Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion for all quiet of the western front
All quiet on the western front analysis paper
All quiet on the western front summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion for all quiet of the western front
Events are the basis on which the audience is given a comprehensive insight into a society. They highlight what the population’s perceptions are and contribute to displaying certain themes. In the novel All Quiet on the Western Front, written by the esteemed Erich Maria Remarque, an insight unlike other books, of the war genre, is given. This novel is an accurate representation of the actuality of war. How lives are seen as dispensable and how the soldiers are emotionally and physically destroyed by it. Through these events the theme of the hypocrisy of the elder generation arises, as a constituent of this society. Specifically in this novel Kantorek, a school master, is the epitome of hypocrisy. Paul recalls his words this from his current …show more content…
position at the front, disillusioned and aware that he has been deceived. Also there is Corporal Himmelstoss, who trains the men to fight a war, yet when he is conscript he displays cowardice. In the seventh chapter Paul returns to his home on leave and discovers he is incompatible with his former society which deceived him. Paul reflects on Kantorek, a symbol of the society in which he lived in, filling students’ heads with notions of patriotism, believing in their country and god, and romanticism. Kantorek refers to them as the “iron youth”. He goes so far as to persuade his students to willingly enlist for the army with enthusiasm. So the event of reflection acts to comment on what the society believed war to be. Therefore, even without the persuasions of Kantorek, the youth were still under immense pressure to enlist, due to this common expectation, lest they be accused of cowardice. If Paul and his classmates had known that war was contrary to their naive expectations they would have been lacking in eagerness to participate in it. Later these members of the lost generation scoff at their former mentor and his ideals, which reflect society. These ideals are useless. The soldiers are made from flesh and blood rather than the “iron” of the “iron youth” which Kantorek speaks of. “Iron” suggests they are protected emotionally and physically against the dangers of war. But this novel proves it to be false. So ultimately the theme of hypocrisy of the elder generation is raised. How men such as Kantorek are content to preach about the virtues of sacrifice, yet remain safe behind their lines, ruining the lives of others. The theme of the lost generation is linked in that this is the result of the hypocrisy. The extent of the effect of this hypocrisy is most significant when contrasted with the event of Paul’s return on his leave. Another hypocritical character that is reflected upon through events in this novel is Corporal Himmelstoss.
He is described as a little power hungry man who torments his subjects and is thus despised by them. He shares similar attributes with Kantorek in that he believes in certain ideals. He trains the new recruits for a war which he has not directly been involved in and which he does not intend to be. Paul and his friends speculate at a little power has significantly changed the man. The Corporal has ideas of what the war is like. But these are false. The front is a substantially different place than what he assumes it to be. Himmelstoss is eventually conscripted into the army as a result of his cruelty. In a frontal charge Paul discovers him in a trench refusing to join. Paul forcefully reprimands him but “he does not stir”. Then, when Paul physically attempts to move him, “he draws up his legs, crouches back against the wall, and shows his teeth like a cur” and “barks” when Paul tries again. This imagery of a dog serves to reinforce the fact that he is a hypocrite. This is a very significant event. It acts as the second part of the proof which acts to heighten the overall hypocritical nature of the society which he …show more content…
represents. In addition, Paul is released from duty to visit his hometown for a period of seventeen days, although some of this time is spent traveling from the front.
He arrives back at his town, unused to the total absence of shells. He wonders how the populations can live such civil lives when there are such horrors occurring at the front. Sitting in his room, he attempts to recapture his innocence of youth preceding the war. But he is now of a lost generation, he has been estranged from his previous life and war is now the only thing he can believe in. It has ruined him in an irreversible way and has displayed a side of life which causes a childhood to vanish alongside any ambitions subsequent to the war in a civil life. They entered the war as mere children, yet they rapidly become adults. The only ideas as an adult they know are those of war. They have not experienced adulthood before so they cannot imagine what it will be lie when they return. His incompatibility is shown immediately after he arrives at the station of his home town. ”On the platform I look round; I know no one among all the people hurrying to and fro. A red-cross sister offers me something to drink. I turn away, she smiles at me too foolishly, so obsessed with her own importance: "Just look, I am giving a soldier coffee!"—She calls me "Comrade," but I will have none of it.” He is now aware of what she is
thinking. In conclusion through certain significant events an aspect of society is displayed: the hypocrisy of the elder generation, the rift between soldiers and their elders. Through Paul’s reflection on his old school master Kantorek, Corporal Himmelstoss’ cruelty and eventual cowardice and through his visit home on leave where he concedes he is of a lost generation.
The soldiers forget about the past, with good food and rest. Paul contemplates why they forget things so quickly; he thinks that habit helps eradicate memory. When one good thing happens, everything else is forgotten. The men turn into “wags” and “loafers” while resting. They cannot burden themselves with the emotions from the consequences
All Quiet on the Western Front is a powerful novel that communicates many messages concerning war’s hidden horrors and gives insight into the unique experiences of soldiers. Remarque uses a wide array of language techniques and writing concepts to expose readers to truth of the simultaneously corrupt yet complex affair that is war. It is an important, genuine novel – the type that needs to exist to end dreadful human affairs, such as
The names of the characters in the book are clear examples of irony. The protagonist’s last name, Bäumer, is similar to the word for ‘tree’ in German: baum. On the last page of the book, Paul’s death s described with a euphemism. “He fell on October 1918…”; “He had fallen forward…” (296). Paul’s last name is a kind of dramatic irony, since the reader could make a connection between his life and that of a tree, while the characters in the book never analyze his name enough to predict his death. Just as his last name suggests, Paul is like a tree. He is sturdy and strong during the war, yet when his time came, he only fell forward, like a tree that had been chopped down in the middle of a quiet forest. In addition, when Haie is beating Himmelstoss, Paul’s description of the final blow is that Haie, “… reached out his right arm… he looked as if he were going to reach down a star.” (49). Remarque used an ironic play on the name of the corporal, since Corporal Himmelstoss has a name that is also a play on German words; “himmel” meaning “heaven” and “stoss” (stoß) meaning kick, push, and other similar words. In effect, the beating that Himmelstoss receives is pushing him down from the “heaven” that ...
about the war and his lack of place in his old society. The war becomes
Training camp was the first actuality of what war was going to be like for the men. They thought that it would be fun, and they could take pride in defending their country. Their teacher, Kantorek, told them that they should all enroll in the war. Because of this, almost all of the men in the class enrolled. It was in training camp that they met their cruel corporal, Himelstoss. The men are in shock because he is so rude to them; they never thought that war would be this harsh. Paul and two of his friends are ridiculed the most by him. They have to lie down in the mud and practice shooting and jumping up. Also, these three men must remake Himelstoss’ bed fourteen times, until it is perfect. Himelstoss puts the young men through so much horror that they yearn for their revenge. Himelstoss is humiliated when he goes to tell on Tjaden, and Tjaden only receives an easy punishme...
During training Paul and his schoolmates come across Colonel Himmelstoss who teaches them the survival skills needed in the front. During training Himmelstoss tortures the recruits but is indirectly teaching them to become hard, pitiless, vicious, and tough soldiers. Althou...
War always seems to have no end. A war between countries can cross the world, whether it is considered a world war or not. No one can be saved from the reaches of a violent war, not even those locked in a safe haven. War looms over all who recognize it. For some, knowing the war will be their future provides a reason for living, but for others the war represents the snatching of their lives without their consent. Every reaction to war in A Separate Peace is different, as in life. In the novel, about boys coming of age during World War II, John Knowles uses character development, negative diction, and setting to argue that war forever changes the way we see the world and forces us to mature rapidly.
When the war breaks out, this tranquil little town seems like the last place on earth that could produce a team of vicious, violent soldiers. Soon we see Jim thrown into a completely contrasting `world', full of violence and fighting, and the strong dissimilarity between his hometown and this new war-stricken country is emphasised. The fact that the original setting is so diversely opposite to that if the war setting, the harsh reality of the horror of war is demonstrated.
In the book, All Quiet On The Western Front, the character Corporal Himmelstoss is portrayed as a disciplinary, brutal, and sympathetic type of person in the training camps. Although prior to his position as a trainer he was a postman. Corporal Himmelstoss is in charge of No. 9 platoon. His petite size and the sleek moustache is not intimidating at first, until he displays his strict side towards the young soldiers. The brutal strictness of discipline that the corporal is known for changes once he has a taste of the frontlines. Thereafter a new soft tender person is born in the need for companionship.
Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front is a novel that takes you through the life of a soldier in World War I. Remarque is accurately able to portray the episodes soldiers go through. All Quiet on the Western Front shows the change in attitudes of the men before and during the war. This novel is able to show the great change war has evolved to be. From lining your men up and charging in the eighteenth century, to digging and “living” in the trenches with rapid-fire machine guns, bombs, and flame-throwers being exposed in your trench a short five meters away. Remarque makes one actually feel the fun and then the tragedy of warfare. At the beginning of the novel Remarque gives you nationalist feelings through pride of Paul and the rest of the boys. However at the end of the war Remarque shows how pointless war really is. This is felt when everyone starts to die as the war progresses.
Life for the soldiers in the beginning is a dramatic one as they are ordered up to the frontline to wire fences. The frontline makes Paul feel immediately different as described here. "As if something is inside us, in our blood, has been switched on." The front makes Paul more aware and switched on as if his senses and reactions are sharpened. I think Paul and his friends are frightened when they are near the front line. After they wire the fences and they are heading to the barracks their group start to be fired at by the enemy. They manage to get through the shelling unscathed but they hear a horse that has been shot. The horse makes a terrible noise of anguish and is in terrible pain and it has been shot as the author describes here. "The belly of one of the horses has been ripped open and it guts are trailing out." This shows that there are not just human casualties of war; the innocent lives of animals can be affected as much as humans who fight in wars. Detering-one soldier in Pauls group-says." It is the most despicable thing of all to drag animals into a war." I agree with Detering, as animals had no choice about going to war. On the way back to the trucks that would take them back to the barracks Paul Baumers company are hit again by heavy shelling and they have to take cover in a military graveyard. The shells blow huge holes in the graveyard and create large...
In All Quiet On The Western Front the main character, Paul, begins to view the men he is fighting as more than just animals. In chapter eight Paul is at a camp in which former Russian soldiers are held prisoner. The Russian prisoners are given very little to eat and very little supplies or items at all needed to survive and in this image of misery Paul finally begins to see these men as people. Paul realizes that “ a word of command has made these men [his] enemies” and even more importantly that a “word of command might transform them into [his] friends” (Remarque 193-194). At this moment Paul realized that the men that he was fighting were more than his enemy and were also people. Even more importantly Paul realized that the men he was supposed to be fighting were not the actual enemy and were only the enemy because of a person's command. The narrator of The Man He Killed appears to grasp the idea that the enemy is human at the beginning of the poem as he says that if he and the enemy had met at an ancient inn they would have sat down to “wet right many a nipperkin” (Hardy). As both Paul and the narrator begin to view the people they are fighting as human their image of who the enemy is slowly fades away as both men realize
Teachers who cultivate the minds of the young and fuel their insatiable ideals become the primary objects of resentment for young soldiers in All Quiet on the Western Front. It is a resentment produced by the lies that teachers fed their students. While on the front, Paul reflects back on his instructor Kantorek who “gave us [them] long lectures until the whole of our [their] class went under his shepherding to the District Commandant and volunteered” (Remarque11). Kantorek, as many other teachers, knew nothing about war but still sent mere innocents to face death. They did not know that “there is nothing glorious, fitting, or right about dying in the way they [the youths] see their comrades dying” (Henningfeld). Depictions of romanticized death in glorifying battle and of the chivalry of soldiers in combat, fighting for their motherland was what they would sermonize. They were sermons of false passions.
Throughout their lives, people must deal with the horrific and violent side of humanity. The side of humanity is shown through the act of war. This is shown in Erich Remarque’s novel, “All Quiet on the Western Front”. War is by far the most horrible thing that the human race has to go through. The participants in the war suffer irreversible damage by the atrocities they witness and the things they go through.
The author's main theme centers not only on the loss of innocence experienced by Paul and his comrades, but the loss of an entire generation to the war. Paul may be a German, but he may just as easily be French, English, or American. The soldiers of all nations watched their co...