Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of reading for writing
What are the benefits of being a good reader
Essay benefits of reading
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of reading for writing
1. I strongly agree with Mr. King that the desire to write always being with a love of reading. In Stephen King’s memoir, On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, he reiterates how important reading is to a writer. One cannot exist without the other—their unbreakable relationship is what makes lots of reading so vital to become a great writer. The pure act of reading teaches lessons impossible to learn without actually doing it. “Every book you pick up has its own lesson”, but this lesson cannot be taught unless the book is actually read (King 145). If one has a desire to read, and loves feeling like they are in a world of their own, the next logical wish is to want others to feel how they feel. Writers are born out of avid readers, which is a nice …show more content…
Not only does the thirst to write start with a love to read, reading helps to make writers better. This is another one of King’s strong beliefs that he touches on in his memoir. According to King, “you cannot succeed unless you read a lot and write a lot” (King 173). Stephen King practices what he preaches, too, as he reads about seventy to eighty books per year. He believes so much in his philosophy that he devotes countless hours studying the occupation he’s in. It would be mentally impossible to spend that much time and effort doing something if there wasn’t a love for it before everything else. In short, I agree with Stephen King’s beliefs on where a writer’s desire to write comes from: reading.
2. I disagree with King’s claim that “while it is impossible to make a competent writer out of a bad writer, and while it is equally impossible to make a great writer
…show more content…
When I write, I generally do not “open the door” for readers until I am done with a certain paragraph or section of my writing. I do this mostly because I like to keep my writing flowing, and I do not like stopping in the middle of an idea especially when someone is there to give me more to add on. I would rather have someone critique me when I’m finished, so I know that I can always just ignore what they are saying and go on with my writing if I need to because it is already done. However, when I do finally “open the door” to a section of my writing, the first people I usually ask are friends that I made in whatever class I am writing something for. But, these people are sometimes not that helpful because I suspect they do not want to be mean or critical, so then I ask my teacher if they can read over my work for me. In English last year, Mr. Biggs was a huge help with being a good critique, and it was really beneficial because he had more experience as a writer than one of my classmates. I really trusted him in reading my writing because I knew he would help me if my thesis was really weak, and he wouldn’t just leave me at telling me that it was. He would suggest different ways I could make it better, which ultimately would make my essay or piece of writing a lot better. Personally, I would rather hear all the things that are wrong with my writing than all the things that are amazing about it. Hearing that something is good doesn’t really help me as much because chances
Chris McCandless "I think that Chris McCandless was bright and ignorant at the same time. He had no common sense, and he had no business going into Alaska with his romantic silliness. He made a lot of mistakes based on ignorance. I don’t admire him at all for his courage, nor his noble ideas. Really, I think he was just plain
The book opens with a squad of soldiers running a tactical control point just outside of a village called Yusufiyah. They are approached when a man Abu Muhammad had found his cousins family brutally murdered not too far off. Sgt. Tony Yribe and 3 others went to go investigate it. Although it was a terrible scene Sgt. Yribe had just assumed that it was like most other situations in Iraq in that the family was a victim of Iraqis attacking other Iraqis. The one thing that bothered him was that there was a shotgun shell and Iraqis do not normally use shotguns.
Opinions. One quote I disagreed with was, “It seems to me that middle-class culture, and schooling gratuitously and foolishly rob children of the pleasures of the physical and intellectual work of learning generally and writing in particular” (21). This is invalid. Not everyone grows up around writing, and reading. Sometimes reading and writing isn’t fun for everyone. It can be boring, or even hard to follow. Reading and writing are a choice, not a requirement. Following onto that quote was one of my favorite quotations by Savannah which stated, “I despaired of becoming a writer whenever a grade or comment even hinted I had not learned and meticulously followed all the rules of spelling, punctuation, and grammar” (3). I do agree with this quote because criticism does break down one’s integrity, and devotion to their work to keep on going. If there is continuous negative feedback given, then it prevents writers from continuing on. I have always struggled as a writer, and I do not appreciate receiving negative criticism. However; when I was younger, my parents had always told me that “criticism is the key to success”. In order to succeed, one must fail as an individual to set higher goals, and actions
In this mysterious story “The Eleventh Hour” the story was about a fantastic party the animals go to but while they are playing someone and steals the grand feast. My initial pre-reading prediction for “the Eleventh Hour” was that there were lots of animals who went to a fancy dress party and a big mystery unfolds during the story. My pre- reading prediction was kind of right. When Horace turns 11he celebrates in a grand style by inviting his friends over for a spectacular party. As they were playing someone from the party secretly sneaks into the banquet hall and gobbles down all the food.
“I write because I love. I write for the survival of self, my children, my family, my community and for the Earth. I write to help keep our stories, our truths, our language alive”. (qtd. in Anthology 396.)
Mark Twain once stated, “You can’t depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus” (Brainy Quote). Despite the imaginative challenges children are faced with in reality, they are able to cope with the advantage of time and mental resilience. Stephen King in his essay, "My Creature from the Black Lagoon" from the Wake Tech English 111 Reader, compared the idea of imaginative strength in children and in that of adults to see who would better fit the horror genre audience. Stephen King recalls one particular time from his past that sends shivers down even the hardest of spines.
The essay “Ten Ways to Think about Writing: Metaphoric Musings for College Writing Students” by E. Shelley Reid discusses a key point in writing that the writer should be passionate or have a connection to their writing. For instance, Reid states that there are three main principals that writers should follow when writing. In her work, E. Shelley Reid wrote, “Write about what you know about,
This is a story about a man named Harold Crick. And his wristwatch. In the aforementioned quote from the comedy-drama- fantasy film Stranger Than Fiction, the character Harold Crick has an idée fixe with his wristwatch that his life revolves around an inanimate object. Unbeknownst to Harold, the writer Karen Eiffel narrates his life and gets him out of his comfort zone thereafter his wristwatch stopped. What Stranger Than Fiction suggests about literature is that it challenges issues correlated with time and emotions.
Many people think that reading more can help them to think and develop before writing something. Others might think that they don’t need to read and or write that it can really help them to brainstorm things a lot quicker and to develop their own ideas immediately (right away). The author’s purpose of Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, is to understand the concepts, strategies and understandings of how to always read first and then start something. The importance of this essay is to understand and comprehend our reading and writing skills by brainstorming our ideas and thoughts a lot quicker. In other words, we must always try to read first before we can brainstorm some ideas and to think before we write something. There are many reasons why I chose Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, by many ways that reading can help you to comprehend, writing, can help you to evaluate and summarize things after reading a passage, if you read, it can help you to write things better and as you read, it can help you to think and evaluate of what to write about.
In the novel Cujo, author Stephen King uses third-person limited point of view to enhance the level of suspense in the story. Third-person limited point of view is when an author focuses on one person’s feelings while the other characters are only there externally. In the novel Cujo, the author Stephen King uses Donna as the main focus to enhance the level of suspense. At the beginning of the novel, Donna sees a dog and responds by thinking “But oh my”. The author puts this as a short line in the story. This makes it seem like the time is passing by quickly. This also creates suspense because the audience will be wondering why she is thinking “But oh my”. Is it because she saw something or is it because she did something? A few seconds later,
Although the greater picture is that reading is fundamental, the two authors have a few different messages that they seek to communicate to their audiences. “The Joy of Reading and Writing” depicts how reading serves as a mechanism to escape the preconceived notions that constrain several groups of people from establishing themselves and achieving success in their lifetimes. “Reading to Write,” on the other hand, offers a valuable advice to aspiring writers. The author suggests that one has to read, read, and read before he or she can become a writer. Moreover, he holds an interesting opinion concerning mediocre writing. He says, “Every book you pick has its own lesson or lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones” (p.221). Although these two essays differ in their contents and messages, the authors use the same rhetorical mode to write their essays. Both are process analyses, meaning that they develop their main argument and provide justification for it step by step. By employing this technique, the two authors create essays that are thoughtful, well supported, and easy to understand. In addition, Alexie and King both add a little personal touch to their writings as they include personal anecdotes. This has the effect of providing support for their arguments. Although the two essays have fairly different messages, the authors make use of anecdotes and structure their writing in a somewhat similar
In the short story “The Reach,” Stephen King addresses the fact that in life there is a constant fear of death, but when confronted with it is easier to accept when someone has seen many deaths and knows that they are dying themselves. The narrator of the story knows that she is dying and, being an elder, has seen many deaths. We reach this conclusion when she questions the love she has for others and no longer cries when others die around her anymore. She has seen many deaths in the years and can only accept that death is inevitable and a part of life. Mostly everyone she grew up with has passed on already.
Only Stephen King could write such a spellbinding tale of a bunch of boys doing nothing but walking.
For such a successful writer, Stephen King really had no secret to his writing style. King has credited free writing for his best ideas. He also has a very down to earth way of looking at his fame. Stephen King would read for four hours, and then he would write for four hours or until he reached 2,000 words. In a Time magazine interview, King called this his nine to five approach and that he, “worked until beer o’ clock.” When asked where his ideas came from, King would often reply, “I have the heart of a small boy. . . And I keep it in a jar on my desk.” Also, he does not have just one particular way of writing horror, and what often sets off the terror in his readers most was the vast amount of detail portrayed.
So, is Joseph Hillstrom King (Joe Hill) a writer because he and his father, Stephen King, share an artistic "gene" that makes them want to write? Or is Joe Hill a writer because he grew up in a house with Stephen King, where he learned to love the things his father loved to do?