It is not that we are selfish, but that we only see the world from our own point of view. We only feel our own emotions, and not others. Language has been used a tool used to communicate emotions and thoughts to others, but that is not its true form. Faulkner illustrates the track of the human mind and the inadequacy of human language as communication, through the grief and interactions of Rider.
In Pantaloon in Black, Rider struggles with verbalizing his emotions and how he understands the world around him. Rider connects with the dog, not only because it is the only living thing connected to his home and wife, but because the dog is nonverbal. This connection is shown through prolonged contact and the fact that the dog is the only being
…show more content…
able to travel with Rider. The dog makes no demands, no judgements, and physically rather than verbally, connects with Rider. Rider cannot talk about how he feels, and the dog is becomes Rider’s outlet. The dog and Rider are very much alike then, maybe not by choice, but both are more able to express their meanings through physical movements and looks. Rider seems to have no feasible relationships with any verbal characters. The Deputy believes that Rider has no emotion and does not understand Rider cannot cope with his wife’s death and that is why he throws the dirt on the grave, and immediately walks home. His care is shown through the illusion of the ghost of his wife, which includes his want to travel with her-and leave his current life. This is also shown through his small observations of the wife's past roles, like her footprints in dirt. Rider drinks to clear his mind, because that is the only way he knows how to cope (found in excerpts of his past life before his wife). When Rider is drinking, there is heavy description and use of metaphors. This diction implies importance on physical movement and emotional reactions by Rider and the reader. His actions of throwing the logs is important as well. The log being thrown, and being very hard to be thrown, represents how he feels about life after the death of his wife. It is difficult for Rider to give up on life, to “throw it” perhaps, but he does it anyway, and during all of these events, we see him and his train of thought, and then reactions of others. The reactions of others are their to help the reader see the disconnect between people. The deputy provides an outside look on Rider. The deputy goes into intense description defining the moments before, during, and after Rider imprisonment. The deputy describes Rider and then proceeds to ask his wife, “‘with tears big as glass marbles running across his face and down past his ears and making a kind of popping sound on the floor like somebody dropping bird eggs, laughing and laughing and saying, “hit look lack Ah just can’t quit thinking. Look lack Ah just can't quit.’ And what do you think of that?’”, His wife responds with “‘I think if you eat any supper in this house you'll do it in the next five minutes,’ his wife said from the dining room. ‘I’m going to clear this table then and I’m going to the picture show.’” (Faulkner 373). The wife does not seem to care, she has ignored her husband's obvious desire to gauge a reaction out of her. This shows the disconnect between people, that although he has tried so hard to understand and help his wife understand, she cannot. Even descriptive language is unable to suffice the wanted portrayed emotion. The deputy himself is representational of disconnect. The Deputy does not understand or connect with Rider, nor his wife. All characters that have come into contact with Rider, have been unable to understand what he is doing, and why. The deputy believes that Rider performed these heinous actions because Rider has no feeling, no emotion. The deputy describes Rider with little emotion but judgement, as he compares him to a white man, placing Rider in a negative light. The deputy describes him this way because he does not understand him, the way he feels, or why he acts. It is known that he does not understand because of the way he asks his wife. The Deputy asks his wife in reassurance of his idea, to further help use her opinion to form his. The order of the story matters in terms of Rider as well.
The order of Pantaloon in Black matches the track of the human mind. The story begins with the burial of Rider’s wife, Mannie. The story sweeps across certain aspects and details and focuses on things like people would. The very first paragraph is mainly dedicated to how Rider is flinging dirt across his wife’s grave. As the story progresses, details are orientated around Rider and changing physical aspects. As Rider is talking to his Aunt, Rider is described as, “Glancing down at the other, his eyes red at the inner corners, in his high slightly back tilted head.” (Faulkner 358). This places importance on his physical movement rather than the dialog between him and his aunt which had just preceded his description. Throughout the entire story, there is an importance placed on description of Rider and emotion instead of dialog. When dialog is introduced it further complicates Rider’s or the Deputy’s situation. When Rider talks to his Aunt, she tries to make Rider stay away from home, but Rider dismisses her readily replying “Ah’m goan home”, Faulkner then writes, “walking out from under her hand, his forearm like iron, as if the weight on it were no more than that of a fly” (358). This implies that dialog, and speech is not sufficient for communication and stability for Rider, and he is more focused on physical and mental feeling. As Rider sees the illusion of his wife faulkner writes, “She was going fast now, he could actually feel between them the insuperable barrier of that very strength which could handle, alone a log which would have taken any two other men the handle, of the blood and bones and flesh too strong, invincible for life, having learned at least once with his own eyes how tough, even in sudden and violent death, not a young man’s bones and flesh perhaps but the will of that bone and flesh to remain alive, actually was.” (361). This scene also places importance on non-spoken bonds. As people
we generally remember things in small fragments of detail and our general emotion towards that being or thing, not by words spoken.
Walter Farley began writing his novel, The Black Stallion, when he was in high school. He finished it years later and then had it published while he was attending college. The novel was an instant hit and many adults have read this book as a child. However, I had never gotten a chance to read The Black Stallion so this book report finally provided me with the perfect opportunity to do so.
...the narrator and all people a way of finding meaning in their pains and joys. The two brothers again can live in brotherhood and harmony.
On December 10, 1950, in Stockholm, Sweden, one of the greatest literary minds of the twentieth century, William Faulkner, presented his acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize. If one reads in between the lines of this acceptance speech, they can detect a certain message – more of a cry or plead – aimed directly to adolescent authors and writers, and that message is to be the voice of your own generation; write about things with true importance. This also means that authors should include heart, soul, spirit, and raw, truthful emotion into their writing. “Love and honor and pity and pride and compassion and sacrifice” (Faulkner) should all be frequently embraced – it is the duty of authors to do so. If these young and adolescent authors ignore this message and duty, the already endangered state of literature will continue to diminish until its unfortunate extinction.
... middle of paper ... ... The two characters give a sense of despair by their appearances. Yet in the passage above, the reader is made aware that their immense agony is only for themselves and not for what they have done.
In the book Literature by Edgar V Roberts, Faulkner begins the story “A Rose for Emily” with an extremely long sentence which shows the communities reaction to death and immediately displays a scene through gender differences:
The first two lines of the poem set the mood of fear and gloom which is constant throughout the remainder of the poem. The word choice of "black" to describe the speaker's face can convey several messages (502). The most obvious meaning ...
All in all, Chris McCandless is a contradictory idealist. He was motivated by his charity but so cruel to his parents and friends. He redefined the implication of life, but ended his life in a lonely bus because of starvation, which he was always fighting against. Nevertheless, Chris and the readers all understand that “happiness only real when shared.” (129; chap.18) Maybe it’s paramount to the people who are now alive.
While I was watching the documentary William Faulkner, a Life on Paper I found it striking how the different people that were interviewed talked about two different sides of the author William Faulkner. His daughters, Jill Faulkner Sommers and his stepdaughter, spoke mainly about his alcohol abuse and his moodiness whereas Faulkner’s contemporaries from Oxford underlined Faulkner’s generosity and kindness. The documentary shows Faulkner not only as father of Jill and his stepdaughter but also as a father figure for many others. He had to take care of several families at once. At one point Faulkner had seventeen dependents to provide for. Many of the people that were interviewed describe Faulkner as being very generous and always willing to help others even when he had almost nothing himself. One special example is his brother Dean who died in an airplane accident and because Faulkner had bought the plane he apparently felt guilty about the death of his brother for the rest of his life as his sister-in-law says in the interview.
Though this poem is only a small snapshot of what I personally thought Douglass was going through, I could never adequately understand the frustration he must have had. My hope in writing this poem was not to provide a psychoanalysis or theoretical idea structure to any audience, but rather to show that even today, a modern audience member like me, can appreciate the struggle of a fellow human and speak against injustices, specifically in Douglass’s time.
By reading closely and paying attention to details, I was able to get so much more out of this story than I did from the first reading. In short, this assignment has greatly deepened my understanding and appreciation of the more complex and subtle techniques Faulkner used to communicated his ideas in the story.
If we compare William Faulkner's two short stories, 'A Rose for Emily' and 'Barn Burning', he structures the plots of these two stories differently. However, both of the stories note the effect of a father¡¦s teaching, and in both the protagonists Miss Emily and Sarty make their own decisions about their lives. The stories present major idea through symbolism that includes strong metaphorical meaning. Both stories affect my thinking of life.
Srikanth’s reaction is one enjoyed by readers from many different cultures in response to reading Faulkner. Despite his heritage in one of the more hateful societies of the world, within the race perceived as superior at the time, his writing about failed expectations of the American Dream is applicable to all humans and especially relevant to our English curriculum.
feelings in the man and the dog, of a constant battle with this world of
"William Faulkner (1897-1962)." Short Story Criticism. Ed. Jelena Krstovic. Vol. 97. Detroit: Thomson Gale, 2007. 1-3. Literature Criticism Online. Gale. Hempfield High School. 31 March 2010.
“The story employs a dramatic point of view that emphasizes the fragility of human relationships. It shows understanding and agreemen...