With every year that passes the United States is changing. Its people are changing. Along with all these changes, so are our morals and the way that we view the world around us. In Stephanie Coontz’s article, Why Gender Equality Stalled, we are walked through her views on gender equality and the progression with the partial influence of feminism. With her opinion and other points of view Stephanie Coontz is arguing that we need to treat “work-family policy issues” as a human rights issue. She claims that these issues affect everyone that are apart the household; parents, children, and elders. After analyzing her article, I have concluded that I fully agree with her statements and arguments that women and men should have equal rights, …show more content…
not only in the workplace but also in the household environment as well. Like Coontz, I believe that men and women should be given the same opportunities; such as the right to choose between their pursuit of a career or their involvement in being a full-time parent. With Stephanie Coontz’s claims, she is further demonstrating that men and women are on their way to equal rights in the United States, but there is still more room for improvement with help from the United States’ government.
“Over the next 30 years this emphasis on equalizing gender roles at home as well as at work produced a revolutionary transformation in Americans’ attitudes” (Coontz 2013, p.1). By using statistics from the 1960’s and 70’s Coontz’s claims became more personal. She is proceeding to argue that American’s have made a leap in gender equality. Later in her argument, she states that by the 2000’s the revolution began to stall. This came with the change of feminist’s outlook on their …show more content…
campaign. When arguing her point on work and family conflict, Stephanie Coontz gathered information from Jody Heymann’s book Children’s Chances. She claims that, “... when the United States’ work-family policies are compared with those of countries at similar levels of economic and political development, the United States comes in dead last” (Coontz 2013, p. 4). By clarifying some of the policies she references statistics provided in Children’s Chances; with these statistics she has a better foundation of arguing her claim against the United States’ government policies on paid leave for new mothers and fathers. These claims help her to argue that the United States has failed in its ability to keep up with other countries, which are developing at similar rates with the United States, “family-friendly” work policies. Through Why Gender Equality Stalled, Stephanie Coontz made several valid claims to support her argument that the United States needs to provide equal rights for both men and women. “In 2011… sixty-five percent of fathers they interviewed felt that mothers and fathers should provide equal amounts of caregiving for their children” (Coontz 2013, p.7). I believe that both the mother and father need to provide an equal amount of care to their children. Children need the presence of both a male and female role model in their lives. Although this is an ideal situation, for some families it may not be ideal for those with special circumstances. From the article Why Gender Equality Stalled, I am able to reference her facts that state that most mothers will be more likely than the fathers to drop work if needed due to family accountabilities. In 2016 I think the circumstances are vastly different from those of the past. Mothers currently will cut or drop out of their jobs solely because it is often the more reasonable of the two options. “Women are still paid less than men at every educational level and every job category… they are less likely to hold jobs that offer flexibility or family-friendly benefits” (Coontz 2013, p.8). This is where we see the break in our fight for equal gender rights. Our society as a whole was constructed around the separation of sexes and it is hard for employers to modify and accommodate, and for hard working families to make the circumstances work. This does everyone a disservice; from families who juggle schedules to the individuals who have to cover mothers and fathers when kids get sick, and those who aren’t allowed to take vacations over the traditional family vacation periods. These policies are hurting everyone involved, and as a result of this we are lacking efficiency in our workplaces. In her article, Stephanie Coontz is claiming that her argument is something feminists should fully support.
Although she is suggesting that they support her argument, she does not want them to claim the movement. She claims that, “Gender equality has not stalled. It has hit a wall.” I believe that with the new way of supporting feminism we as a society have forced this pause in the advancement of equality. By agreeing with Stephanie Coontz, I have been able to view feminism from her point of view. In the 1960’s feminism was lacking ‘political-ness’. Instead, feminists were more focused on the transformation of a woman’s personal consciousness. “Under present conditions, the intense consciousness rising about the “rightness” of personal choices that worked so well in the early days of the women’s movement will end up escalating the divisive finger-pointing that stands in the way of political
reform”. In conclusion, Stephanie Coontz effectively argues that men and women should share equal rights at the workplace and in their households. While I found the author’s claims to be true, I still find points in her article that I believe are exaggerated. I agree with Coontz’s claims about maternal leave with pay for both the mother and/or father. I do also believe that work policies should allow males and females to put their gender values into place. Stephanie Coontz made a valid argument for men and women across the United States to reach equal rights.
Sex and gender inequality is one of the many issues handled in this book. This has always been a social problem in America and other nations. Sex and gender are different terms, where sex refers to the biological difference between men and women while gender refers to the differences between females and males that the society constructs between the two. These inequalities therefore, are society-created where men and women are treated differently not because of what they can do but who they are. The author dedication to portrayal of America as a society that disregarded their rights is therefore, in an attempt to create a society with gender equity and equality where a woman and man will be treated equally in work stations and other public places. The physical characteristics of women and their position as child bearers gave the men a convenience to use, exploit people who were their sex mates, companions and guardians of their children.
The social perception of women has drastically changed since the 1950’s. The social role of women during the 1950’s was restrictive and repressed in many ways. Society during that time placed high importance on expectations of behavior in the way women conducted themselves in home life as well as in public. At home the wife was tasked with the role of being an obedient wife, caring mother, and homemaker. Women publicly were expected to form groups and bond over tea with a slice of cake. All the while government was pushing this idealize roll for women in a society “dominated” by men. However, during this time a percentage of women were finding their way into the work force of men. “Women were searching their places in a society led by men;
For several decades, most American women occupied a supportive, home oriented role within society, outside of the workplace. However, as the mid-twentieth century approached a gender role paradigm occurred. The sequence of the departure of men for war, the need to fill employment for a growing economy, a handful of critical legal cases, the Black Civil Rights movement seen and heard around the nation, all greatly influenced and demanded social change for human and women’s rights. This momentous period began a social movement known as feminism and introduced a coin phrase known in and outside of the workplace as the “wage-gap.”
In contrast, men have been seen as more dominate than women because of their masculine abilities and other traits and most importantly their profound responsibility of being the provider and head of the household. Americans constantly uses theses two distinct stereotypes that in many cases present many biases regarding gender codes in America. Things have changed over time the women are no longer just house wives taking care of the house and children waiting for their husband to come home from his nine to five occupations. Andrea L. Miller explains in her article “The Separate Spheres Model of Gendered Inequality” that, “A common theme in the study of gender is the idea that men and women belong in distinct spheres of society, with men being particularly fit for the workplace and women being particularly fit for the domestic domain” (Miller 2). Miller gives two very specific examples on how gender is viewed in American
“Feminism is both an intellectual commitment and a political movement that seeks justice for women and the end of sexism in all forms” (Baptiste). Just as in the past, feminism continues to act as a controversial issue among men and women. In the 1960’s, women finally addressed workplace inequity and created woman organizations to achieve equality. In the early 1960’s, the Equal Pay Act and the Civil Rights Act set a milestone for women’s progression towards work equality. Though women have made great leaps towards true equality, women still face many challenges and continue to be categorized as the subservient gender.
Traditional gender roles in the United States and other societies have always been dictated as where the man goes and works for a salary as women stay at home to take of house related work. However, many changes in the traditional family has made gender roles go through significant changes. Many women have gone through college and have obtained college education degrees, which has allowed women to advance their careers. The break down of rigid gender roles and the increase in participation of women in the workplace have granted women more choices in life. The choices many women now have in there career fields has made some controversial views on the intelligence of women achieving the status of their male counterparts The first view obtained in the workplace is the ability to make a even paying field for both men and women. Many constituents have pledge to achieve equality for women through laws forbidding the use of any sexist policies that may constitute discrimination against sex. The second is weather working women have been allowed to working women have the same opportunities rewarded to them as men do. Many political action committees have help perpetuate feminist movements which intended to build equal opportunity workplaces for both men and women however, many questionable issues still arise at weather working conditions have become better for women.
Society has long since considered women the lessor gender and one of the most highly debated topics in society through the years has been that of women’s equality. The debates began over the meaning between a man and woman’s morality and a woman’s rights and obligations in society. After the 19th Amendment was sanctioned around 1920, the ball started rolling on women’s suffrage. Modern times have brought about the union of these causes, but due to the differences between the genetic makeup and socio demographics, the battle over women’s equality issue still continues to exist. While men have always held the covenant role of the dominant sex, it was only since the end of the 19th century that the movement for women’s equality and the entitlement of women have become more prevalent. “The general consensus at the time was that men were more capable of dealing with the competitive work world they now found themselves thrust into. Women, it was assumed, were unable to handle the pressures outside of the home. They couldn’t vote, were discourages from working, and were excluded from politics. Their duty to society was raising moral children, passing on the values that were unjustly thrust upon them as society began to modernize” (America’s Job Exchange, 2013). Although there have been many improvements in the changes of women’s equality towards the lives of women’s freedom and rights in society, some liberals believe that women have a journey to go before they receive total equality. After WWII, women continued to progress in there crusade towards receiving equality in many areas such as pay and education, discrimination in employment, reproductive rights and later was followed by not only white women but women from other nationalities ...
Even Though women have revolutionized themselves in relation to the world many other aspects of society have not. This phenomenon, originally coined by Arielle Hochschild in her book The Second Shift, is known as the stalled revolution. In essence while female culture has shifted male culture has not. This has created an unequal, unfair and oppressive atmosphere for women across the nation. The title of Hochschild's book tells it all. The second shift refers to the second shift of work women are and have been burdened with at home. Although they have made enormous leaps within the economy and workforce their gender roles at home and within society remain the same. Male culture and their ideas of female gender roles have not progressed. As a result needs of females have not been met. Working mothers today work more than any other demographic, a rough estimate of this comes out to be a whole extra month of work consisting of twenty four hour work days.
As late as 1962, a survey done by the University of Michigan found that two-thirds of women believed that decisions that were important to the family should be decided by the man of the house (Coontz 2013). Thus, most Americans didn 't believe that gender equality was necessary or good, and most of the information they learned had stated that women couldn 't pursue careers and be a proper mother. (Coontz 2013). Feminists and women 's right 's activists began the task of challenging women to question the assumption that all women are to be used for is to watch children, maintain the house, and make the food. It was a slow, but steady progress, with two-thirds of Americans believe that it was better for men to be the breadwinners and women to be the bread makers in 1977, but only one-third of Americans believing this was the case in 1994 (Coontz 2013). In the 1970s and onward, there was a shift in American 's beliefs in the qualifications of women in the workforce and in the political atmosphere. For example, Myra Marx Feree found that, in the 1970s, the amount of Americans who would vote for a well-qualified woman for president increased only with the continuation of the women 's movement and protests of the time (Cotter 2011). A trend was noticed, however, that the progress
Women have been treated unequally since the beginning of time. Just recently have things began to change for the better for women and the future of our society. The increase in women’s equality rights will take time, but some day women and men will be treated equally. This cannot happen until each of us is able to look at a person and just see another individual, not a male or a female, white or black, rich or poor… a person as just a person.
Paula England, the author of “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled,” sheds light on how the gender system has progressively become unbalanced. England 's main focus for this article is to provide the reader with an understanding of how women 's drive to change hasn 't just affected their labor, but men 's labor as well. She states “Since 1970, women increasingly majored in previously male-dominated, business-related fields, such as business, marketing, and accounting; while fewer chose traditionally female majors like English, education, and sociology; and there was little increase of men’s choice of these latter majors” (England and Li, 2006, 667-69). This quote supports the fact that women have been branching out in the workplace, however
Men have dominated the workforce for most of civilization up until their patriotic duties called away to war. All of a sudden, the women were responsible for providing for their family while the men were away. Women went to work all over America to earn an income to insure their family’s survival. Women took all sorts of jobs including assembly line positions, office jobs, and even playing professional baseball. When the men returned home from war, the women were expected to resume their place as housewives. The women who had gotten a taste of the professional life decided that they wanted to continue working. Thus, the introduction to women in a man’s working environment began. Women were not taken seriously at first, because they were stepping into a “man’s world”.
The roles of women changed drastically between 1950’s and 1970’s due to the political, economic, and social issues, but women’s lives also stayed close to the way they had always been. The lives of women changed in a plethora of ways throughout the years. “We believe that women can achieve such equality only by accepting to full the challenges and responsibilities they share with all other people in our society, as part of the decision-making mainstream of American political, economic, and social life” (Statement of Purpose, 1966).
In the last 50 years we have seen changes in the family structure. In the process the roles of women have also changed however we still see inequalities in the home, workplace and public despite women having proven themselves equal to men.
We have a right to equal well-paid employment, to equal opportunities. The right to vote is an important weapon. And now the Family Code has been passed, restoring to the most humble of women the dignity that has so often been trampled upon. (Bâ 61)