Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does technology help investigate crimes
Impact of technology on legal services
Psychological profiling assignment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does technology help investigate crimes
The NOVA Episode “Mind of a Rampage Killer” was a very interesting and informing video to watch. It brought up many new ways that scientist are now using to try to pin point mental illness and better ways to help people recover. My opinion on how some of these technologies should be used in the criminal justice system is that they shouldn’t be used without proper guidelines. A lot of this new information can help identify who could be a prospective killer, but it doesn’t necessarily mean they will become one. Law enforcement cannot just make someone take one of these tests and if they so happen meet all the criteria’s of a possible “rampaging killer” lock them up. The person may be meeting all the criteria’s but they have not done anything
wrong yet. Dr. Paul Frick from the University of New Orleans said “The analogy I use is (it is) like a hurricane. We’re kind of good at predicting what conditions make hurricanes most likely to develop: low pressure, the warmth of the water, wind shear, things like that. We’re not always perfectly correct. You might have the perfect conditions, and somehow the hurricanes don’t develop, and it is the same thing with violence. We Know the factors that can put a child are risk for acting aggressive and violently. And the Kids who typically do these rampages show many of the same factors. The thing we’re not too good at is determining ‘When does the perfect confluence of influences lead to a Category 5 hurricane (Rampage)?” I do however believe that they should be used to identify the violent tendencies of a criminal suspect. This should not necessarily be the key factor to use when charging someone with murder, but should be able to help narrow down a large suspect pool, if there is one in a large case. The only other way that I believe that this technology or techniques should be involved in the criminal justice system is in the court of law. It should not necessarily be the key factor for the prosecution, but should be used to show the mental state of the suspect during the case. It should also not necessarily let someone walk free just because “Oh they couldn’t help it. It is due to how they are weird”. These people need to be held accountable for their actions, but at the same time they should receive help so that they may be able to live a life without being a possible threat to society not just because he is behind bars. I also believe that there should be more institutions like The Mendota Juvenile Treatment Center where they help the juveniles by providing quality mental health treatment and patient care in a safe setting. Like stated in the video “the place runs on a mix of punishment and positive reinforcement”, which I believe to be very important especially with teens who feel that they have no control on their life and that the only way to have some control is to act out violently. This allows them to have some control where it shows them if you do well at something, like Ken who made honor roll in school; they would be rewarded, as Ken was with McDonald’s with making honor roll. Much like know that they can change and that if that want to have a better life that they can receive it and that there are people there who are willing to help.
In the book, The Serial Killer Whisperer: How One Man’s Tragedy Helped Unlock the Deadliest Secrets of the World’s Most Terrifying Killers, Tony Ciaglia writes letters to various serial killers and starts a friendship with them. The friendships Tony’s build’s with these serial killer’s through phone calls and letters helped law enforcement in more than one way. The serial killers trust Tony and opens up to him about things they’ve done and why. The Serial Killer Whisperer gives readers an inside look of serial killers minds. Although the letters in this novel are between Tony and various serial killers, Pete Earley is the author. He interviewed Tony and his friends and families. Pete Earley is also the author of three New York Times bestsellers and he has won the Edgar Award for Best Fact Crime. Ealey wrote this gripping tale in a way that would captivate any audience.
"A New Death Penalty for Killer." Chicago Tribune. N.p., 25 May 2004. Web. 27 Nov. 2013.
According to federal law The term ‘serial killings’ means a series of three or more killings, not less than one of which was committed within the United States, having common characteristics such as to suggest the reasonable possibility that the crimes were committed by the same actor or actors. Throughout history serial killers have always been a fascination among many individuals. On numerous of occasions law enforcement has tried to dive into the psyche of these killers to determine why they kill. There have also been numerous stereotypes placed on serial killers. Typical stereotypes are serial killers are all white males, loners, and that there crimes are driven by sex. However, through the capture of these individuals we have found said stereotypes incorrect. One of the most interesting cases being of the Beltway sniper attacks.
As typical human beings we all want to know why someone could randomly take the lives of several innocent people all at one time. It is frightening and scientists figure if they can figure out why, then it can be prevented in the future. The documentary, Mind of a Rampage Killer, tries to solve the mystery and really dive deep into the minds of people who could potentially create such a horrifying situation. Through the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, this documentary concludes that every killer had something in common; they all struggled with mental disorders, depression, or outbursts of violence, all stemming from early childhood or an internal battle throughout growing up, some could have even just been born with a violent rage.
The Book, The Psychopath Test, by Jon Ronson is about Jon Ronson trying to learn and discover the inside and out of a psychopath. Jon is a journalist who is drawn into the world of psychopathy through a mysterious book that was delivered by an anonymous person to many different types of people. This prompts Jon to look deeper and he comes out thinking that the person who wrote this book is a psychopath. As his story matures he comes across a man named David Shayler. David has been categorized as a psychopath, but not a dangerous one. This allows him to live in the sane world. David shows an enormous amount of passion towards what he is pursuing or trying to get people to believe, but what he is trying so hard for people to believe is not often taken as truth. He is first thought to be a completely normal, great man but later found to actually be a psychopath. He is also certain that this woman was a government worker trying to cover up a government mandated bombing. Finally he is certain that he is the next Messiah and
They were also concerned with the fact that Holmes and Holmes did not offer a multiple typology killer. They offer a new category in the typology they named a multiple-typology killer (Greeting & Culhane, n.d.). They define this category as not a distinct type of killer, but instead as a way of thinking to keep law enforcement investigators from being biased to profiling the offender in one category of the typology (Greeting & Culhane,
Mass murder is defined by the FBI as the killing of three or more people in a single event or in the same day (Petersen & Farrington, 2007). Mass murderers are complex and can be examined by the many factors that regularly appear among them, such as violence precipitating events, weapon of choice, and mental illnesses. The motivations and methods for committing mass murder are easily broken down into specific groups, and through the examination of these definitions and specific cases there is much to learn about the mind of a mass murderer.
About 1.6% or so of the US population can be described as potentially psychopathic. Some people cut to the conclusion and determine that misunderstood kids are potentially psychopaths. Identifying a child as a psychopath is not developmentally appropriate. The label “psychopath” cannot be placed on a child who is developing emotionally, mentally, or physically. Children who have mental disorders are often interpreted as psychopaths and awful people but they are not, they’re just misconceived.
Serial killers have captivated the attention of scientists from the first signs of their existence to modern day. Interested by these killers’ inhumane actions, researchers set out to determine the cause of such graphic, horrific crimes. The brain has been brought into question regarding the motivation of these cold blooded killers. After extensive research, abnormalities of both the chemical composition and material makeup have been identified within the brains of numerous serial killers. These differences are more than mere coincidence, they are evidence that killers do not think in the same way. The killers’ drives and motives are irregular, just as their brains are. Not only are these variations interesting, but they are also crucial to the justice system in regards to the punishment of past, future, and present sequential murderers. It is important that as a society we learn the differences in the mind of a killer, and also recognize and understand them. A serial killer’s brain greatly differs in function from the average citizen’s brain due to physical variations in the brain and a different chemical makeup.
What drives a person past insanity? What drives an individual to feel no remorse, but rather a psychological relief in murderous acts? Consider all the different types of people on Earth as well as the lifestyles and situations these people are raised up in. As much as it’s desired to think the world is filled with people who carry no such thing as a bad bone in their bodies, that thought process is simple deception. The fact is that psychopaths and sociopaths hide among others in everyday environments - neighbors, teachers, family members, doctors, friends, or even the local mailman. Psychopaths are declared as people who suffer from a mental disorder causing aggression and abnormal behaviors such as their “lack of
We can all agree that serial killers are unpredictable scary people but when it comes to why they kill, everyone has a different view. In my research paper I will get into the mind of a serial killer and try to figure out what exactly sets them into uncontrollable rage.
Serial killers have many frightening facets. The most frightening thing about them is that experts still do not know what makes a human become a serial killer. Many experts believe serial killers become what they are because they have a genetic disposition or brain abnormality while other experts believe that a serial killer is created by childhood abuse; and some other experts believe that it is a combination of both brain abnormalities and abusive childhood experiences that creates a serial killer. A murderer is considered a serial killer when they “murder three or more persons in at least three separate events with a “cooling off period” between kills” (Mitchell and Aamodt 40). When defining a serial killer, their background, genes, and brain are not mentioned; perhaps one day those aspects of the serial killer can be included.
Ever wondered if there is a serial killer in your community? The characteristics of a serial killer may shock you or be surprisingly familiar to some of you. It is important for society to get informed about the various types of serial killers that are out there. It is essential for families to educate their children about strangers, to be careful with everyone they encounter on the streets, store, and even in their neighborhoods. A serial killer is defined as a person who murders three or more people in at least three separate events, with a "cooling-off period" between the kills. The big question is, what makes a person do these atrocious killings? We will analyze personal histories, categorized serial killers,
Criminologists Ronald Holmes, Stephan Holmes, and James DeBurger have created a classification system for serial killers based off motive as opposed to the FBI’s classification system that is based off method (Vronsky 147). This classification system is broken into four categories: visionaries, mission-oriented, hedonistic, and power/control
Jack the Ripper, the Zodiac Killer, Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Son of Sam, the BTK Killer. The names and assumed names of these cold-blooded serial killers are forever branded into the cognizance of people everywhere. This is mainly due to the mass media coverage, including newspapers, movies, television specials and books. This media coverage brought to light that these killers were, on the surface, normal, successful, attractive, productive members of society – that is, until the time that their heinous crimes came to be discovered.