Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cubism and expressionism artists
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“New Field” by Theodoros Stamos is part of the “Edward Joseph Gallagher III Memorial Collection of the University of Arizona” exhibition at the University of Arizona Museum of Art. The artwork is part of this exhibition because Mr. Gallagher donated it. The exhibition featured several pieces of work that all used color and lines to produce the essence of scenery. The artwork depicts Theodoros Stamos’ abstract expressionist style, where he uses a distinguished set of colors on a large flat canvas.
According to an article published in the New York Times, Theodoros Stamos was a Greek American artist who was one of the pioneers for expressionistic painters. Although he was a generation behind Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko, making him the youngest, he is considered part of the original group of abstract expressionist painters. The “New field” artwork is part of Stamos’s Infinity Field Lefkada Series, a series he work on that included a large variety of paintings all that took color and lines to create scenery. Theodoros Stamos attended New York’s American Artists’ School after receiving a full scholarship to study sculpture, but in 1939 he dropped out to pursue a concentration in painting. He received his first solo exhibition in 1943 and soon after became an
…show more content…
established member of the abstract expressionist. “New Field” is an oil painting on canvas that uses darker colors such as red, black, brown, green and yellow in geometric rectangular patterns. In the center of the canvas there are a series of horizontal lines in black oil that capture the attention of the audience. In addition, each of the colors takes on a set of lines using a series of brushstrokes. Each area in which the colors are situated either take on a geometric or organic shape. For instance the color brown utilizes a geometric vertical rectangle while the color red uses and organic shape that is unrestrained and acutely chaotic. The value of the work is rather dark and the amount of light in the painting is minimal, which may mean that Stamos was trying to produce a gloomy mood. However, due to the light of the University of Arizona Museum of Art the colors seem to appear more vibrant than without the light. The artwork uses a mix of both primary and secondary colors. The primary colors uses are red and yellow. However the yellow must have been mixed with a subtractive color due to the fact that the yellow is darker and duller. The secondary colors present are green, brown, and black. The value of the secondary colors are darker that range at the thirty to forty percent level. Since the art is not performance art there is not actual motion or time being displayed. There are several principals of design present in “New Field”. The artwork has variety rather than unity due to the fact that if only one side of the artwork was shown the opposite sides colors, hues, and shapes would not be predictable. In addition, the artwork is balanced in the fact that it seems to have some symmetrical balance. For example, the areas and shapes depicted in yellow weigh out the area in yellow. However, the back, green, and brown areas have an asymmetrical balance to them. The asymmetrical areas may give off disturbed feelings. Stamos’s artwork “New Field” depicts expressionist values due to the fact that he easily portrays emotion through the use of colors and shapes.
In addition, his brushstrokes enforce a rather mixed mood, one. However his art may not be non-objective due to the fact that around this time period of 1957, Stamos was painting emotions in relation to nature and the nature vibe is clearly seen with the use of colors and therefore the artwork is not non-objective because it does depict a recognizable subject. The use of green and brown can be related to trees, while yellows the sun. Overall, the artwork sticks to expressionist values while giving off a disheartened mood due to the brushstrokes and color
choices.
Tim Storrier was born in Sydney Australia in 1949. He spent his early childhood on his family's sheep station at Umagarlee, near Wellington, NSW. His mother and grandmother were interested in art, and he would draw a lot. He drew military heroes and rural subjects such as woolsheds. At the age of ten he went to boarding school in Sydney, where he spent a lot of time in the art room, painting under the influence of his teacher Ross Doig. Storrier attended the National Art School from 1967-1969.
The face of the portrait is detailed, and more naturally painted than the rest of the composition. However, the left iris exceeds her eye and extends past the normal outline. The viewer can see every single brush stroke resulting in a unique approach to the capturing human emotion. The streaky texture combines with the smoothness flow of the artist’s hand creating contrast between the hair and the face. The woman’s hair is painted with thick and chunky globs of paint. The viewer can physically see the paint rising from the canvas and flowing into the movement of the waves of hair. Throughout the hair as well as the rest of the portrait Neel abandons basic painting studies and doesn’t clean her brush before applying the next color. Because of the deliberate choice to entangle the colors on the brush it creates a new muddy palate skewed throughout the canvas. Moving from the thick waves of hair, Neel abandons the thick painting style of the physical portrait and moves to a looser more abstract technique to paint the background. Despite the lack of linear perspective, Neel uses a dry brush technique for the colorful streaks in the background creating a messy illusion of a wall and a sense of space. The painting is not clean, precise, or complete; there are intentional empty spaces, allowing the canvas to pear through wide places in the portrait. Again, Neel abandons
On February 17, 1913 the International Exhibition of Modern Art, or the Armory Show, opened to the public. It is unlikely that the some 4,000 guests milling around the eighteen rooms of the 69th Regiment Armory in New York that night could have realized the extent to which the artwork displayed would set off a revolution that would sweep the nation. Response to the Armory Show, however, was sensational. During the month long exhibition the, Armory Show became the talk of the town. The galleries were constantly full of people who came to gape at the spectacle, artists who came to study or deride, and celebrities and socialites who came to see and be seen. Former President Teddy Roosevelt even made a visit to the show praising the spirit of modernity present in the venture, but distrustful of the so called ‘radical’ art of the European avant-garde. In his response to the show published in Outlook, Roosevelt commented: “It is vitally necessary to move forward and to shake off the dead hand of the reactionaries; and yet we have to face the fact that there is apt to be a lunatic fringe among the votaries of any forward movement.”[2] In this statement Roosevelt summarized the public reactions to the show.
Artists are masters of manipulation. They create unimaginably realistic works of art by using tools, be it a paintbrush or a chisel as vehicles for their imagination to convey certain emotions or thoughts. Olympia, by Manet and Bierstadt’s Sierra Nevada Mountains both are mid nineteenth century paintings that provide the viewer with different levels of domain over the subject.
Furthermore, the art piece is only in shades of black and white, which really intensifies the sadness and darkness. The expressions on the faces, the quality of the lines, the texture, and the absence of color capture the deep emotion of the figures in such a compelling way. During the period in which the piece was created, it was popular to paint in a socialistic style. Kollwitz accurately did this in all of her pieces by depicting social movements, peasant uprisings, the impact of war, and the life of the worker. Her style can be categorized even further by saying that it was a form of German expressionism. This
Mark Rothko, born as Marcus Rothkowitz, was born September 25, 1903 in Gvinsk, Russia and by the age of ten had emigrated to the United States with his parents. He attended Yale University in the early 1920's, but never completed his formal education there. In 1925 he entered studies at the Art Students League in New York City where he started painting under the instruction of Max Weber. Although he studied under Max Weber he still considered himself as basically a self-taught painter. In the 1930's and 1940's he went through phases influenced by Expressionism and Surrealism, but from about 1947 he began to develop his own distinctive style for which he is known for today. Critics labeled Mark Rothko as an Abstract Expressionist, but defiantly he argued this association by his peers, because he did not want to be known for a certain style. When Rothko started painting, his work was more symbolic than...
Goldwater, Robert and Marco Treves (eds.). Artists on Art: from the XIV to the XX Century. New York: Pantheon Books, 1945.
I have never seen myself as an art museum enthusiast, nor have I ever been able to actually appreciate art and the messages it expresses. But never before have I ever been so taken away by an artist's work. Through his unique, inventive use of technology, Robert Buelteman proves in his images of "Through the Green Fuse," the momentary beauty of plants and their visual metaphors for human life. Buelteman's "Cortaderia Selloana" meaning Pampas Grass, caught my eye as soon as I entered his gallery. The colors and form of the image are breathtaking and even furthermore, his process for the creation of this image is fascinating. His choices of exotic plants all of whose characteristics range from delicate to dramatic seem to have been so meticulously chosen and for this piece in particular, pampas grass was a perfect selection because of how sharp and defined each blade of grass is. Buelteman's true messages of these images are expressed not only through his inventive process but through the media he incorporates into the process.
This essay will be a visual description of White Trumpet Flower, an oil painting of 75.6 cm x 100.9 cm in dimensions made by American modernist artist Georgia O’Keefe in 1932. Each paragraph will closely analyze and describe the presence of each formal element of art in the composition. As a whole, the picture illustrates an enlarged white trumpet flower using, what I believe is a combination between sponge painting and smooth brushstrokes, which brings the flower to life and gives the composition a truly naturalistic touch. The surface of the painting appears to be smooth, which contrasts with the visual texture of the composition. In terms of the composition arrangement, this piece of art displays a sense of radical balance, as the main focal point lays in the center - right at the heart of the trumpet, then our visual movement slowly circles out onto the bending white petals, then onto the darker cold colored leaves, which respectively, slowly blend into barely noticeable gray background, only left to occupy less than 10 percent of the surrounding space.
When a person feels sad, they sit by a rainy windowsill, bathe in despondency, and belt along to Celine Dion’s 1996 hit, “All By Myself”; when they turn terrified by the circumstances surrounding them in the post-WWi era, wrought with unemployment and economic ruin, they invent art-house, pastiche horrors that influences large-scale branches of cinema. In Robert Wiene’s ground-breaking German Expressionist, Das Cabinet des Dr.Caligari (The Cabinet of Dr.Caligari) (1922), and F.W. Murnau’s Expressionistic-Kammerspielfilm, Der letzte Mann (The Last Laugh) (1924), a range of audience-broadening experiments are taken within silent film; rooted in the up rise of German expressionism, socio-political horrors of post-war Germany are exploited in
In this oil-on-canvas painting by Kandinsky, titled “Yellow Red Blue”, the viewer immediately senses a warmth and vibrancy emanating from the picture. It consists of multiple shapes, lines and tones that are all uniquely different, yet somehow manage to form a cohesive whole. This serves to bring about an air of organised chaos, which may evoke emotions of
As I read this work of art, my mind was transported to my favorite place in the outdoors. My imagination was filled with the waving of the tall grass, the stillness of the trees, and the feeling that time is standing still and I’m the only one who notices. For example, it sparked the idea, or memory, of how much I love nature and the outdoors, and the great sense of peace it brings to me. In an instant, it showed me how far I had drifted from that mindset.
...f the shadows is sprinkled with the orange of the ground, and the blue-violet of the mountains is both mixed with and adjacent to the yellow of the sky. The brushstrokes that carry this out are inspired by the Impressionists, but are more abundant and blunter than those an Impressionist would use.
In order to answer that question, one must delve into the world of color. As shown throughout his art, Brown focuses on color and fluidity. Brown’s desire is for one’s eye to move about the page, for them to question the colors within the piece. In the interview with Elena Cue, Brown was asked, “What meaning do you give color?” In his answer he described how he “steals” color from other artists while explaining how opposite or different colors in a painting create a different but real reality. By painting opposite colors onto the canvas he heightens reality. This effect is achieved because the color reminds the viewer that what they are looking at is not reality, but a painting created by Glenn Brown. An example of one of these paintings would be, Die Mutter des Künstlers (2016). This panting is a reproduction of one of Delacroix’s paintings in which he painted a model known as Mademoiselle Rose. In the original she is performing a basic pose while seated on a block, whereas Glenn Brown transforms her into a ghostly figure. In this painting he crops her the block and her head, dulls the background, and casts the entire picture in a seemingly ethereal blue. The physical changes to the model and the color of the painting severs the connection that the painting once shared with reality, creating a space where the viewer is faced with fiction and
Between the nineteenth and twentieth century came a time of self-expression and reflection. This time became known as the Expressionism movement and focused on boldly creating a personal and emotional experience through art. Conventional artistic stylings were cast aside as each artist discovered their own creative voice. Artists of all mediums emphasized state of mind and the essence of the human condition through bold representations of their own psyche. Edvard Munch’s painting, “The Scream” and Fritz Lang’s film, “Metropolis,” both convey aggressive emotional characteristic of the Expressionist movement through exaggerated compositional elements, distorted stylistic choices and evocative technique.