Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on aboriginal rights
Essay on aboriginal rights
Rights and freedoms of aboriginal people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Assessing the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People
The Royal Commission on Aboriginal People was established in 1991 as a response to the Oka Crisis and the numerous social and political concerns surrounding the Canadian natives. The mandate of this commission was ambitious and required its representatives to focus on the various aspects of Aboriginal life, their relationship with the government, and the non-aboriginal population, historically and presently (Volume 5, Appendix C). To accomplish this task, the commissioners focused on four key areas of research “governance; land and economy; social and cultural issues; and the North” (Volume 5, Appendix). Their research approach included visiting Aboriginal communities in order to understand
…show more content…
their perspective on pressing issues. The commissioners also held consultations with various scholars and experts, as well as public hearings in order to obtain the opinion of all Canadians.
Ultimately the commission heard over 2000 testimonies and guided 350 research projects nationwide (Volume 5, Appendix C). The report was published in 1993 with the clear goal of “renewing the relationship between the Aboriginal and non Aboriginal peoples of Canada”. The commission was divided into five volumes; Looking Forward, Looking Back, Restructuring the Relationship, Gathering Strength, Perspectives and Realities, and Renewal: A Twenty-Year Commitment. Within each section, the commissioners proposed several recommendations that would help alleviate the tensions currently existing between the government and the Aboriginal Nations. What follows is a discussion of the most notable issues and recommendations presented within the commission which include the restructuring of the relationship between the Canadian government and Aboriginal communities, strengthening self governance, and supporting the social and economic development of Aboriginal communities by addressing issues of health, education, and family. Further, this paper will explore the relevance of the recommendations in the present political climate, as well as the challenges this commission has …show more content…
faced in the past and continues to encounter in the present. The first volume of the commission focuses on a historical review of the relationship between Aboriginal nations and the Government. This section presents the transgressions inflicted upon the Aboriginal peoples by government initiatives such as the implementation of residential schools, the relocation of Aboriginal communities, and the creation of the Indian Act. The commission urges the government to take responsibility for the wrongdoings of the past and issue an apology to the affected parties in order to build a foundation for a relationship built on trust and mutual respect. This volume also discusses the two most important pieces of legislation for Aboriginal Affairs: the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Indian Act of 1876. The first of these documents was created to present a framework of rules for the purchase of Aboriginal land, as well as designating land to Aboriginals and giving them the right to govern over it. The Indian Act followed a similar discourse in attempting to consolidate differences between Aboriginal and other Canadians by indicating the process for obtaining Aboriginal land. However this act has failed to recognize several tribes and nations, rather grouping Aboriginals into “bands” which exclude several nations from constitutional protection (Volume 1, Part Two, Chapter 9). The commissioners characterize the Act to be paternalistic and fail to recognize Aboriginal autonomy. The second volume of this commission discusses the steps necessary for the success of renewed relationships, including honouring treaties, moving towards aboriginal self governance, and redistributing lands and resources amongst Aboriginal nations. Treaties are especially an important aspect of Aboriginal governance and their relationship to the Crown. Aboriginals define treaties as promises that are significant and should be honoured throughout time and space. The current Constitution affirms that treaty rights should be recognized within Canada (Volume 2, Chapter 2). It recommends a renewal process for historical treaties that have been disregarded by the government. One of the assumptions made under these treaties, is that Aboriginals did not willingly give up their lands nor did they agree to give up their right to self govern. The commission recommends that the government implement the treaties in light of their “original spirit and intent” despite whether this is explicitly divulged in the written document. (Volume 2, Appendix A). Recognizing the call for self governance by Aboriginal nations is one of the most important issues indentified in this report.
The commission determines that Aboriginal governments currently lack legitimacy, power, and resources and that these conditions must be alleviated to ensure that self determination is possible (Vol 2, Chapter 3). Thus, Aboriginal governments must be able to create their own institutions and have access to natural resources on their reclaimed lands. In order to be self determinant an Aboriginal nation must be of a fair size and be clustered in a specified territory. The entrenchment of this into the Constitution is necessary in order for the jurisdiction of Aboriginal communities to be specified as it is for Provinces and the Federal government. The commission recommends that the government facilitate this transition into Aboriginal self governance by officially recognizing them within the Canadian Federation. The success of Aboriginal self determination is also dependent on the development of sustainable Aboriginal economies. Historically, the Aboriginal nations gathered most of their economic means by harvesting natural resources thus regaining ownership of these resources will ultimately result in successful development (Volume 2, Chapter 5). Moreover, the commissioners emphasise the importance of training and education in order to ensure that Aboriginal communities have the human capital necessary to grow and create prosperous enterprises.
Fulfilling these recommendations will be costly given the various changes that need to be made. In order for Aboriginal self government to succeed the commissioners propose that Aboriginal governments use the resources available on the land they would be given as well as implement a taxation system. This would mean that individuals living within Aboriginal jurisdiction would pay taxes to Aboriginal governments as opposed to Provincial or Federal governments. Aboriginals living outside of these jurisdictions would still be required to pay taxes to their corresponding government. Moreover, the commission suggests that although Aboriginal communities should have their own source funding, they will require transfer payments in order to develop. Hence, Aboriginal governments with fewer resources should receive equalization payments just as those received by provinces. There is also merit in the recommendation that social assistance be allocated to supporting “employment and other social services” (Volume 2, Summary of Recommendations). Volume Three of this commission focuses on the importance of addressing social, cultural, educational, and justice issues that Aboriginal communities face. Thus, the federal, provincial, territorial, and Aboriginal governments are called upon to form a collaborative and expeditious solution. The commissioners also indicate the importance of family and ending the prevailing family violence that plagues Aboriginal communities. To solve these problems, commissioners suggest healing services run by Aboriginals that will help alleviate high rates of suicide and violence. Furthermore, this chapter makes note of the need to restructure mainstream institutions to serve the needs of Aboriginals. Primarily they indicate the need to create a holistic approach to health in which Aboriginal members will have primary control. Education is also outlined as an important aspect in need of restructuring due to high youth dropout rates that are putting into question the future of these communities. The commission calls for educational institutions that approach education with a cultural framework in mind in order to fulfill the needs of Aboriginal students. Ultimately the commission suggests an emergence of Aboriginal controlled education systems in which these individual must succeed. Lastly, the commission outlines the government’s responsibility to provide Aboriginal communities with adequate housing and basic resources such as adequate food and water. The fourth volume of this commission focuses on the different perspectives of members of different Aboriginal nations throughout Canada including women, youth, elders, Métis, the populations of the North, and Urban centers. Majority of the issues faced by these different groups arise as a need for recognition and legitimacy both within and outside of their communities. One of the most notable recommendations was the need to give access to urban aboriginal populations which will not be within the jurisdictional boundaries of Aboriginal governance, access to Aboriginal resources, in order for them to maintain contact with their culture and access equal benefits. Lastly, the final volume of the commission centers on a clear plan for the twenty years following its publication in order to achieve the goals stated within. The report includes an estimated budget for the several recommendations made within this commission and concludes that the long term economic benefits will outweigh the immediate costs. There are various limitations that have impeded the successful implementation of the recommendations within this report. Cost is one of the barriers for implementation given that the political and economic restructuring of Aboriginal communities will be an added expense for the government. Since its publication of this report Canada has experienced an economic recession which left the country in precarious economic conditions. Thus, issues of enterprise and employment became primary concerns on the legislative agenda and Aboriginal expenses were de-prioritized. Thus, the commissioners overestimate the ability of the government to fund these changes without running a deficit. Canadian institutions such as the constitution, existing legislation such as the Indian Act, and Federalism are also barriers to change. Constitutional change in Canada is a difficult and often incurs only after a court judgement has been made that forces legislative changes. Thus, documents such as the Indian Act continue to prevail despite its regressive and paternalistic nature. Moreover, the commission calls for all levels of government to work together in order to address the current issues and solutions. However, due to the constitutional jurisdictional divisions, the Aboriginal communities are under the mandate of the Federal government and thus may be often seen as a Federal issue and not within Provincial/Territorial concerns. The issues and conclusions addressed by this commission continue to be of vast importance today. Unfortunately, since the publication of the commission, Canada has made little progress to become a just and equitable nation in regards to its Aboriginal communities. Aboriginal peoples continue to be plagued by terrible living conditions. Earlier this year the United Nations published a report denouncing the devastating circumstances under which Aboriginals live within Canada and the tensions that exist between Aboriginal nations and the Canadian government (Campion-Smith, 2014). The current government took a step forward by recognizing the abuse suffered by Aboriginals within residential schools and accepted culpability by apologizing (Walkom, 2013). However, Aboriginal self governance seems to be the least of the items on the government’s policy agenda and their efforts to address issues have excluded Aboriginal leadership which fail to adhere to “renewing the relationship” between the two nations which is the ultimate objective of this commission (Walkom, 2013).
The journey for the Aboriginals to receive the right to keep and negotiate land claims with the Canadian government was long but prosperous. Before the 1970's the federal government chose not to preform their responsibilities involving Aboriginal issues, this created an extremely inefficient way for the Aboriginals to deal with their land right problems. The land claims created by the Canadian government benefited the aboriginals as shown through the Calder Case, the creation of the Office of Native Claims and the policy of Outstanding Business.
The first interpretation of sovereignty that is examined by Flanagan views sovereignty in an international sense. Sovereignty for these leaders means gaining more international power and acceptance. Flanagan argues that major international bodies such as the United Nations will be accepting such an attempt at sovereignty (71). As the second largest country in the world the geographical constraints on uniting Aboriginal people living across the country plays a significant factor. Flanagan also points to the diversity within this group; there are over six hundred bands across the ten provinces in Canada in more than 2,200 reserves. Compounding the geographical constraints facing their unity, Aboriginal bands in Canada often differ from each other significantly in their culture including language religion/customs (Flanagan 71). Many Aboriginal people now choose to live off reserve which further complicates their unity (Flanagan 73). Flanagan highlights that as many small bodies they would not be able to survive in the competition of the international community. Current international governance is extremely complex and Flanagan argues it is unlikely for poor isolated people to succeed (73). One united aboriginal voice is also highly unlikely according to Flanagan; having been freed of one power most bands would not choose to become conne...
Fleras, Augie. “Aboriginal Peoples in Canada: Repairing the Relationship.” Chapter 7 of Unequal Relations: An Introduction to Race, Ethnic and Aboriginal Dynamics in Canada. 6th ed. Toronto: Pearson, 2010. 162-210. Print.
He also assumes that they should be participated in economic cooperation, resource development and the sharing of knowledge and technologies, like they assisted non-Aboriginal people in the past time. (James Tully pg.53) Obviously, Aboriginal people get a chance to participate in the society and to get respect and rights to exert their ability. Therefore, Aboriginal are able to promote the economic development. It is sufficiently show equality between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in economic aspect. On the other hand, Tully’s states that Aboriginal people want to get power back from the government, they more likely to govern themselves and desire to delegate several of their rights to the political area. (James Tully pg.53) I will argue that it is valid to repatriate legal and political powers to Aboriginal people. Because when they self-govern accord with their own tradition and laws, it will create stabilize social order which avoid misconduct in our society. Furthermore, it offers Aboriginal people fair chance to speak in public that maintain their interest and profit. Most importantly, it recalls and emphasizes mutual respect is a factor to balance citizens between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal. So that while Aboriginal people express their voice to society, it gain
White, G. (2002). Treaty Federalism in Northern Canada: Aboriginal-Government Land Claims Board. Publius Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 89-114
Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall. The Justice System and Aboriginal People: Child Welfare. n.d. - n.d. - n.d. The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.ajic.mb.ca/volumel/chapter14.html.
LaPrairie, C. (1995). Community justice or just communities? Aboriginal communities in search of justice. Canadian Journal of Criminology. 37 (4), 521-535.
Canada likes to paint an image of peace, justice and equality for all, when, in reality, the treatment of Aboriginal peoples in our country has been anything but. Laden with incomprehensible assimilation and destruction, the history of Canada is a shameful story of dismantlement of Indian rights, of blatant lies and mistrust, and of complete lack of interest in the well-being of First Nations peoples. Though some breakthroughs were made over the years, the overall arching story fits into Cardinal’s description exactly. “Clearly something must be done,” states Murray Sinclair (p. 184, 1994). And that ‘something’ he refers to is drastic change. It is evident, therefore, that Harold Cardinal’s statement is an accurate summarization of the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationship in
Generations of native people in Canada have faced suffering and cultural loss as a result of European colonization of their land. Government legislation has impacted the lives of five generations of First Nations people and as a result the fifth generation (from 1980 to present) is working to recover from their crippled cultural identity (Deiter-McArthur 379-380). This current generation is living with the fallout of previous government policies and societal prejudices that linger from four generations previous. Unrepentant, Canada’s ‘Genocide’, and Saskatchewan’s Indian People – Five Generations highlight issues that negatively influence First Nations people. The fifth generation of native people struggle against tremendous adversity in regard to assimilation, integration, separation, and recovering their cultural identity with inadequate assistance from our great nation.
Access to land and resources is important for many aboriginal communities as a basis for the maintenance of aboriginal cultural values, financial security, and economic development. The self-government has also helped provide access to treaty rights and land claims settlements for the Aboriginal population.
Presently, access to programs and health care services is fragmented given the nature of the health care system for Aboriginal peoples (Wilson et al., 2012). The federal government is responsible for providing limited health services among Inuit living within traditional territories and status/registered Indians living on reserves (Chen et al., 2004). This responsibility is vested in the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch organizations to carry out protection activities and health promotion, and provide funding for community health programs in Inuit communities and reserves (Chen et al., 2004). Firstly, the complexity of the health care system for Aboriginal peoples has resulted in an unequal access to health services due to the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch program (FNIHB), which only applies to Inuit and Indians. Therefore, Metis and other Aboriginal peoples who do not qualify for registration under the Indian Act do not receive health services provided by FNIHB (Chen et al., 2004). Secondly, the transfer of responsibility to health boards, communities and other authorities has resulted in unequal supply of health services between territories and provinces, uneven distribution among communities, and leaves limited opportunity for increased funding (Loppie et al., 2009). It has also lead to controversy between various levels of government over the responsibility to pay for particular health services. Jurisdictional limitations, which have failed to recognize Metis identity and rights, have resulted in health disparities among the Metis population (Wilson et al., 2012). While the federal government recently decided to include Metis status in Aboriginal initiatives, the funding has not been equitable when compared to those of Inuit and First Nations or to the non-Aboriginal populations in Canada (Loppie et al., 2009). The Aboriginal health
Despite the decreasing inequalities between men and women in both private and public spheres, aboriginal women continue to be oppressed and discriminated against in both. Aboriginal people in Canada are the indigenous group of people that were residing in Canada prior to the European colonization. The term First Nations, Indian and indigenous are used interchangeably when referring to aboriginal people. Prior to the colonization, aboriginal communities used to be matrilineal and the power between men and women were equally balanced. When the European came in contact with the aboriginal, there came a shift in gender role and power control leading towards discrimination against the women. As a consequence of the colonization, the aboriginal women are a dominant group that are constantly subordinated and ignored by the government system of Canada. Thus today, aboriginal women experiences double jeopardy as they belong to more than one disadvantaged group i.e. being women and belonging to aboriginal group. In contemporary world, there are not much of a difference between Aboriginal people and the other minority groups as they face the similar challenges such as gender discrimination, victimization, and experiences injustice towards them. Although aboriginal people are not considered as visible minorities, this population continues to struggle for their existence like any other visible minorities group. Although both aboriginal men and women are being discriminated in our society, the women tends to experience more discrimination in public and private sphere and are constantly the targeted for violence, abuse and are victimized. In addition, many of the problems and violence faced by aborigin...
“In about half of the Dominion, the aboriginal rights of Indians have arguably been extinguished by treaty” (Sanders, 13). The traditions and culture of Aboriginals are vanishing at a quick pace, and along it is their wealth. If the Canadian Government restore Native rights over resource development once again, Aboriginals would be able to gain back wealth and help with the poverty in their societies. “An influential lobby group with close ties to the federal Conservatives is recommending that Ottawa ditch the Indian Act and give First Nations more control over their land in order to end aboriginal poverty once and for all” (End First). This recommendation would increase the income within Native communities, helping them jump out of
Aboriginal people groups depended on an assortment of unmistakable approaches to sort out their political frameworks and establishments prior to contact with Europeans. Later, a considerable amount of these establishments were overlooked or legitimately stifled while the national government endeavored to force a uniform arrangement of limitlessly distinctive Euro-Canadian political goals on Aboriginal social orders. For some Aboriginal people groups, self-government is seen as an approach to recover control over the administration of matters that straightforwardly influence them and to safeguard their social characters. Self-government is alluded to as an inherent right, a previous right established in Aboriginal people groups' long occupation
The question that is often brought to our nations attention is whether or not incremental equality for First Nations children is compatible with reconciliation. When considering my personal opinion, the two are in fact compatible with one another. However, Canada is still working towards reconciliation but still has not completely reached it. The working towards reconciliation within First Nations children is seen throughout many aspects in Canada. Firstly, incremental equality is trying to be reached through education. Next, incremental equality is working towards being met throughout health systems as well as behaviors. Lastly, incremental equality for First Nations children is moving towards reconciliation throughout the physical environments