Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on global health
Negative effects of low socioeconomic status
Effect of social inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on global health
Rethinking Medical Ethics: A View from Below and Mountains beyond Mountains are two readings that will be further analyzed to demonstrate how re-socializing and re-humanizing medicine concurrently may be of importance to global health. As a recap, the former is a philosophical work that gives context to the idea of re-socialization in the medical field (Farmer). The latter is a literary, non-fictional piece that documents the life of Paul Farmer, from his early upbringing to his involvement with treating infectious diseases, from a third-person point of view (Kidder). From engagement with these readings, I have found the critical assessment of the upstream causes of health inequality as it pertains to a particular country's political, economic …show more content…
and social context, as well as the value placed in the human experience to be of great insight. Therefore, I plan to elaborate on the re-socialization and re-humanization of the medical realm in terms of recognizing systemic forms of oppression and utilizing a holistic approach on behalf of health professionals. Generally speaking, there is a wide outcome gap between the countries that are deemed wealthy and those that are considered to be highly underserved. Illness, specifically infectious diseases, seem to be the most prevalent in populations that are stricken with poverty. Clinical trials are conducted in these areas as a means to avoid the high costs of implementing the studies in the first place and guarantee adequate, patient enrollment. Ethical issues arise when there is no planned intervention to mitigate the spread of disease and the individuals from impoverished countries are not granted access to treatment for their health condition.According to Farmer, the underprivileged embody the injustices that persist in the medical and public-health field and the cycle of health inequality will continue unless those with power in these sectors become aware of the upstream causes of poverty, and in turn, health disparities and then take action. Rethinking Medical Ethics: A View from Below expands on these issues of current medical ethics and how there should be a re-socialization and re-humanization of such in order to address the outcome gap between the rich and poor and advocate for those who are disproportionately affected by infectious diseases (Farmer).
For instance, it is imperative for leaders in this field to examine the problems that have been of major focus in other disciplines, such as the social sciences, to get a more accurate depiction of the underlying causes of health inequality and why these determinants have a significant leverage in health outcomes. Examples of social determinants include education, quality of housing, working conditions and access to clean water. With that being said, this approach would give ethicists the necessary tools to pinpoint various forms of systemic oppression, better known as the "upstream causes," which contribute to disparities in these factors and health. Moreover, there are key instances of systemic oppression in Kidder's Mountains beyond Mountains and their detrimental impact on the lives of those who live in impoverished populations, in terms of the high rates of tuberculosis and lack of access to …show more content…
treatment. In the biographical piece, the author details the life of Paul Farmer, a well-renown physician and anthropologist who devotes his time treating patients suffering from the physiological effects of tuberculosis. At first, Kidder does not understand Farmer's reasoning for caring for small populations experiencing health issues in low-income countries, since treatment is expensive and the money can be used to save the lives of a larger populace. Kidder's perception reflects how the healthcare system operates today, where this is a focus on intervention rather prevention in the communities that can afford medical care and the impoverished populations are left to face the consequences of systemic oppression. For example, a dam is constructed in a low-income area on behalf of those with social, political and economic power (Kidder). One may not be able to comprehend how building this embankment directly affects an individual's well-being; the evidence of this relationship lies in the displacement of communities to make this construction possible as well as the decline in water quality and sanitary conditions. Another form of oppression is the presence of war — civilian deaths and the destruction of facilities that are meant to support the underserved reinforce the cycle of poverty, thus creating a suitable environment for tuberculosis to thrive. Therefore, acknowledging the upstream causes of health disparities is an essential step in re-socializing medicine; improving global health also calls for the need to listen to the stories of the underprivileged, in order to bring about re-humanization in the medical sector. Pursuing a holistic approach in medicine where health professionals value the human experience can be an opportunity for discovering forms of systemic oppression that are not as apparent as the ones previously mentioned.
In addition, more emphasis on treatment would be placed on the individual, instead of the disease itself. Narrative-based medicine, in particular, centers on the importance of patient's stories in developing effective interventions grounded in the interpretation of their accounts as well as improving communication in the patient-provider relationship. In Mountains beyond Mountains, the people's narrative gives insight on their history (medical, social or economic) prior to contracting the illness, how they are coping with the illness and what needs to change in terms of the quality and accessibility to treatment. The patient's perception of their illness can also be extracted from the narrative, which adds much clarity to the context of
disease. In summary, the re-socialization and re-humanization of medicine obligates the recognition of systemic forms of oppression or upstream causes of ill-health, as it relates to a specific population, and the inclusion of the people's narrative to improve global health. Furthermore, Kidder and Farmer's work help elucidate the ethics of structural inequality; the concept itself represents the culmination of injustice in the political, social and economic realm and the presence of such is evident in the patient's stories in Rethinking Medical Ethics: A View from Below and Kidder's piece, in terms of their experience with tuberculosis. However, if the idea of structural inequality is applied to Mountains beyond Mountains, the portrayal of Paul Farmer and the work he has done to mitigate infectious diseases in low-income countries may become groundwork for the author's interpretation of this theory.
The concepts discussed within the article regarding medicalization and changes within the field of medicine served to be new knowledge for me as the article addressed multiple different aspects regarding the growth of medicalization from a sociological standpoint. Furthermore, the article “The Shifting Engines of Medicalization” discussed the significant changes regarding medicalization that have evolved and are evidently practiced within the contemporary society today. For instance, changes have occurred within health policies, corporatized medicine, clinical freedom, authority and sovereignty exercised by physicians has reduced as other factors began to grow that gained importance within medical care (Conrad 4). Moreover, the article emphasized
People trust doctors to save lives. Everyday millions of Americans swallow pills prescribed by doctors to alleviate painful symptoms of conditions they may have. Others entrust their lives to doctors, with full trust that the doctors have the patient’s best interests in mind. In cases such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, the Crownsville Hospital of the Negro Insane, and Joseph Mengele’s Research, doctors did not take care of the patients but instead focused on their self-interest. Rebecca Skloot, in her contemporary nonfiction novel The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, uses logos to reveal corruption in the medical field in order to protect individuals in the future.
When a patient’s/family’s religious beliefs go against recommended medical treatment, it brings up an ethical issue. If the patient is a minor, this makes the case even more complex. In such a case, the parents would need to be evaluated to see if they were properly representing their child’s best interest. Depending on the child’s age, the child would need to be consulted to see if he/she meets the criteria of having the capacity to make his/her own medical decisions. Finally, the physician needs to be consulted to determine what his/her beliefs are on the case and under what circumstances would he be willing to perform the surgery.
Holmes explained that he was really concerned with both theorizing social categories and their relationships with bodies and with the possibility that suffering might be alleviated in a more respectful, egalitarian, and effective manner. Additionally, he cites Kleinman’s writings on illness narratives and the explanatory models of patients as well as Farmer’s essays on pragmatic solidarity and structural violence. Kleinman’s work focuses on the ways in which patients somatize social realities and on the importance of clinicians listening to their patients understandings of illness. Farmer’s work basically explains the importance of structural determinants of sickness and calls for more equal distribution of biomedical resources. Moreover, chapter
...e gap in attitudes between pre-medicalized and modern time periods. The trends of technological advancement and human understanding project a completely medicalized future in which medical authorities cement their place above an intently obedient society.
The word ethics is derived from the Greek word ‘ethos’ meaning character or conduct. It is typically used interchangeably with word moral which is derived from the Latin word ‘moves’ which means customs or habits. Ethics refers to conduct, character and motivations involved in moral acts. Ethics are not imposed by a profession, by law but by moral obligation. It is unwritten code of conduct that encompasses both professional conduct and judgement. Ethics helps support autonomy and self-determination, protect the vulnerable and promotes the welfare and equality of human beings. An ethical dentist- patient relationship is based on trust, honesty, confidentiality, privacy and the quality of care.1
Ethical principles in healthcare are significant to the building blocks of mortality. The principles are beneficence, autonomy, justice, and nonmaleficence. Although these principles can be certainly followed they can also be disregarded. Beneficence is a theory that assures each procedure given is entirely beneficial to that patient to help them advance within their own good. For example, There was a young girl, the age of 17. She had been being treated at a small private practice since she was born. She was recently diagnosed with lymphoma and was only given a few more years to live. Her doctors at the private practice who had been seeing her for years were very attached to her and wanted to grant this dying girl her every wish. They promised
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
In the hauntingly true account of one man trying to save the lives of millions, Tracy Kidder depicts the never ending struggle of physician-anthropologist Paul Farmer in the truest way he can. Mountains Beyond Mountains does not hide any facts, it does not cover the truth, nor does it emphasize the good. Tracy Kidder tells of Farmer's struggles to balance his love for Haitians with his need to save humankind from Tuberculosis and related diseases, and in effect exposes readers to the necessity of giving those impoverished decent health care and living conditions. In writing Mountains Beyond Mountains, Kidder not only recounts the life and career of a world-renowned doctor, but he also informs an ignorant population of the degree of neglect that many underdeveloped nations face. Kidder argues that though Farmer tried to change the health of impoverished
What are Health disparities? Health disparities are "preventable difference in the burden of disease, violence, injury or opportunities to meet optimal health experienced by socially disadvantaged populations". This population can be defined by elements such as race, gender, income, career and geographical location. Health disparities are biased and are related to the historical and uneven distribution of social, economic, political and environmental features. Some of this features include poverty, ecological risks, limited access to health care, educational discriminations and individual and behavioral factors. Some people believe that health disparities are ethically wrong because it demonstrates historical inequality. some ethical values of important in bioethics such as "Kantian ethics, contractarian ethics, and utilitarian ethics have provided theoretical justification" on why health disparities are ethically wrong. While most people believe in the unfairness of these approach to health care solutions, others sorely believe that this approach is beneficiary for those that can't afford proper care due to cost because of their financial limitation, geographical location, ethnicity/race or gender orientation. In this paper, I will expatiate on some disadvantages subsidized by this factors to the population in concern and will cite some of the difficulties faced by these populations due to their inadequate access to good or better health care.
Ethics in the medical field are very important and should be taken seriously. As a medical professional you will tested daily on making the best choices, using good judgment and being morally responsible for your actions. There are nine principles in the Code of Medical Ethics that in general make up the primary code. As a medical professional you must always consider what is in the best interest of the patient. Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association, (2012). When determining the proper “Patient-Physician Relationship, the relationship between the patient and physician is based on trust and gives rise to the physicians’ ethical obligations to place a patients’ welfare above their own self-interest” Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association, (2012).
Medicine as a Form of Social Control This critique will examine the view that medicine is a form of social control. There are many theorists that have different opinions on this view. This critique will discuss each one and their different views. We live in a society where there is a complex division of labour and where enormous varieties of specialist healing roles are recognised.
Sociology of Health and Illness The sociological approaches focus on identifying the two sociological theories. We critically analysed the biomedical model and doctor-patient relationship. We also evaluated how the medical professionals exercise social control and the medical professional’s contribution to ill health. The difference between society and health is studied by sociologists in relation to health and illness.
The Importance of Moral Absolutes When Making Decisions About Medical Ethics Some doctors would reject this claim, arguing that moral absolutes help decision making in medical ethics. For example, the rule ‘Do not kill’ is part of the oath taken by doctors. Some doctors would agonise over a decision whether to kill a terminally ill patient who has asked to die. These doctors might then feel guilty if the family turned out to have different wishes, or if a cure was later found for the illness. Having absolute moral rules helps doctors, because they don’t have to think about the individual circumstances or worry about possible consequences that are impossible to calculate or predict.
In this article written by David Hemenway, Why We Don’t Spend enough on Public Health it takes a look at how public health versus the practice of medicine viewed. The article describes Public Health as the underdog and the poor relation in the Field of Medicine. Public Health doesn’t receive the accolades that the Practice of Medicine gets, clearly outlined in the article Practice of Medicine being “flashy and accomplishment widely celebrated”, whereas Public Health described as “being mundane and invisible.” (Hemenway, 2010) This article shines a light on how underappreciated and less notoriety, Public Health receives; the writer, however, places emphases on the important role it plays in society. Hemenway touches on how underfunded and that