What Happened at Lake Bodom? Who says there are crimes known as unsolvable murder cases? The Lake Bodom murders occurred in Finland and involved four teenagers. Three of the teenagers were brutally murdered while one lived with serious injuries. The names of these young victims were Maila Irmeli Björklund and Anja Tuulikki Mäki, who were both fifteen-year-old girls at the time, while the third victim was an eighteen-year-old boy by the name of Seppo Antero Boisman. The lone survivor amongst the teenagers, Nils Gustafsson, was also eighteen along with his friend. These teenagers were camping along Lake Bodom when they were viciously attacked in their tent late into the night with a knife and a blunt weapon by an unknown assailant. Although …show more content…
after extensive research, the clues and information seems to be directed towards Nils Gustafsson. Maila Irmeli Björklund lived a short life as she had only been able to live until she was fifteen. On the day of June 6, 1960, Maila went camping with her friends and had a wonderful day of fun and fishing. Among those friends was her alleged boyfriend, Nils Gustafsson, who was eighteen at the time. As midnight approached, the campers went to sleep for the night, but little did they know they would be savagely attacked while they slumbered peacefully. Investigators figured that the attacker did not go inside the tent to attack the teenagers but instead attacked them from the outside. The killer used a knife along with a blunt object to kill three of the four teenagers and leave the sole survivor brutalized. These murder weapons were never found and still leave police puzzled on where they could have possibly been hidden. (“Lake Bodom Murders”) Unfortunately, among those victims, Maila was one of the teenagers that were murdered. She was initially killed by a severe hit to the head that caused brain hemorrhaging, but the horrific part is that she was stabbed fifteen times after she was deceased, showing this murderer’s ruthlessness. Her estimated time of death was anywhere between four in the morning and six in the morning. All of this evidence would help provide information to find the killer of Maila Irmeli Björklund. After revealing some facts about the tragic events that happened to Maila Björklund, it is evident that more research it needed to determine the true murderer. Although there are numerous suspects, these are the facts that make these the top suspects and also lead me to believe that Nils Gustafsson was the true murderer behind Lake Bodom. The police considered many suspects throughout the investigations. One of the main suspects in the investigation was Valdemar Gyllstrom, also known as “the kiosk man.” He got his nickname due to the fact that he owned a kiosk near Lake Bodom. Valdemar Gyllstrom was known for hating campers and had previously acted violently towards them. He drunkenly confessed to his neighbor that he had killed the kids and had hidden the evidence in a well on his property by sealing the well forever. (Suftin) He later drowned himself in Lake Bodom in 1969. Shortly after his death, his wife confessed that she had lied to the police to protect him and that she knew he was the one who murdered those campers. (Suftin) Although Valdemar confesses to murdering the three teenagers and assaulting Nils, the police did not take this confession seriously due to the suspicion that Valdemar was an alcoholic. It was also revealed that he confessed to the murders while under the influence of alcohol to his neighbor, who said he was simply rambling and had no idea what he was talking about. In addition to the confession to the neighbor, another source states, “Karl Gyllstrom was dead and, on his suicide note he said that he was the one who killed those teenagers” (Tofani). If there were two proven confessions from Gyllstrom, why were the police not convinced enough that he was the murderer? This is because there was not enough evidence to prove he was the true killer. The most suspicious thing about Gyllström was that he filled in his well with cement shortly after the murders, leaving many to believe that the murder weapons were permanently destroyed. This would give police suspicion, leading to a search of his house, but they wound up empty handed, leaving theories that the murder weapons were buried in that well, never to be found. Whether Gyllstrom was the murderer or not, he was clearly affected by these murders, along with the rest of Finland and Sweden. Equally important as a suspect was Hans Assmann, a former KGB spy that was also supposedly involved in two other murders, but was never convicted for any. Hans himself had claimed that, “...he had worked with the German Army under Adolph Hitler, even serving as a guard for Auschwitz, but later fled the SS when he became involved with a Jewish girl” (Suftin). Eventually this would lead to Hans settling in Finland around the fifties, where he would soon find himself in trouble and involvement with mysterious murder cases. For example, there was a little girl that went missing for quite a long time in Finland by the name of Kyllikki Saari. There was suspicion of foul play and later found out that Hans was in the area around the time of her disappearance. Since Hans was known for his involvement with the German army, that he was a foreigner, and that he was within the region at the time, he was under high suspicion but there was never enough evidence to convict him, resulting in him walking away a free man. Hans later revealed on his deathbed that his driver that night had run over the girl while she was biking down the road, and he also admitted helping his driver bury the girl in a nearby swamp, where she would be found weeks later. If Hans admitted to one murder, does that make him more likely to have committed more than just one? In addition, the night after the murders Hans showed up to a hospital with some very strange behavior.
His suspicious activity at the Helsinki hospital included, “The day after the murders Assmann appeared at the hospital, disheveled and erratic. He had blackened fingernails and a red substance covering his clothing. He lied to doctors about his identity and repeatedly played unconscious throughout his stay there” (Suftin). With this suspicious activity and what doctors believe to be blood under his fingernails and covering his clothing. With this evidence, why were the police not involved immediately? One doctor believes that Hans was the murderer so much that he wrote three books in detail and has inspired people to believe that Hans had committed these murders over any other suspect involved. In result of all the suspicion that was surrounding Hans, he would never be thoroughly investigated. Many believe the reason for this was, “...conspiracies surrounding the Lake Bodom murders involve Assmann’s possible association with the KGB and the Finnish government’s refusal to investigate Assmann further for fear the Soviets would be upset on their findings” (Suftin). World War II was still fresh in many civilians and verterans minds, resulting in many people wanting to avoid any more conflict in the world by any means necessary, even if it means not investigating a massive suspect that could have been involved in the mysterious Lake Bodom …show more content…
murders. Perhaps the most hotly debated suspect in this entire crime; Nils Gustafsson. Many believe that he is innocent while about the same amount believe that he is guilty. However the people may feel, there is evidence that supports both sides of the argument. One piece of evidence that supports his innocence is, immediately after the murders, Nils was not suspected as the killer. This was due to the fact that he told the police he had no recollection of the events that occurred that night. However, after being hypnotized, Nils confessed that after he had got of out the tent the attacker had kicked him in the jaw and made Nils pass out. Nils would later describe what the killer looked like and this led to other suspects to be brought to the police’s attention. (Man Remanded) After being hypnotized, it is thought that it is nearly impossible to lie, resulting in the police to believe Nils when he told them that a black figure with red eyes had attacked them through the tent. The attacker supposedly brutalized the victims by beating the teenagers through the tent with a large metal pipe. Another piece of evidence that suggests that Nils was not the killer was, “...(Nils) sustained a concussion, fractures to the jaw and facial bones, and bruises to the face but lived” (Lake Bodom Murders). If Nils was the killer, how would it be possible that he could injure himself with such force as to fracture his own facial bones? Also, while supposedly concussed, how could he dispose of the weapons and hid all of the personal items that were stolen from the teenagers? These reasons help support that Nils was not the killer at Lake Bodom. However, there is more reason and evidence to support that Nils was the murderer at this tragic event in Finland’s history. The fact that Nils supposed girlfriend was stabbed fifteen times after her death is a motive that only Gustafsson would have. If the killer was not Gustafsson, how would he have the knowledge that Maila was Gustafsson’s girlfriend and be able to cover his tracks by stabbing her and Nils best friend, who was supposedly hitting on Maila, more times after their death. Police found that, “The tracks of blood and footprints had shown that the killer was wearing Gustafsson’s shoes” (Lake Bodom Murders). The only tracks found around the crime scene were Gustafsson’s, meaning that no outside person had come and murdered the teenagers, someone within the group had committed the murder. Nils had also been under the influence of alcohol, which is known for enraging some people when drunk. With the fact that it would have been impossible for any other killer to realize that Maila was Nils girlfriend, and covering his tracks by making it seem like a jealous rage had caused Nils to murder his friends, it is clear that Gustafsson is the killer behind the Lake Bodom incident. What happened that night is clear.
After a day of fishing and hanging out with his friends, the teenagers had made a fire and decided to drink some alcohol. Nils noticed that Maila was flirting with Seppo all day and this made Nils upset. The flirting continued throughout the night and Nils became enraged that his “girlfriend” was flirting with his best friend. While under the influence, he made the decision he would teach Maila and Seppo a lesson. While everyone dozed off, Nils found a rather large tree branch and his fishing knife, and began to attack Maila while she was sleeping through the tent. Soon after realizing they were being attacked, Seppo had sprung out of the tent and started to attack Nils, causing Nils to be severely injured with fists to the head. Nils became more enraged and killed Seppo, then went back to finish the job on Maila. After killing her, he consummated that he had to deal with Anja to get rid of all the witnesses. He had killed all three of the teenagers and became enlightened that he would have to cover his tracks and make it look like some stranger had attacked them. He threw his weapons in the Lake, never to be found, took personal items off the victims bodies like wallets and Seppo’s leather jacket and hid them in a tree that was hollowed out, far away from the crime seen. Then realized that he was exhausted, collapsed onto the tent where he would be found in the morning by two boy birdwatchers. The rest is
history.
...ased the brakes until coming to a complete stop. Juan and Glenn, knowing where they were going, went to the door leaving the dad alone to get the money. Upon entering the cabin, Juan asked him for the money. He replied quickly that first he needs to see his daughter. The children came out. There was a sudden movement by Glenn which attracted the attention on him long enough for Marianne’s father to pull out the pistol. He pistol whipped Juan and held the gun towards Rita. Rita suddenly started screaming in Spanish asking where Buck was. They told her he was dead and ordered her to put her hands above her head. He handed the gun to Glenn motioning him to stay here and watch the two as he went for the cops and took the others.
When they found the body, they automatically started looking for clues as to why the person was killed. They wanted to find anything that looked suspicious so that they could search for the killer. When they were looking for clues as to who the killer was, the killer caught on to them. The killer realized that he was being followed up on, and he made it his obligation to get to the main characters instead. The killer got a hold of one of the main characters in the woods, where he killed his second victim. The other two main characters did everything in their power to find their friend and help her, before she would be
La Donna Beaty clearly States in her argument, ?What Makes a Serial Killer?? her opinion and different theories on what causes a human being to become a serial killer. Beaty states that there are many serial killers and victims of them, but she is unsure about what causes a person to become a serial killer. Furthermore, she asked many questions, but there was no definite answer. For example, using examples of serial killers including Jeffery Dahmer and Ted Bundy, but only to draw up more questions. However, she wrote many expert opinions too, using them to her advantage in proving her argument, and giving a statement from a respected author and expert on serial killers named Ann Rule (pg315). Rule states that 3,500 to 5,000 people become victims of serial killers. She also states that 350 serial killers are at large in our society (pg315). Additionally, Beaty also presents an early theory that was completely incorrect. This was about how to identify a serial killer by looks. Beaty then gave her expertise by stating that a serial killer could look like or be anything they choose to become. They are most likely to be males and 92 percents are white (pg316). No doubt, that she appeals to logos by providing evidence about general characteristics of serial killers she quotes that in 1911, an Italian criminologist Cesare Lombrosco concluded that ?murderers as a group [are] biologically degenerate [with] bloodshot eyes, aquiline noses, curly black hair, strong jaws, big ears, thin lips, and menacing grins?.
The famous axe murders of Fall River in 1892 shocked everyone for years and many believe that it was Lizzie Borden or was it? Lizzie Borden is accused of killing her parents with an axe. Many believe that she committed this crime but was never caught. I believe that Lizzie Borden is guilty of killing her parents. Lizzie had a rocky relationship with her stepmother before and a week before the murders Lizzie got into an argument with her father and stepmother. When police searched the house there was no sign of anyone who had tried to break into the Borden house on the day of the murders and Lizzie was the only one in the house
Summary: Brady finds the lifeless body of his 3 year old neighbor Ben, in the river in the middle of the storm. After he pulls Ben into the boat he drops his cell phone over the boat into the water. Brady must then drive his boat and attempt CPR on the lifeless body. Brady must make an extremely difficult choice when he finds out that his two best friends, J.T. and Digger, are the direct cause why little Ben is now dead. Brady’s father assisted him in dredging up the Red Kayak. When Brady see’s that holes are drilled into the bottom, he breaks down and tells his father what his friends J.T. and Digger did. Brady decides to turn in his friends only after the stress, torment, and sadness began to seriously affect him. His friends are charged with murder and the story revolves around his coping with the boy's death, assisting Ben’s own mother with her grieving, and reliving the death of his infant sister years
...hes her in the face and kicks her. He is disgusted with her. He then turns and leaves. Kino makes his way up the beach as a group of men assault him. Kino struggles to get away and while doing so he stabs one of the men and kills him. Juana finally gets on her feet and begins to make her way home. She sees Kino lying on the group hurt with another man dead next to him. She hauls the dead man into the brush and tends to Kino. She says they must run away immediately because of what a terrible crime Kino committed. Kino refuses at first, but then agrees. Juana runs back to the house grabs Coyotito, while Kino goes to the beach once again to prepare his boat, but realizes that the group of men made a hole in it. He becomes full of rage and kicks at the water. He then tells Juana what happened and they decide to hide at Juan Tomas’s house for a while.
There was a heavy rain outside, but other than that, the room was silent. George stared at the bunk where Lennie slept, unable to sleep. He was filled with hatred of the world that forced him to kill his own friend. As the night dragged on his hatred shifted to Curley’s wife, then Curley. “If Curley hadn’t let his tramp wife go around and cause trouble Lennie would still be here” George thought. Just then, Lennie appeared in front of him with a look of deep sadness and pain. Seeing Lennie’s pain and suffering, sent him over the edge. “That god damn Curley!” George thought, grabbing Carlson’s gun while he slept. “This is all his fault!” he thought, consumed by rage. He shuffled over to where Curley slept and pulled out the gun. George aimed the gun at Curley and pulled the trigger. An instant later he is horrified by what he has done. A couple seconds pass and Slim comes into the
When a death occurs suddenly, unexpectedly and from unnatural or unknown causes, a forensic scientist has the duty to gather and analyze evidence to determine whether the victim died from a previously undiagnosed disease or infection or from a homicide, suicide or accident (Lurigio, 2009). When considering suicide as the probable cause of death, we are looking at the act of intentionally killing oneself through one’s own effort or with the assistance of another (Sever, 2009). The resolution of the manner of death by a forensic pathologist as suicide is based on a series of factors which eliminate natural causes of death, homicide and accident (Geberth, 2013, p.55). The cause of death is also determined by the medical examiner in conjunction with the crime scene investigator; however, it can only be determined after a thorough investigation is concluded. Therefore, in the complicated process of doing a death investigation there are several mistakes that should be avoided, which are discussed in Geberth’s article, Seven Mistakes in Suicide Investigation (2013). Mistakes in doing any death investigation affect the integrity of the evidence in determining the cause of death and in its admissibility in court.
Although there is a significant amount of data found on murder, serial murder statistics are much more difficult to establ...
Now we will look into more of what the evidence shows and look at more of an analysis. With no fingerprints, reliable eyewitnesses, or authentic leads, it is hard to frame someone for the murders of the axeman, but some evidence exists that led police to a particular suspect. According to the New Orleans article, “Jake woke his brother Andrew, then they went outside and around to Joseph’s kitchen where they saw a panel removed from the door. The brothers walked into Joseph’s bedroom, where they found him lying on his bed, with Catherine’s body draped over him.
242) due to the fact that females can kill without anyone being aware of their activities and therefore without anyone stopping them (Schurman, 2000, p. 13).Therefore, we should still have a considerable bulk of research directed toward these women in order for the criminal justice system to effectively catch these offenders, rehabilitate, and prevent increasing numbers of female serial killers. So why has there been a lack of research on female serial killers when there has been enough of them throughout history to justify inquiry and analysis? This is because woman’s tactics and victim choices often effectively conceal their crime to look like natural or accidental death, while society is simultaneously mislead to think women cannot be serial killers because of culturally defined gender
Serial murder investigations are the most difficult cases for investigators. Serial murder investigations can become wide spread, and can include many challenges that will require time, money and resources. An example of the commitment required to investigate a serial murder case is that of Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber. One investigator worked the investigation full time for 11 years. The day he made the Arrest was the day he retired. Serial murder is one of today’s most terrifying crimes. The killing of multiple people within various jurisdictions can alter everyday life for people residing within these communities. The result is intense pressure from the public and media placed on investigators to track down and apprehend these killers who commit such horrific acts to unsuspecting victims.
Serial killers have many frightening facets. The most frightening thing about them is that experts still do not know what makes a human become a serial killer. Many experts believe serial killers become what they are because they have a genetic disposition or brain abnormality while other experts believe that a serial killer is created by childhood abuse; and some other experts believe that it is a combination of both brain abnormalities and abusive childhood experiences that creates a serial killer. A murderer is considered a serial killer when they “murder three or more persons in at least three separate events with a “cooling off period” between kills” (Mitchell and Aamodt 40). When defining a serial killer, their background, genes, and brain are not mentioned; perhaps one day those aspects of the serial killer can be included.
Serial murder as defined by the FBI is, “[t]he unlawful killing of two or more victims by the same offender(s), in separate events" (Morton Robert J. Ed, & Hilts., Ed, 2005, p. 9). Numerous people disagree with the definition, this researcher included, since it lacks the cool- down period after they murder, which various people feel stands necessary for serial killer status. Serial killers remain a rare phenomenon. The FBI states, serial murder accounts for less than one percent of killings per year (Morton Robert J. Ed, & Hilts., Ed, 2005, p. 2). Nevertheless, throughout the years, countless people have researched serial killers since they commit such heinous crimes. Criminologists and researchers have been attempting to identify various
The water beats at the bank feel gently, and resides carefully to avoid over soaking it. The air is fresh and overwhelming with cool gushes of wind blowing past, provoking the trees to yawn and some times sleep. It was a lovely Valentine day and perfect for a picnic at Lake Lavon.