Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Materialism and american culture
Materialism and american culture
An-analysis-of-kurt-vonnegut-writing-style/p3jyvzxkuykw
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Materialism and american culture
“The Foster Portfolio,” is a short story piece within Kurt Vonnegut’s Welcome To The Monkey House. Differentiating the piece from the others is the ironic touch “The Foster Portfolio” seems to carry that is different from Vonnegut’s short comically audacious works. Vonnegut realized this is a materialistic world where people evaluated by their physical features, and possessions of the moment. Small details such as what shoes are being worn, what kind of car stands in the driveway, and how one is attired is speculated before partaking in a conversation with them. Within the introduction of each character they are described using the objects around them, attire, physical attributes, and social standing is made clear to the reader. Therefore, …show more content…
this is a story about appearances, and what is truly hiding beneath them. The storyline exemplifies the challenge of human nature in a materialistic driven society and the lengths to which one will go to indulge in their true passions. Herbert Foster’s wife is found her in her niche. Portrayed as a scrawny, “shrewish- looking woman” that has a dulled out smile, and she is first presented surrounded by unfolded clean laundry. The narrator has difficulty distinguishing her features from the “clash” around her. Painting her into the scene around her, hard to peel her out of. That is her life of a family bound, god-fearing housewife and that’s where she belongs. She represents being restricted by the appearance she upholds. Most people would like to make so much money they will never have to work another day in their lives and afford sumptuous things.
Vonnegut construes Jim’s occupation is evaluating bond value and handling large sums money for a living, as a result he is superficial and judges based on the bountifulness he sees. Although he does not seem to have acquired any substantial amount of money, he adopts the appearance of a victorious businessman because of the desperation he has that one day he will become one. “Since I don’t have a portfolio, my job is a little like being a hungry delivery boy for a candy store” (Vonnegut 59). He puts on a clean fake façade of the man he really wants to …show more content…
be. This story promotes the reader to look past monetary value and seek a true pleasure in life no matter the cost.
Vonnegut hopes to reach out to the common working class, the ones that are constantly seeking improvement in terms of material luxuriance. Upon meeting his new client, Jim's shallow views are tested. Because Herbert’s lifestyle is quite humble, Jim is forced to look within and doubt his life choices. Herbert Foster appears as a conservative man with strict moral values. Herbert resorts to living a lie because he is overcome with desperation to conserve his impoverished status so he can consequently retain his guilty life pleasure concealed. Although he most certainly does not need to, considering the inheritance bestowed. “Herbert already had what he wanted. He had had it long before the inheritance or I intruded. He had the respectability his mother had hammered into him. But just as priceless as that was an income not quite big enough to go around. It left him no alternative but… to play piano in a dive, and breathe smoke, and drink gin, to be Firehouse Harris, his father’s son, three nights out of seven.” (Vonnegut
73-74) Herbert Foster lives his dream, he has what he wants and he doesn’t care the cost he pays every day of having a jerrybuilt home, furniture from a discount mart, secondhand car, and eating out of a brown-bag lunch sandwiches made with the less expensive spread. His love for jazz music in a dusty, smoky honky tonk looking dive supersedes his self-control. As it said it is not a disgrace to live that way; Many Americans do in fact. Foster exemplifies the lifestyle of the American middle lower class and the contentment of having a simple guilty pleasure. Even if it is despicable and is contrary from our own held values. Which explains the fact mister Foster feels the need to uphold such a façade.
Vonnegut deals a lot with fantasy in his book, Cat's Cradle. From the beginning, he talks about the religion that he follows: Bokonism. This is not a real religion, however he has rules, songs, scriptures, and opinions of a person that practices this fantasy religion. Within his description of this religion however is black humor as well. I think that by him making up this whole religion and an entire island of people who follow it, is in a way mocking today's religion and the way that people are dedicated to their beliefs.
Danny Kaye, famous actor and comedian, once said, "To travel is to take a journey into yourself". He is suggesting that by seeing a new part of the world, one is inevitably confronted with deeper realizations about one’s self. Thomas C. Foster, author of How to Read Literature Like a Professor, would likely agree. In his book, he argues that every trip in literature is actually a quest. The word "quest" conjures images of knights in shining armor, princesses, and dragons, but Foster uses the word in a more archetypal sense. A journey, Foster says, needs only to fit five relatively simple criteria to be considered a quest (1-3). Quoyle, the protagonist of Annie Proulx's novel, The Shipping News, undergoes a life-changing journey that clearly meets all necessary criteria set forth by Foster to be regarded as a quest.
In one of the scenes, Jim is caught between trying to prove his masculinity or staying home and being the good son that his parents have yearned for. He struggles emotionally and physically, mainly because his parents do not live up to society’s expectations of
Kurt Vonnegut's apocalyptic novel, Cat's Cradle, might well be called an intricate network of paradox and irony. It is with such irony and paradox that Vonnegut himself describes his work as "poisoning minds with humanity...to encourage them to make a better world" (The Vonnegut Statement 107). In Cat's Cradle, Vonnegut does not tie his co-mingled plots into easy to digest bites as the short chapter structure of his story implies. Rather, he implores his reader to resolve the paradoxes and ironies of Cat's Cradle by simply allowing them to exist. By drawing our attention to the paradoxical nature of life, Vonnegut releases the reader from the necessity of creating meaning into a realm of infinite possibility. It appears that Vonnegut sees the impulse toward making a better world as fundamental to the human spirit; that when the obstacle of meaning is removed the reader, he supposes, will naturally improve the world.
After seeing both his father and brother find success, Willy attempts to prove himself to his family by chasing after his own version of the American dream. Willy grows up in the “wild prosperity of the 1920’s” when rags-to-riches tales inspire everybody, making them believe that “achieving material success [is] God’s intention for humankind (Abbotson, Criticism by Bloom). Willy’s father, a “very great” and “wildhearted man,” made a living traveling and selling flutes, making “more in a week than a man like [Willy] could make in a lifetime” (Miller 34). Even though Willy barely knew his dad, he built him u...
One of the best, most valuable aspects of reading multiple works by the same author is getting to know the author as a person. People don't identify with Gregor Samsa; they identify with Kafka. Witness the love exhibited by the many fans of Hemingway, a love for both the texts and the drama of the man. It's like that for me with Kurt Vonnegut, but it strikes me that he pulls it off in an entirely different way.
Kurt Vonnegut, critically acclaimed author of several best-selling novels, uses self-expression and psychological manipulation to stress to the reader his beliefs and ideas dispersed within the context of Cat's Cradle. From reading this novel, one might attribute perplexity pondering over the plot and general story line of the book. Cat's Cradle entangles itself in many interesting changes of events; strange outlandish ideas and psychological "black holes" can be found with just the flip of a page.
... American Dream that was sold in society at the time after World War II can overshadow the actual meaning in real life. The “American Dream” is, in the end, defined as a comfortable living in a happy house. Instead, the materialistic society back then attempted to sell it in terms of appliances and products that were not needed, and unaffordable. They marketed it to the middle-class by attracting them to the aspect of credit, buying it with money that they don’t have. As Willy’s neighbor claimed at his funeral, Willy was merely a victim of his profession, leaving him with an unhealthy obsession with an image that was unrealistic, especially for them. This dissatisfaction with his life, and his misinterpretation of the “American Dream”, led to his downfall as a tragic hero, and a death that went in vain, as his son failed to follow the plan he had laid out for him.
Andrew Foster was a teacher, missionary, and pioneer, He dedicated his life to helping Deaf people learn ASL, and working to assure that Deaf people in Africa had access to education. He was passionate about helping the less fortunate, and felt compelled to go to Africa to do mission work. He stated in some of his writings that he was, “moved by this vast educational and spiritual void among my people.”
Money is the get-all, give-all in Gatsby’s version of the American dream. If one can obtain lots of money to impress the women, then he must have it made; Realists disagree with this mindset. ‘“[Gatsby] wants her to see his house,” she explained. “And your [Nick’s] house is right next door (84).” ’
The thought of having an immense sum of money or wealth brings certain people to believe that money can buy almost anything, even happiness, however in reality, it will only lead to loss and false hope. In the novel, The Great Gatsby, the author, F. Scott Fitzgerald, writes a story about a man named Gatsby who is a victim of this so-called false hope and loss. Throughout the novel, Fitzgerald clearly demonstrates and elaborates on the relationship between having money, wealth, and one's ethics or integrity by acknowledging the idea that the amount of money or wealth one has attained does affect the relationship between one's wealth and one's ethics whether or not in a pleasant manner. Although money and wealth may not be able to buy a person happiness, it surely can buy a person's mind and action, given that a wealthy person has a great deal of power. Fitzgerald analyzes the notion that even though many people dream of being both rich and ethical, it is not possible, and therefore, being poor and ethical is much better than trying to be rich and ethical.
Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle I believe that Vonnegut uses Cat's Cradle as an allegorical tale about what will happen to the world if we are not careful with technology that has the ability to end life on this planet. He points out one of the qualities of humanity: that people make mistakes, thus poisoning our minds and encouraging a better world. One of the obvious ways that Vonnegut uses this book to "encourage a better world" would be by showing that the end of the world may come from an accidental release of technology. At the time when this book was written, nuclear war seemed to be almost a certainty.
Money, Love, and Aspiration in The Great Gatsby." P. 51
The American dream described in the play can be achievable, but Willy’s ways of achieving that American dream leads him to a failure. According to an article published by the South Atlantic Modern Language Association, the play builds the idea of American dream that it is harmful and immoral as long as it is based on selfishness and greediness. However, the dream us described realistic when it is achieved on values that ar...
Miller connotes the 20th century increasing concerns of the American Dream with the moral implications of becoming free from debt, being looked down upon if they could not self-sustain. The firing of Willy “I think you need a good long rest” emphasises the fleeting nature of materialism if Willy is not an invaluable component of the business he is dismissed thus objectified as a commodity, asserting pressures upon Willy to perform to society’s expectations, particularly Ben whom “walked out (of the jungle)... and by God, I was rich!” Through repetition of “I’m the New England man. I’m vital in New England.” Willy falsely insists that he is a critical player in his business in order to bolster his sense of self worth and desire to satisfy his family’s expectations, associated with the false projection of the American Dream. The imagery of “Sometimes I wanna just rip my clothes off in the middle of the store...I can’t stand it anymore.” accentuates Happy’s compulsion to tear off his clothes and attack his co-workers which afflicts society’s standards, and thus reinforces the frustration with the importance of appearances. Willy attempts to fabricate the image of a “self made man” acting as the major breadwinner, conversely the reality remains in the metaphor of Willy as a “small, fragile- seeming home”, highlighted further by the