Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of war on soldiers essay
Psychological effects of war on soldiers
Psychological effects of war on soldiers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of war on soldiers essay
R.C Sheriff successfully describes the horrific effects of war on different soldiers
“Journey’s End” is a fascinating play written in the twentieth century by R.C. Sherriff. R.C. Sherriff, served in the east survey regiment during world war one; this play he wrote describes how it felt like being a part of the war and how it may have changed soldiers. He used a lot of examples, such as; Stanhope, who was the leader of the company, Hibbert, who is terrified of war and young Raleigh, who gets excited for being sent to war especially after knowing that he would be serving in the same company his hero Stanhope serves in. This essay will show how R.C. Sherriff successfully manages to describe the horrific effects of war on those characters.
…show more content…
Stanhope, who was the commander of the company, is our first character. Stanhope joined army as a youngster who just finished school. He was described as the “best company commander we’ve got” by Officer Osborne, who had great faith in Stanhope and supported him immeasurably. A young Stanhope used to strongly dislike alcohol, he once “caught some chaps” in a school study with a “bottle of whisky,” because of how strong his hatred towards alcohol is, he “gave them a dozen each with a cricket stump.” However, Stanhope disliking alcohol didn’t last long after joining the army and experiencing tragedies. The importance of alcohol to him after joining the army was compared to the importance of water to fishes by some of his mates. As an officer asks “how is the dear young boy?” referring to Stanhope “Drinking like a fish as usual?” Thus, it’s an exaggeration to show that Stanhope can’t live without alcohol, just like a fish can’t live without water. “I’ve never seen a youngster put away the whisky he does.” Is another quote to show that Stanhope is extremely addicted to whisky. Later in the play, Stanhope says that he wants his family back home to think that he is “a fine fellow for ever – and ever – and ever.” This explains why he didn’t visit home on his leave because “he didn’t think he was fit to meet papa” said one of the officers. He didn’t want his family to sense that aspect of his. Another character who has definitely changed during war was Raleigh.
He was first described as a “Well-built, healthy looking boy of about eighteen.” Raleigh was a thrilled young soldier, full of passion and excitement. However, after his first catastrophe; the dreadful death of Osborne, all Raleigh’s passion and glorious ideas vanished into non-existence since then, just as his interesting conversation with Stanhope suggests “Good God! Don’t you understand? How can I sit down and eat that- when – when Osborne’s – lying – out there” Raleigh refuses to eat his dinner because he feels depressed for the death of Osborne. He changed from the passionate, excited soldier, to the depressed soldier right after experiencing the first tragedy war has …show more content…
created. Also, another character has changed, who is called Hibbert.
He is introduced being a young “slightly built man in the early twenties, with a little moustache and a pallid face.” He would’ve without any doubt make readers question themselves, “is he a hero?” or “is he a coward?” Hibbert is a coward to most readers because he fabricated sickness. The sickness he pretended to have was the “beastly neuralgia” that “seems to be right inside this eye. The beastly pain gets worse every day.” He explains. Hibbert also refuses to eat as he claims that “the pain rather takes my appetite away.” Stanhope analyzes as “he could eat if he wanted to; he’s starving himself purposely.” What makes people think he is a coward is that he would rather get shot by Stanhope than going to war fields and fighting with other soldiers. As this mysterious quote of his shows “Go on, then shoot! You won’t let me go to hospital. I swear I I’ll never go into those trenches again. Shoot!” which indicates that, Hibbert is frightened from the hidden miseries more than he is frightened from the known. Besides, he makes a perfect contrast to Stanhope, who drinks to forget all his fears. On the other hand, Hibbert allows his fears to take over his acts, like when he feigned sickness as a way to run away from
war. To conclude, I think that R.C. Sheriff creates an idea to the reader of how war can change people a hundred and eighty degrees. For instance, Stanhope changed from being a hater to alcohol to being a very strong alcoholic. Raleigh changed from the passionate, excited soldier, to the depressed soldier right after experiencing the first tragedy war has created. Hibbert didn’t even dare to face his fears and try to play a role in war. Rather, he pretended to have the beastly neuralgia, just to stay away from war fields. The beauty of Journey’s End is that it was written by someone who was a part of the war; therefore, everything he has written was from his experience which makes the play even more interesting.
In An American Soldier in World War I, David Snead examines account of George Browne, a civil engineer who fought as part of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) during World War I. Snead shares Browne’s account of the war through the letters he wrote to his fiancé Martha Ingersoll Johnson. Through Browne’s letters and research conducted of the AEF, Snead gives a concise, informative, and harrowing narrative of life as a soldier serving in the camps and front lines of the Great War. Snead attempts to give the reader an understanding of Browne’s service by focusing on his division, the 42nd Division, their training and preparation, combat on the front lines, and the effects of war on George and Martha’s relationship. As Snead describes, “Brownie’s letters offer a view of the experiences of an American soldier. He described the difficulties of training, transit to and from France, the dangers and excitement of combat, and the war’s impact on relationships.” (Browne 2006, 2) Furthermore, he describes that despite the war’s effect on their relationship, “their
The first chapter in the book At The Dark End of the Street is titled “They’d Kill Me If I Told.” Rosa Park’s dad James McCauley was a expert stonemason and barrel-chested builder. Louisa McCauley was Rosa Park’s grandmother, she was homestead and her husband and oldest son built homes throughout Alabama’s Black Belt. In 1912 James McCauley went to go hear his brother-in-law preach. While there, he noticed a beautiful light named Leona Edwards. She was the daughter of Rose Percival and Sylvester Edwards. Sylvester was a mistreated slave who learned to hate white people. Leona and James McCauley got married a couple months after meeting and Rosa was conceived about nine months after the wedding. In 1915, James decided to move North with all
Many war stories today have happy, romantic, and cliche ending; many authors skip the sad, groosom, and realistic part of the story. W. D. Howell’s story, Editha and Ambrose Bierce’s story, An Occurence at Owl Creek Bridge both undercut the romantic plots and unrealistic conclusions brought on by many stories today. Both stories start out leading the reader to believe it is just another tpyical love-war senario, but what makes them different is the one-hundred and eighty degrees plot twist at the end of each story. In the typical love-war story the soldier would go off to war, fighting for his country, to later return safely to his family typically unscaved.
As he immerses his audience into combat with the soldiers, Shaara demonstrates the more emotional aspects of war by highlighting the personal lives of the men fighting. For example, when Shaara reveals the pasts of James Longstreet and Lewis Armistead’s, I started to picture them as the men that they were and not as soldiers out for blood. After suffering a devastating loss of three of his children to fever, Longstreet is tossed into battle. In Armistead’s case, he not only suffered the loss of his wife, but also of a friend fighting on the Union side, General Winfield Scott Hancock. Shaara saves his readers a front row seat to the inner turmoil of General Chamberlain regarding his hindering duty as a soldier clashes with his duty to family as he strived to serve the Union as well as protec...
The following book of Peter Kreeft’s work, The Journey, will include a summary along with mine and the authors’ critique. As you read the book it is a very pleasant, symbolic story of always-existing wisdom as you go along the pathway of what knowledge really is. It talks about Socrates, someone who thinks a lot about how people think, from Athens, is a huge part in this book. This book is like a roadmap for modern travelers walking the very old pathway in search of reality. It will not only show us the pathway they took, but the pathway that we should take as well.
Timothy Findley Creates a fictional world through his novels, where readers can relate to the situations and characters. The protagonists that Findley creates are often similar and connected to the hardships that they eventually encounter and defeat or that which they are defeated by. Findley takes his readers back in time to the First World War, displaying his knowledge of history and research, where the hardships of a young soldier’s battles internally and externally are brought to the reader’s attention in his historical-fiction novel The Wars. Findley writes about the reality and absurdity of the First World War, and takes the reader’s on a journey through the active reading process to find what is “sane” and “Insane” throughout the duration of the novel. Following the journey of the protagonist, Robert Ross as he enlists in the Canadian Army after the death of his sister Rowena, and undoubtedly is the turning point of the text and ideally where Findley initiates the active reading process, and where the contents placed in the story by Findley, are analyzed and opinionated based on the reader’s perception and subjectivity of truth. Essayist Anne Reynolds writes “ Findley manages, through technical prowess, to combine Hemingway-like choices of clear moment searing horror and truth at the battlefront with scenes depicting the effects of war on the families and lovers of the soldiers.” (Reynolds, 4) According to Reynolds Findley has been able to display the absurdity and affect that not only the First World War has caused but the ludicrousness war in general has caused the families of soldiers, and society as a whole. Using the literary theory of deconstruction many aspects and scenarios in The Wars can be analyzed, as Fin...
Imagine being in an ongoing battle where friends and others are dying. All that is heard are bullets being shot, it smells like gas is near, and hearts race as the times go by. This is similar to what war is like. In the novel All Quiet on the Western Front, the narrator, Paul Baumer, and his friends encounter the ideals of suffering, death, pain, and despair. There is a huge change in these men; at the beginning of feel the same way about it. During the war the men experience many feelings, especially the loss of loved ones. These feelings are shown through their first experience at training camp, during the actual battles, and in the hospital. Training camp was the first actuality of what war was going to be like for the men. They thought that it would be fun, and they could take pride in defending their country. Their teacher, Kantorek, told them that they should all enroll in the war. Because of this, almost all of the men in the class enrolled. It was in training camp that they met their cruel corporal, Himelstoss.&nbs most by him. They have to lie down in the mud and practice shooting and jumping up. Also, these three men must remake Himelstoss’ bed fourteen times, until it is perfect. Himelstoss puts the young men through so much horror that they yearn for their revenge. Himelstoss is humiliated when he goes to tell on Tjaden, and Tjaden only receives an easy punishment. Training camp is as death and destruction. Training camp is just a glimpse of what war really is. The men do not gain full knowledge of war until they go to the front line. The front line is the most brutal part of the war. The front line is the place in which the battles are fought. Battles can only be described in one word- chaos. Men are running around trying to protect themselves while shooting is in the trench with an unknown man from the other side. This battle begins with shells bursting as they hit the ground and machine guns that rattle as they are being fired. In order to ensure his survival, Paul must kill the other man. First, Paul stabs the man, but he struggles for his life. He dies shortly after, and Paul discovers who he has killed. The man is Gerald Duval, a printer.&n Having to deal with killing others is one of the horrors of war. The men who are killed and the people who kill them could have been friends, if only they were on the same side. The other important battle leaves both Paul and Kropp with injuries.
He arrives back at his town, unused to the total absence of shells. He wonders how the populations can live such civil lives when there are such horrors occurring at the front. Sitting in his room, he attempts to recapture his innocence of youth preceding the war. But he is now of a lost generation, he has been estranged from his previous life and war is now the only thing he can believe in. It has ruined him in an irreversible way and has displayed a side of life which causes a childhood to vanish alongside any ambitions subsequent to the war in a civil life. They entered the war as mere children, yet they rapidly become adults. The only ideas as an adult they know are those of war. They have not experienced adulthood before so they cannot imagine what it will be lie when they return. His incompatibility is shown immediately after he arrives at the station of his home town. ”On the platform I look round; I know no one among all the people hurrying to and fro. A red-cross sister offers me something to drink. I turn away, she smiles at me too foolishly, so obsessed with her own importance: "Just look, I am giving a soldier coffee!"—She calls me "Comrade," but I will have none of it.” He is now aware of what she is
In the history of modern western civilization, there have been few incidents of war, famine, and other calamities that severely affected the modern European society. The First World War was one such incident which served as a reflection of modern European society in its industrial age, altering mankind’s perception of war into catastrophic levels of carnage and violence. As a transition to modern warfare, the experiences of the Great War were entirely new and unfamiliar. In this anomalous environment, a range of first hand accounts have emerged, detailing the events and experiences of the authors. For instance, both the works of Ernst Junger and Erich Maria Remarque emphasize the frightening and inhumane nature of war to some degree – more explicit in Jünger’s than in Remarque’s – but the sense of glorification, heroism, and nationalism in Jünger’s The Storm of Steel is absent in Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front. Instead, they are replaced by psychological damage caused by the war – the internalization of loss and pain, coupled with a sense of helplessness and disconnectedness with the past and the future. As such, the accounts of Jünger and Remarque reveal the similar experiences of extreme violence and danger of World War I shared by soldiers but draw from their experiences differing ideologies and perception of war.
When the war breaks out, this tranquil little town seems like the last place on earth that could produce a team of vicious, violent soldiers. Soon we see Jim thrown into a completely contrasting `world', full of violence and fighting, and the strong dissimilarity between his hometown and this new war-stricken country is emphasised. The fact that the original setting is so diversely opposite to that if the war setting, the harsh reality of the horror of war is demonstrated.
In Hemingway’s short story “Soldier’s Home”, Hemingway introduces us to a young American soldier, that had just arrived home from World War I. Harold Krebs, our main character, did not receive a warm welcome after his arrival, due to coming home a few years later than most soldiers. After arriving home, it becomes clear that World War I has deeply impacted the young man, Krebs is not the same man that headed off to the war. The war had stripped the young man of his coping mechanism, female companionship, and the ability to achieve the typical American life.
War slowly begins to strip away the ideals these boy-men once cherished. Their respect for authority is torn away by their disillusionment with their schoolteacher, Kantorek who pushed them to join. This is followed by their brief encounter with Corporal Himmelstoss at boot camp. The contemptible tactics that their superior officer Himmelstoss perpetrates in the name of discipline finally shatters their respect for authority. As the boys, fresh from boot camp, march toward the front for the first time, each one looks over his shoulder at the departing transport truck. They realize that they have now cast aside their lives as schoolboys and they feel the numbing reality of their uncertain futures.
... Paul's strong words, demonstrated through the author's talent, are denouncing the authority figures who were supposed to guide his generation into adulthood but instead turned the youth against each other in the pursuit of superficial ideals. The soldiers were simply the victims of a meaningless war. In conclusion, Remarque's firsthand encounters with trench warfare, Owen's vivid descriptions of the soldiers' experiences and Baker's touching accounts of the lives of historical figures, all state that there were no victors in war, only losers in a hopeless battle for territorial supremacy.
Hibbert deals with fear by trying to run away from it. Osborne talks about unnecessary topics, such as rugby, to hide his fears. Throughout the play, we see displacement tactics becoming one of the main themes, because all the characters use diversion tactics as their way of viewing things in an attempt, not to make the problem seem so harsh. Raleigh is the odd one out, because he is the youngest and is a new soldier, as he only joined the battalion at the beginning of the play. He therefore does not yet know about the dangers in war and living in the trenches.
The detailed descriptions of the dead man’s body show the terrible costs of the war in a physical aspect. O’Brien’s guilt almost takes on its own rhythm in the repetition of ideas, phrases, and observations about the man’s body. Some of the ideas here, especially the notion of the victim being a “slim, young, dainty man,” help emphasize O’Brien’s fixation on the effects of his action—that he killed someone who was innocent and not meant to be fighting in the war. At the same time, his focus on these physical characteristics, rather than on his own feelings, betrays his attempt to keep some distance in order to dull the pain. The long, unending sentences force the reader to read the deta...