Summary Of The Doctors Plague By Nuland

705 Words2 Pages

Imagine a world where there was a great chance of a mother dying right after giving birth to her child. Sounds like a pretty crazy supposition. Unfortunately, not too long ago, that was the world we called home. Nuland’s book discusses the unfortunate tragedies of puerperal fever and the journey the medical field in Europe took to discover a cause and prevention. Hand in hand, Nuland also depicts the life of Ignác Semmelweis, the unknown founder of the aforementioned cause and prevention strategies: washing hands in chloride of lime. The Doctors’ Plague is a worthwhile read based off the information provided, its ability to break new ground, and the credibility of its author and sources. The overall information covered in the novel was vast. …show more content…

The reason Semmelweis is the unknown founder of the cure for childbed fever is because he never concretely published or shared his findings. Thankfully, Nuland has taken the time to compile all of this information to share Semmelweis’ story. Admittedly, before reading this book, I had never heard of childbed fever or Semmelweis. With today’s advances in medicine, there was never a need to know. Nevertheless, by taking the steps to publish the story of the life of Semmelweis’ and his important findings, Nuland broke new ground. Nuland was the first to put two and two together to inform the medical and historical fields of this great mans discovery. By writing the Doctors’ Plague, Nuland finally can give Semmelweis the recognition he so thouroughly deserves. Additionally, the credibility of the author and sources is important when considering the Doctors’ Plague as a book choice. Nuland is very qualified himself, being a surgeon, a professor of medicine, a professor of history of medicine and an author. Just as Nuland is credible, so is the information in the Doctor’s Plauge. In the chapters where Nuland references other peoples findings when giving background information about childbed fever, Nuland makes sure to give them credit. Moreover, his use of selected quotes helps to tie all of the information together that make the novel the gem it …show more content…

One weakness can be found with the way the information flowed together, sometimes making the text either difficult to follow, or in the second and third chapters, quite dry. Also, in my edition of the book, one of the few pictures Nuland decided to add to supplement his writing was a complete waste of space. The pictures were supposed to show the differences between Ingác Semmelweis over a span of a few years, but the reader can’t even see any differences because the printing quality was absolutely terrible. Still, the overall strengths of the book overrule the few flaws mentiones. The Doctors’ Plague was a meaningful book to read because of the information provided, its ability to break new ground, and the credibility of its author and evidence. Overall, there were more strengths than weaknesses, and this served to cement new knowledge into the reader’s heads. I would recommend this book to anyone in the medical field, as well as for anyone who likes

Open Document