Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Walmart and competition
Walmart + corporate strategies
Walmart impact on economy and community
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Walmart and competition
According to article “No Cheers When Walmart Packs Up” in the February 1st – 7th edition of Bloomberg Businessweek, Wal-Mart being blamed for leaving small towns and rural communities without grocery stores or pharmacies because they have opened stores in these areas which resulted in the closure of the typical mom-and-pop stores. This is due to the fact that one-stop shopping centers such as Wal-Mart use their enormous purchasing power to provide the best products at the lowest prices, making it impossible for small family owned or local stores to compete. Additionally, Wal-Mart recently started closing some of its stores in the very same small towns and rural communities. In Oriental, North Carolina for example, Wal-Mart closed its store less than two years after had it opened and …show more content…
Wal-Mart have also been spending more on its Web operations as well. As a result, Wal-Mart announced on January 15th that it would close all 102 of its small Express stores, many of which are located in these small towns and rural communities. Doing so would cut cost and allow the company to focus on its supercenters and midsize neighborhood markets and hopefully increase its profit margins.
Unfortunately, as bad as it sounds, Wal-Mart has no responsibility to help communities deal with the adverse effects of store closings. The reason for this is simple, Wal-Mart is a business, and like most businesses, they are in it to profit and therefore it does whatever needs to be done to make and continue making profits for its shareholders even it means putting its competitors out of business. It has to make decisions that are in the best interest of the company. So if it thinks that the closure of its Express stores would be beneficial to the company then that is a business
The success of Wal-Mart is so great, that many people believe that Wal-Mart is becoming a monopsony . Suppliers are forced to deal with Wal-Mart because of the large percentage of sales at Wal-Mart cash registers. As such, Wal-Mart also has the ability to dictate prices of the goods it receives from the suppliers. Every day, more and more retail stores close their doors for good because Wal-Mart controls such a huge margin of the retail sector.
Besides all the points that I have stated, Wal-Mart has had to pay fines due to breaking Child Labor laws and Illegal Immigrant laws; fines up to $11.5 million for just those two types of laws. Wal-Mart is not good for this economy, for the people, and the company, in a whole, is criminal. If the people let Wal-Mart stay on the track it is on, the United States will not have anything but Wal-Marts. Wal-Mart will become a monopoly and put everyone, who started with something more than greed, out-of-business.
Walmart is bad for America, as some say. The Globalization essay that was handed out in class had many good points. It states that Walmart puts many smaller businesses out of service. A recent study by David Neumark of the University of California at Irvine and two associates at the Public Policy Institute of California, "The Effects of Wal-Mart on Local Labor Markets," uses sophisticated statistical analysis to estimate the effects on jobs and wages as Wal-Mart spread out from its original center in Arkansas. The authors find that retail employmen...
In order to gain the success it has had, Wal-Mart has no doubt affected small businesses. But in the place of small business Wal-Mart has been able to do far more for Americans than small businesses could. It provides consumers inexpensive necessities for life, it provides work for those who would otherwise have none, and it has a stake in the global economy that benefits our own with trading. Wal_mart
Wal-Mart represents the sickness of capitalism at its almost fully evolved state. As Jim Hightower said, "Why single out Wal-Mart? Because it's a hog. Despite the homespun image it cultivates in its ads, it operates with an arrogance and avarice that would make Enron blush and John D. Rockefeller envious. It's the world's biggest retail corporation and America's largest private employer; Sam Robson Walton, a member of the ruling family, is one of the richest people on earth. Wal-Mart and the Waltons got to the top the old-fashioned way: by roughing people up. Their low, low prices are the product of two ruthless commandments: Extract the last penny possible from human toil and squeeze the last dime from its thousands of suppliers, who are left with no profit margin unless they adopt the Wal-Mart model of using nonunion labor and shipping production to low-wage hellholes abroad." (The Nation, March 4th 2002 www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020304&s=hightower).
Wal-Mart is, to some extent, a values-based corporation. The Wal-Mart Corporation takes a strong, direct stance on many issues. This can be seen in many items in which they refuse to sell, such as; music and games with explicit content, adult magazines, and the morning after pill. This shows character in the company because they are foregoing potential profits in order to enforce values that they believe in. Wal-Mart is probably making some people very happy by this moral stance that they have undertaken, and it gives a message to the public that Wal-Mart is not a heartless corporation like many others.
More than 95 percent of the stores to be closed in the USA are near another Wal-Mart, including all the Wisconsin locations. The company said the stores it plans to close are generally poor performers, and most are within 10 miles of another Walmart. Financial performance is just one of many factors the company took into account when deciding which stores to close. Of the 16,000 associates or employees to be affected, 10,000 will be in the United States. The company aims to place those associates in nearby
Before Wal-mart, the trend in the American workplace was to internalize the cost of doing business. American companies tried to compete with everything from higher wages, to better health care benefits, to limiting the work-week to 40 hours. In its ruthless pursuit of cheaper products, Wal-mart has reversed the trend, by externalizes its costs anyway it can. These costs are first explicit in nature, by receiving tax breaks to operate in some cities or the tax dollars that Wal-mart employees utilize for health care/public assistance. The costs are implicit as well; these big box stores destroy local economies, are known as a bad neighbor and are also harmful to the environment.
Wal-Mart has branded stores in all 50 states and in over 27 countries. Wal-Mart started with humble roots in 1962 by Sam Walton in the small town of Bentonville, Arkansas. Within thirty years, the small local discount retailer grew to one of the largest retail companies in the United States of America. Now it stands as the largest retailer in the world. As the largest retailer, Wal-Mart has gained many detractors. In "The Case for Wal-Mart," Karen De Coster and Brad Edmonds recognize how people “like to attack bigness” (632). Many believe Wal-Mart offers low wage jobs with few employee benefits, discriminates against women, and among many other issues, doesn’t give back to the community (631). In contrast to the constant barrage negative attacks, Wal-Mart proves beneficial to the community. Wal-Mart prides itself on being an equal opportunity employer to such a degree it has the most diverse group of employees anyone can imagine. Most Wal-Mart stores are the anchor that provides a steady stream of consumers to other much small businesses in the area. Beyond providing quality jobs for the people in and around the store, Wal-Mart brings convenience, lower prices, and help to those in need.
With its headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, Wal-Mart was commissioned in the hands of its founder Sam Walton. Generally, the Wal-Mart effect is structured in a manner that it aids economic experts to evaluate attached global and local economic effects to the famous Wal-Mart retail. The term Wal-Mart effect is often employed by analysts to refer to the wide variety of both negative and positive influences of the retail business (Hiltzik 1). Evaluation of the retail’s effects is significant as the business is not only a key figure is the world’s economy but also it is arguably the most performing private economic retail. Briefly, Wal-Mart has conventionally caught the eyes of consumers since it not only boosts their experience by suburbanizing local shopping but also it avails low commodity prices for necessities (Neumark, Junfu, and Stephen 406).
In a world scattered with millions upon millions of Walmart locations, one might ask the question-how can one small, insignificant Walmart affect me? The answer is-a lot! Perhaps the most impacting consequence of society's acceptance of a Walmart within their community lies within the drainage and leeching of the economy. Take the San Francisco Bay for instance, the prolonged construction costs alone, cost the city 256 million dollars in additional costs, not to mention the insane amount of fuel consumed by consumers commuting to the new store location. As if that weren't bad enough, that very same Walmart that caused such tedious amounts of grief, tedious amounts of extra time, money and fuel was relocated outside of the area within 2 years-leaving the surrounding land destroyed and devoid of life. But what about the Walmart's within the community that aren't being relocated? How are they hazardous then? Well, the answer is the same type of concept as a lion guarding its' kill from the surrounding wildl...
During the first week, the store had almost 1.5 times as many transactions as people live in the town. According to "Shopping With the Enemy", town life will never be the same because "people crave the low prices, large selection and convenient parking," offered by discount stores (146).In the article "Wal-Mart's War on Main Street," by Sarah Anderson, it is correctly stated that "rural life is changing and there's no use denying it." (Anderson 139) Even without imposing businesses, the technological advances of today make the world smaller and smaller. It used to be that in rural places there would be one farm and then nothing for miles. There wasn't much contact with people outside of one's family.
The Journalist Resource also tells us that, "the probability of going out of business was significantly higher for establishments closer to a Walmart" making us believe that Walmarts are the reason for our local businesses to leave (Kille and Ordway). Walmarts our liking our local businesses, making it so hard for local business owners to keep their jobs. Most local business owners are loosing their jobs, money, and careers because of the Walmarts coming to our local counties. Kille and Ordway say that "on average, within 15 months of a new Walmart opening as many as 14 local businesses close" causing us to believe that Walmarts are the reason for the decline of businesses (Kille and Ordway). Walmarts coming to our counties is completely destroying our local economies. Eventually, the collapse of our local economies is inevitable. Our local economy is being destroyed by the big box Walmarts coming to our towns and counties, closing all our local
When a Wal-Mart is built there is a possibility of taxes being raised and smaller businesses closing. But Wal-Mart is the largest corporation in the world. They also pride themselves in offering the lowest prices for products. Because of their lowest prices being offered when the taxes go up it is barely noticeable because the cost levels out. Small towns benefit by having a Wal-Mart because it provides more jobs, low cost items all in one location, and they even help local farmers.
As mentioned in the case in Mexico, China, and the U.K. the company’s efforts to offer the lowest price to customers backfired because of resistance from established retailers. However, still by their efforts Walmart became successful in Mexico and China; it had 889 stores and was planning to open 125 more. In China domestic Chinese rivals also have built their business in order to compete with Walmart. China Resources Enterprise had hired away managers for foreign chains and cut staff in order to increase profitability. Walmart faced high entry barriers in China because of china’s cultural, linguistic and geographical distance from the US so Walmart decided to use two beachheads as learning vehicles for establishing an Asian presence. In Germany, Walmart could not seem to fit its model to local tastes and preferences. In Japan, its joint venture had a series of setbacks, many related to buying habits for which the Walmart model did not respond well. In Mexico, three of the largest domestic retailers constructed a joint buying and operational alliance solely to compete with Walmart. Its presence in Hong Kong ended after only two years during the 1990s, and it shuttered operations in Indonesia in the mid-1990s after rioting incidents in Jakarta. Walmart also owned approximately 16 stores in South Korea and 85 in Germany; however, it sold off these operations in 2006 after merchandise failed to match consumer tastes, distribution and re-bagging problems arose, and strong loyalties to other brands made attracting customers difficult and expensive.