Strict Liability Of California's Dog Bite Victim

1257 Words3 Pages

California Civil Code Section 3342 is California's dog bite statute. California's dog bite statute provides that dog owners are legally responsible for damages related to the dog bite if:

the dog bite victim is in a public place or,
lawfully on any property, including the property of the dog owner. (not a trespasser) [1]
California Civil Code Section 3342 reads in part:

"The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner's knowledge of such viciousness. A person is lawfully upon the private property of such owner within the meaning …show more content…

Strict liability means that the owner of the dog is responsible if the dog bites someone. Period. It does not matter if the dog has bitten anyone before. The owner is liable.

There are exceptions to the rule, including:

the dog bite victim is a trespasser,
the dog bite victim provoked the dog,
the dog bite victim assumed the risk given the nature of his or her employment
the dog bite victim contributed to his own injuries.
Our California personal injury attorneys address some of the key concerns of dog bite victims.

1. What are compensatory damages?
2. Can I get punitive damages?
3. What if this was the first biting incident?
4. What if the dog runs off of the owner's property?
5. What if I am bitten by a military dog or police dog?
6. What defenses can the dog owner assert?
7. What if the owner is successful? Can I still get monetary …show more content…

Comparative Negligence or Comparative Fault occurs when the dog bite victim contributed fully or partially to his or her injuries. For example, if Tom touched a dog that was showing his teeth and growling, the dog owner would argue that Tom assumed the risk of being injured by the dog.

Provocation occurs when a dog bite victim provokes the dog. This typically includes some type of physical abuse.

7. What if the owner is successful? Can I still get monetary damages?
It is possible. California is a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction. [5] In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, your damages are proportionality reduced by your contribution to your injuries.

Therefore, using the example above, if a jury awarded Tom $4,000.00, but they found him 50% responsible for his own injuries, Tom would only be able to recover $2,000.00 or 50% of his awarded damages.

An experienced personal injury attorney can help you determine if you will be successful in your case.

Injured by a Dog in California? Call us for

Open Document