Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay disposal of nuclear waste
Essay disposal of nuclear waste
Term paper topic, discuss wastes management associated with nuclear sciences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay disposal of nuclear waste
1) What is the “Superfund” law? When was it created? 2) Using this site: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/ identify one brownfield/Superfund site within 200 miles of Louisville and respond to the following items. a. Where is it located? U.S. Doe Gaseous Diffusion Plant Paducah, McCracken County, Kentucky b. What contaminant(s) is/are present? Technetium, uranium, thorium, plutonium, neptunium, trichloroethylene, polychlorinated biphenyls c. What affects does that contaminant have on? 1. People Technetium, as with other radioactive material there is the chance of cancer, and other health conditions from exposure to radioactivity. 2. Environment Technetium, this is very bad for the environment it has a very long half-life, 212,000 years, …show more content…
Tc-99 remains in the environment. Air, sea water, soils, plants and animals. d. What industry/action was using the site during the contamination? PGDP provides fuel rods to nuclear power plants, they are still in operation.
e. What is the current status of cleanup at that site? Physical cleanup activities are underway, but difficult to do at this time because the company is still in operation. Once PGDP eventually shuts down, DOE plans to take more cleanup actions before transferring the site to a new owner. 3) Where/ how do nuclear facilities in the US store their wastes? Most Nuclear Waste is stored where it is produced. They first put the nuclear waste in cooling tanks for five years. Dry cask or vaults 40-50 years the heat and radioactivity have fallen to one thousandth of the level at removal. Until the radioactivity has reduced to about 0.1% of its original level. Then, after forty year’s it’s encapsulated or loaded into casks ready for indefinite storage or permanent disposal underground. What I would Like to do with is site; I would like to put in place a science center, where children, and adults can learn about environmental science. I feel another great thing that you could have at the facility could be a recycling center, and also a garbage treatment plant. Paducah has two major prisons near it, The Western Kentucky Correctional complex and The Kentucky State Penitentiary; they are both about forty minutes away. Prisons are big sprawling complexes that create a lot of waste, that should be recycled, and what can’t be incinerated …show more content…
cleanly. The DOE has done a lot of things at the plant to cut back on pollution.
They have been cleaning up this site, since the 1980’s. “There was contamination in the ground water, and soil, as well as off-sight sediments and surface water.” They have gone in a numerous times and removed contaminated soil, and treated the ground water. The DOE continues to evaluate other ways to continue to clean up the area. The DOE plans on doing an extensive cleanup when PGDP eventually shuts down, and they sell to a new owner. I would use a Geiger counter and go over every inch of the facility, this measures radiation, and remove as much waste as possible. I would remove all equipment from the site and as soon as I was done I would put a clay cap down. I would then build my new facility on top of
it. I would like to change this polluted property into a re-designed community space. I would also like to have an indoor park or nature preserve on the site. The surrender neighbors of this site have suffered, because of this contamination, and deserve a community they can be proud of. They even had their own drinking water contaminated. I feel a green house would be good at this site as well, to help the people nearby that may have been unable to grow their own garden. I feel there should be solar panels on the new facility. I like this option, because it is the least polluting form of energy. I also feel by using renewable energy, we are showing are commitment to stopping pollution in the area. I feel this is great in step in helping this community to recover from living in a polluted environment. This will also make them feel their lives matter, and give them a better quality of life. References http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/ www.scientificamerican.com www.distance-cities.com
The Lowry Landfill Superfund Site is located in Arapahoe County, Colorado, approximately 2 miles east of Aurora. It consists of approximately 507 acres of waste disposal area and is operated by Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. The land surrounding the site consists of native prairie grass and a wetland located along a local creek. Sections around the site are zoned for agricultural use including cattle grazing and non-irrigated wheat farms. 1 The area is home to numerous endangered species including the bald eagle and peregrine falcon. Due to the large amounts of wastes disposed on the site between 1965 and 1980, it became extremely contaminated with a variety of inorganic and organic contaminants. From 1984 to 1993, the EPA oversaw remedial investigation and feasibility studies that were performed by all responsible parties. Since its listing as a superfund site in 1984, multiple remedial actions have been performed in order to rehabilitate the site. These include clay barrier walls around the site, a groundwater collection system, a soil cover for the main landfill, as well as a landfill gas collection system. Groundwater that is collected on the site is treated at an onsite water treatment facility. In 2007, construction began on an onsite gas to energy plant that utilizes the methane produced by the landfill site. The electricity produced by the plant is enough to power 3000 households. 1 Today, use of land and groundwater on and near the site is still restricted by the state of Colorado.1
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering took ground water samples that showed volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) in the supply well. This well was formerly used for drinking water for the community. The results indicated that the ground water beneath the property was contaminated with radioactive material and VOCs. A sphagnum bog on the grounds had evidence of radioactive contamination. The soil, sediment, surface water, and ground water on the site had high levels of depleted uranium. On some of the soil and sediments, Poly Chlorinated Bi-phenyls were recorded. The buildings and structures on the grounds were as well contaminated with depleted uranium and other hazardous substances.
What is the difference between a. and a. Five Year Review of Tar Creek Superfund Sites. Ottawa County, Oklahoma; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6: Dallas, TX, 1994. 12. What is the difference between a.. Cates, D.; Technical Report After Action Monitoring of the Roubidoux Aquifer at the Tar Creek Superfund Site. EPA Cooperative Agreement #V-006449-01-N. U.S. Department of Environmental Quality: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 2006.
All three of these examples prove that pollution is happening in Texas and that it is important for residents to get involved if they want a change to happen. Sometimes, even governmental agencies cannot stop pollution. We must take care of our natural resources, especially land and water, because they are non-renewable. We want our state to be clean for our grandchildren, great grandchildren, and great-great grandchildren. This will not happen unless residents of these toxic waste sites take action and let their voices be heard. Besides, whatever happened to the slogan, “Don’t Mess With Texas?”
... structure to encapsulation the property. The federal government would pay 90 percent of the cost, with the state picking up the other 10. Given the hazardous nature of the waste and the threats to human health and the environment, this process should begin immediately.
Lanthanum (La) is a member of the rare earth elements (REEs), which consist of a group of 15 trivalent metallic elements with similar properties. Lanthanum is mostly dangerous in the working environment, due to the fact that damps and gasses can be inhaled with air. This can cause lung embolism, especially during long-term exposure. Lanthanum can also cause cancer with humans, as it enlarges the chances of lung cancer when it is inhaled. Finally, it can be a threat to the liver when it accumulates in the human body.
In addition to the potential dangers of accidents in generating stations, nuclear waste is a continuing problem that is growing exponentially. Nuclear waste can remain radioactive for about 600 years and disposing these wastes or storing them is an immense problem. Everyone wants the energy generated by power plants, but no one wants to take responsibility for the waste. Thus far, it is stored deep in the earth, but these storage areas are potentially dangerous and will eventually run out. Some have suggested sending the waste into space, but no one is sure of the repercussions.
I agree that recommending Dr. Babin weigh in on the EPA review of the San Jacinto River superfund site, on behalf of the local communities, is a good idea. The local officials and constituents will appreciate DBB’s interest in the issue. By supporting their call removal, he may gain unlikely and very vocal allies in the environmentalist community.
“Waste Management Overview.” World Nuclear Association. World Nuclear Association. Nov. 2013. Web. 22 Apr. 2014. >.
Technetium-99m was used in an imaging demonstration in 1964. As a result of its favorable physical and chemical properties, it quickly became one of the most used radioisotopes for nuclear medical procedures (Keevil). This radioisotope can be found in nuclear medicine procedures that involve diagnostics of the heart, kidneys, lungs, liver, spleen, bones, and blood flow (GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy).
Facility Maintenance – that’s adding more stuffs to the lists Robert Phelps already have. I think Michal can elucidate on this more so standby
The Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Pesticide Act, the Resource Conservation Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act are all a vital link. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Environmental Protection Agency is making grants accessible to states in order to help them form programs to guarantee the safe management and disposal of hazardous waste. Work is being done to ensure that state inventories of industrial waste disposal sites include full assessments of any probable dangers that could be created by these sites. The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a method to make sure that the 35 million plus tons of hazardous wastes that are manufactured in the United States each year are disposed of carefully. Under the plan, hazardous wastes will be controlled from their point of production, to their final disposal. Dangerous practices which currently result in serious threats to health and the environment, will not be permitted (Beck, 2016). In the after math of The Love Canal tragedy, a state of the art containment system has closed off the dump site itself with thick, clay walls, and two clay caps. The over 200 homes in the immediate surrounding area of the dump site have been demolished, and roughly 236 homes that were previously
and possibly to be sent to a landfill. They are then compacted and shipped off to the
to ninety percent of it? Does it just sit there and have absolutely no use? Or
Agrawal (1993) has provided in detail important information on Causes of deterioration, General treatment procedures and equipments required for preservation. The principles of preservation of specific materials also explained.