Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis of two kinds
Literary analysis of two kinds
Literary analysis of two kinds
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis of two kinds
However, as the novel progresses, the soundness of his fantasy begins to unwind and undergo pressure. As seen in Scene Two of Act One, the party notes to be in present time, however it is still a projection of Gallimard’s imagination. It can be considered present time because he situates the scene in present time, but the conversations and proceedings are still a projection of Gallimard’s imagination and are therefore fictitious. Merely by reading the dialogue of the party members, it is evident how extensive Gallimard resides in his denial. The party goers mock his ridiculous status and position, and even question how Gallimard has not come to believe the truth, stating his fault is due to “simple ignorance” (page three). By addressing Gallimard’s …show more content…
denial, the party goers reveal an internal conflict residing deep within Gallimard. With the party spawning entirely from Gallimard's own mind, his sincere delusional reception and reaction to their conversation is absurd due to it being a figment of his imagination.
It is assumed he should be able to control his own fantasies, yet they materialize as counteractive, self sabotaging and destructive independent entities. In this scene, Gallimard takes the role as more of an observer and audience member than narrative controller. The dialogue from the party goers represents the underlying current of Gallimard’s subconscious, or his id3, which is evidently at war with his ego4. Despite his partially subconscious defense mechanisms fighting against his reality, the manifestations of his mind seem to be involuntarily counteracting his state of denial. It is as if the deep subconscious mind of his id is acting on its own accord, which is common to the characteristics that identify this layer of the human psyche, with the “id” commonly being compared by Freud to a wild horse5. Therefore, Gallimard’s blatant disregard to the party goers insults are due to his ego, which is trying to regain control over his mind. He resides in a passive defensive position where he can only adapt and adjust to the barrages thrown against him from his own
mind. Another example of how Gallimard’s control over his own mind fails is during his scenes interacting with Song. As he tries to tell his version of events, Song from the present interjects and presents the reality of what actually occurred in the past. Gallimard tries to exclude chinese spy Comrade Chin from the procession of events, as well as trying to prevent Song from undressing into a man in order to erase any corruption associated with her. However, his efforts are usurped as Song acts on his own accord and infiltrates Gallimard’s fantasy with reality. Even though all the events on stage are a figment of his imagination, it is apparent Gallimard has no control over them. In Scene Eleven of Act Two, Gallimard unsuccessfully attempts to control Song as he exclaims to her “you have to do what I say! I’m conjuring you up in my mind!”. She responds, saying “Rene, I’ve never done what you said. Why should it be any different in your mind?” The reality of his situation being presented through his own imaginationー despite his best efforts to repress itー portrays how truth inevitably overpowers “the self-deceiving narratives human beings construct to comfort themselves” (Jensen). Song directly accosts Gallimard with this fact by stating “No matter what your eyes tell you, you can’t ignore the truth. You already know too much”. (page 78) This presents that subconscious knowledge of truth repressed by the desire to retain blissful ignorance will ultimately resurface despite the natural instinct to preserve happiness.
Hyde gives several definitions of qualities that contribute to the archetype of trickster. It is stated that the trickster, when in the presence of someone who cannot make an honorable choice, “suggests an amoral action, something right/wrong that will get life going again,” (Hyde 7). Additionally, a trickster very well may be troublemakers, leaving mischief strewn across their path, however despite “all their disruptive behavior, tricksters are regularly honored as the creators of culture,” (Hyde 8). The Green Knight tests Gawain’s honor by swaying him to make immoral decisions, and while these actions may cause the knight to falter some in his honor and chivalry, in the end he is stronger for it and grows in character. In the tale, the Green Knight crosses boundaries, offers a sense of contradiction, and allows a space within society to question itself. All these reasons fulfill the requirements of the trickster archetype as laid out by Hyde, and prove that the Green Knight typifies the characteristics of the trickster within the story of Sir Gawain and the Green
In his youth, Gimpel was picked on and made fun of for being easily fooled. Gimpel, however, was rarely unaware of his peers' intent. Gimpel simply preferred to avoid confrontation and simply let them “take advantage of [him]” (96). This purposeful show of pacifism does not make Gimpel a fool, but quite the opposite. And even though if he slapped someone they'd “see all the way to Cracow”, Gimpel was “not a slugger by nature” so he'd “let it pass” (96,96,96). He knowingly let his peers “fool” him and take advantage of him simply to avoid having to deal with conflict. Gimpel does not see any harm in letting himself be fooled, and just in case they might actually be telling the tru...
However, Cyrano should have realized that with De Guiche’s support he would have a higher status and a more stable economic source. The reason why Cyrano's ingenuity is never publicly recognized is because his poems are never published. Not only does he not have funds to pay for their publication, but his poems are often spontaneous and thus recapturable in their context without the situation to which it applied. A number of his poems are also on the objectionable because of the merciless way he regards others. If he would seize this brilliant opportunity, he would have made more friends and fewer enemies, and he would not have died so young. It was his impudent satire that infuriated his enemies to the point of conspiring his "accidental" death. This somewhat rash action reflects on Act I when he threw a bag of gold to th...
In the final scenes of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Gawain’s encounter with Sir Bertilak allows Gawain to perceive his own flaws, manifested in his acceptance of the Green Girdle. The court’s reaction to his personal guilt highlights the disconnect between him and the other knights of the Round Table. Gawain’s behavior throughout the poem has been most noteworthy; his understanding of his sin, one that many of us would dismiss since it was propelled by his love of life, enhances his stature as a paragon of chivalry.
A few characters in The Once and Future King knew about Guenever’s secret and wanted to exploit her and take care of personal issues, while others were completely oblivious to the affair. King Arthur, for example, “hated knowing the future and managed to dismiss it from his mind”, as told on page 335. He knew, from Merlyn’s warning, about the affair and was too nice to believe in it. Weakness and ignorance flooded his mind, as it was right in front of his face. Mordred and Agravaine, on the other hand, hated Lancelot and Arthur, and manipulated Guenever’s private life to fit their desire of killing them. Their scheme is explained on page 522, when Agravaine cunningly states that “(he would kill them) not by using force against force, but by using our brains.” In a mischievous plot, Arthur would be given actual proof of the affair and, in time, he and Lancelot would eventually obliterate each other.
In The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, there are several parties that take place in the novel that provide the reader with insight on the characters. At each party the reader gains new information about the major characters. At the first festivity, it is in Tom Buchanan's house in East Egg, a large and elaborate house , owned by Tom and Daisy Buchanan. Tom , Nick , Daisy , and Jordan have dinner. It is a private dinner party, and the conversation that takes place during this dinner, includes talking about other people, and Jordan enlightening Nick on Tom’s affair with Myrtle.
Through jest of a game the Green knight enlightens Gawain the short sights of chivalry. He comes to realize within himself that the system which bore him values appearance over truth. Ultimately he understands that chivalry provides a valuable set of ideals toward which to strive, but a person must retain consciousness of his or her own mortality and weakness in order to live deeply. While it is chivalrous notions, which kept him, alive throughout the test of the Green Knight, only through acute awareness of the physical world surrounding him was he able to develop himself and understand the Knights message. From the onset of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight the author relies intensely upon descriptive language to create ambiance and tonality, but it is only later in the work, upon Sir Gawain’s development, that like Gawain, the reader is able to derive meaning from the descriptive physicality and understand the symbiotic relationship of nature and society.
...h century or today, is human and subject to failings, as well. Gawain learned his lesson from the Green Knight and communicated it to Arthur's court. I believe that the author hopes that his audience will take the message to heart, as well.
This monologue represents an exercise in creative writing. It was created to convey something that Sir Gawain might say:
In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, a motif of “unrequited desire” runs deep through the novel, and while the main characters exemplify this theme, the fact that the minor characters also demonstrates this unreturned respect suggests that the motif runs deep in the novel. These minor characters include the girls in yellow at Gatsby’s parties, who fail to gain the recognition they desire from the wealthy. Also through the different minor characters and especially the McKees, Fitzgerald illustrates different methods that the minor characters attempt, yet fail, to gain acknowledgment. Besides the behaviours of the characters, the time of appearance for the characters also becomes significant, as Catherine, who fails to achieve recognition
This is particularly potent when considering the novel’s end in which Cromwell has reached his peak in terms of influence and power, and yet the reader’s historical perspective awards them the knowledge of his later downfall that follows shortly afterwards. This therefore indicates that the novel acts simply as a snapshot in the never-ending progression of
The identity of a person is created by how one precieves themselves to other people. With respect to Garcin of No Exit, this is very evident. He claims: "I'm no talker, I don't move much; in fact I'm a very peacful sort of fellow"(Satre 9) even though speaks and voices his opinion often. Garcin becomes more comfortable when he begins to realize his identity, "I'm no gentleman, and I have no compunction about striking a woman". Thomas Whitaker believes "Garcin...finally sees that one who identitfies conciousness with any role or ideal must submit to the unpredictable validating judgement of others"(par. 4). Garcin's identity becomes clear as soon as he enters the room when talking to the valet: "I tell you, I regret nothing"(Satre 24). This is also evidence that Garcin thinks of himself as a hero. Garcin's deludes himself by convincing himself that he did do the right thing: "I shan't be sorry for myself, I'll face the situation, as I said just n...
People may urge to sacrifice Egoism and to sacrifice himself, unthinkingly, for God and this Country, or whether if the political and religion represents the same ideas. The unthinkable thing about egoism is that people think differently. He asked people to imagine that a man is proven to have a ring that makes them invisible. When in control of this ring, the man can perform unjustly without fear of punishment. No one wouldn’t comprehend what Glaucon had claimed, but the most thing to achieve is to behave unjustly if he/she had the ring. He could pamper all of his greedy, self-important, and immoral urges. This story verifies that people are terrified of punishment for
...ing of what he may have once declared to be truth. Ibsen uses Rank to make these truths about Nora and Torvald's personalities evident to the reader.
Wilde’s strategically uses each of the characters to represent the manner in which those, who were in the upper class, would behave. As the play begins we are instantly battered with the satirically condemning wit that is Oscar Wilde. Algernon requests his servant, Lane, to produce the cucumber sandwiches for the arrival of Lady Bracknell. Lane and Algernon have idle chatter and end up on the subject of marriage. After Lane exits the room and Jack insists, “Lane’s views on marriage seem somewhat lax. Really, if the lower orders don’t set us a good example, what on earth is the use of them? They seem, as a class, to have absolutely no sense of moral responsibility”. This is Wilde’s analysis on the absurdity of the upper class and also gives us an improved view of the character Algernon. Algernon is a constituent of the affluent. He assumes less responsibility than his counterpart Jack,...