Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyses of bureaucracy
Analyses of bureaucracy
Role of government in poverty reduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyses of bureaucracy
Name: Abbas Sibai Class: Public Policy - Fall 2014 Professor Mikhail Pryadilnikov
Incentives as Reform Model for Street-Level Bureaucracy
Michael Lipsky in his research on “Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Critical Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats” examines the role of front-line public employees in the bureaucracy. Street-level bureaucracy is the subset of a public agency or government institution containing the individuals who carry out and enforce the actions required by laws and public policies. Those individuals who interact directly with citizens. There are many street-level bureaucrats in public service agencies such as welfare offices. In fact, it seems that the poorer
…show more content…
On average, over 80% of gross fares end up in the hands of street level bureaucrats. What’s more, of the percentage that is retained by public institution, a large portion goes to cover variable expenses within the service. These expenses include payment processing, payment fraud, refunds, customer service, dispute resolution, logistics and service fees for the street level bureaucrats, and local regulatory efforts.
- Input: Public Institutions, Street-Level Bureaucrat, Clients
- Transformation: Connecting the (Street-Level Bureaucrats) and Clients via public institutions to deliver service upon request from the client.
- Output: Service provided to the client upon their desired request
- Flexibility: refers to how quickly operations processes can adjust to changes in the market.
This can be achieved through: - Increasing the provider's skill level: Public Institutions are able to do this easily, as they freely hire licensed Street-Level Bureaucrats. By increasing restrictions, it allows public institution to find higher skilled Street-Level Bureaucrats to provide the service.
- Improving the level of technology: Buying new technologies increases flexibility and capacity
- Dependability: Refers to how consistent and reliable a business' products are. In services, it is the consistence of service standards and reliability. A measure for this is the number of complaints received.
…show more content…
This process allows the public institutions to create and maintain a decent and respectful environment for clients and Street-Level Bureaucrats.
- Real-time feedback allows public institutions to respond quickly to issues, and may result in a Street-Level Bureaucrats being deactivating due to their unreliable service.
- Quality of Design: arises from an understanding of clients and their preferences. It extends to how well a product is made or a service is delivered.
- Quality of Service: Quality of design and quality of conformance can be applied to the design and delivery of services. In this sense quality refers to:Reliability of service Public institutions promises that when an clients requests a service, the allocated Street-Level Bureaucrats will be available to track. The client will be informed when their service is ready and the Street-Level Bureaucrat name and details will be indicated.
How the service meets the specific need of the client?
Public Institutions uses a feedback system whereby the client's feedback is noted. This allows them to meet the specific needs of the client next time they use the
Often, when the discussion of American bureaucracy is broached in conversation, those holding these conversations often think of the many men and women who operate behind the scenes within the government. This same cross section of Americans is looked upon as the real power within the federal government and unlike the other branches of government, has little to no oversight. A search of EBSCO resulted in the following definition, an organization “structure with a rigid hierarchy of personnel, regulated by set rules and procedures” (Bureaucracy, 2007). Max Weber believed that a bureaucracy was technically the most efficient form of organization, one structured around official functions that are bound by rules, each function having its own specified competence (2007). This wide ranging group of Americans has operated within the gaps, behind the scenes, all under the three core branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The division of government into three branches and separate powers gives each branch both exclusive powers and some additional power...
According to Merriam-Webster, quality is defined as how good or bad something is. This applies to all things such as a computer, food, and even life. However, Pirsig goes beyond the superficial and explores the true meaning of Quality.
Modern Bureaucracy in the United States serves to administer, gather information, conduct investigations, regulate, and license. Once set up, a bureaucracy is inherently conservative. The reason the bureaucracy was initiated may not continue to exist as a need in the future. The need or reason may change with a change in the times and the culture needs. A bureaucracy tends to make decisions that protect it and further it’s own existence, possibly apart from the wishes of the populace. It may not consistently reflect what might be optimal in terms of the needs and wants of the people. Local governments employ most of the United States civil servants. The 14 cabinet departments in the U.S. are run day-to-day by career civil servants, which have a great deal of discretionary authority.
This essay will discuss the mainstream and critical perspectives of bureaucracy and post-bureaucracy. It will begin by examining the characteristics of bureaucracy and then compare the mainstream and the critical views. Post-bureaucracy will then be discussed using the same structure.
• Competitive pricing: The pricing will be more than competitors but will be reasonable compared to the services
...r pillars of public administration are equally important in the process of public administration and complement one another in the provision of quality public service. When public administrators have economy in mind they focus on the best combination of available resources to provide optimum public service. To ensure that public service is not limited to only a section of the public, the issue of equity is taken into consideration so that public interest is realized. Efficiency and effectiveness additionally go hand in hand in ensuring that allocated resources are used in the best possible manner to attain set goals. Thus whereas the first three public administration pillars – Economy, efficiency and effectiveness are concerned with how public service is provided the fourth and most recent addition (Equity) concerns with for whom public service is provided.
Who are street-level bureaucrats and why are they so powerful? What can we do to curb their excessive power? INTRODUCTION The process of implementation of public policy has been a main concern and highly debatable issue of public administration. For years many scholars have tried to define a clear relationship between the laws enacted by legislature and the laws administered by the executive branch in government. Street-level bureaucrats, who comprise a large portion of all public employees in governmental organization, can be seen as CONCEPT AND THEORY Street-level bureaucracy, in general, is defined as “the subset of a public agency or government institution containing the individuals who carry out and enforce the actions required by laws and public policies”.
Service quality – this refers to the quality of the support that the users of the system receive from the IS department and the IT support team. Key attributes include responsiveness, accuracy, reliability, technical competence and understanding of the personnel staff.
Max Weber, Henri Fayol and Luther Halsey Gulick all addressed issues, concerning how an overall organization should be structured, bureaucratic administration, while Frederick Taylor’s theory of scientific management concentrated on techniques for increasing production (Tomkins, 2005). This essay will focus on the disadvantages and the advantages, including the effective and efficient components, of bureaucracy in public management.
Quality relates to ensuring that the item or service supplied firstly meets the specification but also that considers the lifespan of the product, ease of repair and maintenance (Coyle, 2017). For example, a light fitting may meet the required light output specification but if it only lasts a few hours before blowing it would not be suitable in a long-life appliance.
Ohemeng, Frank, L.K. and Leone, Robert P. “Should Public Sector be RUN like a Business.” Approaching Public Administration. Edmond Montgomery Publications Limited, (2011), P. 1-362.
Service Quality: This dimension is the last and final factor of the value it appears when the customer has made up his mind to purchase a product or service. Service quality decides the relationship between the customer and the store.
According to Sapru R.K. (2008) p370-371 the traditional ideal of public administration which inclined to be firm and bureaucratic was based on processes instead of outcomes and on setting procedures to follow instead of focusing on results. This paradigm can be regarded as an administration under formal control of the political control, constructed on a firmly ranked model of bureaucracy, run by permanent and neutral public servants, driven only by public concern. In emerging nations the administration was true bureaucracy meaning government by officers. In this perspective Smith (1996) p235-6 perceived that“the bureaucracy controls and manages the means of production through the government. It increases chances for bureaucratic careers by the creation of public figures,demanding public managers, marketing boards.
Since the 1980s vast change initiatives has been undertaken in the public sector of the developed countries. The inflexible, hierarchical and bureaucratic form of Public management which was common during the twentieth century is shifting to more flexible, market-oriented form of public management. This dramatic shift alters the role of government and the relationship between government and citizens. Traditional public administration has been questioned in practice, and the acceptance of new public management means the rise of a new model in public sector management (Hughes, 1998).
The dimensions of service quality refer to the attributes which contribute to consumer expectations and perceptions of service quality, thus serving as the determinants of consumers’ quality assessment (Rowley, 1998). The most well-known, commonly used service quality scale is the SERVQUAL, a general instrument for measuring service quality developed by Parasuraman et al., (1988). It includes five dimensions of service quality: (1) tangibles: appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel and communication materials; (2) reliability: ability to perform the promised services dependably and accurately; (3) responsiveness: willingness to help customers and provide prompt service; (4) assurance: knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to convey trust and confidence; and (5) empathy: caring, individualized attention that a firm provides its