Stephen Langton Chapter 4 Summary

3573 Words8 Pages

ARCHBISHOP STEPHEN LANGTON

Chapter 4
THUNDERING TONGUE

As a Master at the University of Paris, Langton was expected not only to teach his students in the classroom but also to be an example to them of what a Godly clergyman should be. Part of that example was that he should preach, and Langton was a very significant preacher. He earned the nickname “Stephen of the Thundering Tongue” because of the power of his preaching and the way in which he preached. Pope Innocent III was very much interested in things that would strengthen the Church and cause the people of Europe to live a truly Christian life. Langton was a part of that same group of concerned clergy. They were known as the Evangelical Movement or the vita apostolica movement. …show more content…

As a member of the Evangelical Movement which taught that the Church was the vehicle for positive change in society he taught that the secular government must submit to divine lordship--lordship in the feudal obligation sense. The king must be under the authority of God and His representative on earth was the Pope. This was called natural law, the law of creation. Kings were anointed by a high Church official like a Pope. According to Langton the king was anointed to the service of the church, not to the ministry of God. Romans 13: 4 is often translated to read that the ruler is a “minister” of God, but it can also be rendered “servant” of God. The Church did not wish to elevate any king to the level of clergy in light of the fact that kings regularly conducted wars, and they did not take the vows a clergyman did. The inconsistency laid in the fact that while kings were not to be seen as clergy the Pope and many other clergymen were considered to be secular rulers over significant expanses of land and even contributed money and men for the conduct of war. If Langton recognized that inconsistency he never directly addressed it. He did often preach about justice which …show more content…

Judging the faith of another is usually a useless activity as one cannot see the heart but only the outward behavior of another. Undoubtedly Stephen was a man of shining character fully dedicated to serving God as boldly and clearly as he was able. He was incredibly knowledgeable about the Bible and he tried to act out its teachings to the very best of his abilities. We cannot fault him for not expressing his faith in the terms used by Protestant Christians in Martin Luther’s day three hundred years later, or even of John Wycliffe’s time over a hundred years later. Stephen was a man of his time, a loyal Roman Catholic who went to confession, venerated Mary as “Mother of God”, and believed in transubstantiation which is a doctrine that attributes a miracle during the mass where the bread and wine become the literal body and blood of Christ (Lk. 22:19-20). Transubstantiation and verbal confession to a priest were not official Catholic doctrines until 1215, the same year that Stephen was working on the Magna Carta. However Langton regarded these doctrines as issues of interpretation of Scripture within the responsibility of the Pope. He willingly submitted to Innocent’s decisions about them. Some historians have suggested that Langton was an “Anglican before his time”. This author recalls Heb. 11: 6 which assures us that “without faith it is impossible to please (God); for he that cometh to

Open Document