Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Walmart and competition
Walmart + corporate strategies
Walmart impact on economy and community
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Walmart and competition
According to article “No Cheers When Walmart Packs Up” in the February 1st – 7th edition of Bloomberg Businessweek, Wal-Mart being blamed for leaving small towns and rural communities without grocery stores or pharmacies because they have opened stores in these areas which resulted in the closure of the typical mom-and-pop stores. This is due to the fact that one-stop shopping centers such as Wal-Mart use their enormous purchasing power to provide the best products at the lowest prices, making it impossible for small family owned or local stores to compete. Additionally, Wal-Mart recently started closing some of its stores in the very same small towns and rural communities. In Oriental, North Carolina for example, Wal-Mart closed its store less than two years after had it opened and …show more content…
Wal-Mart have also been spending more on its Web operations as well. As a result, Wal-Mart announced on January 15th that it would close all 102 of its small Express stores, many of which are located in these small towns and rural communities. Doing so would cut cost and allow the company to focus on its supercenters and midsize neighborhood markets and hopefully increase its profit margins.
Unfortunately, as bad as it sounds, Wal-Mart has no responsibility to help communities deal with the adverse effects of store closings. The reason for this is simple, Wal-Mart is a business, and like most businesses, they are in it to profit and therefore it does whatever needs to be done to make and continue making profits for its shareholders even it means putting its competitors out of business. It has to make decisions that are in the best interest of the company. So if it thinks that the closure of its Express stores would be beneficial to the company then that is a business
In order to gain the success it has had, Wal-Mart has no doubt affected small businesses. But in the place of small business Wal-Mart has been able to do far more for Americans than small businesses could. It provides consumers inexpensive necessities for life, it provides work for those who would otherwise have none, and it has a stake in the global economy that benefits our own with trading. Wal_mart
Walmart is bad for America, as some say. The Globalization essay that was handed out in class had many good points. It states that Walmart puts many smaller businesses out of service. A recent study by David Neumark of the University of California at Irvine and two associates at the Public Policy Institute of California, "The Effects of Wal-Mart on Local Labor Markets," uses sophisticated statistical analysis to estimate the effects on jobs and wages as Wal-Mart spread out from its original center in Arkansas. The authors find that retail employmen...
Wal-Mart represents the sickness of capitalism at its almost fully evolved state. As Jim Hightower said, "Why single out Wal-Mart? Because it's a hog. Despite the homespun image it cultivates in its ads, it operates with an arrogance and avarice that would make Enron blush and John D. Rockefeller envious. It's the world's biggest retail corporation and America's largest private employer; Sam Robson Walton, a member of the ruling family, is one of the richest people on earth. Wal-Mart and the Waltons got to the top the old-fashioned way: by roughing people up. Their low, low prices are the product of two ruthless commandments: Extract the last penny possible from human toil and squeeze the last dime from its thousands of suppliers, who are left with no profit margin unless they adopt the Wal-Mart model of using nonunion labor and shipping production to low-wage hellholes abroad." (The Nation, March 4th 2002 www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020304&s=hightower).
Wal-Mart is, to some extent, a values-based corporation. The Wal-Mart Corporation takes a strong, direct stance on many issues. This can be seen in many items in which they refuse to sell, such as; music and games with explicit content, adult magazines, and the morning after pill. This shows character in the company because they are foregoing potential profits in order to enforce values that they believe in. Wal-Mart is probably making some people very happy by this moral stance that they have undertaken, and it gives a message to the public that Wal-Mart is not a heartless corporation like many others.
Before Wal-mart, the trend in the American workplace was to internalize the cost of doing business. American companies tried to compete with everything from higher wages, to better health care benefits, to limiting the work-week to 40 hours. In its ruthless pursuit of cheaper products, Wal-mart has reversed the trend, by externalizes its costs anyway it can. These costs are first explicit in nature, by receiving tax breaks to operate in some cities or the tax dollars that Wal-mart employees utilize for health care/public assistance. The costs are implicit as well; these big box stores destroy local economies, are known as a bad neighbor and are also harmful to the environment.
The quality jobs that come with a Wal-Mart store provide employment and income to the members of the local community. A small retailer is most likely a family run business offering only a few jobs with little upward growth for those employees. In comparison, a single Wal-Mart store may offer around five hundred jobs. While most of the jobs are low wage jobs, Wal-Mart is not much different that other retailers (De Coster and Edmonds 632). However, those jobs at Wal-Mart come with competitive wages and comparable benefit packages to other ret...
The success of Wal-Mart is so great, that many people believe that Wal-Mart is becoming a monopsony . Suppliers are forced to deal with Wal-Mart because of the large percentage of sales at Wal-Mart cash registers. As such, Wal-Mart also has the ability to dictate prices of the goods it receives from the suppliers. Every day, more and more retail stores close their doors for good because Wal-Mart controls such a huge margin of the retail sector.
During the last 20 years, Wal-Mart has moved into many areas wiping out all the stores around causing people to loose jobs, slashing the tax base and causing many more disturbing problems to neighborhoods so people should stop supporting Wal-Mart for many of these reasons. Always low prices, does this sound familiar? Well this would be the slogan of the world’s most controlling company; Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart grew over the years into a 256 billion dollar company after making its name across the world in 1915. The major problem with Wal-Mart is that it maintains its own mini-economy. Some people believe Wal-Mart supports the American economy while most others hold that Wal-Mart’s global outsourcing will and has damaged the economy over time. When comparing these two opposite points, Wal-Mart has and is continuing to be more destructive than constructive to our economy. It has left employees with little to even no healthcare at all, destroyed more jobs then it has even created and it has also dishonored our environment. The second most common job, cashiers, are suppose to earn just about $7.92 per hour and work 29 hours a week which was said in a 2003 analysis. This only brings in yearly wages of only $11,948 (Wal-Mart Wages and Worker Rights 1). It is incredible that their employees can support themselves with making such low wages."With its low price focus, Wal-Mart may appear to help the U.S. economy. But, the reality is that with its poor wages and benefits, massive China sourcing and tax avoidance, Wal-Mart makes its workers and the communities where it operates poorer."-David Nassar.
It is relatively easy for Americans and Walmart activists to point out the faults of the Walmart Corporation because they are so huge and are constantly in the spotlight of social media. When such a large corporation can be demonized for issues that can occur within any other company, it makes it difficult to shake that negativity out of the consumer mind frame. I am not dismissing the fact that there are some real management issues that need to be addressed within the Walmart Stores and a couple of corporate issues that should be addressed to improve public relations or the corporate image. I do believe that it is jumping the gun to question or promote the idea of an
In a world scattered with millions upon millions of Walmart locations, one might ask the question-how can one small, insignificant Walmart affect me? The answer is-a lot! Perhaps the most impacting consequence of society's acceptance of a Walmart within their community lies within the drainage and leeching of the economy. Take the San Francisco Bay for instance, the prolonged construction costs alone, cost the city 256 million dollars in additional costs, not to mention the insane amount of fuel consumed by consumers commuting to the new store location. As if that weren't bad enough, that very same Walmart that caused such tedious amounts of grief, tedious amounts of extra time, money and fuel was relocated outside of the area within 2 years-leaving the surrounding land destroyed and devoid of life. But what about the Walmart's within the community that aren't being relocated? How are they hazardous then? Well, the answer is the same type of concept as a lion guarding its' kill from the surrounding wildl...
Besides all the points that I have stated, Wal-Mart has had to pay fines due to breaking Child Labor laws and Illegal Immigrant laws; fines up to $11.5 million for just those two types of laws. Wal-Mart is not good for this economy, for the people, and the company, in a whole, is criminal. If the people let Wal-Mart stay on the track it is on, the United States will not have anything but Wal-Marts. Wal-Mart will become a monopoly and put everyone, who started with something more than greed, out-of-business.
The Journalist Resource also tells us that, "the probability of going out of business was significantly higher for establishments closer to a Walmart" making us believe that Walmarts are the reason for our local businesses to leave (Kille and Ordway). Walmarts our liking our local businesses, making it so hard for local business owners to keep their jobs. Most local business owners are loosing their jobs, money, and careers because of the Walmarts coming to our local counties. Kille and Ordway say that "on average, within 15 months of a new Walmart opening as many as 14 local businesses close" causing us to believe that Walmarts are the reason for the decline of businesses (Kille and Ordway). Walmarts coming to our counties is completely destroying our local economies. Eventually, the collapse of our local economies is inevitable. Our local economy is being destroyed by the big box Walmarts coming to our towns and counties, closing all our local
With its headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, Wal-Mart was commissioned in the hands of its founder Sam Walton. Generally, the Wal-Mart effect is structured in a manner that it aids economic experts to evaluate attached global and local economic effects to the famous Wal-Mart retail. The term Wal-Mart effect is often employed by analysts to refer to the wide variety of both negative and positive influences of the retail business (Hiltzik 1). Evaluation of the retail’s effects is significant as the business is not only a key figure is the world’s economy but also it is arguably the most performing private economic retail. Briefly, Wal-Mart has conventionally caught the eyes of consumers since it not only boosts their experience by suburbanizing local shopping but also it avails low commodity prices for necessities (Neumark, Junfu, and Stephen 406).
More than 95 percent of the stores to be closed in the USA are near another Wal-Mart, including all the Wisconsin locations. The company said the stores it plans to close are generally poor performers, and most are within 10 miles of another Walmart. Financial performance is just one of many factors the company took into account when deciding which stores to close. Of the 16,000 associates or employees to be affected, 10,000 will be in the United States. The company aims to place those associates in nearby
As mentioned in the case in Mexico, China, and the U.K. the company’s efforts to offer the lowest price to customers backfired because of resistance from established retailers. However, still by their efforts Walmart became successful in Mexico and China; it had 889 stores and was planning to open 125 more. In China domestic Chinese rivals also have built their business in order to compete with Walmart. China Resources Enterprise had hired away managers for foreign chains and cut staff in order to increase profitability. Walmart faced high entry barriers in China because of china’s cultural, linguistic and geographical distance from the US so Walmart decided to use two beachheads as learning vehicles for establishing an Asian presence. In Germany, Walmart could not seem to fit its model to local tastes and preferences. In Japan, its joint venture had a series of setbacks, many related to buying habits for which the Walmart model did not respond well. In Mexico, three of the largest domestic retailers constructed a joint buying and operational alliance solely to compete with Walmart. Its presence in Hong Kong ended after only two years during the 1990s, and it shuttered operations in Indonesia in the mid-1990s after rioting incidents in Jakarta. Walmart also owned approximately 16 stores in South Korea and 85 in Germany; however, it sold off these operations in 2006 after merchandise failed to match consumer tastes, distribution and re-bagging problems arose, and strong loyalties to other brands made attracting customers difficult and expensive.