“How can there be a God in a world full of suffering?” This question, left unanswered, is enough to turn a potential believer or one of weak faith away from Christianity. The suffering of the world cannot be denied, especially living in a time preceded by the bloodiest century in human history. Furthermore, there is no simple, neat answer to account for the presence of pain, misery, and death within the world, while also accounting for the limitless power of a God. Malcolm Guite provides a reassuring poem in response to this issue, entitled “Jesus falls the third time,” central to his collection of poetry, Sounding the Seasons, in he describes the suffering of mankind and Christ.
The opening line the poem is thus, “Jesus weeps with you and with you he will stay.” The use of “you,” directly addresses the reader. The reader could be anyone who comes across the poem, and Guite cannot be sure who would and who would not read his poem, so the poem must refer to everyone, to not exclude any possible audiences. Guite is contending that Jesus weeps with everyone, that is, all of humanity. So, the question is: why is Jesus weeping? The poem goes on to describe the
…show more content…
suffering of the reader. He describes the “long descent through darkness and depression from which there seems to be no rising,” and almost wishing for a defeat, that is, death. Jesus is weeping with humanity because humanity is suffering. It doesn’t take a theologian to understand that Jesus is God, and therefore, Jesus could stop all suffering, including his own. However, he does not. In his ministry, he does not vanquish disease, poverty, and war. He ministers, performs miracles, and then goes to the cross, bearing the sin of the world, and dies. We are not to believe Christ is not in control because he suffers, but the poem expresses how we should take comfort because Christ chooses to suffer with us. Augustine on Suffering Augustine of Hippo, like many Christians today, could not simply dismiss the issue of suffering. A fourth century philosopher who converted to Christianity from Paganism at the age of 31, Augustine discussed the presence of suffering and evil in the world in his work, Enchiridion. His work still resonates with theologians today as an explanation for the coexistence of a loving God and a fallen world. He claims that evil cannot exist without good, and that the presence of evil in the world creates a greater good. Augustine beings his argument referencing Genesis: God created all things and declared them good. Everything in creation is good. Therefore, he argues, evil cannot be a “thing,” because it is not good. Since it is not good or a thing, God could not have created it. Evil, rather than being something in itself, is rather the absence of good, like how a shadow is not something of its own, but is merely an obstruction of light. Similar to shadow’s dependence upon the light for its existence, evil depends upon good for its own existence. Good can exist without evil, just as angels and God do, but evil, not being a thing of itself and merely being an obstruction of good, cannot exist without the presence of good. Knowing that goodness can exist without evil, one may ask, “then why is there evil, if good can exist without it?” Greg Koukl summarized Augustine’s answer, “since all that God made is good, even those things which appear evil only appear that way because of a limited context or perspective. When viewed as a whole, that which appears to be evil ultimately contributes to the greater good.” Christians often illustrate this concept with the image of a sunset. If one were to take a picture of the sunset, and to crop out all but a portion of a dark cloud, then viewers of the photo would believe the picture was dark, and not understand its purpose. This viewer would lack the context of the dark image, as they have no way of seeing the entire picture. If one were to see the image in its entirety, they would understand the purpose of the darker portions of the picture, which were essential for the image of the breathtaking sunset. Augustine believed that the evil and suffering in the world contribute to goodness. The most important commandments, according to Jesus, are to love God and one another. The greatest acts of love are not possible without sin. There would be no compassion without suffering, no mercy without offence, and no forgiveness without wrongdoing. The love God has for us is expressed with his mercy and forgiveness. It is because of the fallen world that people learn to love despite one another’s faults, and it is with this sort of love that mankind becomes more Godly, for this is the love God has for man. His mercy and forgiveness, though man sins against him every day, are infinite. Suffering as Part of the Human Condition Suffering was not always present in the world. In the beginning, Adam and Eve lived in Eden, a beautiful garden where they lived in unity with God. There was no sin, sickness, hatred, pain, war or death. However, there was never a day in which there was no free will. God told Adam, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden, but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for on the day you eat from it, you will surely die.” If Adam did not have the choice to eat from the tree, committing the original sin, then God would have no reason to tell Adam not to. When Adam ate the fruit, he was cast from the garden, condemning humanity with him. “Suffering was never God’s intention for the world,” says John Berry, editor and chief of Bible Study magazine.
“Humans made the choice to allow suffering to enter the world.” By eating the apple, Adam made a conscious choice to go against the will of God, and it was this choice that cast mankind from the garden, and rebellious choices of the like made by his descendants that allow suffering to continue in the world. Mchanon, a Puritan minister says on the matter, “When men are regenerated, they have the capacity to choose good or evil. The will was corrupted as a result of original sin, which envelops all of humanity in a mass damnation, unless otherwise rescued by Christ.” Man’s free will, a good gift from God, has been corrupted, and without Christ, acting in perfect submission, there is no
redemption. “Simply because we are human, we suffer,” contends Mary Craig in her article on human suffering. She argues that if God intervened with mankind’s decisions, then free will would be meaningless, “and we would be no more than robots. The price of our freedom is pain and suffering, a price that must be paid.” Man removes God and His goodness from their lives when making choices, and it is those choices that lead to war and destruction, she argues, not a sadistic God. Men repeatedly make such choices, for it is in their nature since the original sin, as Paul tells the Romans, “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” In this fallen world, where suffering and sin are a reality of the human condition, Guite is correct in assuming that his readers have all suffered, and have reached low points in their lives in which they felt like they could not go on: “He stumbles beside you when the doubt/ That always haunts you cuts you down at last/ And takes away the hope that drove you on.” This doubt becomes most prevalent in man’s darkest hours. When Jesus separated from God to become a man on earth, and in this felt the distance from God that men feel. It is this feeling of distance from God that exacerbates suffering, and takes away feelings of hope. However, the hope is Christ himself, who has stumbled and fallen with men, but has risen, and so we will rise with Him.
N.T. Wright: During my first semester at Northwestern College, I was assigned the book, “The Challenge of Jesus” by N.T. Wright for one of my Biblical Studies courses. This book and every other book Tom Wright has written has dramatically impacted my Christian faith. Dr. Wright has not only defended the basic tenants of the Christian faith, but also has shown how an academically-minded pastor ought to love and care for his or her congregants. N.T. Wright was previously the Bishop of Durham and pastored some of the poorest in the United Kingdom. His pastoral ministry has helped shape his understanding of God’s kingdom-vision which he is diagramming within his magnum opus “Christian Origins and the Question of God”. This series has instructed myself and countless other pastors to be for God’s kingdom as we eagerly await Christ’s return. Additionally, I have had the privilege of meeting with N.T. Wright one-on-one on numerous occasions to discuss faith, the Church, and his research. I firmly believe Tom Wright is the greatest New Testament scholar of our generation and he is the primary reason why I feel called into ministry.
Drugs are known to be the shortcut to nefarious and decadent life. Jesus’ Son is a collection of stories containing vivid narrative about life as a drug addict. These stories are all told in first person narrative, which is perhaps one person who is suffering from poverty and drug addiction. They are seemingly disconnected but are all about the experience of drug addiction, working together under the theme of drug addiction and how it fragments people mentally and physically. “Car Crash While Hitchhiking” and “Work” both convey this theme by using abrupt tone and unique figurative language. However, “Car Crash While Hitchhiking” characterizes the protagonist more directly to reveal the fall of protagonist because of drug.
The book Under the Feet of Jesus by Helena Maria Viramontes shows you the story of Estrella and her family and the struggles they face as migrant workers. Among all the symbolism in the book the one that stand out the most is Petra’s statue of Christ, which symbolizes the failure of religion and the oppressive nature of the Christian religion especially in minorities. Throughout the book, Estrella’s mother, Petra relies on superstitions and religion to get her through the hardships in life. In tough times, she turns to the statue and prays for guidance. Her thirteen-year-old daughter Estrella is the first of her family to realize that she needs to stop relying on religion and take control of her life. This brings in a wave of self-empowerment, not only for Estrella but eventually for all the characters as well. In the book, you’re able to see how religion exemplifies the failures of religion in minorities and how it hinders the growth of the characters while helping some of them.
Adam was the first man that God created and was created to be the image of God himself. God planted the beautiful Garden of Eden in which there was no sin and the trees were filled with delicious fruits, everything a person would need to eat. In the middle of the garden was the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.” One day, a serpent came into the garden and convinced Eve to eat an apple from the forbidden Tree of Knowledge. The fruit did not make Adam and Eve any better than they already were. Instead, the jealousy, the desire to eat what was forbidden—and then the physical eating of the fruit that was forbidden—allowed sin to enter humanity. God punished Adam and Eve, and all their descendants, by making their lives hard. Likewise, in the novel, peace and innocence left the Devon school and Gene and Finny's friendship, and after the winter session, discipline and hard work began. Eve eating the apple can be paralleled to Gene jostling the limb of the tree while Phineas was standing on the edge of it for in that second, both of their lives ch...
If God loves us, why does He allow us to suffer? The central question in Shadowlands challenges traditional religious and moral conventions. It is a question asked by many, with few satisfactory answers. Before attempting to answer the question, and explore its relationship to Shadowlands, let us first define the question, so its implications may be more clearly understood. At the heart of the question is a doubt in the goodness of God, "If God loves us". From the beginning it is clear that God is being judged and criticized by the question. Then the second phrase follows"Why does He allow us to suffer?". The assumption made in the second phrase is that God has enough control over the world to prevent suffering. If He can prevent suffering, and He really loves us, then why shouldn' t He excercise that control, and prevent needless suffering?
Edward Taylor’s Upon Wedlock, and Death of Children and Upon a Wasp Chilled with Cold are similar in their approach with the illustration of how beautiful and magnificent God’s creations are to humankind. However, each poem presents tragic misfortune, such as the death of his own children in Upon Wedlock, and Death of Children and the cold, enigmatic nature of human soul in Upon a Wasp Chilled with Cold. Taylor’s poems create an element of how cruel reality can be, as well as manifest an errant correlation between earthly life and spiritual salvation, which is how you react to the problems you face on earth determines the salvation that God has in store for you.
The question of why bad things happen to good people has perplexed and angered humans throughout history. The most common remedy to ease the confusion is to discover the inflicter of the undeserved suffering and direct the anger at them: the horror felt about the Holocaust can be re-directed in the short term by transforming Adolf Hitler into Lucifer and vilifying him, and, in the long term, can be used as a healing device when it is turned into education to assure that such an atrocity is never repeated. What, however, can be done with the distasteful emotions felt about the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Surely the citizens of those two cities did not themselves directly provoke the government of the United States to deserve the horror of a nuclear attack. Can it be doubted that their sufferings were undeserved and should cause deep sorrow, regret, and anger? Yet for the citizens of the United States to confront these emotions they must also confront the failings of their own government. A similar problem is found in two works of literature, Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound and the book of Job found in the Tanakh. In each of these works a good man is seen to be suffering at the hand of his god; Prometheus is chained to a rock by Zeus who then sends an eagle to daily eat Prometheus' liver while Job is made destitute and brought to endure physical pain through an agreement between God~ and Satan. To examine the travails of these two men is to discover two vastly different concepts of the relationship between god and man.
After reviewing the work of David Hume, the idea of a God existing in a world filled with so much pain and suffering is not so hard to understand. Humes’ work highlights some interesting points which allowed me to reach the conclusion that suffering is perhaps a part of God’s divine plan for humans. Our morals and values allow us to operate and live our daily lives in conjunction with a set of standards that help us to better understand our world around us and essentially allows us to better prepare for the potential life after life. For each and every day we get closer to our impending deaths and possibly closer to meeting the grand orchestrator of our universe.
The existence of a God is always questioned, but it is questioned even more so at times of suffering. As Rabbi Dr Louie Jacobs comments “If God exists… how and why could such a Being tolerate all the pain, misery, and anguish that is often the lot of humanity”.
Despite its prevalence, suffering is always seen an intrusion, a personal attack on its victims. However, without its presence, there would never be anyway to differentiate between happiness and sadness, nor good and evil. It is encoded into the daily lives people lead, and cannot be avoided, much like the prophecies described in Antigone. Upon finding out that he’d murdered his father and married his mother,
God and the suffering He seems to allow is the paradoxical question posed since the start of religion. Philosophy and literature alike have long struggled with the issue, and poet Countee Cullen takes yet another crack at it in the poem “Yet Do I Marvel”. Cullen uses rhyme, classical allusion, and Shakespearean sonnet form in “Yet Do I Marvel” to exhibit God’s paradoxical nature and purpose the true marvel is in the miracles of life.
In a world of many different religions and beliefs that are separated by physical boundaries, imposed values, and moral codes there holds a universalized question by all who believe in the existence of God: Why would a being capable of creating good things also partake in the creation of evil? Many people often find themselves asking that same question when a tragedy has occurred which is a common happening in this day and age. The poems “Yet Do I Marvel” by Countee Cullen and William Blake’s “the Tyger” both contain this bewilderment as to why God would create and disperse negativity throughout the world to display this theme that is universalized through time, culture, and
The concept of suffering plays an important role in Christianity, regarding such matters as moral conduct, spiritual advancement and ultimate destiny. Indeed an emphasis on suffering pervades the Gospel of Mark where, it can be argued, we are shown how to "journey through suffering" (Ditzel 2001) in the image of the "Suffering Son of Man" (Mark 8:32), Jesus Christ. Although theologians have suggested that Mark was written to strengthen the resolve of the early Christian community (Halpern 2002, Mayerfeld 2005), the underlying moral is not lost on a modern reader grappling with multifarious challenges regarding faith in the face of suffering. In his article "A Christian Response to Suffering", William Marravee (1987) describes suffering as an "experience over which we men and women continue to stumble and fall". The way we view God is crucial to the way we view suffering according to Marravee, who delineates the disparity between a view of God as an ‘outsider’ and the biblical image of God – where God is an ‘insider’ who suffers with us in our struggle. This essay seeks to explain the Christian view of suffering and the purpose suffering can have in our lives.
It is impossible to taste the sweet without having first tasted the sour. This is one of the many lessons found within Genesis 2.0 and more specifically the story of Adam and Eve. It is also from this twisted tale of betrayal and deceit that we gain our knowledge of mankind?s free will, and God?s intentions regarding this human capacity. There is one school of thought which believes that life is mapped out with no regard for individual choice while contrary belief tells us that mankind is capable of free will and therefore has control over hisown life and the consequences of his actions. The story of Adam and Eve and the time they spent in ?paradise? again and again points to the latter as the truth. Confirming that God not only gave mankind the ability to think for himself but also the skills needed to take responsibility for those thoughts and the actions that they produced.
When wisdom is mixed with disobedience it opens the door for evil to abound. Although Eve was the first to take of the fruit and Adam the second, both shared responsibility in the transgression as Arnold describes it. (62;67,