Summary Of Rob Ford: Toronto Finally Knows The Truth

1032 Words3 Pages

Rob Ford: Toronto Finally Knows the Truth is a very biased article written by John Cruickshank, published by the Toronto Star on Friday November 1st of 2013, about then mayor of Toronto, Rob Ford, who has since passed away. The article writes of the dispute between Ford and the Star's journalists, and of the allegations against Ford stating that he has been spotted smoking cocaine and expressing homophobic and racist statements. The article is quick to remind the readers in every opportunity, of the evil, Ford, and the good, The journalists. It writes of Ford and his brother asking their supporters to cancel their subscription of the Star, because of their belief that the Star's form of journalism is "unethical". It mentions Mr. Ford's "drug …show more content…

Bias is always unfair, and almost always bad, but it is very common regardless.

Rob Ford: Toronto Finally Knows the Truth does not fail to antagonize Ford at every turn, from calling his actions, as reasonable as they are, a "brilliantly cynical and manipulative campaign", to calling Doug Ford "Mr. Ford's thuggish brother", and to naming Ford a deceiver and a liar over a video, which might not even be proof of the drug allegations. The emotionally charged words work against Ford and very much in favour of the journalists. Cruickshank, the author of the article, writes of the Star and it's workers, calling it "powerless [under Ford] to defend their own integrity", "wise and enormously experienced", "extraordinary reporting", and calling its sources, usually unnamed in articles, "deep and knowledgeable". Another form of bias obvious through the article is the use of we. Cruickshank uses we many times throughout the article, sometimes meaning it as we the journalists, but other times as we the people, which manipulates the reader into believing whatever is written without them realizing. An example …show more content…

This gives the power to media to speak of people the way they want, which is not what the media is supposed to do, but it is what is done nevertheless. As students learn at school, a report is not supposed to be biased, but it is virtually impossible to find an unbiased article today. Because of free speech, the Star can state what they think are the problems with the mayor, the prime minister, and probably even the queen. Others can read this article and decide either to agree or disagree with it, but they can form an opinion without having to worry about their safety. As stated in the story, this article might just stop Ford from receiving a seat in the coming election. That is how powerful it is. The problem with democracy in this case is the same thing as what was stated above. This article is clearly very biased, but it might nonetheless take away Ford's political career if it convinces enough people. If the majority agree with this article and not vote for Ford, he is going to lose his job, regardless of the allegations' state of

Open Document