Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Model essay
The gossip industry effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Model essay
Model Essay for “Studies Find That Gossip Isn’t Just Loose Talk”
Malicious gossip has been known to hurt relationships, damage reputations, and cause other social harms. But is all gossip destructive? In the article “Studies Find That Gossip Isn’t Just Loose Talk”, Alina Tugend argues that certain gossip can have important social functions. She notes that certain gossip can provide us with information about people who might mistreat us. Tugend adds that people have an overwhelming urge to gossip about people who they feel have wronged them. However, Tugend notes that many people believe gossip does not have any beneficial function. I feel that the article makes two important points when it discusses how gossip can push people to act
…show more content…
The article discusses an experiment that proved this point. The researchers were trying to find out if people cheat or play fairly when there is a possibility that others will gossip, if they cheat. To test this, the researchers set up an online game in which players could see how others were playing the game, including any cheating behavior. Through this experiment, they found out that people felt compelled to play more “fairly” because the other players can see and gossip about any cheating behavior. I feel that these results are interesting because it shows how people will change their behavior to avoid being the topic of gossip. I can imagine that the participants in this experiment wanted to avoid being labeled a cheater and then become outsider in the group. This reminds me when I play Monopoly with my friends. There are certain times during the game that I can cheat, and maybe take extra money from the bank to give me an advantage in the game. But I rather win or lose “fair and square”, then risk being caught cheating, and being labeled a cheater. Knowing my friends, my cheating ways will become an immediate gossiping topic, which I, like the experiment participants, want no part
First and foremost, it is critical to discuss and unpack the ethics behind online gossiping. The way Klosterman describes online gossiping is by using the word villainy. However, villainy is typically defined as cruel or wicked behavior. In his essay, Klosterman discusses what makes a villain in regards to the online world. Specifically, Klosterman states, “The reason Perez Hilton became a villain was because the intersection of those two qualities: It wasn’t just the content, and it wasn’t just the success. It was the creeping fear that this type of content would become the only way any future person could be successful” (226). This interpretation of villainy is quite different than what most would consider. When people hear the
Asch and Milgram’s experiment was unethical in their methods of not informing the participant of the details surrounding the experiment and the unwarranted stress; their experiment portrayed the circumstances of real life situation surrounding the issues of obedience to authority and social influence. In life, we are not given the courtesy of knowledge when we are being manipulated or influenced to act or think a certain way, let us be honest here because if we did know people were watching and judging us most of us would do exactly as society sees moral, while that may sound good in ensuring that we always do the right thing that would not be true to the ways of our reality. Therefore, by not telling the participants the details of the experiment and inflicting unwarranted stress, Asch and Milgram’s replicated the reality of life. In “Options and Social Pressure” Solomon E. Asch conducts an experiment to show the power of social influence, by using the lengths of sticks that the participants had to match up with the best fit, Asch then developed different scenarios to see how great the power of influence is, but what he discovered is that people always conformed to the majority regardless of how big or small the error was the individual always gave in to the power of the majority.
Detrimental gossip was not a new concept brought to life in Virgil’s Aeneid; gossip has been around since the dawn of time and still exists in modern day. Gossip, especially false, can significantly alter the lives of those gossiped about, as shown in the Aeneid and in a Washington Post article written by Cass Sunstein, “Rumors are nearly as old as human history, but with the rise of the Internet, they have become ubiquitous… False rumors are especially troublesome;
The results of those that thought about cheating were high along with those that actually
Here lie the students who found it entertaining to spread rumors and gossip about their fellow classmates. “The Gossipers” spent their high school careers revealing information that was not their business to share in the first place.
In the article, “A Psychology of Rumor” by Robert H. Knapp, he discusses how rumors
Conversation Analysis (CA) is the study of talk-within-interaction that attempts to describe the orderliness, structure and sequential patterns of interaction in conversation. It is a method of qualitative analysis developed by Harvey Sacks with the aid of Emmanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson in the late 1960s to early 1970s. Using the CA frame of mind to view stories shows us that what we may think to be simplistic relaying of information or entertaining our friends is in fact a highly organised social phenomena that is finely tuned in a way that expresses the teller’s motivation behind the talk. (Hutchby & Wooffitt, 2011). It is suggested that CA relies on three main assumptions; talk is a form of social action, action is structurally organised, talk creates and maintains inter-subjectivity (Atkinson & Heritage, 1984).
Gossip has been known to hurt relationships, damage reputations, and cause other social harms. But can it have any social benefits? In the article “Studies Find That Gossip Isn’t Just Loose Talk”, Alina Tugend argues that certain gossip can have important social functions. She notes that certain gossip can provide people with information about people who might mistreat us. Tugend adds that people have overwhelming urge to gossip about people who they feel have wronged them. However, Tugend notes that some people feel that gossip has no social benefit. Thesis: I found it interesting when the article discusses how certain gossip can make people in a group follow rules and it can protect us from people.
Lying the action, we love to hate, but love to do. Secrets, lying, cheating are actions people actively and repeatedly find themselves engaging in. Characteristics of deception are quick to be demonized. The disclosure of any type of dishonesty is viewed as the severest act of betrayal a person can commit to another. Deception is deemed to be the villain in all relationships, the one thing that will destroy any relationship. However, contrary to belief, deception is a fundamental human behavior that maintains intimate relationships. There is this belief, knowing the complete truth of our partner’s actions and thought means the truest form of intimacy will be established in a relationship. Simply, there is a false optimistic relationship expectation that deception needs to be avoided in order to certify a stronger intimate connection. However, this is a disillusioned perspective. No one believes they will be betrayed of any magnitude within a relationship. A sense of objectiveness is dismissed and the understanding of the role of deception within people’s lives is overshadowed by the immoral and dysfunctional perspective
In its entirety, the message of the chapter was to display the roots that cheating has throughout society, however the examples enable the authors to demonstrate the specific factors that play into developing a form of cheating. A major component of determining a type of cheating is the incentive that is present. In the examples of the Israeli daycares, an economic incentive of $3 was put in place to encourage parents to pick up the children on time, but the incentive did not work in favor of the day care and eventually encouraged more cheating after the fee had been dropped. The situation with the cheating teachers in Chicago also displayed a key form of cheating due to economic incentives; the Chicago teachers were motivated by incentives to either advance their economic situation by receiving a bonus or maintaining their economic situation by not losing their job, overall encouraging the teachers to cheat on their students’ standardized tests. The situation of the sumo wrestlers in Japan reflected both economic and social incentives, the wrestlers worked with one another among the stables in the elite rankings in order to maintain their elite ranking, thus feeding into the social order of Japanese sumo wrestling. The economic incentives came into play with prize money and larger salaries that came along with being in the elite class of
Rumors are strong and powerful. In the article Anatomy of a Rumor: It Flies on Fear, written by Daniel Goldman, he states that rumors are “thriving because of their ability to create the very anxieties that make them spread, and to mutate to fit new situations” (Anatomy). What is being said in this quote is true. Logically rumors spread because people believe that the rumor could be true, this would be the fear that is instilled into the rumor. Fear and Anxiety play a good role in
A light soft whisper escapes your lips, twinkling, gleaming eyes, and a mischievous smile is thrown. A secret escapes your lips and now the question is whether this is the ultimate sin or virtue. The act of secrecy is pretty normal to be committed by the human nature. The question now today is whether or not secrets can be harmful. Secrets are harmful, whether you have a secret or if you’re keeping a secret for someone else. When you keep secrets you harm your health and destroy your relationships with family, friends, and your partner. Several scientific research now explain and demonstrate how secrecy is harmful.
Whatever it is, it is meant to murder the reputation of another. There is no guarantee that the "bad mouther" comes out victorious in the end, since there is always the possibility that the truth will come out eventually - and perpetrator
A more pro-social type of deceptive behaviour can include using deception to benefit other individuals, such as lying to someone to comfort them or to spare them from knowing a harsh truth. In contrast, some children could be motivated to act deceptively solely to exhibit anti-social behaviour, which often has the intention of hurting someone deliberately (Buller, Burgoon, Buslig, & Roiger,