In Baz Luhrmann’s film Strictly Ballroom, the concept of showcasing opposing characters using film techniques are shown. These techniques exemplify how Scott and Doug contrast from one another. At the outset of the text, Doug Hastings, experiences fear of others opinion’s aroused from painful past choices, expressed through colour, lighting and dialogue. Conversely, Scott Hastings, displays rebellion over use of dialogue and camera angles. Through similar filmic techniques, Luhrmann brings to life two contrasting characters that are so similar. Suggesting that fear and rebellion can lead to procrastination. Luhrmann’s use of colour, lighting and dialogue portrays Doug’s fear towards society’s criticism of him. We see evidence in Doug’s fear …show more content…
when he secretly re-watches the dance competition where Scott broke the convention. To indicate to the audience Doug’s fear, Luhrmann uses low-key lighting and darker tones in the scene. Telling the audience that he wants to be hidden amongst dark and gloomy colours. Low-key lighting gives a mysterious and ominous feeling to film as if something is being hidden. Similarly, dark tones, namely black, represent secrecy, absorbing light in visible parts of the spectrum. This evidence suggests that people hide things from others because they’re fearful of their opinions. Doug too displays his fear during a conversation with his wife, Shirley, when he’s constantly being interrupted. Doug’s morbed anxiety is shown here when he doesn’t stand up for himself by stopping her interruptions. Instead, he replies with an “okay, honey” and is then left alone. This happening makes Doug seem unimportant and overpowered by other characters in the film. Therefore, Luhrmann asserts that fearful behaviour can hint to rebellion and procrastination, stalling the journey of happiness. Thus, colour, lighting and dialogue contribute to Doug’s fear of being criticised for being perceived as not good enough, instead of enjoying the capacity of his ability. The director uses dialogue and camera angles to display Scott’s rebellion towards the desired dance steps.
Scott’s character traits are thought-provoking and through his use of dialogue and how Luhrmann uses camera angles, we can track his journey from being cowardly and manipulated to courageous, passionate and confident in expressing his indathy for other charay. Dialogue conveys the majority of the plot-line, providing texture and a deeper insight into Scott. We see evidence of Scott’s rebellion when Liz is angry with his unruly dance moves presented in the Waratah Competition and screams “I’m not dancing with you till you dance like you’re supposed to”. The dialogue indicates Scott’s rebellious quality as it tells us that to express his individuality, he had to break the rules. Low angle shots and medium shots aid Scott’s confident, strong and rebellious persona, adding a dominant and ominous effect, making him seem powerful when looking up at him. Consequently, the audience feels vulnerable and small during his rebellious acts and feel empathy for other characters. Medium shot displays the characters face, expressions and body language to viewers and their interaction between other characters. These camera angles, display confidence and the potential of disobedience, and rebellion, a trait in Scott’s personality. These aspects/angles are seen during and after Scott and his partner, Fran dance at the Pan Pacifics. In this case, their purpose would be to draw attention to the couple’s rebellion rather than what is going around them. Through Scott’s rebellion, Luhrmann believes that people rebel because they want to emphasise/support themselves forcefully in their fearful thoughts and attitudes. The more done, the more violent they’ll become in their actions that stop them from doing what they want or must do. Therefore, Luhrmann believes that dialogue and camera angles best showcase Scott’s rebellion towards the “correct” dance
moves. Ultimately, Luhrmann uses a variety of film techniques to illustrate how Scott and Doug contrast. He demonstrates to the audience how fear and rebellion can lead towards postponement of freedom. Using colour, lighting and dialogue to portray Doug’s fear of public criticism, Luhrmann too uses dialogue and camera angles to expose the rebellious side of Scott. Overall, Luhrmann puts forward that fear and rebellion lead to procrastination.
Mr. Leo wrote this piece not only for informative purposes, but also to convince a particular audience that, whether intentional or not, characters have taken on harmful images some may find offensive. He is not speaking only to his fairly educated, loyal readers, but also to those who may have taken part in producing the movie. Mr. Leo makes visible to his readers what he believes to be stereotypes in the film. People may not have noticed these before, so he makes clear definitions and comparisons. To the rest of the audience, those who had a hand in making the movie, he makes a plea not to redevelop these characters in future films.
Mad Hot Ballroom, directed by Marilyn Argrelo, is a documentary about the ballroom dance program in the New York Public School system. The documentary follows the journey of fifth grade students as they learn how to ballroom dance, and enter a citywide competition. The children in the documentary express their perspectives on ballroom dancing, goals and inspirations, and what it is like to grow up in their neighborhoods. The documentary highlights the benefits of exposing urban youth to ballroom dancing (Agrelo, 2005).
Kerner, Aaron M.. “Irreconcilable Realities.” Film Analysis: A Norton Reader. Eds. Jeffrey Geiger and R.L. Rutsky. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2nd edition, 2013. 462-83.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
In The Pathos of Failure, Thomas Elsaesser explains the emergence of a new ideology within American filmmaking, which reflects a “fading confidence in being able to tell a story” (280) and the dissolution of psychologically relatable, goal-oriented characters. He elaborates that these unmotivated characters impede the “the affirmative-consequential model of narrative [which] is gradually being replaced by another, whose precise shape is yet to crystallize” (281). Christian Keathley outlined this shape in more detail in Trapped in the Affection Image, where he argued that shifting cultural attitudes resulted in skepticism of the usefulness of action (Keathley). In Robert Altman’s McCabe & Mrs. Miller and Roman Polanski’s Chinatown, this crisis of action is a key element of the main characters’ failure, because it stifles the execution of classical narrative and stylistic genre conventions.
Run Lola Run, is a German film about a twenty-something woman (Lola) who has 20 minutes to find $100,000 or her love (Manni) will be killed. The search for the money is played through once with a fatal ending and one would think the movie was over but then it is shown again as if it had happened ten seconds later and changed everything. It is then played out one last time. After the first and second sequence, there is a red hued, narrative bridge. There are several purposes of those bridges that affect the movie as a whole. The film Run Lola Run can be analyzed by using the four elements of mise-en scene. Mise-en-scene refers to the aspects of film that overlap with the art of the theater. Mise-en-scene pertains to setting, lighting, costume, and acting style. For the purpose of this paper, I plan on comparing the setting, costume, lighting, and acting style in the first red hued, bridge to that of the robbery scene. Through this analysis, I plan to prove that the purpose of the narrative bridge in the film was not only to provide a segue from the first sequence to the second, but also to show a different side of personality within the main characters.
Cabaret provides for its audience an animated and a uniquely exciting dramatization of Berlin, Germany just before the Second World War. The story of many Germans living in an uncertain world is shown through just a few characters. Life is a cabaret, or so the famed song goes. After watching "Cabaret," you'll agree to an extent, but also realize how unsettling the assertion is. Taking place in the early 1930s, a portrait of life in decadent Berlin, is both uplifting and grim. Not your typical musical, it is comedic and dramatic, realistic, very tasteful, and ultimately thought provoking.
Color is a powerful tool in film making. What once was only black and white is now a full spectrum of vibrancy. But monochromatism is still an integral artistic choice in film. Blacks and whites in movies and television tend to represent the dark nature of scenes: death, evil, sadness, the macabre. Deep blacks, rich grays, and harsh whites tend to illustrate the Gothic influence of the piece as well as its tone. Adam Barkman, a writer famous for his analysis of films, explains the impact of color in film in his book A Critical Companion to Tim Burton “When we see a particular color, we immediately attach a particular set of meanings to it that is triggered by either our instincts or our memories” (Barkman
The Classical Hollywood style, according to David Bordwell remains “bound by rules that set stringent limits on individual innovation; that telling a story is the basic formal concern.” Every element of the film works in the service of the narrative, which should be ideally comprehensible and unambiguous to the audience. The typical Hollywood film revolves around a protagonist, whose struggle to achieve a specific goal or resolve a conflict becomes the foundation for the story. André Bazin, in his “On the politique des auteurs,” argues that this particular system of filmmaking, despite all its limitations and constrictions, represented a productive force creating commercial art. From the Hollywood film derived transnational and transcultural works of art that evoked spectatorial identification with its characters and emotional investment into its narrative. The Philadelphia Story, directed by George Cukor in 1940, is one of the many works of mass-produced art evolving out of the studio system. The film revolves around Tracy Lord who, on the eve of her second wedding, must confront the return of her ex-husband, two newspaper reporters entering into her home, and her own hubris. The opening sequence of The Philadelphia Story represents a microcosm of the dynamic between the two protagonists Tracy Lord and C.K. Dexter Haven, played by Katherine Hepburn and Cary Grant. Through the use of costume and music, the opening sequence operates as a means to aesthetically reveal narrative themes and character traits, while simultaneously setting up the disturbance that must be resolved.
Rascaroli, Laura. "The Essay Film: Problems, Definitions, Textual Commitments." Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 49.2 (2008): 24-47. JSTOR. Web. 08 May 2014.
... movie stars like royalty or mythical gods and goddesses, viewing the drama between great archetypal characters in a personal psychic realm. By considering the statements made and their societal impact from a Marxist perspective, Benjamin’s method is highly effective, as it does not simply consider art in terms of pure aesthetics anymore, but considers art’s place in a society capable of mechanically reproducing and endlessly duplicating film, photography, and digital art. His qualm with losing the aura and mystique of an original work is negated by the cult of movie stars, the adoration of fame, the incorporation of soundtracks which embody a particular time period, cinematographic allusions, and time-capsule-like qualities of a film such as Basquiat, a 90s tribute to the 80s, produced both as a part of and resulting from the art movements and trends it addresses.
Since the communist era, the concept of conformity has been tested on humans thinking it would bring a sort of comfort. These regimes rapidly crumbled due to their often authoritarian nature. Following these dictatorships, we often associate conformity with misery. Similarly, in Edward Scissorhands, through the characterization of Peg Boggs, the symbolism of Edward’s castle home and the change in Edward’s behaviour, director Tim Burton rejects conformity since it leads to fakeness, boredom, and corruption and, instead, promotes the benefits of authenticity and old habits.
Each chapter invents its own reality, a reality of the screen, of the movies, that is brought into closer contact by means of a literary text. The book as a whole, then, glorifies in the postmodern tradition multiple interpretations of reality. Movies themselves present alternative realities or interpretations of perceived realities, most often differing from our own individual constructions. Thus, by offering ...
“Entertainment has to come hand in hand with a little bit of medicine, some people go to the movies to be reminded that everything’s okay. I don’t make those kinds of movies. That, to me, is a lie. Everything’s not okay.” - David Fincher. David Fincher is the director that I am choosing to homage for a number of reasons. I personally find his movies to be some of the deepest, most well made, and beautiful films in recent memory. However it is Fincher’s take on story telling and filmmaking in general that causes me to admire his films so much. This quote exemplifies that, and is something that I whole-heartedly agree with. I am and have always been extremely opinionated and open about my views on the world and I believe that artists have a responsibility to do what they can with their art to help improve the culture that they are helping to create. In this paper I will try to outline exactly how Fincher creates the masterpieces that he does and what I can take from that and apply to my films.
Classic narrative cinema is what Bordwell, Staiger and Thompson (The classic Hollywood Cinema, Columbia University press 1985) 1, calls “an excessively obvious cinema”1 in which cinematic style serves to explain and not to obscure the narrative. In this way it is made up of motivated events that lead the spectator to its inevitable conclusion. It causes the spectator to have an emotional investment in this conclusion coming to pass which in turn makes the predictable the most desirable outcome. The films are structured to create an atmosphere of verisimilitude, which is to give a perception of reality. On closer inspection it they are often far from realistic in a social sense but possibly portray a realism desired by the patriarchal and family value orientated society of the time. I feel that it is often the black and white representation of good and evil that creates such an atmosphere of predic...