The book of Daniel is probably one of the most important books in the entire Bible. Daniel not only deals with history, stories, biblical principles, and general accounts, but also deals with prophecy (both immediate and apocalyptic), thus setting the stage for everything that happens thereafter. Daniel deals with historical accounts as well as with prophecies that have already been fulfilled and those that will be fulfilled.
Daniel also plays a vital role in a Christian’s beliefs. There are many fundamental truths and principles that can be found in this book. The prophecies in this book hold many of the major proofs of a pre-tribulation rapture. The accounts in this book provide vital lessons to the Christian (i.e. Daniel’s conviction,
…show more content…
For many years, scoffers have been trying to discredit and disprove the book of Daniel. If the credibility of this book can be dismissed, then many of the beliefs we have from this book will also be discredited! Critics often attack Daniel in two areas: its authenticity and its authorship. For the most part, these 2 go hand-in-hand. Many try to say that Daniel is just a compilation of writings, with only a small portion written by Daniel. Although Daniel was written sometime in the 6th century B.C. (Ray), many often argue that it was written in the 2nd century B.C. A late authorship would imply that the fulfilled prophecies in Daniel (i.e. the rise and fall of empires, the first abomination of desolation, etc.) were written after those particular events occurred, thus disproving that these events were predicted. There are many …show more content…
Daniel 7:28; 8:1, 15; 9:2; 10:2; and 12:4-5 all point to the fact that Daniel was the one penning this book. Daniel referred to himself often when he was writing, which gives assurance of its authorship. Jesus also referred to Daniel as the author of the book. Mark 13:14 says, “But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:”; Matthew 24:15 expresses a similar statement that references a prophecy made in Daniel 9:27.
Prophecies in Revelation often correspond with prophecies in the book of Daniel. These books coincide with each other in their descriptions of the events of the rapture and tribulation. In fact, although Revelation gives us many of the details regarding end times, Daniel gives a very clear timeline of those events. These books work together to try and give us an accurate depiction of the “last days.” The Bible often confirms itself by cross-referencing among books, and the authorship/authenticity of Daniel is no
Joseph Hirsch’s painting Daniel was painted in 1976-1977. In 1978 during the153rd Annual Exhibition of the National Academy of Design, it won the First Benjamin Altman (Figure) prize. It measures 38 inches by 45 inches (96.52 cm x 114.3 cm) with a five inch gold wood frame surrounding it. The medium is oil on canvas. Everything within the painting is centered to draw your eyes to the action of the turned head and the pointed finger. According to the placard next to the painting this is a modern day version of the biblical story of Belshazzar’s Feast following the sacking of Jesualism from the Book of Daniel. From this point on, each figure within the painting will be addressed as Hirsch intended. The painting depicts a seated king, a dozing courtesan and Daniel. The three figures are the focal point of the composition. Hirsch uses a strong color palette to give the painting a luxurious and wealthy feel. Although the detail is not miniscule, the composition as a whole is easily understood. The use of oil paint allowed Hirsch to play with the composition as it was created.
Much of Revelation is the source of debate. Many passages are symbolic in nature, and the exact meaning of the symbols can be difficult to determine. Some passages can be interpreted in various ways. The identity of the Four Horsemen, the 144,000, and Babylon the Great in particular are points of contention. Nevertheless, proper hermeneutics and careful study can illuminate these difficult passages.
This paper is written to discuss the many different ideas that have been discussed over the first half of Theology 104. This class went over many topics which gave me a much better understanding of Christianity, Jesus, and the Bible. I will be addressing two topics of which I feel are very important to Christianity. First, I will be focusing on the question did Jesus claim to be God? This is one of the biggest challenges of the Bibles that come up quite often. Secondly, I will focus on character development.
The Book of Daniel is the only full-blown apocalyptic book in the Protestant recognized version of the Canon. A literary device divides the book into two halves. Chapters 1-6 are a collection of stories that introduces the reader to Daniel and three other Israelites as unwilling guests of the Babylonian Empire ruled by Nebuchadnezzar. The second half, Chapters 7-12, consists of apocalyptic imagery of deformed beasts and the heavenly court. The focus of this paper will be on chapter 7, which serves as a bridge between the two halves.
Correspondingly, other canonical prophetic books interpret Yahweh’s will during periods of social or political crisis.4 Many minor prophets wrote during one of the three critical periods: the Assyrian Crisis, the Babylonian threat, or the postexilic readjustment.5 During the Babylonian threat of the late-seventh century, Habakkuk served as a link between God and humanity. The Assyrian kingdom, led by Shalmanasar V, forced the people of Judah into harsh conditions through a heartless deportation. In time, political drama spread throughout the region. After 612 B.C.E. when Assyria fell to Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, Habakkuk wrote his prophetic book, focusing on the agony of humankind’s struggle to progress in such a wicked world. His message of faith and morality transcended the evil within society, ultimately revealing to the Israelites that justice would prevail.
"Revelation, n. A famous book in which St. John the Divine concealed all that he knew. The revealing is done by the commentators, who know nothing."1 The book of Revelation, the only apocalypse among the twenty-seven books of the New Testament, has always occupied a marginal role within the field of Biblical interpretation. Its bizarre visions of beasts, dragons, plagues, and cataclysms have inspired poets and artists while confounding more traditionally minded scholars for centuries. England in the early seventeenth century proved an exception to this rule. The flowering of apocalyptic exegesis in this period among academic circles bestowed a new respectability on the book of Revelation as a literal roadmap of church history from the time of Christ to the present, and on into the eschaton. The principal writers in this field, including Arthur Dent, Thomas Brightman, and Joseph Mede, have been dubbed "Calvinist millenarians" by modern historiography. They were certainly Calvinist in their views on doctrine, and also in their melioristic vision of England as the consummation of the Reformation, as an elect nation with the potential to recreate the true church of the early Christians. Their intense belief in the imminence of the end of the world, however, along with the mode of interpretation which they applied to the Revelation, reflected trends in Christian thought redirected by Martin Luther, and largely ignored by John Calvin.
However, always it have to be careful that the interpretation of each of the prophecies has to be guaranteed by the scriptures, if the prophecy fail to be endorsed, and supported by the scriptures this shall be taken as false.
Works Cited: Aune, David E. Revelation 1-5. Word Biblical Commentary 52A. Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1997. Bauckham, Richard. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. New Testament Theology.
The First Book of Samuel, named after Samuel himself, can be found in the Old Testament and is also part of the Deuteronomistic History. There are many scholars that believe Samuel himself wrote this book, but the authorship is still relatively unknown. The First Book of Samuel appears to be written during the divided monarchy but before the fall of the northern kingdom. The Book tells the stories of Samuel, Saul, and David. The first part of the book describes the birth and story of Saul. The second part describes the relationship between Samuel and Saul. Finally, the third part describes the relationship between Saul and David.
Scholars also believe the text of 1 Samuel and 2 Samuel were originally one manuscript. These scholars believe the book of Samuel was written as a part of a whole sequence beginning with Joshua and ending with Kings. Others believe two literary sources lay behind the present form of Samuel. Though differences have been noted, such as the story of David and Goliath being much shorter in the Septuagint, these scholars still have not determined the author, time of writing or the purpose of the text. I noted some minor textual differences in my research but the main theme and message remained the same in all sources that I verified.
...f God’s glory and for those that have questioned their faith. The book urges the reader to consider the sacrifices Jesus made, his role as a messenger and mediator, and the ability of people to find salvation through the acceptance of Jesus. These are central messages that other portions of the Bible touch on but do not discuss with the same degree or urgency.
No part of the Bible and its interpretation is more controversial than the book of Revelation. The book of Revelation is the last profound book in the New Testament. It conveys the significant purpose of Christianity by describing God’s plan for the world and his final judgment of the people by reinforcing the importance of faith and the concept of Christianity as a whole. This book was written by John in 95 or 96 AD. What is, what has been, and what is to come is the central focus of the content in Revelation.
Ezekiel’s message and profile as a prophet ended after twenty years. This is the same as that of Daniel and Jeremiah. Another similarity was that these prophets saw their prophesies come true and thus, they feared God even more. Jeremiah witnesses the prophesied destruction of Jerusalem and as it were, Daniel experienced the earlier invasion by Nebuchadnezzar, and was taken into captivity. The main approach in Ezekiel, bring out the notion that every individual has his own responsibility to God and the rules or laws of God. Ezekiel mentions, subtly, that God will punish individuals for personal transgressions. In contrast, earlier prophets had insisted on collective punishment for groups of people and punishment and sins of a nation as compared to the individual.
“Book of Daniel”. New King James Version of the Holy Bible. Thomas Nelson Publishers. Nashville. 1982.
Documentary hypothesis says that there were several authors who wrote first five books of the Bible. In my essay I will try to discuss J, P, and E - authors of Genesis, Exodus and Numbers. I must admit that all these authors had lived after the division of the kingdom.