Spunk By Zora Neale Hurston Analysis

1301 Words3 Pages

“Spunk,” by Zora Neale Hurston, is a short story about a man who appears masculine and fearless claiming another man’s wife, but the tables turn by the end of the story. The short story begins with Spunk, the main character, walking off with Lena Kanty. Joe Kanty knows about the affair, but is too timid to confront Spunk. “The Storm”, by Kate Chopin, is a short story about a woman who has intercourse with an old boyfriend, while her husband and son are at the store. While a storm is passing by Alcée happens to stop by and stays at Calixta’s during the storm. The two commit adultery, but never tell anyone. While there are many similarities between these two stories, there are also several differences. The central idea of “Spunk” is karma. Hurston demonstrates karma with the main character Spunk. When describing what happens to Spunk he says, “’Lige—the dirty hound pushed me in the back!” Spunk says “the dirty hound” in reference to Joe’s spirit whom pushes him for karma. When Elijah describes the bob cat roaming around Spunk’s house he says, “…stood right still an‘ looked him in the eye, an’ howled right at him” (2). Spunk says Joe did not look him in the face, and now Joe is back as a bobcat, whom directly looks at Spunk’s face to scare him. Hurston uses Joe’s spirit as an example of karma. …show more content…

It helps the reader determine when the stories take place, but also allowing the reader to feel the characters’ emotions. When Spunk talks about Joe he says, “‘Joe come out there wid a meatax an' made me kill him’” (2). The way Hurston spells “with” and “metal ax” demonstrates how there is limited education. Likewise, when Calixta talks to her husband she says, “‘W’ere you been during the rain? An’ Bibi? he ain’t wet? he ain’t hurt?”’ (271) Chopin uses dialect to also demonstrate the limited education during the time of her

Open Document