Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of civility in society
Statement on civility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of civility in society
Part one of Choosing Civility by P.M Forni is an interesting chunk that discusses a lot about what civility means, what it doesn’t mean and how it affects our daily live. So far I have enjoyed the book and have found some very interesting quotes and key points. “Although life entails hardship and suffering, we can do something about it- we can always do something about it”(6). I highlighted this quote in my book because it really stood out to me. When life gets hard the worst thing I think you can do is just to give up because you always have the power to change things. It’s not what happens to you it’s how you handle it. In this book so far I have learned a lot about civility that I hadn’t really noticed before. Another quote I really enjoyed
was about politeness. “The very essence of politeness seems to be to take care that by our words and actions we make others people pleased with us as well as themselves”(10). I like this quote because it is so true and I have never identified politeness in this sense before; politeness is an act that not only makes you feel good it also make others feel good. A lot of the different parts of civility relate to each other when it comes to positivity and how you look at life. “Happiness does not depend on outward things, but on how we see them”(15). “Our happiness does not spring from the events of our lives but rather from how we choose to respond to those events”(10). I picked out both of these qoutes/points because I don’t think people realize that their attitude has a huge effect on their life. I think if more people would try to be more positive and look at the greater things in life people would live better, happier lives. Before reading this book I have to admit I wasn’t always very civil in the past but after reading this book I realize how much I would like to be civil and how important it really is. I think sometimes we get irritated and frustrated and we drift farther away from civility. Eric Hoffer stated “Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength”(22). I included this quote because I think it is important to point out that being rude does not make you strong in a way it makes you weaker. Being polite is a more true characteristic of strength. The last important quote I pulled out of part one was “Social ties are the cheapest medicine we have”(28). When Shelley E. Taylor wrote this quote she was referring to the scientific proof that the stronger relationships you have with the people around you the healthier you will be. I believe this is true when you are depressed and have bad connections with people around you, you have a great chance of becoming sick. What I have taken from part one of choosing civility is that a lot of what affects you is based upon your attitude towards life.
In “Cruelty, Civility, and Other Weighty Matters” by Ann Marie Paulin, she was trying to get across a very important message: skinny doesn’t mean happy. The main idea was about how our culture in America encourages obesity because of the food choices they offer, how expensive weight loss pills and exercise bikes is, and etc., yet the culture also is prejudice against these same fat people that they encourage. It’s a constant back and forth in America between what is convenient with the little time we have in between everything we have to do each day and working out to be skinny enough for everyone to not judge you. Ms. Paulin wrote this article for literally everyone, this article was for skinny people to show them like hey, you’re not all
In "The Perils of Obedience," Stanley Milgram conducted a study that tests the conflict between obedience to authority and one's own conscience. Through the experiments, Milgram discovered that the majority of people would go against their own decisions of right and wrong to appease the requests of an authority figure.
A human being is a complicated entity of a contradictory nature where creative and destructive, virtuous and vicious are interwoven. Each of us has gone through various kinds of struggle at least once in a lifetime ranging from everyday discrepancies to worldwide catastrophes. There are always different causes and reasons that trigger these struggles, however, there is common ground for them as well: people are different, even though it is a truism no one seems to able to realize this statement from beyond the bounds of one’s self and reach out to approach the Other.
During the movie, I found that these concepts that were taught in class helped me better understand and relate to certain clips of the movie. Throughout the rest of the paper, I will be going into a bit more detail about exactly what these concepts are and mean, following that I will be giving examples from the movie that demonstrate the concepts of conflict and politeness theory.
The issues discussed by Thomas Nagel in 'Ruthlessness in Public Life' are that continuities and discontinuities exist between the public and private morality. Public officials need to recognize that there are clear limitations on actions which conflict with morality concerns. Nagel explored how public and private sectors need to adhere to certain ordinary moral standards.
Society constantly changing rules and culture is the main reason for conflict between people. This is displayed in “Kindred” were numerous African descending people are enslaved. In the novel Rufus and Dana -the main characters- have a difficult time getting along. This is because they were raised in different societies with different cultural acceptance. In the novel, you can observe Dana struggles with trying to fit in and stay out of trouble, and Rufus frustration in trying to control her. As seen in this novel, the thing people are taught or use to often time interfere with their good judgment and can make overlook things that are morally wrong.
Despite the belief that fighting with violence is effective, civil disobedience has been tried throughout history and been successful. Fighting violence with violence leaves no oppertunity for peace to work. By refusing to fight back violently, Martin Luther King Jr. took a race of people, taught them the value of their voice, and they earned the right to vote. Henry David Thoreau presented his doctrine that no man should cooperate with laws that are unjust, but, he must be willing to accept the punishment society sets for breaking those laws, and hundreds of years later, people are still inspired by his words. Mohandas K. Gandhi lead an entire country to its freedom, using only his morals and faith to guide him, as well as those who followed him, proving that one man can make a difference. Civil disobedience is the single tool that any person can use to fight for what they want, and they will be heard. After centuries of questioning it, it appears that the pen truly is mightier than the sword.
In reviewing the documentary Psychology: The Human Experience, Viktor Frankl’s “Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.” comes to mind. Even though our behaviors are being dictated by the environment we reside in, by being aware of our motivations and choices we make, there is a high chance that our attitudes towards one another might be a positive experience that can increase our quality of life for the individual, the society and the world we live in.
“The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.”~ Martin Luther King, Jr.
In the article, “American Jerk: Be Civil or I’ll Beat You to a Pulp," by Todd Schwartz, Schwartz discusses his belief that people can be self-centered and can act Very selfishly while pretending to be civil. He believes that our civilation has progressed to the point where we no longer care about anything at all. While I agree with a lot of Schwartz's statements and conclusions, I also disagree with many things He said.
The article “On Instinctive Human Peace Versus War” by professor David P. Barash seeks to find a connection between human genetic inheritance and their aggressiveness or/and peacefulness level. Author is attempting to confront the previous research results of all the scientists and scholars claiming that human beings are instinctively war prone. Professor Barash is not endeavoring to oppose their argument by stating that all humans are peaceful creatures. He emphasizes that we are as inclined to war, as we are inclined to peace. The main purpose of the text is mostly to prove that humans are not inherently violent species as considered by many and that they are able to negotiate and perfectly
“Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see” – Mark Twain.
John Knowles, the author of the book a separate peace uses a highly descriptive paragraphs and a child narrative to give the reader the perspective of a teenage student as he explores the true meaning of friendship, the loss of innocence, self-realization.
In today’s society there still exists many injustices, whether it be freedom of speech or equality amongst races. In order to make a change in relation to such issues, one must put themselves forward and inevitably cause conflict. This conflict could be something as large as a war between two countries or simply a debate amongst peers. Whether it be in the form of arguments or gunfire, people are given the opportunity to step forward and demonstrate their true strength. It may have been unnoticeable before, but during moments of great conflict, the admirable traits of strength and determination rise to the surface for all to see.
Civility, as stated in the Webster’s Dictionary, as polite or courteous is represented in the novels Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austin and in Part IV of Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. Civilization, as seen in the novels Pride and Prejudice and Gulliver’s Travels, is depicted as an act of human nature as compared to the act of savages. Human beings can be civilized and uncivilized depending on the way the reason things out or the way they act in a certain situations. The following essay will contain several ways in which civility is represented in the two novels. Human beings may be civilized in the way they act but the way they think may be contradictive or uncivilized. In Pride and Prejudice the characters may act civilized in all human ways but really they are uncivilized in the way they think because they live in a world that seems too perfect, yet they are not satisfied with it, “the more I see of the world the more I am dissatisfied with it and everyday confirms my belief of the inconsistency of the human characters…”. In Gulliver’s Travels, Gulliver believes the exact same thing when he says, “when I happen to behold the reflection of my own form in the lake or fountain I turned away my Face in Horror and detestation of myself; and could better endure the Sight of a common yahoo, than of my own Person. Yahoos may be represented as uncivilized savages in Gulliver’s Travels yet the civilized human being of Pride and Prejudice act as savages in other ways.