Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social life in canterbury tales
The prologue of canterbury tales analysis
The prologue of canterbury tales analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social life in canterbury tales
The Canterbury Tales is a collection that withstands the test of time. Written in the fourteenth century, Chaucer skillfully illuminates different ranks and correlating stereotypes that existed throughout society through a storytelling competition. The competition, consisting of a prologue and tale from each character on their pilgrimage to Canterbury, offers life messages from different societal perspectives. Although the tales are memorable for many reasons—including their absurdity, nobleness, wisdom, and crudeness—one tale (and character) in particular stands out from the rest: The Wife of Bath. The Wife of Bath and her prologue and tale depict what were seen as radical and provocative ideas, the main belief being that women should have …show more content…
control over their husbands and their own lives. The Canterbury Tales has been translated and modernized throughout the years, showing its relevance in our society today. BBC created a Russian/Welsh series of cartoons of The Canterbury Tales, one for each character on the pilgrimage. When looking at the Wife of Bath’s BBC cartoon and comparing it to Chaucer’s version, it is very clear that fundamental differences exist between the two. In The Canterbury Tales, although the Wife of Bath has to fight for her authority, to the reader, her authority is validated and she is seen as a powerful force to be reckoned with. In the BBC cartoon, through not establishing the Wife of Bath’s character via her prologue, dramatizing the tale to a greater extent, depicting the female characters much more aggressive than the male characters, and the general act of portraying women in a bad light, the Wife of Bath loses credibility. While the BBC episode stays generally true to the plot of Chaucer’s “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale”, by skipping her prologue and negatively emphasizing and dramatizing scenarios where women are in power, the Wife of Bath’s character and message are delegitimized. Both versions of “The Wife of Bath” in Chaucer’s collection and in the BBC cartoon series follow the same general storyline.
A knight is facing his death sentence by the Queen for raping a woman. The Queen allows the knight to search for a year and a day to figure out what women want most in the world; if he cannot find the correct answer, he will be decapitated. The knight goes on his quest for the answer, and receives different solutions from each character he meets. Some say women want money, others say love, some say sex, the list goes on. The knight is about to give up when he sees women dancing in the forest—once he approaches, the fairy-like women disappear and he is left with an old lady. The old lady promises that she has the answer that will spare his life, but in return the knight must promise to do something for her. The knight accepts and they ride to the court together to face the Queen. The knight proclaims to the Queen that women want to be in control of their husbands; the answer is accepted, and by keeping his word, the knight is forced to marry the old woman. The knight is distraught about the situation, causing the old woman to offer him the choice of her identity. The knight can choose to have her be young, beautiful, and unfaithful, or old, ugly, and faithful. The knight is so flustered that he allows his wife to choose her identity for herself; because he let the old woman decide, she chooses to become young, beautiful, and
faithful. In “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale”, the Wife of Bath begins by illuminating the company on her past marital experience. She is a professional wife and business woman; she has had five husbands, both young and old, and has dealt with her fair share of traumas within her relationships. Her negative past marital experiences—such as her favorite husband, Janekyn, beating her with his version of the Bible called “The Book of Wikkid Wyves”—helps establish credibility in regards to her views on marriage and her past as a professional wife. The Wife of Bath constantly has to establish authority and explain her actions as a way of validating her beliefs to the company on the pilgrimage. She relates her own relationship experiences with figures from The Old Testament, such as Jacob and Paul; since they had multiple partners, it should not be a crime for her to have multiple partners as well. She manipulates her husbands and lovers as a means of gaining control and getting what she wants; although it is not an amicable quality, she is brutally honest and stands by her actions, solidifying her character. She has traveled the world on multiple pilgrimages, made her own money as a businesswoman, and embraces her sexuality to the fullest extent. She is consistently interrupted by the others on the pilgrimage, especially in her prologue: “Up sterte the Pardoner, and that anon. “Now dame,” quod he,“by God and by Seint John, ye be a noble prechour in this cas! What should I bye it on my flesh so dere? Yet hadde I levere wedde no wyf-to-yere!” (Chaucer 106). With that being said, she continues to preach regardless. Her prologue is one of the longest among the collection, not only because the length correlates with her personality, but also because she has to establish her credibility much more than the other ranks. Regardless of the time it takes the Wife of Bath to be taken seriously by the company, she tells a memorable story while illuminating the connectivity between her tale and her identity (as shown through her prologue). One of the biggest differences in the BBC cartoon—which stands as the main reason why the Wife of Bath does not have the same powerful effect and legitimacy as her character does in the collection—is that the cartoon completely skips her prologue. The Wife of Bath episode begins with her flirting with the Friar and kissing him (BBC 0:25); the Summoner interjects among their interaction and begins to argue with the Friar (BBC 0:35). Although the nature of the interruption aligns with Chaucer’s version, because the Wife of Bath does not preach her prologue and instead the viewer only has her flirtatious encounter with the Friar to base her character off of, the same impression is not made. Her strongly rooted beliefs and values, along with her evidence to support them, are lost in the cartoon. Although she is physically depicted the same—with a gap toothed smile, a red robe, and curves—her character and personality comes off different. The Wife of Bath is sexualized in a way that is different than in the collection due to the fact that she is not proclaiming her sexuality on her own terms; she comes across as a strictly promiscuous woman through her interaction with the friar, and is not given the chance to illustrate it and defend it for herself. Because of this, it is not made evident to the viewer that her tale aligns so closely with her as a character; this causes it to lose the impact it has in The Canterbury Tales.
In The Canterbury Tales Chaucer demonstrates many themes such as lust, greed, and poverty. During the Canterbury tales the travelers the author himself is in the tale and he describes every character in detail. Most importantly in The Wife of Bath there is numerous examples of poverty. Thought out the tale Chaucer introduces to us a man who couldn’t control himself because of lust. As a result, he gets punished by the queen.
Some say women can get the worst out of a man, but in The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer in 1485, proves it. The tales were originally written as a collection of twenty four tales, but has been narrowed down to three short tales for high school readers. The three tales consist of “The Miller”, “The Knight”, and “The Wife of Bath” along with their respective prologues. In The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer shows the weak but strong role of women throughout the “The Knight’s Tale” and “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” to contrast different human characteristics and stereotypes on the spectrum of people.
In Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, The Wife of Bath is a strong woman who loudly states her opinions about the antifeminist sentiments popular at the time. Chaucer, however, frequently discredits her arguments by making them unfounded and generally compromising her character. This brings into question Chaucer's political intent with the Wife of Bath. Is he supportive of her views, or is he making a mockery of woman who challenge the patriarchal society and its restriction and mistrust of women? The Wife's comedic character, frequent misquoting of authorities, marital infidelity, and her (as well as Chaucer's) own antifeminist sentiments weaken the argument that Chaucer supported of the Wife's opinions.
In The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer, the stereotypes and roles in society are reexamined and made new through the characters in the book. Chaucer discusses different stereotypes and separates his characters from the social norm by giving them highly ironic and/or unusual characteristics. Specifically, in the stories of The Wife of Bath and The Miller’s Tale, Chaucer examines stereotypes of women and men and attempts to define their basic wants and needs.
"The Wife of Bath's Tale." The Canterbury Tales. New York: Viking, 2009. . Web. Jan. & Feb.
In his story titled "The Canterbury Tales" Chaucer seems to truly admire some of the pilgrims while displaying disdain and sarcasm towards the others. The pilgrims that he most seems to admire are the Knight, the Oxford Clerk and the Parson. The knight he seems to admire based on his notation of all the campaigns in which the knight has participated in service to just causes. Chaucer makes mention of the knight 's worthiness, wisdom and humility "Though so illustrious, he was very wise And bore himself as meekly as a maid." (67,68 Chaucer). It seems as though Chaucer admires the knights great ability both in warfare and practicing what he preaches. This can be seen in his description of all those he seems to admire in the tale. The Oxford Clerk
There are two types of people in this world, the first ones are, the people who doesn't really like reading books because most of them doesn't have pictures on it, and they find it extremely boring. Then the other type of people, who simply gets lost into their book every time they read, because they just simply love reading. Some of them even say that when they're reading, it is taking them to a different world that only their imagination can create. That is why some people consider their books as their most priced possessions, because of how much it means to them and also some books can be rather pricey. Indeed, books can really be expensive, however, you might be too astonished when you see the following books, because they're considered
As a man fascinated with the role of women during the 14th Century, or most commonly known as the Middle Ages, Chaucer makes conclusive evaluations and remarks concerning how women were viewed during this time period. Determined to show that women were not weak and humble because of the male dominance surrounding them, Chaucer sets out to prove that women were a powerful and strong-willed gender. In order to defend this argument, the following characters and their tales will be examined: Griselda from the Clerk's Tale, and the Wife of Bath, narrator to the Wife of Bath's Tale. Using the role of gender within the genres of the Canterbury Tales, exploring each woman's participation in the outcomes of their tales, and comparing and contrasting these two heroines, we will find out how Chaucer broke the mold on medievalist attitudes toward women.
Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” is an important part of his most famed work, The Canterbury Tales. One of the most respected highly analyzed of all of the tales, this particular one is important both for its character development and its prevailing themes. It seamlessly integrates ideas on society at that time with strong literary development. This work stands the test of time both because of its literary qualities and because of what it can teach us about the role of women in late Medieval society.
One of the most interesting and widely interpreted characters in The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer is the Wife of Bath. She has had five different husbands and openly admits to marrying the majority of them for their money. The wife appears to be more outspoken and independent than most women of medieval times, and has therefore been thought to symbolize the cause of feminism; some even refer to her as the first actual feminist character in literature. Readers and scholars probably argue in favor of this idea because in The Canterbury Tales, she uniquely gives her own insight and opinions on how relations between men and women should be carried out. Also, the meaning of her tale is that virtually all women want to be granted control over themselves and their relationship with their husbands, which seems to convince people that the Wife of Bath should be viewed as some sort of revolutionary feminist of her time. This idea, however, is incorrect. The truth is that the Wife of Bath, or Alisoun, merely confirms negative stereotypes of women; she is deceitful, promiscuous, and clandestine. She does very little that is actually empowering or revolutionary for women, but instead tries to empower herself by using her body to gain control over her various husbands. The Wife of Bath is insecure, cynical towards men in general, and ultimately, a confirmation of misogynistic stereotypes of women.
“The Wife of Bath’s Tale” in The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer is a story about a widow who took a pilgrimage to the town of Canterbury with an array of dynamic characters whose diverse backgrounds allowed them to share their stories with one another to make the long journey more interesting. The widow named Alisoun in the “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” told the tale of her experiences with her five past husbands and a story about a knight and a witch. She truly believed that for a woman to have a happy life she would need to gain dominion over a man; however one could assume this was programmed into her by her influential mother and her own religious doctrines. Accordingly, Alisoun argued that the woman must control everything in order to have a happy marriage; however, her life experience and the story she shared should tell her otherwise.
The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, (written c. 1387), is a richly varied compilation of fictional stories as told by a group of twenty-nine persons involved in a religious pilgrimage to Canterbury, England during the fourteenth century. This journey is to take those travelers who desire religious catharsis to the shrine of the holy martyr St. Thomas a Becket of Canterbury. The device of a springtime pilgrimage provided Chaucer with a diverse range of characters and experiences, with him being both a narrator and an observer. Written in Middle English, each tale depicts parables from each traveler.
In the 14th century Geoffrey Chaucer wrote The Canterbury Tales, which included a progressive view of women's concerns in "The Wife of Bath." During a time when women were still considered chattel existing almost exclusively to produce heirs, Chaucer takes a stand on issues affecting women that were not commonly given consideration. Writing in the first person, Chaucer is able to describe life from the viewpoint of a woman. Through this style, Chaucer addresses subject matter that would have been too candid for a female writer during his time period. By writing "The Wife of Bath" in a satirical way, Chaucer points out issues facing women regarding double standards, the validity of female desire, and the economic necessity of women to marry well while keeping the text humorous with some common female stereotypes regarding deception that have persisted into present day culture.
Chaucer, in his female pilgrimage thought of women as having an evil-like quality that they always tempt and take from men. They were depicted as untrustworthy, selfish and vain and often like caricatures not like real people at all. Through the faults of both men and women, Chaucer showed what is right and wrong and how one should live. Under the surface, however, lies a jaded look of women in the form that in his writings he seems to crate them as caricatures and show how they cause the downfall of men by sometimes appealing to their desires and other times their fears. Chaucer obviously had very opinionated views of the manners and behaviours of women and expressed it strongly in The Canterbury Tales. In his collection of tales, he portrayed two extremes in his prospect of women. The Wife of Bath represented the extravagant and lusty woman where as the Prioress represented the admirable and devoted followers of church. Chaucer delineated the two characters contrastingly in their appearances, general manners, education and most evidently in their behaviour towards men. Yet, in the midst of disparities, both tales left its readers with an unsolved enigma.
The knight bases his decision off of information he learns in the beginning of the tale; that “women desire to have sovereignty as well over their husbands as their loves, and to be in mastery above” (Chaucer WBT 1038-1040). With this information, the knight voluntarily decides to give the hag control over his decision, given that a woman’s greatest desire is to have control. The hag rewards the knight’s decision by becoming “both fair and good, as will be plain” (Chaucer WBT 1240). This reward allows the knight to understand that it is beneficial for the hag to have authority in their marriage, as events will end favorably for him if he continues to give her the