A Humboldt County courthouse judge on Thursday said a man facing murder charges for shooting down his wife’s lover will stand trial on separate charges that allege he assaulted his wife with a firearm.
Judge John Feeney scheduled a May 11 arraignment on information date after finding Jon Goldberg, 36, of Fortuna, after finding there was enough evidence to hold him to answer on a count of assault with a firearm with a special allegation he used a revolver to commit the crime and a second count of battery. Feeney did not rule he be held to answer on a count of brandishing a concealable firearm in public.
Goldberg is facing separate charges for the murder of Timothy Smith, 37.
The ruling came at the end of an hours-long preliminary hearing in
…show more content…
Rachel Goldberg got in the car with her child and the mothers drove around to look for a place to Rachel Goldberg to stay.
Frida Smith said they picked up her daughter and at one point Rachel Goldberg received a call from her husband.
She recalled hearing him say in a loud voice over the phone that “it’s not OK for another man” to be engaged in an affair with his wife before hanging up.
After some time driving around, they eventually decided to drive past Timothy Smith’s house but were stopped by a roadblock that had been set up by police. When someone from the car asked an officer if a traffic accident was causing the delay the officer responded by saying there had been a “people accident,” Frida Smith said.
Rachel Goldberg was mortified by the statement, according to Smith but the two did not learn the altercation was fatal until sometime after. The mothers made their way to the police station where Frida Smith told Rachel Goldberg she ought to speak with police.
After she did give a statement to police she allegedly to Frida Smith that her husband had also assaulted her earlier that day.
“She told me Jon had been shooting around her that morning,” Frida Smith said.
Deputy Public Defender represented Jon Goldberg in
Throughout the trial, defense attorneys attempted to argue Salvi was suffering from psychological disorders that would make him incompetent for trial. Ultimately, however Salvi was found competent to stand trial. After reading Salvi’s full psychiatric interview, the official court transcript of the four-day competency hearing, and the day-to-day summary; I have come to agree that the defendant, John Salvi was competent to stand trial.
Also, he was telling her what to do. He wanted her to sit around at home and not work and it was no conducive to her plans.
“I agree with Ms. Krejci that the entire file should have been disclosed with the publics record request, but that does not make it discoverable.” Feeney said. “I understand her frustration that she wasn 't given the same information that another defense attorney was. When I discovered what had happened, which was in august, I immediately requested the entire file from the Phoenix Police Department so that I could disclose it to the defense council. I didn’t do that because I believed that the information was discoverable or relevant. I did it as a professional courtesy. So that we were on the same field, and so that she felt that she had everything tha...
The case involved a line of duty shooting that took place between Illinois Officer Mary Redmond and suspect Ricky Allen, whom Redmond fatally wounded, and revolved around the family’s excessive force complaint, which they filed on the grounds that the witness testimony differed from Redmond’s account. [1]
Presumably, complications start to revolve around the protagonist family. Additionally, readers learn that Rachel mother Nella left her biological father for another man who is abusive and arrogant. After,
In society, any accidents are perceived as negative outcomes illustrate a terrible ending that has taken place but in reality it can be perceived as something positive in the long run. By obstructing the 2005 Camaro and the three teens, it occurred that no one was injured and everything was calm. Accident by Dave Egger represents how a bad decision becomes a point of conflict and symbolism within the theme of the story.
Death race 2000 PHILADELPHIA, PA - Tamika Ross, 26, is being held for trial on charges of the murder of Nathaniel Davis. Apparently Ross ran over Davis' hat with her car. When Davis confronted the driver a dispute erupted and Davis allegedly hit Ross. That's when the mother of five took matters into her own hands and ran him over with her car, killing him. When questioned, police quoted Ross as saying, "He hit me so I ran him down."
reported that she had been abducted from a parking lot and raped by a black male ("A.B. Butler").
...the foot as he had planned. This accident made Stuart’s cover story more believable. The police, or anyone for that matter, never thought that a man would risk his own life to cover up the murder. One major incident that led the police to the truth was Stuart’s suicide (Carlson 10-14).
The stories and narratives between these three women differ greatly. Rachel, for instance is present in the content of interpersonal relationships within the Jewish theories (Sered 131). According to the book of Genesis, Laban tricked Jacob into marrying Leah, Rachel’s sister, instead of her. Jacob suspected Laban of such action so he set up secret gestures for Rachel to give during the wedding ceremony. Rachel, however, could not go through with it after considering Leah and the possibility of shame upon her sister. After the ceremony, Rachel hid underneath Jacob and Leah’s bed and spoke for Leah so that Jacob would not recognize the voice and realize he married the wrong sister. Rachel was protecting her sister from humiliation both publically and privately. The story continues to explain that Rachel was infertile for many years. She eventually was blessed to conceive, but then later died during childbirth. “Rachel is portr...
“This is an arraignment for Marlene Barnes accused in the murder of her mother, Katherine Lincoln. Is the State ready to present their evidence?” Asked Judge Dean,
“In the front seat was Gregg, driving, Sarah, in the middle, and Robyn, on the passenger side. In the rear seat was Jeff, behind the driver, Haley, in the middle, and Rachel, on the passenger side. EVERYONE was wearing their SEAT BELTS, as is our family habit. EVERYONE walked away from this accident with only bruises. The only blood was Robyn had small nicks from glass in a couple of places on her right arm and right leg.
husband’s rules. But what she didn’t know is that her husband is still alive and came into
The subsequent paragraphs contain a general analysis as well as a description of the legal questions and principles that were raised in the age discrimination case of Mckinney v. University of Guelph. This case raised the issue of whether a company or organization (in this case, a post secondary institution for education) should have jurisdiction over the age at which an individual must retire. Additionally, this document contains an analysis of the laws of mandatory retirement and how they are still currently in effect in countries such as China. Along with the aforementioned is a description of how mandatory retirement is imperative to population management,
She then saw that Eric’s moped was in a lot of pieces. Then she saw the paramedics working on his body. She didn't know what to do. When her husband David arrived, they both watched the paramedics try to keep Eric alive. They loaded Eric in the back of the ambulance because they couldn't get a Life flight Helicopter. Debbie rode in the ambulance and David drove close behind. Debbi looked at Eric,