Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of creative and critical thinking
The flaws in standardized testing
Debate surrounding standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of creative and critical thinking
Standardized testing has become a wide-spread problem to numerous school systems. Many schools have become reliant of tests given at the state level for most students in elementary, middle, high school, and college. The Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), American College Testing (ACT), Advanced Placement (AP), and many other state tests have become an inadequate way of measuring a students’ achievement. The state does not have as much concern for the other necessities of a child’s learning. Students need further types of evaluation, not only the knowledge and skills needed for one test. Schools put too much stock into standardized tests because they don’t measure creativity and critical thinking, are too complex in giving an understanding of student achievement and give students and teachers stress. It is evident that standardized testing should not be a measure of student achievement. …show more content…
Classroom curriculum is in distress because of the time taken to prepare for standardized tests. Test preparation takes away numerous hours a teacher could be using for more important educational purposes. Solley states, “Because of the increased pressure on teachers for their children to do well on standardized tests, the curriculum has been narrowed” (Solley 8). Many curriculums have been minimized to make room for testing. Another major aspect of testing is the accountability placed on the schools, students, and teachers. If students do not perform well the schools amount of funding could decrease. A student could be placed in classes for extra help with their school work and discriminates the students’ amount of knowledge. Additionally, teachers are judged by how well their students perform. Solley states, “Standardized tests are now used to hold up children and schools for comparison; the scores are used to discriminate rather than diagnose, punish rather than reward” (Solley
Current educational policy and practice asserts that increased standardized student testing is the key to improving student learning and is the most appropriate means for holding individual schools and teachers accountable for student learning. Instead, it has become a tool solely for summarizing what students have learned and for ranking students and schools. The problem is standardized tests cannot provide the information about student achievement that teachers and students need day-to-day. Classroom assessment can provide this kind of information.
Parents and advocates of education can all agree that they want their students to be in the best hands possible in regards to education. They want the best teachers, staffs, and schools to ensure their student’s success. By looking at the score results from standardized testing, teachers can evaluate effectively they are doing their job. On the other side, a proponent for eliminating standardized testing would argue that not all students care passionately about their education and will likely not perform to expectations on the test. However, receiving the numerical data back, teachers can construe the student’s performances and eliminate the outliers of the negligent kids. Teachers can then look at the individual scores and assign those outliers to get the help they need in school. This helps every student getting an equal chance at education. Overall, taking a practice standardized test can let a teacher look at individual questions and scores and interpret what they need to spend more time on teaching. A school also can reap the benefits from standard testing to ensure they are providing the best possible education they can. The school can look at the average scores from a group and hold the teacher accountable for the student’s results on the test. The school can then determine the best course of action to pursuit regarding the teacher’s career at the school. By offering teachers and schools the opportunity to grow and prosper, standardized testing is a benefit for the entire education
...achieving high scores on standardized tests” (Solley).Because of this, teachers take more time to teach test preparation skills than valuable information (Neill, 165). Although standardized tests have been trusted for years to assess the progress of students, there is little evidence that they measure progress accurately.
The United States of America has placed low on the educational ladder throughout the years. The cause of such a low ranking is due to such heavy emphasis on standardized testing and not individual student achievement. Although the United States uses standardized testing as a crutch, it is not an effective measure of a student’s ability, a teacher’s competency, or a school’s proficiency.
Standardized tests have been used to see how much a child has learned over a certain period of time. These tests have been a highly debated issue with many parents and just people in general. In the article “Opting out of standardized tests? Wrong answer,” the author Michelle Rhee argues that people should not be trying to opt out of standardized tests because it allows the country to see how much a child has learned and the things they need to improve. On the other hand, in the article “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools Is Wrong,” the author Kristina Rizga argues that standardized tests are not an efficient way to measure a student’s intelligence.
Standardized testing is not the best way to measure how well a teacher teaches or how much a student has learned. Schools throughout the United States put their main focus on standardized tests; these examinations put too much pressure on the teachers and students and cause traumatizing events. Standardized testing puts strain on teachers and students, causing unhealthy occurrences, Common Core is thrown at teachers with no teaching on how to teach the new way, which dampers testing scores for all students, and the American College Test determines whether a child gets into college or not based on what they have learned during high school. Standardized tests are disagreeable; tests should not determine the ranking of people. Standardized testing is believed to be the best way to evaluate how much a child has learned, however most students only score average on the tests.
tests were primarily employed as measures of student achievement that could be reported to parents, and as a means of noting state and district trends (Moon 2) . Teachers paid little attention to these tests, which in turn had little impact on curriculum. However, in the continuing quest for better schools and high achieving students, testing has become a central focus of policy and practice. Standardized tests are tests that attempt to present unbiased material under the same, predetermined conditions and with consistent scoring and interpretation so that students have equal opportunities to give correct answers and receive an accurate assessment. The idea is that these similarities allow the highest degree of certainty in comparing result...
Standardized testing scores proficiencies in most generally accepted curricular areas. The margin of error is too great to call this method effective. “High test scores are generally related to things other than the actual quality of education students are receiving” (Kohn 7). “Only recently have test scores been published in the news-paper and used as the primary criteria for judging children, teachers, and schools.”(2) Standardized testing is a great travesty imposed upon the American Public School system.
Too much time is being devoted to preparing students for standardized tests. Parents should worry about what schools are sacrificing in order to focus on raising test scores. Schools across the country are cutting back on, or even eliminating programs in the arts, recess for young children, field trips, electives for high school students, class meetings, discussions about current events, the use of literature in the elementary grades, and entire subject areas such as science (if the tests cover only language arts and math) (Kohn Standardized Testing and Its Victims 1).
Article 1: “Leaving Tests Behind” by Haley Sweetland Edwards This article discussed the never-ending debate on the emphasis on standardized testing in the United States. It also addressed the idea that some states are eliminating several of the required standardized tests in public schools. Instead the states expected teachers to assess students’ progress through “alternative assessments” including performance-based projects. The principal from Abingdon Elementary School expressed that these “alternative assessments” allowed for teachers to see “more authentic” way to view their students’ growth (Edwards, 28).
Teachers who lack passion and desire to teach what they are given can translate and manifest its way to students as they also lose aspirations to come to school and learn only what will be on exams they are supposed to take to show that they are “learning.” Students come to school to learn things they did not know prior and with the acquisition of knowledge it can many a times create a drive for students to expand upon a particular subject, which can ultimately determine their careers and goals, but this whole process is shutdown with standardized tests, as many topics and subjects are limited to a few basic ones that put out the fire students are expected to have.
Standardized testing in the United States is not always a common practice. In the Mid-1800s, Horace Mann, an education reformist, developed a test to administer to a group of students. Its purpose was to determine how students were performing at their current level and whether they were capable of proceeding to a higher level of education, although the student’s success on the test had no negative repercussions. These tests were a necessity at that time because the idea of public education was still being molded and these tests were the only means by which student progress could be measured. Within 35 years of the first recorded examination in 1845, testing became the factor which determined whether students were able to be promoted to the next grade.
In many schools, tests are so important that the students focus more on passing a test and less on actually learning. Some things teachers know about the subject are important, but it may not come up on the test, so the teacher doesn’t teach it. The teachers are also told to teach things specifically about passing standardized tests instead of the curriculum. Much of schools’ budgets have gone to test preparation instead of other useful learning resources. In conclusion, Holmes says having government mandated standardized tests take time away from kids’
Standardized testing is not good for the students because it becomes the prime focus and instead of learning and understanding material, they memorize. In the study done by Beverly Hoeltke the following was found: “Assessment is an integral part of instruction, as it determines whether or not the goals of education are being met. Assessment affects decisions about grades, placement, advancement, instructional needs, curriculum, and, in some cases, funding.” This quotation is a reminder that testing is in most ways important and paves paths for students even though it can also be a
These are some important questions that will be discussed within this paper leading to the conclusion that standardized testing has destructive effects on U.S. education, especially, in schools, on teachers and most severely on the students. These destructive effects are mirrored in a decrease of a solid knowledge foundation, a decrease of different essential skills like solving cognitive problems, social conflicts and a lack of creativity. Furthermore, holding schools and teachers accountable for test results promotes a grave narrowing of the curriculum. It leaves only very little time for other important aspects of teaching such as diversity and interests, and it leads to cheating on test scores. In addition, more tests produce more stress for pupils, teachers and parents.