rest of his life, until one day, he gets a call from an old uncle, who tells him that “there is a way to be good again.” (2) The Kite Runner follows Amir on his odyssey to redeem himself for his hurtful actions. Through this journey, Khaled Hosseini delivers the message that sins and guilt can always be atoned for.
How would you feel if your friend died and it was believed in your mind that the death was your fault? It’s hard to forgive yourself. Even if it is not your liability, you feel guilty. You feel survivor’s guilt. The narrator of “The Seventh Man” should forgive himself for his failure to save K. K. was a young boy who didn’t hear the call of his name. The narrator should not be at culpability for the miscommunication between him and his best friend. If he tried to save K. for even a minute longer both of them could be gone. Then who would feel the guilt? His parents for letting them go down to the beach? There will always be someone who feels solely responsible for a death that was close to them personally. Many people
“Forgive and forget” is a common phrase in our society. However, one may argue that mistakes are never truly forgotten. The Kite Runner suggests that the best way to resolve your past and make up for your mistakes is through doing good. Through Rahim Khan’s wisdom, the actions of Baba, and the journey of Amir, Khaled Hosseini illustrates that the need for redemption, due to unresolved guilt, can haunt someone throughout their life.
Human nature is a conglomerate perception which is the dominant liable expressed in the short story of “A Tell-Tale Heart”. Directly related, Edgar Allan Poe displays the ramifications of guilt and how it can consume oneself, as well as disclosing the nature of human defense mechanisms, all the while continuing on with displaying the labyrinth of passion and fears of humans which make a blind appearance throughout the story. A guilty conscience of one’s self is a pertinent facet of human nature that Edgar Allan Poe continually stresses throughout the story. The emotion that causes a person to choose right from wrong, good over bad is guilt, which consequently is one of the most ethically moral and methodically powerful emotion known to human nature. Throughout the story, Edgar Allan Poe displays the narrator to be rather complacent and pompous, however, the narrator establishes what one could define as apprehension and remorse after committing murder of an innocent man. It is to believe that the narrator will never confess but as his heightened senses blur the lines between real and ...
If we are to be truly innocent and humble beings, we must recognize our own innate guilt as human and accept it. If we do not, we will constantly be obsessed by our “state of apparent acquittals”. Kafka, Franz. A. The Trial. Trans.