Summary Of Olaudah Equiano

722 Words2 Pages

One thing is without debate, Olaudah Equiano’s, A.K.A. Gustavus Vassa, novel was instrumental in the abolition of the Atlantic Slave trade. His writings helped influence Europe to believe that the Atlantic Slave trade was evil and wrong. Also, it helped to give human properties to the dehumanized Africans. While I concede that there are not many, if any, similarities between Anthony Benezet’s writing and Equiano’s, I still believe he was not born in Africa for the following reasons: the inconsistencies between information that Equiano himself passed along, issues with names and identity, and the obvious motives for lying.

Olaudah Equiano had very obvious motives for lying about his roots in West Africa. This novel was published in the height of the debate over the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade. Equiano’s lie would have changed the impact of the book entirely. Since the debate at the time was over the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade and not the abolition of slavery, people were not interested in the evils of slavery, they were interested in the evils of the middle passage and taking people out of their natural African habitats. Therefore, without Equiano’s description of his “idealic” African village of which he grew up and the evils of the middle passage he experienced, his novel would have been useless for the time to which it was written (Carey 241).

If you were to read Anthony Benezet’s account of Guinea and Olaudah Equiano’s account of Guinea one after the other, you would not leave thinking you had just read two identical passages. While there are some similarities in the descriptions of location in Benezet's Chapter 1 and Equiano’s pages 43-44, that is to be expected because geography is not a subjective ...

... middle of paper ...

...o obviously was not opposed to slavery.

Equaino’s essay has many inconsistencies between the beginning of the story until the end. Equiano’s story starts off with his wonderful childhood in West Africa, but what few seem to notice is that the people which he describes are very nondescript. While later in the novel everyone has names and specific facts about themselves, the people early and dear to the authors childhood do not even get names. Everything about the authors childhood is vague, while everything about his adulthood is very clear, concise and detailed (Carey 245). Another interesting fact to follow that is that Equiano gets the dates about the ships to which he was brought from Africa to England wrong as well as most dates given within the first 10 years of his life, but he gets no other dates of ship voyages wrong throughout his adulthood (Carey 240).

Open Document