Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of technology on the music industry
How has technology affected music in society
The impact of technology on 20th and 21st Century Music
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of technology on the music industry
The music industry is known to be one of the most cutthroat industries in today’s time. With physical copies of music becoming more and more ostracized, digital music streaming services have increased in popularity and usage over the past few years. Musicians can now get their music out into the world more effectively through these streaming services including Spotify, Youtube, and Apple Music. In the past few years, Spotify has gained much criticism in regards to the ways the company pays musicians. However, as Spotify continues to make millions, other companies such as Apple have set a target on them. In order to survive the perils that come with the digitally advancing music industry, Spotify must work to better compensate artists. Streaming …show more content…
“These are called record one royalties, because they’re paid from the first record that the company sells” (Passman). All music producers at one point has had to pay royalties on every single album they took part on. However, producers still make more money on their end than the artist no matter what because producer royalties are computed to be less favorable to musicians, exposing yet another flaw in the music industry. A website has recently been created in hopes to sell off deeds to the music simply called Royalty Exchange. Royalty Exchange allows songs to share parts in the royalty amounts. CEO Sean Peace believes his website can help the music industry get back on its feet since the physical amount of print music has drastically decreased over the last several years. “Over time, he expects laws to change to allow non-accredited investors to participate, and a secondary market for royalty shares to form” (Baverman). While Peace’s predictions might prove to be too revolutionary for this time, he is on the right track to keeping up with the ever-changing music industry and how royalties
The Web. 26 Feb. 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/oct/10/music-streaming-songwriters-youtube-pandora>. Luckerson, Victor. The "Business & Money" Business Money Revenue Piracy Down Has the Music Industry Finally Turned a Corner Comments.
An “analyst” was quoted in the case (in 2002) as saying that “people will pay for music on the Internet, eventually.” This person was skeptical of the willingness of consumers to pay for
Spotify is an on-demand music streaming service that provides a two tiered service to its users. The free service allows users to listen to any song on demand within the application’s music catalogue, but with the presence of ads. The premium service, however, is completely ad free. Launched in 2008 in Sweden, Spotify has grown and currently has over 24 million active users. (Sisario, B) As a result of several deals struck with EMI, Sony, Universal, and Warner Music Group, Spotify currently holds a music catalogue of roughly 20 million songs.
Consumers rely on their smartphones and laptops to listen to music on-demand. Although there are many music streaming companies, Spotify was one of the first to let consumers access millions of artist without buying individuals songs or albums. With Spotify, consumers pay for a premium subscription that allows access to every artist, album, and song within their library of
The most significant down side to technology is the loss in revenue from album sales. Illegal downloading of music has become prevalent in today’s society, and many artists—major or independent—receive little to no profit from album sales. Many companies, such as Apple, have tried combating the issue with protected file formats, but a loophole has always been found to bypass the protection. Unsigned and independently signed artists hurt the most, as they pay almost everything out-of-pocket to produce their music. The only feasible response to the loss in revenue, artists have found, is to increase tour dates. In today’s age, it is not rare to find artists who tour more than eight months out of each year. Touring has become one of, if not the only, reliable source of income for many
Verizon’s cease and desist order to Netflix represents the overall stance ISPs have towards net neutrality. Although there are many reasons to support net neutrality, opponents of it point out that there are benefits to avoiding net neutrality. One of the main arguments against net neutrality is that it raises the cost of infrastructure for data networks. On December 10, 2014, 60 large companies sent a letter to the White House stating that the classifying the internet as a common carrier would stifle the growth of the industry (Aguilar). Marc Andreessen, a co-founder of NetScape, states that the large investment in the infrastructure of the internet needs to show promising returns and that the FCC’s efforts are difficult to realize because they marginalize those returns by preventing ISPs from doing certain
Spotify: Are artists being paid enough?Since Spotify’s launch in 2008, the music industry has changed rapidly. With download revenue down and streaming revenues hitting huge figures, artists and record labels are concerned that they are not being paid enough. Huge artists such as Taylor Swift, Thom Yorke, and Beck have all had disputes with Spotify resulting in the artists removing their catalog from the service. Whilst it could be argued that relying on sound recording revenue to survive is not a sensible outlook on the industry, it cannot be denied that Spotify needs to pay them more. Spotify (2017) announced it has over 140 million active users with a catalog of over 30 million songs and still, artists are being paid very little.
People pay low subscription fees to streaming services, and as a result of this, listeners can be exposed to new artists and help these artists become popular (“Music Industry”). New artists are exposed to more people as streaming services often increase the amount of artists that people listen to. While streaming services do result in more exposure for an artist, that’s where the benefits stop. One of the issues with streaming services is payment issues. "Public relations missteps in the early 2000s kept many musicians from speaking out about economic issues, artists and executives said... But the shift toward streaming in recent years has prompted many musicians to investigate the changes in the business and comment online (Sisario)." Artists are not being paid much for providing their music to streaming services, but these issues and artist protests are being ignored by executives of the services until a high-profile artist makes the wage disparity public. "Streaming services pay a lot less than downloads, with the artists receiving a fraction of a cent per play on the service. Newer artists could struggle with the level of payments offered by the services, opponents have argued (O’Brien).” Hardworking artists are not receiving as much money from streaming services as they did from people purchasing their albums. This
Spotify is one of the most popular streaming services. And since its breakthrough, access to music have never been easier – just type in the name of an artist or a song and press play. The advantage of it is that listeners gets to listen to their wanted music instantly and for free and artist gets paid royalties. But since spotify’s big breakthrough there has been big debates if free music streaming is going to kill the music industry or if it’s going to help it.
“Artists rely on publishers to carry out the complex business negotiations involved in earning as much as possible from their music” (Frost Online). Music publishers are responsible for many financial aspects of an artist’s career, such as registration of rights, copyrights, licensing, and the collection of royalties in benefit of the artist. They are regarded as the artist’s “advocate” (Frost Online). Arguably, the most important financial device to an artist’s economic revenue is derived from royalties and licensing. This is where a music publisher would step in.
In December 2016, Apple Music hited 20 million paid subscribers within 18 months. Even though Spotify has 50 million paid subscribers, it took 8 years to hit this figure after they first launched in October 2008 (Sanchez, 2017). In fact, Seitz (2017a) cited that Apple Music offers a three-month free trial to get users hooked. Sanchez has the same point with Seitz that one reason for Apple Music to gain more subscribers comes from a three-month free trial. However, Digital trends (2017) indicated that a majority of Spotify users listen for free, and they will be able to experience Spotify’s service as long as they want.
The music industry started in the mid 18th century with Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Through the decades there has been a great increase in this industry; however, the revenues for this industry have declined by half in the last 10 years. This has been caused by music piracy, which “is the copying and distributing of copies of a piece of music for which the composer, recording artist, or copyright-holding record company did not give consent” . After 1980’s, when the Internet was released to public, people started to develop programs and websites in which they could share music, videos, and information with...
The interaction between producers and consumers in the market was as simple as buying a physical copy of artists’ album or going to their performances. Yet from the late 20th century up until now, there have been huge shifts in the way the music industry functions as a whole. As Mark Taylor states in his book, The moment of complexity: Emerging network culture, society has entered “the moment of complexity” in which things are changing faster than ever before (Taylor 3). He states that “we are … incarnations of worldwide webs and global networks whose complexity is fraught with danger as well as opportunity” (Taylor 17). This is not an overstatement even if “the modern music industry” replaces the word “we”.
In the article, “The Internet will Suck All Creative Content out of the World,” David Byrne clearly expresses his concern about the future development of music industry under the shadow of online streaming popularity. Byrne admits that, even though the online streaming apps such as Spotify and Google Play gives many start-up bands and emerging artists the chance to let the public know them, the way these apps operate, especially the amount their users are charged, throttles many musicians’ careers. Byrne explains that, since apps like Spotify give their users limited access to listen online without payment, and free access to download all the songs by charging only monthly fees, musicians who are thriving in the community but need financial
Spotify is on-demand streaming music player. After registration and downloading the desktop application user gains access to more than 20 million songs that are currently available on Spotify [1]. The main characteristic of Spotify’s streaming service is that it does not sell music, but it gives access to it. Streaming digital music is based on agreements with content owners - record labels, digital distributors, aggregators and publisher collecting societies, to whom Spotify pays out royalties [2]. Without these agreements there would be no music to stream. Basically, Spotify has an intermediary role as it distributes music content from right holders to listeners.