Standard Of Beneficence In Medical Education

Introduction

Every day with every patient each physician has put into practice the ethics they are taught during obtaining their education. Some physicians may not even acknowledge it because it is almost second nature. Ethics can be defined as the study of and resolution of differing principles. Although books have been written on ethics and the definition of it, one practical functioning definition is that ethics is the study and resolution of conflicting principles (Ethical Principals). An ethical principle is a central initial belief which guides the actions of individuals. Many ethical principles are relevant and pertinent to any and every medical situation. Ethics dominates everything that is done in medicine today. Medical education requires each healthcare professional to

Body

The standard of autonomy stands for the intention that an adult with ability to decide has a full and god given right to decide on what he or she may do to their body. This is a right acknowledged in ethics, medical practice, and law. The standard of beneficence stands for the intention that it is the physician's obligation to do right by his patient. This is certainly an important rule of medical practice. For a real long time, beneficence was actualized through the method of the patient opening himself up to the physician for assessment and analysis and then often listening to and following the advice the physician offers. There have been many times when societal needs for self fortitude have sometimes brought this principle into discrepancy with autonomy. Often corresponding with beneficence is non-maleficence, which stands for the Hippocratic duty to "do no harm"(Ethical principals). You can come across conflicts between beneficence and nomaleficence in pretty much any clinical aspect or circumstance. The dictation between the two principles is the foundation for "risk/benefit" analysis for example a physician desires to shield