Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspectives on social stratification
Social stratification analysis
Perspectives on social stratification
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Perspectives on social stratification
Society has inequality built into its foundation whereas individuals are categorized into positions based on how they match certain criteria. This establishes a social stratification hierarchy with those achieving the most prestige and power can be located at the top while those who struggle with much less prestige possess less power and are found at the bottom. This ideal where people are given of their social position given to them by society and ranked upon that in which they were given is known as social stratification (Larkin, 2015a). Three of these stratification systems that will be focused on are slavery, class and caste. Each system differs in how the societies characteristics are carried out on the social hierarchy. The purpose of …show more content…
This extreme system of stratification contains the most social inequality as it denies fundamental human rights, establishes people as property of others, and places said slaves at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Those who own the slaves are elevated higher on the social hierarchy as they have power over their slaves. Furthermore, those who fall into this system compared to other systems have the least flexibility in social mobility, which is defined as an individual’s ability within a stratified system to move down or up in their established social position. Due to the limited to nonexistent social mobility for slaves, this system is referred to as a closed system of stratification (Larkin, 2015a). Regrettably, this system is tolerated in certain societies as it follows their inherited rights and social norms which enforce their society’s s legality of slave …show more content…
Stratification systems are able to do this through the use of organizing principles that are necessary for the proper functioning of a society. To fill needed social positions and roles in the USA, the organizing principles of class, race, and gender were established to lay a foundation of what individuals fill those roles and what they get in return (Larkin, 2015b). This foundation is shown to be prevalent to this day through collected data, revealing different social inequality patterns that each of the organizing principles have led to. The purpose of this section of the paper is to compare genders by the organizing principles held in the USA and describe which of the gender and race categories hold the most
Rothman, R. A. (2005). Inequality and Stratification: Race, Class, and Gender (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J. :Pearson Prentice Hall.
According to Black?s definition, stratification is ?the vertical aspect of social life?, ?any uneven distribution of the material conditions of existence? (Black 11), in other words the discrimination of wealth. Stratification can be measured in quantity, delineated in style and viewed from two perspectives, as a ?magnitude of difference in wealth? (Black 11) and as the level to which the setting is stratified. Moreover, stratification explains not only law, its quantity and style, but also other aspects of social life. The relationship Black is mostly interested in is the positive correlation between stratification and law, meaning the more law, the more stratified the setting is. When utilizing this proposition by inserting other variables of social ...
African American women are considered the most disadvantaged group vulnerable to discrimination and harassment. Researchers have concluded that their racial and gender classification may explain their vulnerable position within society, despite the strides these women have made in education, employment, and progressing their families and communities (Chavous et al. 2004; Childs 2005; Hunter 1998; Settles 2006; Wilkins 2012). Most people agree that race and gender categories are explained as the biological differences between individuals in our society; however sociologists understand that race and gender categories are social constructions that are maintained on micro and macro levels. Historically, those in power who control the means of production within a society have imposed race, class, and gender meanings onto the minority population in order to maintain their dominant position and justify the unequal treatment of minority individuals by the divisions of race, class, and gender categories (Collins 2004; Nguyen & Anthony 2014; Settles 2006;).
Stratification systems, categorized people by class, gender, ethnicity, wealth/income. When people are categorized, start looking at different systems within the social system or social mobility. “The four main systems of stratification have been slavery, caste, estate, and class. Each of these systems allows greater or less flexibility in terms of social mobility. Social mobility is the ability to move up or down within a social stratification hierarchy” (Larkin, 2015). Slavery is a social status began with social norms allowing people to own others. The slaves had no wealth or power while under this social status. Caste systems are all aspects of social status are assigned at births and held forever,
Social Stratification in the African American community has changed over the years. Social stratification is defined as a rigid subdivision of a society into a hierarchy of layers, differentiated on the basis of power, prestige, and wealth according to Webster’s dictionary. David Newman in Sociology Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life describes stratification as a ranking system for groups of people that perpetuates unequal rewards and life chances in society. From slavery to the present, the African American community has been seen to have lower status compared to white people. Today, the stratification or hierarchy difference between whites and black are not really noticeable, but it is still present. However, during slavery, the difference in social stratification was noticeable. Whites dominated over the blacks and mulattoes (offspring of a white and black parent). The mulattoes were seen to have a higher stratification than an offspring of black ancestry. Because the mulattoes were related to the whites, they were able to obtain higher education and better occupations than blacks. For example, most slaves of a lighter skin tone worked in the houses and darker slaves worked in the fields. As the people of light skin tone had children, they were able to have advantages too. The advantages have led into the society of today. In this paper I will discuss how stratification has been affected in the African American community over time by skin tone to make mulattoes more privileged than dark skin blacks.
Social stratification is putting individuals into certain rankings within a society. One process of social stratification is socioeconomic status, which is a measurement of a persons standing based on education, work experience, and income. Socioeconomic status is something that separates individuals and can cause severe isolation between the distinct groups. The functionalist perspective focuses on how problems come from society and whether they serve a function for society. Changes in society, such as war or even an economic change, can affect the rate of suicide for a society (Risholm 2014).
According to Henslin, mobility is the movement of individuals, families and groups from one social position to another (Henslin, 2015, p. 237-239). It can be viewed in terms of distribution of resources and power among the different social stratification and its effect on the people involved. Stratification is a ranking system for groups of people that continue to receive unequal rewards and life chances in society. Through stratification, society categorizes people and distributes valued resources based upon these categories (Henslin, 2015, p190). The social status of a person is determined by his or her work, how much money they have earned, and how they move their way up the social class.
What is inequality, social structure and social stratification? According to Study.com social inequality is, “the existence of unequal opportunities and rewards for different social positions or statuses within a group or society.” Sociology.about.com says, “Social structure is the organized pattern of social relationships and social institutions that together compose society.” Wikipedia says Social stratification, is “a society 's categorization of people into socioeconomic strata, based upon their occupation and income, wealth and social status, or derived power”.
Social stratification is seen everywhere within the United States and around the world. As discussed in lecture, there are two types of stratification systems, and both are prominent in the United States. The first type is achievement based, which depends on a person’s wealth and accomplishments (Wadsworth). In the film, “People Like Us,” this system is presented. A teenage boy is embarrassed of his mother and his family’s social status, so he hides is social class from his friends. The second system is ascription-based stratification which has to do with what an individual is born with. The school that was interviewed and observed in “People Like Us,” prove that the family you are born into plays a huge role in popularity, and the group of friends you choose to surround yourself with. Another example in this film was the WASP label. The man they interviewed, explained that you are
Today we classify people into groups based on their shared socio economic conditions, or interpersonal set of inequalities. When people are classified into these groups, greater status, power or certain privileges are granted to some and not to others. This is known as social stratification. This concept illustrates the advantages and disadvantages that one will acquire; depending on how qualified an individual is, in order to meet the needs of society. Although, Davis and Moore’s theory demonstrates how social stratification and inequality are positively functional and therefore necessary, it is relevantly important because it encourages people to take on the more complicated and important tasks, when basic rewards are given to the most skillful and qualified individuals.
First, the chapters cover stratification. According to study.com “Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. In the United States, it is perfectly clear that some groups have greater status, power, and wealth than other groups.” According to the textbook “Stratification is unequal distribution of valued
Those two axes of inequality mask the social classes within culture, because if there had been no distinctions between race and gender in class structures, “class or socioeconomic differences would have been more obvious” as Robert Dahl explains in Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City (Dahl 54). This paper will mainly focus on the class aspect of inequality within government, keeping race and gender in mind while continuing forward. Social class, as George Domhoff introduces in Who Rules America?, started in the colonial and revolutionary times, and therefore contains deep roots in the foundation and history of the United States. Leaders “who did not fight for equality accepted it in order to win” not taking into account slaves and native Americans, but the class inequality of white men (Domhoff 15). Americans took pride in a smaller class distinction than Europe, and thus ignored the great class distinction that was present, further allowing those class inequalities to permeate throughout American culture and discretely form an aristocracy model of government under the democratic illusion. Dennis Gilbert in The American Class Structure In an Age of Growing Inequality expands on this theme
A stratified society shows how members of society are ranked. They are arranged in a hierarchical
These examples illustrate that when stratification increases due to a fall in inferior status, conflict
Kerbo, H. R. (2012). Social stratification and inequality: class conflict in historical, comparative, and global perspective (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.