Streetcar Named Desire Movie Vs Play

1784 Words4 Pages

As Blanche DuBois said, ‘I don’t want realism; I want magic’. And magic is exactly what I got when watching this production. ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’, titled after the famous ‘Desire’ streetcar line in the 1940s in New Orleans, is a play by Tennessee Williams, a work that is considered to be his magnum opus. First performed on December 3rd, 1947, ‘Streetcar' is one of the most critically acclaimed plays of the 20th century and is one of Williams’ most performed, also regarded as his most famous. It has been the subject of many adaptations, most famously the 1951 film starring Vivian Leigh, Marlon Brando, and Kim Hunter. The play follows the tragedies around the central character, Blanche DuBois. A former Southern belle, Blanche falls far …show more content…

Stanley coldly switched off the lightbulb before raping his sister-in-law, representing the loss of her sanity, the snuffing of the light in her life, and her having to confront the real world as opposed to her delusions of grandeur. Moving onto the acting, there is a lot to be said. First, I would like to mention Isaac Jolicoeur-Harris. As the antagonist, it is very easy to make Stanley Kowalski, originally played by the revolutionary Marlon Brando, a caricature of a working-class husband. Loud, arrogant, aggressive, and stupid. While the character of Stanley is all of these things, Jolicoeur-Harris manages to maintain a skillful balance between the core aspects of Stanley, which are very easy to exaggerate, and the realistically terrifying malice inside of him. I wouldn’t say this often, but there were times when he struck genuine horror into the audience’s hearts. That is an extremely difficult thing to do, especially given the fact that he is a student. Jolicoeur-Harris somehow lives up to the impossible standard set by Brando in the original Broadway production of Streetcar, which is a meritorious thing to do in itself. On to our leading …show more content…

Essa and Kesterton also incited rioting laughter from the audience with their brilliant comedic timing, while still maintaining the naturalistic style of the play. Although, Uliarte plays a more serious role as the matron and flower seller. She presents the grimmer aspects of the play with a haunting demeanor, interacting directly with the audience and chilling them to the bone. What stands out most of all, however, is the phenomenal direction of this play done by Mrs Pegna and Mrs Larsen, not to mention assistant director, Nandini Bhattacharya. The understanding of the source material is obvious and kudos to Mrs Larsen for managing to make a 77 year old play interesting enough to make Gen Z actors show this much passion. I would also like to congratulate her and Mrs Pegna for making this play so enrapturing to a contemporary audience. If in the wrong hands, this play could have been tedious and anachronistic. However, it is the exact opposite, managing to keep me on the edge of my seat. It is very clear that these are teachers who genuinely care about getting their students interested in the subject

Open Document