Stigma as a Process by Which the Reaction of Others Spoils Normal Identity
The American sociologist, Erving Goffman, introduced into sociological
discourse the notion of stigma. Stigma was used by the Greeks to mean
a bodily sign inflicted upon a person to mark them as outcasts from
normal society. However, due to Goffman's work, stigma has come to
mean any "condition, attribute or trait which marks an individual as
culturally unacceptable or 'inferior'" (Scambler 1991:186). Goffman
was following in the interactionist tradition of sociology - founded
by G. H. Mead. The interactionist perspective argues that our
self-concept is created through our interactions with others: we learn
to see ourselves as others see us and through this we build a sense of
our own identity. Goffman added that we become skilled in how to
present ourselves so as to protect our identity. However in the case
of disabled or ill people, this self-presentation is under threat
because illness and disability is often seen as a deviation from
'normality'. The reaction of others to the disability disrupts the
normal social interaction. The person is denied a normal identity
because of their 'stigma'. This essay will first discuss Goffman's
theory of stigma with reference to some sociological studies of
disability (the term disability will henceforth include chronic
illness). Then there will be an analysis of the subsequent
modifications to Goffman's theory and the criticisms of the
interactionist perspective on disability. This essay will conclude
that Goffman's descriptive analysis of stigma provides an important
lens through which to view the experience of disabil...
... middle of paper ...
...ma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.
Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Higgins, P. (1980). Outsiders in a Hearing World: A sociology of
deafness. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications.
Kelly, M. and D. Field (1998). Conceptualising Chronic Illness.
Sociological Perspectives on Health, Illness and Health Care. D. Field
and S. D. Taylor. Oxford, Blackwell Science.
Nettleton, S. (1995). The sociology of health and illness. Oxford ;
Cambridge, Mass, Polity Press.
Scambler, G. (1991). Sociology as Applied to Medicine, Balliere
Tindall.
Scott, R. A. (1969). The Making of Blind Men: a study of adult
socialization. New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
Williams, S. (1987). Goffman, Interactionism and the Management of
Stigma in Everyday Life. Sociological Theory and Medical Sociology. G.
Scambler: 134-64.
Humans are, by nature, filled with curiosity. We incessantly seek to learn about the universe. Not surprisingly, we simultaneously strive to learn about ourselves. What is our place in the world? How do we grow into the people we are meant to be?
These misconceptions of mental illness lead to stigma. The most commonly used definition of stigma comes from sociologist Erving Goffman in 1963. He defined stigma as an "attribute that is deeply discrediting" and individuals who bear the stigma are reduced, "from a whole and regular person to a tainted, discounted one" (Goffman 5). Edward Jones’s book, Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships, analyzes the many social mistreatments, of which stigmatized individuals are susceptible. The book first analyzes the origin of stigma, proposing they are derived from abnormal or “negative” attributes. The book goes on to say that stigmatized individuals often conceal their condition if they can, such is the case with mental illness. There
Thoit, Link, Bruce G., and Jo C. Phelan. "Labeling and Stigma." Handbook of the sociology of mental health. Springer Netherlands, 2013. 525-541.
Purpose: The stigma of mental disorders continues to dissolve, however it remains clear that we need take control of the issue, spread awareness, and educate the public on detecting mental illness and equipping the public with tools on how to be resilient. This purpose paper taps into brain disorders, mental health stigmas and how early detection along with mindfulness contributes to the enhancement of overall well-being.
...ns of human purpose.” Obviously, these insights didn’t appear outside the cultural context, as an individualistic researcher might suggest.
Stigma can be a major issue for those with mental illness. It can come from many different people in their lives, from family to complete strangers. So along with their own issues dealing with symptoms and regaining control of their life back, they also can have a negative influence related to their worth from stigma that can hinder them. Recovery in mental illness is ongoing and develops as the person matures, hopefully progressing in their ability to function better in society (Markowitz, Angell, & Greenberg, 2011). Stigma logically has an influence on self-worth and self-esteem for any group of people. Stigma if a large enough influence can make an individual diagnosed with a mental illness view themselves as tainted or less than before
People in modern Britain acts in a certain way that is seen as appropriate for ill people. In the 1950s, Parsons (1951) outlined the norms that govern illness behaviour and professional responses to it, in modern society. He also saw the patient - doctor relationship as a social system, governed by norms about appropriate behaviour. Also, Parsons (1951) claimed illness as disruptive, a kind of deviance and is therefore potentially disruptive to the social order. Parsons saw society as a functioning whole, and was concerned with how the social order was maintained, and how various institutions in society in the case health care institution function... ...
It could be said that in modern industrial society, Disability is still widely regarded as tragic individual failing, in which its “victims” require care, sympathy and medical diagnosis. Whilst medical science has served to improve and enhance the quality of life for many it could be argued that it has also led to further segregation and separation of many individuals. This could be caused by its insistence on labelling one as “sick”, “abnormal” or “mental”. Consequently, what this act of labelling and diagnosing has done, is enforce the societal view that a disability is an abnormality that requires treatment and that any of its “victims” should do what is required to be able to function in society as an able bodied individual.
Since human kind gained the ability of reflection we have questioned our purpose of existence. What makes a human, human? Four philosophers, representing four areas of Philosophy, attempt to answer this question. First is the Dutchman Soren Kierkegaard and his book Sickness unto Death, who is considered the “Father of Existentialism”. Prevalent through all of Kierkegaard’s work was his constant goal to move people closer to God and thus closer to discovering their authentic self. Therefore, our relationship with God is what makes us human. Next is Jeremy Rifkin and his book The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in A World in Crisis who believes that humanity is defined by our ability to empathize with other humans whether
As I continue to dive deeper into the novel, I have realize that the society back then has created stigma towards those who have Down Syndrome. This is shown when David gave Caroline, the nurse, the address of the special care place, where he wants to send his special needs newborn to (18). With David knowing the address of that place on top of his head, it shows that he uses it often, which suggests that he usually sends his patient's special needs newborn there. As a result, this further suggests that society back then did not accept those who are developed mentally disabled people. Thus, this is possibly why the parents of these newborns decided to give up their child and send them off to somewhere else. Also, Down Syndrome is a type of
My mother was never inclined to use therapy as an intervention and whenever it was mentioned she became very defensive. My brother followed suit by laughing it off. Many non-medical beliefs endorsed by racial/ethnic minority groups assign personal responsibility to the development of illness and may explain increased negative views held by racial/ethnic minority groups (Alvidrez, Snowden, & Kaiser 2008). The result of personal responsibility is an outside perception of weak and disabled.
aspects of who we are how we can do it or how can we make sense in the
Stigma is a powerful tool of social control. Stigma can be used to marginalize, exclude and exercise power over individuals who show certain characteristics. While the societal rejection of certain social groups (e.g. 'homosexuals, injecting drug users, sex workers') may predate HIV/AIDS, the disease has, in many cases, reinforced this stigma. By blaming certain individuals or groups, society can excuse itself from the responsibility of caring for and looking after such populations. This is seen not only in the manner in which 'outsider' groups are often blamed for bringing HIV into a country, but also in how such groups are denied access to the services and treatment they need.
We are more than our identities. To know your inner self is to know your purpose, your values, your goals, and your motivations. Aligning with your inner thyself. Knowing your inner self comes from self-awareness, having a clarity of your inner self opens the consciousness and set up a solid focus in self-actualization. Referring to the need of personal growth and development that exists throughout their life cycle. Life is about pushing self in accomplishing goals although a challenge because of risky obstacles that always lands on our track of completion. An individual’s identity is molded by many diverse aspects. Family, culture, friends, personal interests and adjoining environments are all influences that tend to help shape a person’s
The fact that we are aware of the world around us and we decide what goes on is a fundamental ability of being human. It is mentioned multiple times. We decide who we are and where we stand in relation to the world around us because of this we have a certain power over nature even if it is not just because of our physical adaptations (Cartmill & Brown, 2012). We are human because we have both genes and traits and this makes us unique. It gives us the ability to see and interpret things differently. We are able to look towards the future and guess what is going to happen and in so doing we are able to plan ahead (Weiss, 2012). We are curious and want to learn, we want to know what is going to happen and we ask questions. We are human because we are aware of ourselves, our emotional state and where we plan to be, what our intentions are. This awareness of self allows us to be much more aware of others, to be empathetic. (Dunbar,