Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Immigration essay us history
Immigration essay us history
Immigration essay us history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A View of Perspective: “Free Vacation House” by Anzia Yezierska How someone experiences a city is determined by many factors such as sex, race, religion, time period, ethnic group and whether they come from a working class background or a wealthy background. These things shape the way they view and experience the city. In Anzia Yezierska’s story “Free Vacation House” the main character whose name is not given is a wife and mother of polish decent living in tenement housing in the early 1900’s. She is a part of the lower income or working class from what we can determine. She resides in the Lower East Side of Manhattan which is very congested with many immigrants and small housing. In this story the main character is not given a name as if to make us feel as if she could be anyone or even us. Throughout this story you are made to see things from the mother’s (main character) perspective by the author not giving you a name as well as the way she inverts her sentences and uses Yiddish within the story …show more content…
further depicting what the mother is feeling and experiencing through this very livid language. In the 1900’s not many women worked outside of the home. They were mostly responsible for cooking, cleaning and raising the children and doing laundry. Our main character begins the story by telling the teacher from the school how overwhelmed she is , stating, “ When I get up in the morning , I don’t know on what to turn first :should I nurse the baby make Sam’s breakfast or attend the older children. I only got two hands. (1)”. This inverted language style tells us that the main character is more than likely of foreign decent and not extremely educated. The housing in which she live with her husband and children is referred to as tenement housing. According to History.com the tenement housing of the early 1900’s in the Lower East Side of Manhattan were once “single family dwellings that were increasingly divided into multiple living spaces. . . too often cramped, poorly lit and lacked indoor plumbing and proper ventilation”. This description is a complete opposite view from the way she describes the country house. Our main character is from a working class and is a very proud woman who seems to feel trapped or imprisoned in her home and lifestyle and is completely overwhelmed She shows us this with her response to the charities and her not wanting to answer questions about her families’ income. The women going to the country are told to report to the charities office and inspected by doctors, questioned about their finances. They were then lead out into the street to the car that takes them to the country. Not knowing why they were being put through so much she makes the statement, “For why did they make us walk through the street, after the nurse, like stupid cows? Were n’t all of us smart enough to find our way without the nurse? Why should the whole world have to see that we are from the charities?”. The country house was more of a prison for the mother even though it was open and beautiful.
The women are put on a very strict time schedule told only to stay in the back of the house and not to let their children run or play to loud. This schedule was determined by bells she states,” Bell one, was for getting up. Bell two, for getting babies’ bottles. Bell three, for coming to breakfast. Bell four, for bathing babies. If we come later, after the ring from the bell, then we’ll not get what we need.” “Everything in the front from the house must be kept perfect for the show for visitors” as if to keep up the appearance of the Social betterments Society’s Good work for the less fortunate lower class women. The house in the country is set up so that the wealthy women can come and applaud their charitable acts. The front is set up for the wealthy and the women from the charities are only allowed in designated areas on a strict schedule and no
freedom. There is a proudness about the mother that makes her anxious when answering the questions. “Charities! I scream out. Ain’t the charities those who help the beggars out? I ain’t no beggar. I’m not asking for no charity. My husband, he works.” “I shivered to think how I would feel, suppose somebody from my friends should see me walking into the charity office with my children . . . They may think I go to beg. Have I come down so low as to be seen by the charities? But what’s the use? Should I knock my head on the walls? I had to go. “ At the charities office, “ I took my seat with them and we were sitting and sitting and looking on one another sideways and crosswise and with lowered eyes like guilty criminals. Each one felt like hiding herself from all the rest. Each one felt black with shame in the face. Repeatedly the mother is questioned by the betterment society. They want information that makes her uncomfortable and it seems to make her feel like they were demeaning her. They repeatedly put the women through questions asking them, “Do you keep boarders? How much do you spend out for rent? How much wages does your man get for a week?” The Dr. “I wish I could ease out my heart a little bit, and tell in words how that doctor looked on us, just because we were poor and had no money to pay. He only used the ends from his fingertips to examine us. From the way he was afraid to touch us or come near us, he made us feel like we had some catching sickness that he was trying not to get on him.”
The novel Bread Givers by Anzia Yezierska examines the roles and experiences of Jewish immigrants in America roughly after the years of WWI in New York City. The novel follows the journey of Sara, a young Jewish immigrant, and her family who comes to the country from Poland with different beliefs than those in the Smolinsky household and by much of the Jewish community that lived within the housing neighborhoods in the early 1900s. Through Sara’s passion for education, desire for freedom and appreciation for her culture, she embodies a personal meaning of it means to be an “American”.
According to Coming to America: A History of Immigration and Ethnicity in American Life, between 1880 and about World War I, the vast majority of Eastern European Jews and Southern Italians came to the United States populating neighborhoods in New York and the Lower East Side is the best example. One thing, which was common to the immigrant experience is that, all immigrants come to the United States as the “land of opportunity”. They come to America with different types of expectations that are conditioned by their origins and families. But every immigrant comes to America wanting to make himself/herself into a person, to be an individual and to become somebody. In this case, the author showed in Bread Givers, Sarah’s desire to make herself into something and bring something unique to America, which only she can bring. It is an effort to understand the immigrants, particularly Jewish immigrants, from a woman’s point of view. The book shows that it was a challenge for Jewish immigrant children, particularly females, on the account of the intensity of their family’s connections and obligations that was so critical for the immigrant communities. This was true for the immigrants who came to settle in the neighborhoods like the one Sarah and her family settled in.
Anzia Yezierska’s 1925 novel Bread Givers ends with Sara Smolinsky’s realization that her father’s tyrannical behavior is the product of generations of tradition from which he is unable to escape. Despite her desire to embrace the New World she has just won her place in, she attempts to reconcile with her father and her Jewish heritage. The novel is about the tension inherent in trying to fit Old and New worlds together: Reb tries to make his Old World fit into the new, while Sara tries to make her New World fit into the Old. Sara does not want to end up bitter and miserable like her sisters, but she does not want to throw her family away all together. Her struggle is one of trying to convince her patriarchal family to accept her as an independent woman, while assimilating into America without not losing too much of her past.
4: what makes Bechdel’s story interesting? What makes Bechdel’s story so fascinating is that she took what would have been an amazing novel and turned it into a comic book. Aside from the author’s lack of celebrity, she created a profound grippy story. Most autobiographies are written by famous people. Bechdal’s creativity as a writer and illustrator led her to capture thousands of satisfying details, with word and images, along with emotional truth and humor to produce this extraordinary first person autobiography herself.
Anzia Yezierska has written two short story collections and four novels about the struggles of Jewish immigrants on New York’s Lower East Side. Yezierska stories explore the subject of characters’ struggling with the disillusioning America of poverty and exploitation while they search for the ‘real’ America of their ideals. She presents the struggles of women against family, religious injunctions, and social-economic obstacles in order to create for herself an independent style. Her stories all incorporate autobiographical components. She was not a master of style, plot development or characterization, but the intensity of feeling and aspiration are evident in her narratives that overrides her imperfections.
This book talks about the immigrants in the early 1900’s. The book describes how they live their daily lives in New York City. It helped me a lot on Riis photographs and his writings on to better understand the book and the harsh reality this people lived. This comes to show us that life is not that easy and it will cost us work to succeed.
The word ‘houseskeeping’ refers to both the lack of domestic feminine roles in the book, but also to what the girls’ grandmother, Sylvia Foster, stated about keeping her home within the family, both in a physical sense and, as Sylvie and Ruth depart from it, a spiritual one. Ruth’s grandmother is using the maintenance of the family home as a metaphor for the women of the Foster house to maintain the very essence of their family itself, “Sell the orchards, but keep the house. So long as you look after your health, and own the roof over your head, you’re as safe as anyone can be,” (Robinson 27). In saying that the orchards should be sold, but not the house, Sylvia is telling her granddaughters that everything outside of the family can be lost and replaced, but so long as they contain the family unit, they will remain safe. While this story does deconstruct the idea of an “all-American”, aesthetically pleasing family, it doesn’t shed the values that one would consider typical for American Literature, such as a heavy emphasis on religion and family. Instead, it allows a unique viewpoint of the different structures of an American family, and demonstrates how, while the structures may change, the overall goals of staying rooted in one’s beliefs and in one’s familial comfort zone often are the same no matter how the roles within a household are established and
In the short story, “Girl,” the narrator describes certain tasks a woman should be responsible for based on the narrator’s culture, time period, and social standing. This story also reflects the coming of age of this girl, her transition into a lady, and shows the age gap between the mother and the daughter. The mother has certain beliefs that she is trying to pass to her daughter for her well-being, but the daughter is confused by this regimented life style. The author, Jamaica Kincaid, uses various tones to show a second person point of view and repetition to demonstrate what these responsibilities felt like, how she had to behave based on her social standing, and how to follow traditional customs.
... lived in New York tenements. In Riis’s book, How the Other Half Lives: Studies Among the Tenements of New York, he uses prolific prose coupled with emotionally powerful illustrations that paint a vivid picture of immigrant families living in tenements in the late 1800s. Throughout Riss’s book, exposes how immigrant children were forced to work in factories and sweatshops. As a result, Riss successfully achieves his goal of educating the middle class regarding the challenges that urban immigrants faced. Lastly, although Riss tact regarding racial epithets of the immigrants he wrote on and photographed are offensive, the importance of Riss’s photographs outweighs the racial insults because his pictures lie not only in their power to enlighten but also to move his readers regarding how immigrant families were forced into making their children work.
As a result, women were stuck at home, usually alone, until their husbands got home. In the story, Jane is at home staring at the wallpaper in her room. The wallpaper’s color is described by Jane as being “repellent, almost revolting” (3) and the pattern is “torturing” and “like a bad dream” (10). The description of the wallpaper represents Jane’s and all women’s thoughts about the ideologies and rules upheld by men prior to the First World War. It is made evident that this wallpaper represents the screen made up of men’s ideologies at the time caging in women. Jane is subconsciously repelled by this screen and represents her discovering continuously figuring out what she wants. Metaphorically, Jane is trapped in that room by a culture established by men. Furthermore, Jane compares the wallpaper’s pattern to bars putting further emphasis on her feelings of being trapped and helpless. Later in the narrative, she catches Jennie staring at the wallpaper’s pattern and then decides to study the pattern and determine what it means herself. Her study of the pattern is representative of her trying to analyze the situation in which she’s in. By studying the pattern, she progressively discovers herself, especially when she sees the woman behind the
In society, there has always been a gap between men and women. Women are generally expected to be homebodies, and seen as inferior to their husbands. The man is always correct, as he is more educated, and a woman must respect the man as they provide for the woman’s life. During the Victorian Era, women were very accommodating to fit the “house wife” stereotype. Women were to be a representation of love, purity and family; abandoning this stereotype would be seen as churlish living and a depredation of family status. Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s short story "The Yellow Wallpaper" and Henry Isben’s play A Doll's House depict women in the Victorian Era who were very much menial to their husbands. Nora Helmer, the protagonist in A Doll’s House and the narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper” both prove that living in complete inferiority to others is unhealthy as one must live for them self. However, attempts to obtain such desired freedom during the Victorian Era only end in complications.
From the beginning of this work, the woman is shown to have gone mad. We are given no insight into the past, and we do not know why she has been driven to the brink of insanity. The “beautiful…English place” that the woman sees in her minds eye is the way men have traditionally wanted women to see their role in society. As the woman says, “It is quite alone standing well back from the road…It makes me think of English places…for there are hedges and walls and gates that lock, and lots of separate little houses for the gardeners and people. There is a delicious garden! I never saw such a garden—large and shady, full of box-bordered paths, and lined with long grape-covered arbors with seats under them.” This lovely English countryside picture that this woman paints to the reader is a shallow view at the real likeness of her prison. The reality of things is that this lovely place is her small living space, and in it she is to function as every other good housewife should. The description of her cell, versus the reality of it, is a very good example of the restriction women had in those days. They were free to see things as they wanted, but there was no real chance at a woman changing her roles and place in society. This is mostly attributed to the small amount of freedom women had, and therefore they could not bring about a drastic change, because men were happy with the position women filled.
...demonstrates the oppression that women had to face in society during the nineteenth century. The nursery room, the yellow wallpaper, and the windows, all symbolize in some way the oppression of women done by men. She bases the story on one of her life experiences. Charlotte Gilman wrote the story because she believed that men and women should be treated equally.
A notable image that readers of the twentieth-century literature easily recognize is a bell jar. A bell jar is an unbreakable, stiff glass container that confines objects within its inescapable walls. It metaphorically represents the suffocating and an airless enclosure of conformism prevalent during the 1950’s American society. More specifically, American societal standards approve men to have the dominant role as they are encouraged to attend college in order to pursue professional careers. They are given the responsibility of financially supporting their families. In contrast, a women’s life in the 1950’s is centralized around family life and domestic duties only. They are encouraged to remain at home, raise children and care for their husbands. Women are perceived as highly dependent on their husbands and their ability to receive education is regarded as a low priority. Thus, the social conventions and expectations of women during the 1950’s displayed in The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath correlate to Esther Greenwood’s downward spiral of her mental state. Throughout the course of her journey, Esther becomes increasingly depressed because of her inability to conform to the gender roles of the women, which mainly revolved around marriage, maternity and domesticity.
Many women in modern society make life altering decisions on a daily basis. Women today have prestigious and powerful careers unlike in earlier eras. It is more common for women to be full time employees than homemakers. In 1879, when Henrik Ibsen wrote A Doll's House, there was great controversy over the out come of the play. Nora’s walking out on her husband and children was appalling to many audiences centuries ago. Divorce was unspoken, and a very uncommon occurrence. As years go by, society’s opinions on family situations change. No longer do women have a “housewife” reputation to live by and there are all types of family situations. After many years of emotional neglect, and overwhelming control, Nora finds herself leaving her family. Today, it could be said that Nora’s decision is very rational and well overdue.