Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of friendships and how they evolve in middle and late adulthood
The evolution of the hero in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change themselves can’t move forward.”(George Shaw) Stanley goes through a lot of change throughout the story. Through the book, Holes Stanley changes from insecure to loyal and truthful. Stanley at the beginning of Holes was insecure about these events. Holes describes Stanley as an overweight insecure teenager. “Stanley weighed three times as much as the other boys.” ( Sachar 7) This quote shows how Stanley was insecure about how he weighed more compared to the other boys. In the text, stanley was insecure about teaching Zero. “All this time he thought Zero was reading over his shoulder. Sorry he said. I don’t know how to teach.” ( Sachar 82) In this text evidence, this shows how he was not loyal to Zero and insecure about …show more content…
teaching him. This following text shows how he’s liked by the other boys. “ but X-Ray told him to get behind Magnet and in front of Zero.” (Sachar 63) This text shows Stanley’s importance to the boys and how he was insecure and went with the flow. These pieces of text evidence shows how Stanley was at the beginning of the book and how he was insecure about everything. Zero has made Stanley more loyal as a person through the middle of the book. Stanley shows loyalty by taking the time to say, “Stanley never thanked him. But now sat on his cot and waited for Zero to return from the shower room. Thanks, he said to Zero.” ( Sachar 95-96) Stanley shows loyalty in this text evidence toward Zero by thankful for him digging his hole. Showing in this quote is how Stanley stood up for Zero when he could have been silent. “ Isn’t it more important to learn to read.” (Sachar 131) When Stanley stood up to the Warden he showed loyalty toward Zero and when he could have been quiet he stood up and talked. Stanley proves how he is loyal by teaching him to read. “I’ll try to teach you to read if you want, Stanley offered.” (Sachar 96) Proving how at the beginning he said no but now under the influence of Zero he is showing loyalty by saying yes. In the middle of the book, Stanley shows loyalty from Zero’s influence and it helps his character from the beginning. At the end of the book Stanley shows confidence through the end.
Confidence is shown when Stanley thought this. “ No one liked him and the truth was he especially didn’t like himself. He liked himself now.” (Sachar 186) This shows how he can be honest and confident with himself and showing how he didn’t like himself but he does now. Stanley confidence when he was about to leave and how he said, “ I can't leave Hector, Stanley said.” (Sachar 219) He was confident when he stood up to the warden and backing out Zero. Proving confidence he finally shows how he could show his math teacher a lesson. “Stanley’s former math teacher, might want to know the percent change in Stanley’s weight.” (Sachar 230) This text shows how he can prove to his math teacher how much he’s lost since she used to pick on him. Throughout the story, he changed from being insecure to confident. Last of all throughout the story Stanley at the beginning showed insecurity, in the middle loyalty, and at the end confidence. Zero helped him be the person he is in the middle and at the end. In Holes, the lesson is to trust friendship and learn that all people aren’t what they seem, and it changes us for the
better.
happens in the novel shows the foundation of his want to change. Phil Sullivan, explains, “The
A character can change many times throughout a novel, or film, whether it’s good or bad. It can be a character’s willingness to change or it can be a life changing journey he or she went on that made it happen. The novel, A Lesson Before Dying, by Ernest J. Gaines, talks about characters such as Grant, Jefferson, and Paul along with the life changing journey they went through in their life in Bayonne, Louisiana. In the novel, Grant said, “we are […] all of us on this earth, a piece of drifting wood, until we […] decide to become something else” (Gaines 193). Grant’s change of mind set, Jefferson’s ability to stand up for himself, and Paul wanting to be a part of the change, shows how they went from a drifting piece of wood to something
Stanley repeatedly gets what he wants by using any means possible. In addition, the person whoever threatens the existence of his poker game receives a beating, in this case his wife. This scene demonstrates Stanley’s viscous animal-like traits with such violence. If what happened here was repeated in today’s society, he would find himself in a jail cell with a pending divorce.
...ices, such an attempt to elicit sympathy for this monster falls short” (Bell 2). Stanley is looked at as the monster of the play which is how he should be viewed. Luck was not on Blanches side through her life which made her make the mistakes she made. Even though her past was not clean, Stanley did not purge her of this. He tried to show her the reality of the world, but through his brutal treatment, only made her sensibility worse. Stanley is a primitive ape-like man, driven only by instinct, who views women as objects and has no respect for others. He is a wife batter and a rapist who is responsible for the crumbling sanity of Blanche who is “the last victim of the Old South, one who inherits the trappings of that grand society but pays the final price for the inability to adapt to a modern world that seeks to wipe grace and gentility out of existence” (Bell 2).
He said “Pig-Polack-disgusting-vulgar-greasy…Remember what Heuy Long said-“Every Man is a King!” And I am the King around here, so don’t forget it! My place is cleared! You want me to clear your places?”(Williams131). This proves that Stanley has a violent and disrespectful character. He claims that he is the man of the house and no one else can take his place even temporarily. Every time his dominance is doubted by someone else he feels challenged and impulsive. Especially with women, he gives them no respect but expects their respect and shows a deep desire for control. This relates to the thesis because he talks and acts with women in a very violent way, which makes them emotionally hurt. This scene is also very ironic because Stanley states that he is not an animal and that he is a hundred percent perfect American but in reality he has an inhuman behavior and he is savage, which is portrayed in the way he talks, eats , and acts with
The character Stanley represents the theme of reality. Stanley Kowalski is the simple blue-collar husband of Stella. His actions, reactions, and words show reality in its harshest most purist form. His actions are similar to a primitive human. For example he doesn’t close the door when he uses the restroom. This rudeness represents the harsh reality that Blanche refuses to accept. Moreover, when he was drunk he hit Stella. This attack on Blanches sister could be a symbolic “wake up” slap to the face of Blanche.
In the book Holes Stanley Yelnats gets sent to a detention camp because of bad luck. His bad luck was that he was standing under a bridge when a stolen pair of a famous basketball player’s shoes got dropped on his head. He was in the wrong place at the wrong time because of an ancient family curse. The curse put on his family was set because of Stanley’s pig stealing great-great grandfather who disrespected one of the ancestors of Zero, the boy who committed the crime that Stanley was convicted of. Zero, who was also in the camp, told Stanley that his ancestor had told Stanley’s great-great grandfather how to get rid of the family curse but that he never got rid of it. This is the first time that Stanley realized that the curse could be broken. This curse is taken away at the end of the book. Stanley’s fate and bad luck were changed because he did something that his great-great grandfather was supposed to do.
After an attack, his wife states to her sister, "He was as good as a lamb when I came back and he's really very, very ashamed of himself (Williams, 2309). Due to human nature, he does show that he feels sorry for his wife, in order to make sure she doesn't get any ideas to leave. Stanley is unaware of this, but the fact that he fears his wife's departure is an insecurity we will never admit to (psychological/psychoanalytic approach).
However, there are also many instances where Stanley, a common working-class man, reveals his desire to be powerful and manly in his relationship with Stella, a woman who is of high class. Stanley is a man from a poor background and is married to a woman with a rich family history. Logically, Stanley may feel intimidated by Stella’s upbringing and feels that it is crucial to oppress her; it is hinted many times throughout the play as Stanley clearly demonstrates he is the one that holds the power by the way he treats Stella. Right from the start of the play, with Stanley’s introduction, he comes “around the corner… [with] a red-stained package from a butcher’s” (4), much like how an animal would bring its kill back home. With this, it is an analogy to a leader, Stanley, of a pack that brings back the food for the others to eat. The reliance of Stanley to bring back home the food broadcasts his will as the almighty alpha male that holds more importance than Stella. Furthermore, Stanley “heaves the meat at her (Stella),” (4) treating her as like a servant and also making a sexual innuendo. This action is one of disrespect and lets Stella know that she is under Stanley. This is an example of Stanley seeing Stella as a slave, a sexual object, under his control. Control is a large factor to Stanley as a husband and as a person. This is apparent when Stella explains that “Stanley doesn’t
Stanley is ill-tempered and continues to shout at Mitch saying “Get off the table, Mitch” he then “lurches up and tosses watermelon rinds to the floor.” Masculinity is evident here in both the stage directions “lurches up” which describes a rash movement, possibly with no control as he’s been drinking whisky and is likely to be drunk. When Mitch says he needs to go home, Stanley immediately retorts “Shut up,” which leads to Mitch complaining about a sick mother at home, who has no one else, Stanley is impatient and has no sympathy for him telling him to just “go home, then!” Stanley seems to lack any tolerance for other people’s emotions and lacks sensitivity, Williams portrays Stanley as a man who fits the stereotypical masculine view that men don’t care about such things. Mitch is another character who is ‘controlled’ by Stanley, and would be known nowadays as Stanley’s “bitch.” He does what he is told and follows every word Stanley says, looking up to him as his superior, the ultimate goal to become. When Mitch leaves for the bathroom
Also, the repetitive comparison of him to an animal or ape is the perfect image not the id as it is the instinctive part of your psyche. The way this passage leaves the reader is very powerful saying that “maybe he’ll strike you” is a good example of Stanley’s aggressive nature, and when Blanche says “or maybe grunt and kiss you” is a very good example of his sexual nature.
E). Stanley did not seem like it was okay for her to be there, by his tone. After he talks to her, he starts screaming at Stella about supper. Stanley personality through reading the text shows how he is a selfish human being.
The audience can sense that Williams has intended Stanley to question Blanche and for her to simply return his remarks with what seem like legitimate reasons "Why, those were a tribute from an admirer of mine." The conflict can only be increased because Stanley has not yet been able to dismantle Blanche and find the truth.
List the methods for improving self confidence mentioned in the textbook and provide an example of something you could do in each area to help improve your self-confidence.
Confidence is an ordeal of how one may view a point or even diverse there opinion in a belief or character. Confidence is a good thing to have, but having too much confidence can alter a person’s character overview and judgments of many situations.