In this modern romantic play written by David Ives in 1988, the first experience with the commonly rung bell sets the mood for my perspective that the two characters Bill and Betty are very particular in what will cause the ring. Quickly, I noticed that the play seems to repeat starting from where the conversation was originally going to start if the bell had not been rung. Throughout Sure Thing, various topics in Bill or Betty’s conversations seem to slowly build with emotions from either person until one of themselves does not feel pleased with the other’s reply. David Ives expresses his feelings towards how he perceives modern romances are by having Bill and Betty’s personalities being very superficial and quick to judge. The over confident …show more content…
and know-it-all attitude Bill presents early in the play as he pretends to be familiar with The Sound and the Fury (Ives 3) is the beginning to an ongoing one-up conversation between the two characters. Betty’s character, unlike Bill presents herself to be an aggressive (Ives 3), more out spoken person that differs from Bill who wants and attempts to impress Betty throughout the story. Ives begins putting focus in how Bill and Betty like to hear what they want to, rather than accepting what one another have to offer. As Bill explains to Betty his political views, a bell is repeatedly rung as nothing he states comes to an agreement with Betty and her political views (Ives 6). Ives ideas of modern romantic relationships presented in Sure Thing broadcast a closer perspective as to what immediately attracts or hinders our modern generation’s connectivity. The thought process that typically occurs in a long loving relationship is not sought after in first impression experiences as it may had be once in time long ago. As religion, political, and ethnicity are problematic areas in discussions, Ives tends to have Bill and Betty connect over small talk. Ives used small talk between Bill and Betty to share common interests after causing the characters to share deep feelings about their morals or passions which resulted in repeated bell rings. The nature of modern romantic relationships presented in Sure Thing demonstrates the lack of connectivity that married couples share that modern romantics crave without the responsibility or true loving emotion, but simply the fun of being in a relationship.
Ives has Billy and Betty share a common interest in films (Ives 6). “Betty: Listen, I was headed to the movies after I finished this section. Would you like to come along? Bill: That sounds like fun. What’s playing? Betty: A couple of the really early Woody Allen movies. Bill: Oh. Betty: Don’t you like Woody Allen? Bill: Sure. I like Woody Allen. Betty: But you’re not crazy about Woody Allen movies. Bill: Those early ones kind of get on my nerves. Betty: Uh-huh. (Bell.)” The first attempt Ives makes with having Bill and Betty share a common interest results in a bell. Making another attempt leading to the idea of moves, at this point after the bell is rung, both seem to very much enjoy Woody Allen movies as both were heading the Woody Allen film festival (Ives 6). Continuing to partake in sharing each other’s interests, a wide variety of topics seem to be taking action while both Bill and Betty now find more mutual enjoyable activities (Ives 7). “Betty: Do you like Entenmann’s crumb cake...? Bill: Last night I went out at two in the morning to get
one”. Along with their new found enjoyment about discussing toys and foods, what typically seems to be a very serious discussion amongst any relationship is talked upon with laughter and jokes (Ives 7). “Bill: Do you still believe in marriage in spite of current sentiments against it? Betty: Yes. Bill: And children? Betty: Three of them”. The point Ives is presenting by having what usually is a serious topic discussed as a joke allows and proves to his theory of how modern romantic relationships feel more comfortable about sharing. The power of laughter of and joking is what seems to connect the people of our generation. “Bill: And will you love me? Betty: Yes. Bill: And cherish me forever? Betty: Yes. Bill: Do you still want to go to the movies? Betty: Sure thing”. Ives’ creates what to me seems as a genuinely compassionate yet sarcastic gesture. The nature of relationships in today’s generation that Ives brings in Sure Thing between Bill and Betty as they are now feeling the comfort to make such jokes, opens the readers mind to how a lot of modern romantic relationships thrive on the simple thrills and joys of caring, sarcastic, yet genuine and innocent remarks that one another make.
The play that was chosen to be read for the actor’s analysis was, “The Norwegians” which was written by C. Denby Swanson. As there is no specific style for this play, it is known to be categorized as a contemporary comedy as well as a character driven play.
Before 1882, the United States did not have any immigration rules which means anybody that came to America has the opportunity to stay here. The attitude of Americans toward immigrants has changed which transported the Chinese immigration act “into national prominence” (Daniel, 11). However, the Americans are now afraid of the immigrants due to their overpopulation. Half of the Americans rejected the immigrant’s presence, while the other half profits of their cheap labor. In this book “Guarding the Golden Door by Roger Daniels” heavily discovered over the one and only issue of how the immigrants are being treated in America.
In the story, “Your Move”, by James Ransome, James, the protagonist, admires family more than friends. This is because, he cares for Isaac during dangerous times, keeps Isaac entertained by doing activities, and did not join the “K-Bones” club his friends were in.
The differences between the movie doubt and the play have significant differences that would influence ones opinion about certain characters and situations in the story. Though the differences are few one would agree that at least one of these differences are game changers or at the very least they get you thinking and having doubts of your own.
How Willy Russell Uses Dramatic Devices to Allow the Audience to See Many Different Sides of Shirley Valentine's Personality
The play’s major conflict is the loneliness experienced by the two elderly sisters, after outliving most of their relatives. The minor conflict is the sisters setting up a tea party for the newspaper boy who is supposed to collect his pay, but instead skips over their house. The sisters also have another minor conflict about the name of a ship from their father’s voyage. Because both sisters are elderly, they cannot exactly remember the ships name or exact details, and both sisters believe their version of the story is the right one. Although it is a short drama narration, Betty Keller depicts the two sisters in great detail, introduces a few conflicts, and with the use of dialogue,
This results in the audience questioning the actress’s goal of fixing the relationship with her husband, because the audience understands that she is unhappy with how they communicate, yet still asks for more of the basis of the communicative ways they do now, seeing no end to the repetitive cycle (Dooley and Holzman, 852). It is clear that the conversations between the two characters make the audience questionable of the character’s relationship in many ways. Now that the play, “Post-its (Notes on a Marriage),” could make the audience react to feel distanced and questionable about the actions of the characters, how can that relate to everyday life? traits of the play Post-its (Notes on a Marriage) through staging and conversation, Is the way we use our phones in modern day use an effective way to communicate with individuals?
When deciding what element a play should contain, one must look at a large variety of options. These options can alter how the audience depicts the play and change their overall opinions. Oscar Wilde’s “The Importance of Being Earnest” is a play set around 1895 where the protagonist, Jack Worthing, takes on two identities in order to avoid social obligations. This play’s era affects how the characters are dressed and how their households appear.
Written in 1962-3, Play depicts three characters, a man (M), and two women (W1 and W2) trapped in urns with only their heads showing. These characters each present their own version of a love triangle, which once occurred between them. It becomes clear during the play that the characters, once tortured by each other, are now tortured by their situation. A spotlight acts as a "unique inquisitor," compelling each to speak when it shines on them, and to stop when it goes out. As this assault continues, the characters become increasingly maddened by the light, and increasingly desperate to make it stop. The play repeats itself, providing the audience with a sense that these characters have been saying the same words for an eternity, and will continue to do so until the light decides they can stop. Beckett demonstrates how "A style of living, theatrically communicable, is used to express a state of mind."
Playing with descriptions of characters is the way that Chandler fits them into stereotypical roles as women who should be feared. Carmen is crazy and Vivian is a seductress who has the same mental abilities as Marlowe. His descriptions of the characters are detailed and they tell the reader just enough to allow her to fit the character into an inappropriate stereotypical group.
Plump, undeniable, fashion-impaired Minerva Dobbs suffers one of the cruelest fates of a unmarried woman’s lifestyles: she gets dumped by means of her boyfriend 3 weeks earlier than her beautiful sister Diana’s wedding. She turned into virtually counting on David to be her date, and it rankles while he dumps her due to the fact she received’t sleep with him. Dumping is just part of David’s ordinary scheme for purchasing electricity of their courting, however. He doesn’t imply this to be over for good. But he is ticked at the shortage of horizontal tangoing in their courting. To get back at Min, he bets Mr. Successful, Calvin Morrisey (who he also can’t stand), $10,000 that he can’t get Min inside the sack in a month’s time. Unfortunately (or luckily) for Cal, Min overhears a part of their verbal exchange, and is infuriated. But then she recollects the marriage, and thinks that Cal may want to end up beneficial in spite of everything. Thus begins an fun story of misunderstandings, distrust, misanthropy, misadventure, distress, and genuine
At the beginning of the play Betty and Bill are in conflict regarding their individuality. As their conflict plays out, Ives demonstrates how individuality can at times be detrimental to the formation of a sound relationship. Indeed, the play demonstrates that individuality can impede one’s ability to be congruent in a couple. Ives uses the bell which chimes every time that Bill or Betty makes a comment or shares an interest that was not well received by the other, to demonstrate this fact. One example is Bill's love of sports and his statement: “I'm a Mets fan, myself,” (643,49). One has a sense that Bill’s love of sports is a bit extreme and thus is not received well by Betty. The point the author makes is that having such passion for sport, or any individual interest for that matter, could take away from the amount of time he has to focus on the relationship. Moreover, Betty does not seem to share his passion thus making it hard for her to engage in conversation on the subject.
During the confrontation during the poker game, which immediately ends it, readers are exposed to the reality of Stella and Stanley’s
Everyman is English morality play written by an anonymous author in late fifteenth century. The play’s represent the values that Everyman holds on to by its characterization. The spiritual life of Everyman was neglected by him, but he is quickly repents of his sins as the play develops. After realizing Everyman is summoned by Death, he doesn’t want to die and die alone for that matter. Everyman soon realizes that when he is seeking for a companion to go on a journey that he wants to go but there is no one available. He soon comes to terms that everyone will soon abandon him who accompanied him on earth. The play is in allegorical characters that represents variety of concepts such as (Knowledge, Good Deeds etc.)
To give a little background on the play, the pursuit of marriage is the driving force behind the play. “I now pronounce you, man and wife.” This traditional saying, commonly used to announce a newlywed couple during a wedding ceremony, marks the happily ever after that many dream of today. In today’s society, marriage is an expression of love between two individuals. Marriage has not, however, always been an act of love.