“Flaking”, an allegedly common practice to boost arrest records, well known among NYPD officers, according to Stephen Anderson, a former undercover New York City narcotics detective, refers to the planting of drugs on innocent people and charge them for drug possession, in order to increase a police officer’s otherwise low, arrest quota.
Anderson along with fellow police officer Henry Tavarez was busted for “flaking” four men (i.e. in this case planting cocaine) in a Queens bar, NY in 2008 in order to help his partner, who had a low of buy-and-bust arrest record and thus was in jeopardy of losing his undercover job, and be assigned to regular patrol, which he did not welcome.
In a cooperation agreement with prosecutors, the former NYPD detective’s bombshell testimony, described in detail the police culture of the Brooklyn South and Queens
…show more content…
narcotic forces that led to the arrests of eight officers and created a huge shakeup in these NYPD precincts. Mr.
Anderson, who had worked numerous years in narcotic elite units in Brooklyn and Queens, NY described how rules were broken or simply ignored and corners cut by drug law enforcement officers to achieve drug arrests or buys monthly quotas.
In the two-day trial of fellow officer Detective Jason Arbeenie, Stephen Anderson who testified for the prosecution regarding “flaking” in the police units he was assigned to, stated in his testimony that his partner police officer Henry Tavarez "was worried about getting sent back [to patrol] and, you know, the supervisors getting on his case". He then added, "As a detective, you still have a number to reach while you are in the narcotics division".
Two years later, the former undercover New York City narcotics detective testified in the Brooklyn Supreme Court, that the Brooklyn South and Queens narcotic squads had been framing innocent people routinely by planting evidence, in order to reach arrest quotas. “It was something I was seeing a lot of, whether it was from supervisors or undercovers and even investigators” , he recounted during his
testimony. After this huge scandal that led to the indictment, prosecution and sentencing of eight NYPD police officers, the city of New York was left to pay $300,000 to settle a false arrest lawsuit against Jose Colon and his brother Maximo, who were wrongfully arrested by Anderson and Tavarez, as a surveillance tape inside the bar proved beyond reasonable doubt that they had been framed by the above-mentioned police officers. Federal judge Jack Weinstein who was presiding over Maximo and Jose Colon huge lawsuit against the NYPD stated, that the Brooklyn South and Queens arresting police officers’ reports were plagued with "widespread falsification". Furthermore, following thorough investigations and a scrutinized judicial review into the Brooklyn and Queens, NY narcotic units, district attorneys were forced to dismiss more than 400 criminal cases that were proven being reasonable doubt to be tainted by the involvement of numerous police officers associated with the “flaking” scandal. Moreover, according to Richard Cardinale, a Brooklyn attorney who filed civil claims for 24 individuals, the city of New York was forced to pay approximately $1,000 per hour of wrongful incarceration to settle civil lawsuits against these NYPD police officers’ misconduct Additionally, in numerous criminal cases in which the unethical police officers were involved, the arrested individuals were able to walk free from what seemed damning evidence of wrongdoing, as these evidences could no longer be considered trustworthy , which have left the New York Police Department's credibility frayed.
This led to corruption of the departmental level and an unethical subculture based on skewed officer loyalty. An example of this given in the movie when Dowd and Eurell made a malfeasant deal with Adam Diaz, an infamous drug lord. In exchange for a hefty fee, Eurell and Dowd would alert Diez whenever his underground business was being watched by the police department. Furthermore, they would assist Diaz by putting his competition out of business by tipping off the narcotics unit or robbing the competitors’ headquarters at gunpoint. Dowd and Eurell became extremely rich from their criminal exploits and they often flaunted their wealth. Dowd began forgetting to pick up his measly paycheck from the police department, but he would be seen driving to work in a shiny, new Corvette. Dowd and Eurell also went on lavish vacations that did not go unnoticed by their fellow
Because police investigators are usually under pressure to arrest criminals and safeguard the community, they often make mistakes. Sometimes, detectives become convinced of a suspect 's guilt because of their criminal history or weak speculations. Once they are convinced, they are less likely to consider alternative possibilities. They overlook some important exculpatory evidence, make weak speculations and look only for links that connect a suspect to a crime, especially if the suspect has a previous criminal record. Picking Cotton provides an understanding of some common errors of the police investigation process. During Ronald Cottons interrogation, the detectives did not bother to record the conversation “But I noticed he wasn 't recording the conversation, so I felt that he could be writing anything down”(79) unlike they did for Jennifer. They had already labelled Ronald Cotton as the perpetrator and they told him during the interrogation “Cotton, Jennifer Thompson already identified you. We know it was you”(82). Jenifer Thompson 's testimony along with Ronald Cotton 's past criminal records gave the detectives more reason to believe Ronald committed the crime. Ronald Cotton stated “ This cop Sully, though, he had already decided I was guilty.”(84). Many investigative process have shortcomings and are breached because the officials in charge make
“My crimey here think the way to go is more drugs. But I know better. I think making money is okay, but not making it just by dealing. You gotta go legit, at least for a minute. You gotta go state fresh, all the way live, if you wanna do anything worthwhile out here. Everybody thinks they can make crazy dollars, but they confused. It aint like that. I’ve seen co-caine bust many a head – they get fucked up and be clocking out after they find out they cannot find the key to understanding that mystery skied. But you know what? But-but0but you know what? They don’t have a clue. Word.” (Williams, 1989)
During the seventies in New Jersey created a program that could change life in society. This program occurred only in twenty-eight cities. Government and public officials were excited about this concept. Police officials were not so much. Foot patrol made officers walk in sleet and snow. Assigned foot patrol was a way of punishment for officers. State funding of foot patrol shut the mouths of some people. Silence stopped after the “Police Foundation”(Kelling) put foot patrol to the actual test. To contrary belief this rattled some arguments in the community an...
For years police corruption has been a major problem in American society but where is the line between moral and unethical police corruption, many modern movies address this vary issue. Some films portray how types of police corruption can have a positive influence on society, while others show the dark side of police corruption. Many law enforcement agents join the criminal justice with the basic idea of “justice for all,” however, most of them do not realize that the nice guy doesn’t always win. Even though there are vast amounts of movies which specifically address police corruption we will use three main movies for our argument today, mostly LA Confidential, however, also Training Day.
And so comes into the question the arrest of Eduardo Balarezo by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics in in 1949. Balarezo was a prominent drug lord in Latin America. He was credited as being the sole leading distributor of narcotics specifically cocaine and heroin in the United States. He had a structured organization known as the ‘Balarezo gang’ who had set up cells in the northeastern part of the United States more specifically in New York (Gootenberg, 2011). Harry Anslinger the Director of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics was on a mission to crack down ...
In January of 1990, Washington, DC, the seat of the federal government of the United States was turned upside down by scandal. While the headlines were filled with the efforts of the Bush Administration to crack down on drugs, the District's Mayor and symbol of black power against a nearly all white backdrop of authority was caught on videotape buying and than smoking crack cocaine with an exotic dancer two days before he was expected to announce an unprecedented fourth campaign for mayor. The sting was setup and carried out by a Federal Bureau of Investigation unit that had been pursing the frequent rumors of the Mayor's drug dependency.
Walker, S., & Katz, C. (2012). Police in America: An Introduction (8th Edition ed.). New York:
This documentary takes place in Newark, New Jersey. One of the most crime filled cities in the United States. Murder, drugs, and gangs fill this city. Many police officers work hard to keep their city safe and others for other intentions. This documentary shows how the police work, their tactics, and the reality of how police officers are working with the community.
On June 2, 1985, Officer Daniel Wright, of the San Francisco Police Department, was dispatched to a lumberyard where a shoplifting had just occurred. Upon arrival, a store employee informed the officer that an Asian man had concealed a bench vice in his jacket and was seen placing it in the trunk of a 1980 Honda Prelude., and when the employee attempted to question the man he quickly fled on foot. Officer Wright looked into the vehicle and discovered a bag that contained a silenced handgun. At this point a bearded man approached the officer with a sales receipt claiming that he had paid for the vice his friend had taken. Officer Wright questioned the bearded man after discovering that he had someone else's drivers' license and the vehicle plate had been switched. Wright recovered the silenced handgun from the vehicle after placing the bearded man under arrest.
The New York Police Department has a mission to "preserve peace, reduce fear, maintain order," and protect its civilians in their communities (NYPD, 2016). On the contrary, civilians do not see the police officers as individuals who are there to protect them because they do not trust the police officers or the justice system. In the past few decades, police officers have not been held accountable for their actions in a few incidents where a few unarmed young black males were killed by the police. Communities responded to this issue with the Black Lives Matter movement with protests nationwide to show support for the unarmed young black men who were killed by police. In response to the aggressive policing, methods of using body cameras and detailed incident reporting ...
In many ways, Andrew’s story is a culmination of all of the influences mentioned so far. Andrew grew up in the projects with a lightly involved father, a drug addicted mother, ended up in a group home, and fell into a life of crime. Andrew is not exactly a model citizen, but may a perfect example of what is wrong with black America. He started out early with a variety of petty offences around the time his mother died, and worked his way up to dealing drugs, serving time for a stabbing, and spending a full year “in the hole” for giving verbal threats while in prison. After spending his entire youth living outside of the law, Andrew decided to clean up around age 25, and this is where his story stops making sense. He gave up selling drugs and committing crimes, but Andrew continued to be harassed by police officers because he “fits the description. (Taibbi 101)” It turns out that he fits the description because he is black, in a poor neighborhood full of black people. There is a law in the New York Penal Code that allows for officers to arrest or detain people for disorderly conduct, and this option is exercised regularly by the police to gain the opportunity to search African Americans in poor neighborhoods for drugs or guns. Disorderly conduct can be anything from “blocking pedestrian traffic (Taibbi 102),” which means standing on a sidewalk regardless of whether or not there actually is pedestrian traffic, to making an obscene gesture at a cop. Basically, anything a person does that a police officer doesn’t like can be interpreted in court as disorderly conduct. Overbearing police action and catch-all laws do not discourage poor behavior or encourage trust from the
Knowles, Gordan James M.A. "Dealing Crack cocaine: A View From The Streets of Honolulu." FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin July 1996: 1-8.
This book consists of many different arguments as to what flaws exist in the “Mr. Big” undercover operation, and how one’s confession to a crime when targeted through this operation could not be reliable. I have chosen to discuss two specific arguments which I feel are the most significant ones. Firstly the operation only takes place after a trial has occurred and due to lack of substantial evidence the accused is let go, and only then is it that an undercover officer begins to lure him into this so called criminal organization, they build his/her trust by giving him/her abundant of money, and once trust is gained they introduce him/her to the “Mr. Big” who will solve all his/her problems and all he has to is confess the crime to him. Given the level of inducement there is no reason for him to reject committing the crime, may it be false or not. The justice in the Mentuck case worded it perfectly as he said “ the police must be aware that as the level of inducement increases, the risk of receiving a confession to an offence which one did not commit increases, and the reliability of the confession diminishes correspondingly… (page 15, Mr. Big).
Facts of the case: Two undercover officers went to an apartment to buy drugs from someone there. Officer G knocked, and a man opened the door. The officer was about two feet away and had several minutes to look at the man, who sold him some drugs. Later an officer at the station left a picture for Officer G to look at in his office. Officer G identified the picture of as the dealer.