Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of war on soldiers essay
The effect of the war on soldiers
Emotional effects of war on soldiers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of war on soldiers essay
Denise Grady’s (2006) article sound a strong wake up call for the American government and for the American public to re-evaluate their guiding principles towards war in Iraq and the continued presence of the American soldiers in the Iraqi soil. Grady delineated the enormous damages the war had costs in not only monetary terms but also the future of thousands of promising young and talented men and women sent in the Iraq War; that had no clear benefits to them or the American people. The story of Jason Poole as presented by Grady is a clear picture of the ravage of the potentials of soldiers in the face of war, and the wrong priorities of the American government in spending billions of dollars for the war that have no clear advantage for them or the American people, that is worth dying for. The sending of potential young men and women in Iraq to sustain its war lacked the basic objective that warrant their sacrifices, as well as the billions of dollars spend in pursuing such unclear purpose that is wrongly labeled “war on terror.” As per records, American fatalities in Iraq as of January 20 stood at two thousand two hundred twenty five (2, 225), while casualties numbered at 16, 472 (The New York Times, par. 8). Grady cited that medical treatments for brain injuries in Iraq alone would cost fourteen billion dollars. In the light of the enormous figures, the question that has to be answered is, are these spending justifiable? On the other hand, are the injuries that ruined the life of Corporal Poole and those of others justifiable? Can his goals in his life be worked out for him by the government, now that he is disabled? Can Justice be served to him for losing a relationship because of that war? Grady pictured Poole as a man full of dreams. He dreamed to enter college and to become a teacher some day and raise his own family (Grady, 2006, p 332). Now, these dreams were all shattered by war. The war in Iraq is snatching young men from their love ones only to meet their brutal death in a foreign soil, or get severely injured that will forever disable them. It is clear that these soldiers like Corporal Poole have dedicated their lives to their profession as a soldier to the point of risking their lives just to prove their loyalty and dedication to their profession.
It’s hard for civilians to see what veterans had to face and still do even after all is said and done. The rhetorical strategies that contribute to Grady’s success in this article is appealing to the reader’s emotions through the story of Jason Poole. Denise Grady’s “Struggling Back From War’s Once Deadly Wounds” acts as an admonition for the American public and government to find a better way to assist troops to land on their feet post-war. Grady informs the reader on the recent problems risen through advancements in medical technology and how it affected the futures of all the troops sent into the Iraq war.
PBS’ Frontline film “The Wounded Platoon” reviews the effects the Iraq war has had on soldiers as they return home and transition back into civilian life, focusing particularly on the rise in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among American military members from Fort Carson Army base (Edge, 2010). Incidents of PTSD have risen dramatically in the military since the beginning of the Iraq war and military mental health policies and treatment procedures have adapted to manage this increase (Edge, 2010). In “The Wounded Platoon,” many military personnel discuss how PTSD, and other mental health struggles, have been inadequately treated (if at all) by military mental health services. Reasons and Perdue’s definition of a social problem allows us to see inadequate treatment of PTSD among returning United States military members as a social problem because it is a condition affecting a significant number of people in undesirable ways that can be remedied through collective action (Reasons & Perdue, 1981).
As time passes, every society endures situations which stress its' very fabric. Each societies' history is sprinkled with these situations. One such situation which the United States underwent was the Vietnam war. For years this particular event has been hotly debated. Hardly anyone who was present at the time agrees on any point concerning this war, except that they regret it. It has become 'the greatest American foreign policy calamity of the century.' . Now the United States finds itself entangled in another war. A war in Iraq which is beginning to resemble more and more the events of the Vietnam war. Many analysts, and even the public have begun to wonder if the current situation is the same as what took place in Vietnam. The answer is a disturbing yes. The current military engagement in Iraq is showing signs that it will become for this generation what Vietnam was to that generation.
After an analysis of the preliminary speeches Former Senator Robert C. Byrd gave in the early 2000s one may deduce that the senator had the welfare of his fellow Americans in mind as the copious amounts of people around the world might be effected by this war. These speeches are in regard to the grand dilemma that presented itself over a decade ago. This conflict happened to be whether or not we ought to go to war with Iraq. The vein of the initial speech, Rush to War Ignores U.S. Constitution, is cautionary. Byrd is attempting to emblematically pump the breaks on the notion that we have a duty to wage war. In the second speech A Preordained Course of Action on Iraq, Byrd continues to convey his disapprobation as well as recurrently referencing
In the aftermath of a comparatively minor misfortune, all parties concerned seem to be eager to direct the blame to someone or something else. It seems so easy to pin down one specific mistake that caused everything else to go wrong in an everyday situation. However, war is a vastly different story. War is ambiguous, an enormous and intangible event, and it cannot simply be blamed for the resulting deaths for which it is indirectly responsible. Tim O’Brien’s story, “In the Field,” illustrates whom the soldiers turn to with the massive burden of responsibility for a tragedy. The horrible circumstances of war transform all involved and tinge them with an absurd feeling of personal responsibility as they struggle to cope.
“The Price of Military Folly.” U.S. News Online. 1996. 10 April 2000 . Robinson, Linda.
The Civil War, World War I, the Vietnam War, World War II, and the conflict in the Middle East are all wars that have been fought over the difference of opinions, yet come at the cost of the soldier 's fighting them; Humans killing other humans, and death is just one of the many emotional scars soldiers of war face. Why do we go to war when this is the cost? For many it is because they are unaware of the psychological cost of war, they are only aware of the monetary cost or the personal gains they get from war. Tim O 'Brien addresses the true cost of war in "The Things They Carried". O 'Brien suggests that psychological trauma caused by war warps the perception of life in young Americans drafted into the Vietnam War. He does this through Lieutenant
Trauma can be defined as something that repeats itself. In The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, trauma recurs in soldiers for different reasons. However, although their reasons for trauma are different, the things they carried can symbolize all the emotions and pasts of these soldiers. One man may suffer trauma from looking through letters and photographs of an old lover, while another man could feel trauma just from memories of the past. The word “carried” is used repeatedly throughout The Things They Carried. Derived from the Latin word “quadrare,” meaning “suitable,” O’Brien uses the word “carried” not to simply state what the men were carrying, but to give us insight into each soldiers’ emotions and character, his past, and his present.
1. Marks, Alexandra, “Back form Iraq – and suddenly out on the streets” The Christian Science Monitor on the Web 8 Feb. 2005 < HYPERLINK "http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0208/p02s01-ussc.html" http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0208/p02s01-ussc.html>
...will never be compensation great enough for a vets time in service. Every day of a soldier’s tour there is a chance of their livelihood or life itself to be taken from them, a chance to no be able to return home to their families. For this it would be expected that the government would expend every resource to make sure a soldier is able to live a normal life outside of the military. But instead they receive minimal benefits in their return home. Rather than immediately receive treatment for a mental illness a vet can sit waiting for months at a time pondering suicide. Instead of receiving a college education a vet may end up on the streets alone. As an alternative to spending all of its money on failed projects across the nation, it should instead invest that money into the VA so that veterans might actually receive some type of beneficial help in their return home
On September 11th, 2001, the entire world, especially the United States, would be changed for a very long time when President George W. Bush declared, "We are at war. Somebody is going to pay." No one knew this would last this long. A dozen years down the road, we are still paying for this war. Bullets, misles, and weapons of all kinds are rendering pain on soldiers and men and women military personnel. Thousands and hundreds of thousands have paid the ultimate price - death. Children have been killed by road side bombs and some will never even have the chance to live, to smell the sunshine for the first time, or blink their eyes.
The soldiers were isolated from the outside world, and felt solidary confined within the oi rigs. They entertained themselves by playing football, shooting their rifles into the air and getting wasted with alcohol. Eventually, the soldiers were going insane and was tire of doing the same thing for the past six months and felt their “purpose” were served at all. The purpose of their duties were to guard the oil fields until their allies arrive to take control but the soldiers joined the military with the purpose to “serve and protect the united states of America against all foreign enemies”. The idea of serve and protect is completely differ from their point of view, and that is you can’t protect if there’s no harm to being protected from. They didn’t feel they had a purpose doing what they did and it wasn’t what they expect to being as “righteous” when citizens view a soldier. When civilians see a soldier in uniform, we often come to a conclusion that, this individual is risking their lives to protect ours. Private Swofford and battle buddy Corporal striving to have some type of action and were thirsty for an all-out battle with the enemies. Killing an Iraqi was an honor to them, the movie went on to how the soldiers were fighting over an enemy kill is an award to be cheer for. Corporal Alan Troy was an ex offender who lied to on his application to join the military and in order to stay in the military he would need to find all possible ways to proof he is capable of doing what others can and obtain the honor of a soldier. In order for him to proof he can be a soldier, he would need to rake up battle kills on his portfolio. In Juliet B. Schor’s essay on Work and Spend; it is our unceasing quest for material goods is part of the basic makeup of human beings. We work hard and want to obtain a reward; achievement for putting our time into something. It’s a structural process that
It can be hard to fully comprehend the effects the Vietnam War had on not just the veterans, but the nation as a whole. The violent battles and acts of war became all too common during the long years of the conflict. The war warped the soldiers and civilians characters and desensitized their mentalities to the cruelty seen on the battlefield. Bao Ninh and Tim O’Brien, both veterans of the war, narrate their experiences of the war and use the loss of love as a metaphor for the detrimental effects of the years of fighting.
Soldiers voluntarily leave the safety of their homes to protect our citizens and our country. These often unsung heroes inspire civilians to do and give more of themselves to others. During the Afghan War, an American soldier, Sgt. Dennis Weichel, lost his life rescuing an Afghan girl. She and some other children were picking up shell casings from the road as large military vehicles barreled toward them. He put himself in harm’s way to pull her to safety. Many heroic acts by soldiers also happened during the War in Iraq. American pilots are again flying over Iraq’s skies, risking their lives to save Iraqi citizens from terrorists. Their efforts are the latest in a long line of sacrifices made by the U.S. military in Iraq since 1990. Soldiers’ willingness to sacrifice their lives, gives Americans new heroes every day. Fellow citizens view these soldiers with admiration and
It is clearly seen that during the early half of the Nineteenth Century, many people and groups of people promised many things to others for support in wars or revolutions. Most of these promises were never meant to be kept, nor where they kept. As seen in these documents, Russia, Mexico, and the Middle Eastern territories of the Ottoman Empire all experienced turmoil during this time. England and France had their eyes set on Ottoman land for after World War I, whereas Mexico was dealing with their own revolution and Russia was experiencing their own political change.