California Civil Code Section 3342 is California's dog bite statute. California's dog bite statute provides that dog owners are legally responsible for damages related to the dog bite if:
the dog bite victim is in a public place or,
lawfully on any property, including the property of the dog owner. (not a trespasser) [1]
California Civil Code Section 3342 reads in part:
"The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner's knowledge of such viciousness. A person is lawfully upon the private property of such owner within the meaning
…show more content…
of this section when he is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed upon him by the laws of this state or by the laws or postal regulations of the United States, or when he is on such property upon the invitation, express or implied, of the owner." California's dog bite statute is a strict liability statute.
Strict liability means that the owner of the dog is responsible if the dog bites someone. Period. It does not matter if the dog has bitten anyone before. The owner is liable.
There are exceptions to the rule, including:
the dog bite victim is a trespasser,
the dog bite victim provoked the dog,
the dog bite victim assumed the risk given the nature of his or her employment
the dog bite victim contributed to his own injuries.
Our California personal injury attorneys address some of the key concerns of dog bite victims.
1. What are compensatory damages?
2. Can I get punitive damages?
3. What if this was the first biting incident?
4. What if the dog runs off of the owner's property?
5. What if I am bitten by a military dog or police dog?
6. What defenses can the dog owner assert?
7. What if the owner is successful? Can I still get monetary
…show more content…
damages? 1. What are compensatory damages? Compensatory damages compensate dog bite victims for their injuries. These damages include, but are not limited to: Medical bills Physical therapy Disfigurement Pain and suffering Lost wages Loss of earning capacity Emotional distress Loss of consortium Loss of limb Loss of impairment of mental or physical capacity You should keep a record of your expenses and medical records. Also, keep a journal of the emotional and psychological effects of the trauma. It could help your case. 2. Can I get punitive damages? California civil code 3324 allows dog bite victims to recover punitive damages in certain instances. Punitive damages are awarded when the defendant acts are found to be shocking, intentional, and malicious. For example, if the owner trained his or her dog to attack people. The purpose of punitive damages is to punish the owner so he or she will not act badly again. Since the purpose of punitive damages is to punish, it is more difficult for plaintiff to receive punitive damages. Generally, the standard of proof to receive compensatory damages in civil cases is the preponderance of the evidence standard. "Preponderance-of-the-evidence" requires a jury (or judge) to believe that the existence of a fact is more probable than its nonexistence. [2] However, to recover punitive damages the dog bite victim must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant’s actions amounted to “oppression, fraud, or malice.” [3] 3. What if this was the first biting incident? California dog bite statute is a strict liability statute. This means the dog owner does not have to have notice of the dog’s violent or aggressive behavior. Additionally, the dog bite victim does not have to prove that the dog has a history of violent behavior to recover damages. However, owners whose dogs have a previous biting history could have their dogs taken away or euthanized. 4. What if the dog runs off of the owner's property? California civil code 3342 provides that owners are legally responsible for damages if their dog bites someone on public property. A public area can be a neighborhood, park, bar, library, restaurant, beach, apartment complex, or public square. Therefore, if Fido escapes from his crate and runs into a public street and bites you, you are entitled to damages. 5. What if I am bitten by a military or police dog? California civil code 3342 prohibits recovery in cases where a government agency using a dog in military or police work if: the bite occurred while the dog was defending itself from an annoying, harassing, or provoking act; it was assisting an employee of an agency in apprehending a suspect; or, it aided in the investigating a possible crime, executing a warrant, or defending another person. [4] However, there are exceptions to the rule. For example, if the police executed a warrant for Tom, but the dog attacks Karen, Karen can receive damages for her injuries because Karen was the the subject of the warrant. 6. What defenses can the dog owner assert? There are three defenses a dog owner can assert to protect himself or herself from legal liability for your damages: Assumption of Risk Comparative Negligence or Comparative Fault Provocation Assumption of Risk is a valid defense if the dog bite victim voluntary and knowingly assume the risk of injury when he or she engages in an inherently risky activity. For example, a kennel worker or dog groomer assumed the risk of being bitten by a dog because of the nature of his or her occupation as a kennel worker or dog groomer.
Comparative Negligence or Comparative Fault occurs when the dog bite victim contributed fully or partially to his or her injuries. For example, if Tom touched a dog that was showing his teeth and growling, the dog owner would argue that Tom assumed the risk of being injured by the dog.
Provocation occurs when a dog bite victim provokes the dog. This typically includes some type of physical abuse.
7. What if the owner is successful? Can I still get monetary damages?
It is possible. California is a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction. [5] In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, your damages are proportionality reduced by your contribution to your injuries.
Therefore, using the example above, if a jury awarded Tom $4,000.00, but they found him 50% responsible for his own injuries, Tom would only be able to recover $2,000.00 or 50% of his awarded damages.
An experienced personal injury attorney can help you determine if you will be successful in your case.
Injured by a Dog in California? Call us for
help... If you or someone you know was injured by a dog in California, we invite you to contact us for a free consultation. Call us at (855) JUSTICE to discuss your case with a knowledgeable lawyer in your area. We have offices throughout California, including in Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, San Bernardino, San Diego and Riverside Counties, as well as Central and Northern California. We may also be able to help you if were injured by a dog bite in Nevada. Legal References: Cal.Civ.Code § 3342 (a) In re Angelia P. (1981) 28 Cal.3d 908; California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 200. See, e.g., Beverly Hills Municipal Code 5-2-111, which imposes strict liability on "[a]ny person owning, controlling, or having care or custody of any animal." Cal. Civ. Code § 3342 (b) Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal. 3d 804, 829 (1975)
Hawaiian Laws also contain a doctrine known as contributory negligence. This means a plaintiff cannot recover damages if he or she is more at fault that the defendant. Furthermore, any possible monetary recovery will be decreased in proportion to the plaintiff’s proved fault. (FindLaw, n.d.)
Raghavan, M. (2008). Fatal dog attacks in Canada, 1990–2007. The Canadian Verterinary Journal, 577– 581.
On 04/14/18, at approximately 1:30pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian with Franklin County Animal Care and Control (FCACC) was dispatched to 235 N. 18th St on a nuisance dog investigation (dog owner's address). I arrived on scene at approximately 1:56pm. I met with victim Robert White. Mr. White stated he was walking in the alley behind 200 Block of Monroe Ave. A white male had a black dog approximately 6 feet away from him. As he continue to walked through the alley, the dog tried to attack him. Mr. White stated the dog was on a "retractable leash" but Mr. White noticed that the dog owner had extended the leash to the point that the dog was close enought to Mr. White. Mr. White stated he move to the opposite side of dog owner, and words
Nationwide, approximately 50 percent of all children will be bitten by a dog before they reach the age of twelve (DeIorio, “Have a Dog-Bite-Free Summer”). In Marion County, Florida, aggressive and dangerous breads of dogs are a “serious issue” for the community according to Marion County Commissioner Jim Payton (Thompson, “County drops '1 free kill'”). Responsible dog owners seem to be unaware of the problem but area residents who have been victims of these attacks have turned to the Marion County Board of Commissioners for help. The local County Commissioners have been wrestling with this issue since October of 2009 when a widow from Ocklawaha, Patricia McBee, had three of her dogs euthanized after they allegedly killed her neighbor’s cat (Thompson, “County drops ‘1 free kill’”). The need for change moved even faster after a 3-year-old little girl was attacked and killed by a dog that was chained to a tree outside her house in Citra (Lee, “Girl, 3, mauled”).
calculation to illustrate limitations of breed-specific legislation and decreasing the risk of dog bite-related injury.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 237.7 (2010): 788-792.
...ed by owner or animal that is not covered by another, non-breed specific portion of the Animal Control Code (i.e., vicious animal, nuisance animal, leash laws).”
The dogs listed are not identified as a type rather than a breed. The dogs listed in the Act under section 1 are the pit-bull terrier, the Japanese tosa, the Dogo Argentrino and the Fila Braziliero. Other dogs can be added to the banned breed list. Owners of controlled dogs cannot breed them, sell them or trade them for another dog or give them away. The owner of the dog has to keep it on a lead and muzzled at all times and the person who is in control of the dog should be older than 16 years old. The muzzle has to be of a standard so the dog cannot bite a person. When a person owns a controlled dog they cannot let them wander the streets or vacate them, if they do so this is an offence and criminal sanctions would be put in place. This can be a fine, prison sentence and a ban on keeping animals.
National Canine Research Council. Investigative Report for Dog-Bite Related Fatalities 2009. National Canine Research Council, 2010. 6-48. Print.
Chapter 9 of division 14 of the food and agricultural code of California. (n.d.). Retrieved March 20, 2014 from http://www.rott-n-chatter.com/rottweilers/laws/california.html
“Dog Bite: Fact Sheet.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC, 1 Apr. 2008. Web. 13
Enacting and enforcing strong leash laws is another very effective way to help reduce dog attacks and its easy to tell whether or not a dog has a leash on, unlike the difficulty of trying to determine the breed of some dogs. If a dog is on a leash the owner has control of it, even if said dog does lunge at someone. But leash laws can't just say you must have your dog on a leash. They also need to address dogs being tied out and left outside alone. Do...
How did the RCI come to decide which dog breeds were considered “dangerous” and therefore banned? According to the FAQs of the pet policy, RCI “evaluated input from current residents, past experience with animals in residential developments (both on-post and off), and the effect on the Projects’ ability to obtain and maintain adequate liability insurance at a reasonable price” (“Frequently Asked Questions“). In other words, pure anecdotal evidence. No scientific tests or studies of any kind. In fact researching dog bite fatalities involving military children from 2007 to 2010, none of those children were bitten by Doberman Pinschers (“Dog Bite Fatalities…”). Furthermore, in a study done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which covered...
Dog parks are a great place to take the dogs because it provides a space where they do not have to be on a leash every time, while they can interact with other animals of their species in a pet-friendly environment. Every city in the country should have at least one of these places, in order to help their inhabitants with their pets and because it is a good part of the life in the community. A few days ago, while walking my dog, I decided to run with him but with the leash in my hand, so that way he could be free to stop and sniff wherever he wanted. This experience was very good for the dog because he was not tied to the limits that I provided, but he was always by my side running. A couple of minutes after being “free” a policeman showed up.
Aggression directed toward owners is not a unique occurrence, and it is one that causes an emotional struggle between owner and pet. Assessment and treatment of this troublesome behavior problem must take into account the owners safety as well as practical expectations for improvement. Comparatively mild aggression may be...
Liability: • The owner agrees to take full financial liability, and shall indemnify Khatala Pet Lodge, its employees and representatives, from any claims or actions, of any kind, and nature whatsoever, arising from injury, sickness, Canine cough, accident, death, loss or damage of any kind whatsoever, of their pet/s whilst in the care of Khatala Pet Lodge where the utmost care and diligence has been taken by Khatala Pet Lodge. • The owner indemnifies Khatala Pet Lodge, and takes full financial liability where their pet/s have caused injury to other pets or persons whilst in the care of Khatala Pet Lodge, where the utmost care and diligence has been taken by Khatala Pet Lodge. •