How do observations of an ordinary and personal custom (in this case, a birthday party), evolve into reflections on the disturbing realties of everyday life? In “Rite of Passage”, the speaker in Sharon Olds poem impassively relates how first-grade boys (including her son) participate in and view violence as an achievement. Through a Post-Modern focus on society’s more intimate and hushed truths, the poem speaks on the unspoken norms of the path from boyhood to manhood. Disclosing social conventions, which automatically accept and propagate what is the standard role for boys. The role of an aggressor. The result is a myriad of possible meanings in a text, which at first appears to satirize those assumptive roles. Yet, the speaker of the poem …show more content…
recognizes the innate capacity for violence, in the boys. Contrasting the behaviors of the boys at the birthday party, with that of men engaged in warfare, serves to decenter the reader to the “as it is” state of the world. In “Rite of Passage”, the pre-conceived positive associations one connects with a birthday celebration, take a deviation towards the destructive. In true Post-Modern fashion, Olds seeks to disturb her readers to incite changes in perspective and make them question the existing social acceptance of aggression in boys; Bringing a conscious awareness to the issue, through use of discordant metaphor, similes, and structure. Foremost, “Rite of Passage” snares a reader with a Post-Modern use of an unusually extended metaphor, which creates intense and unexpected images of quarrelsome little boys, morphed into the aggressive warriors they could become. Through the metaphor, the mother assesses the boys conduct and words as being comparable with the stages of battle. At first, it seems benign, with the little men’s induction into manhood consisting of an image of them standing about, while mentally testing each other’s capabilities and merits. Then skirmishes erupt and subside as they progress to testing each other’s physical strength, as well as their place amongst the age and power determinant social hierarchy, that is manhood. Consequently, engaging in the prospective role that men are obligated to play when in the company of other men, a role that is rarely thought about. The expected peer and societal roles for boys to rival each other, and to be stronger, tougher, superior than each other is powerfully depicted. The imagery of little boys as men engaging in war tactics is uncomfortable, because rough-housing and aggression is often perceived as “boys just being boys” and insignificant. The discordant imagery is meant to have the reader consider that the youngest boys have a potential for violence and aggression, and treating it as meaningless behavior, only trains boys to fill that role early on, to attain their established place in society. In the same way, Olds use of incongruous similes are Post-Modern in how they discomfit the reader, causing an awareness of how boys fighting can be portrayed as insignificant, yet be momentous.
After the little men size each other up and prepare for battle, the speaker evokes comparison to an uncompromising image of grim little “bankers” evaluating each other’s abilities as a possible opponent. Just as how grown men are conditioned from an early age to view other men as possible rivals for position, strength, influence, and so they must be more competitive and aggressive. How else can they “win” those battles? The imagery advances to those of war preparations, when an ordinarily anticipated chocolate birthday cake, is compared to the forbidding vision of a menacing turret. One looming in the background, warning of how men must keep their guard up and always be strong. In the next simile, the reader is jarred by (yet welcomes) the speakers sudden change in vision, with the soothing thought of her son’s freckles likened to sprinkles of nutmeg, and his body like a patiently put together model boat. That’s more fitting with how the speaker and parents want to view their own boys, as peaceful and able to patiently mediate opposing sides, not as a part of the opposition. Meanwhile, her son’s surprising comment, about the boy’s collective power to destroy someone younger than all of them, returns the reader to the battleground, and serves to unite the now “General” like boy-men. …show more content…
The little Generals are now agreeing on the same common enemy, but the remark and the son have both lost some of their innocence. There’s the impression that this simile is meant to warn that these aren’t’ simply boys at odds, they’re boys who’ll grow up to be engaged in the conflicts of politics, war, and economics. The odd similes function to discomfort the reader, as it’s generally human nature to want to see the best in one’s sons (no matter what), but it’s worth examining how ignoring and permitting early signs of aggression in boys, only helps foster their idea of what’s expected of them later in life. Consistently, Olds disturbs the reader and makes them pay attention, with the nonconformist overall structure of the poem. One that appropriately conflicts with an account of boys seen conforming to what men should be. It tests what a reader is conditioned to expect a poem to look and read like. In effect, reminding readers that nothing can be taken for granted, and how young boys are conditioned to prove their strength and conquer each other. The poem’s free verse and lack of breaks in the lines looks disorderly, yet unremitting. Rather like the little men at the birthday party, and the disjointed tension created by the speaker’s matter of fact observations. The three italicized lines of the poem allows the reader to hear some of the boys’ words, which the mother hears. Comparable to the poems figurative language, Olds purposefully has the boys spoken lines stand out to disturb the reader. Each italicized line becomes more steadily aggressive, in keeping with the behavior of the boy-men’s growing conflict. The first “How old are you? —Six. —I’m seven. —So?” seems to be an insignificant questioning between two boys as to their age. Even so, the question mark at the end of “So?” marks a show of disdain on the part of the six-year-old, as well as an effort to assert their power. The battle lines are drawn, while Olds drawn the reader into the boys’ uncertain battle, as the tension rises. The second instance of italics has a seven-year-old bragging he could beat up a six-year-old, and the verbal sparring officially turns violent. A result of conditioning boys to believe they must physically get the better of each other and assert their authority. The final use of italics occurs after the mother’s reflection of the birth and innocence of her son, when her son speaks up with an ironic and hyperbolically succinct statement of how they “. . . could easily kill a two-year-old”. Which also ironically diffuses the boys’ threats of battle and aggression, leveling them as equals, for the moment. Through her son’s assertion, the mother comes to the realization that her son is and will be a part of the intense social expectancies placed on boys. Likewise, it’s also meant for the reader deliberate over the distressing idea that society helps create men who are aggressive and violent with each other. Consequently, Old’s goal in “Rite of Passage”, is to unsettle readers as to the passive and fixed expectations that boys should be aggressive to mature into ruthless men who view each other as rivals.
The Post-Modern intent, is for the reader to question why society obligates boys to submit each other to verbal and physical contests. Primarily, as a method of establishing their powerful masculinity. Juxtaposing a birthdays party’s celebratory rite of life, alongside young boys engaged in the warlike rite of passage for a boy to become, emphasizes the offensiveness of those roles. Olds sets out to disrupt readers points of view, and she succeeds. The use of jarring imagery and rebellious poetic structure, aids in conveying unsettling images of aggressive young boys, who grow up to be even more aggressive men. The poem implores readers to be concerned about the severe pressures mindlessly placed on boys, compelling them to conform to the part of the aggressor. Olds wants readers to ask why boys are brought up to be so aggressive, and to recognize their own possible
culpability.
...ir eyes off of the naked women dancing. The outbursts towards the black men is farther evidence that during that time, blacks had little to no say and had not felt equal to their white counterparts. Perhaps the most conspicuous symbol of all is the battle itself. The white men pitted a group of black men against each other; the black men were in a no win situation. Instead of expressing their displeasure with the white men, the black men were forced to take their anger out on each other. The narrator also seems to seek approval by the white men; remembering his speech as he fights the other men. According to the protagonist: Should I try to win against the voice out there? Would not this go against my speech, and was not this a moment for humility, for nonresistance?” ( ). He’s worried about defying the white men; letting them down by not performing well enough.
In her poem “The School Children”, Louise Gluck uses imagery by applying an extended metaphor to show how going to school is similar to going to battle and by describing the mothers’ actions through the use of vivid verbs to portray the disconnection between children and their guardians, despite the sacrifices that mothers make.
...escribable sadness that lurks in the air around them. The way the young child will not be satisfied sends his father into a frustrated resentment of modern society. People take too much for granted in a place of hope, privileges, and freedom while war drags on in another country, ten thousand miles away. The appreciation of youthful innocence is thus juxtaposed with selfishness and an inability to be satisfied, which seems to create a double tone that creates a contrast about the reality of humanity. Sometimes we can never be content with what we have until something is lost or sacrificed. In youth and innocence, satisfaction and the appreciation of the world around us seem to come more easily, perhaps because life has not yet been tainted by greed. It may be part of human nature that, as one grows, his desires become more complex and thus more difficult to satiate.
Intergenerational conflicts are an undeniable facet of life. With every generation of society comes new experiences, new ideas, and many times new morals. It is the parent’s job go work around these differences to reach their children and ensure they receive the necessary lessons for life. Flannery O’Connor makes generous use of this idea in several of her works. Within each of the three short stories, we see a very strained relationship between a mother figure and their child. We quickly find that O’Conner sets up the first to be receive the brunt of our attention and to some extent loathing, but as we grow nearer to the work’s characteristic sudden and violent ending, we grow to see the finer details and what really makes these relations
Through diction, the tone of the poem is developed as one that is downtrodden and regretful, while at the same time informative for those who hear her story. Phrases such as, “you are going to do bad things to children…,” “you are going to suffer… ,” and “her pitiful beautiful untouched body…” depict the tone of the speaker as desperate for wanting to stop her parents. Olds wrote many poems that contained a speaker who is contemplating the past of both her life and her parent’s life. In the poem “The Victims,” the speaker is again trying to find acceptance in the divorce and avoidance of her father, “When Mother divorced you, we were glad/ … She kicked you out, suddenly, and her/ kids loved it… ” (Olds 990). Through the remorseful and gloomy tone, we see that the speaker in both poems struggles with a relationship between her parents, and is also struggling to understand the pain of her
In the beginning of the short story, the young boy is already imprinted with the ideas of war from his father. His father was a former soldier who “had fought against naked savages and followed the flag of his country..” (Bierce 41). The image of war that is imprinted on the young boy from his father is that of nobility and righteous that comes from war.
	The narrator in Ellison’s short story suffers much. He is considered to be one of the brighter youths in his black community. The young man is given the opportunity to give a speech to some of the more prestigious white individuals. The harsh treatment that he is dealt in order to perform his task is quite symbolic. It represents the many hardships that the African American people endured while they fought to be treated equally in the United States. He expects to give his speech in a positive and normal environment. What faces him is something that he never would have imagined. The harsh conditions that the boys competing in the battle royal must face are phenomenal. At first the boys are ushered into a room where a nude woman is dancing. The white men yell at the boys for looking and not looking at the woman. It is as if they are showing them all of the good things being white can bring, and then saying that they aren’t good enough for it since they were black. Next the boys must compete in the battle royal. Blindly the boys savagely beat one another. This is symbolic of the ...
The first four stanzas are a conversation between the mother and daughter. The daughter asks for permission to attend a civil rights march. The child is a unique one who believes that sacrificing something like “play[ing]” for a march that can make a difference will be worthwhile (2). However, the mother understands that the march is not a simple march, but a political movement that can turn violent. The mother refuses the child’s request, which categorizes the poem as a tragedy because it places the child in the chur...
Each of the poems offers insight to what a boy needs to know and will expect when turning twenty one. The each shows different perspectives on the importance of this birthday and how it can change a boy into a man. The tone, dictions, and structure offers insights and help to the reader of how these poems can convey each their own compelling
The poem also focuses on what life was like in the sixties. It tells of black freedom marches in the South how they effected one family. It told of how our peace officers reacted to marches with clubs, hoses, guns, and jail. They were fierce and wild and a black child would be no match for them. The mother refused to let her child march in the wild streets of Birmingham and sent her to the safest place that no harm would become of her daughter.
... overall themes, and the use of flashbacks. Both of the boys in these two poems reminisce on a past experience that they remember with their fathers. With both poems possessing strong sentimental tones, readers are shown how much of an impact a father can have on a child’s life. Clearly the two main characters experience very different past relationships with their fathers, but in the end they both come to realize the importance of having a father figure in their lives and how their experiences have impacted their futures.
The events of our childhood and interactions with our parents is an outline of our views as parents ourselves. Although Robert Hayden’s relationship with his father differentiates from the relationship of Theodore Roethke and his father, they are both pondering back to their childhood and expressing the events in a poem. “My Papa’s Waltz” and “Those winter Sundays” provide the reader with an image of a childhood event which states how fathers are being viewed by their children. These poems reflect upon the relationship of the father and child when the child was a youth. Both Roethke and Hayden both indicate that their fathers weren’t perfect although they look back admiringly at their fathers’ actions. To most individuals, a father is a man that spends time with and takes care of them which gains him love and respect. An episode of Roethke’s childhood is illustrated in “My Papa’s Waltz”. In “My Papa’s Waltz”, the father comes home showing signs of alcohol and then begins waltzing with his son. Roethke states that the father’s hands are “battered on one knuckle”. The mother was so upset about the dancing that she did nothing other than frown. At the end of the day, the father waltzed the son to bed. “Those Winter Sundays” is based on a regular Sunday morning. The father rises early to wake his family and warm the house. To warm the house, he goes out in the cold and splits wood to start a fire. This is a poem about an older boy looking back to his childhood and regretting that “No one ever thanked him.” In Those Winter Sundays'; by Robert Hayden, the poet also relinquishes on a regular occurrence in his childhood. On Sunday mornings, just as any other morning, his father rises early and puts on his clothes in the cold darkness. He ...
In a typical family, there are parents that expected to hear things when their teenager is rebelling against them: slamming the door, shouting at each other, and protests on what they could do or what they should not do. Their little baby is growing up, testing their wings of adulthood; they are not the small child that wanted their mommy to read a book to them or to kiss their hurts away and most probably, they are thinking that anything that their parents told them are certainly could not be right. The poem talks about a conflict between the author and her son when he was in his adolescence. In the first stanza, a misunderstanding about a math problem turns into a family argument that shows the classic rift between the generation of the parent and the teenager. Despite the misunderstandings between the parent and child, there is a loving bond between them. The imagery, contrasting tones, connotative diction, and symbolism in the poem reflect these two sides of the relationship.
In Hayden’s poem “The Whippings,” the readers are given a more direct vision of what Hayden experienced at the hand of his foster mother. Hayden writes the poem in third person as he reminisces about how his mother “strikes and strikes the shrilly circling boy till the stick breaks,” and how “his tears are rainy weather to wound like memories” (The Whipping 1). He then ends the poem with by saying “… and the woman leans muttering against a tree, exhausted, purged—avenged in part for life long hidings she has to bear” (The Whipping 1). We see through the eyes of Hayden himself, that his foster mother would go far beyond a simple disciplinary punishment. Instead, she beat him in order to release her own frustrations for the demons in her life. Her actions filled Hayden’s childhood memories with pain and sorrow, and we see that through his own recollections in “The Whippings,” and “Those Winter Sundays” alike. In the poem “Those Winter Sundays,” Hayden’s choices in diction like the words “cracked,” and “ached” initiate the gloomy tone of the poem, and reflect the pain that derived from his relationship with his foster mother, which also could be a reason for the purposeful absence of Hayden’s foster mother in the poem (Howells 288-289). The reader also interprets that Hayden’s painful memories of being beaten and tormented as part of the unspecified “chronic angers” that haunt
The speaker reflects on the teenage girl’s childhood as she recalls the girl played with “dolls that did pee-pee” (2). This childish description allows the speaker to explain the innocence of the little girl. As a result, the reader immediately feels connected to this cute and innocent young girl. However, the speaker’s diction evolves as the girl grew into a teenager as she proclaims: “She was healthy, tested intelligent, / possessed strong arms and back, / abundant sexual drive and manual dexterity” (7-9). The speaker applies polished language to illustrate the teen. This causes the reader not only to see the girl as an adult, but also to begin to grasp the importance of her situation. The speaker expresses what the bullies told this girl as she explains: “She was advised to play coy, / exhorted to come on hearty” (12-13). The sophisticated diction shifts towards the girl’s oppressors and their cruel demands of her. Because of this, the reader is aware of the extent of the girl’s abuse. The speaker utilizes an intriguing simile as she announces: “Her good nature wore out / like a fan belt” (15-16). The maturity of the speaker’s word choice becomes evident as she uses a simile a young reader would not understand. This keeps the mature reader focused and allows him to fully understand the somberness of this poem. The speaker concludes the poem as she depicts the teenage girl’s appearance at her funeral: “In the casket displayed on satin she lay / with the undertaker’s cosmetics painted on” (19-20). The speaker elects not to describe the dead girl in an unclear and ingenuous manner. Rather, she is very clear and