Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on characterisation of sherlock holmes
Characteristics of sherlock holmes
Characteristics of sherlock holmes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on characterisation of sherlock holmes
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is an author who is deeply interested in the mysteries of Sherlock Holmes. He wrote this novella called “The Adventure of the Speckled Band.” Sherlock Holmes is an observant detective and Dr. Watson is a compassionate medical doctor. As soon as they are informed of this murder case, they report straight to Stoke Moran, where Helen Stoner awaits their arrival. Helen Stoner is an anxious woman who is petrified that she will not survive as her sister Julia dies on the eve of her wedding. Dr. Roylott is an abusive and violent man. Nobody in the story is comforted with his presence. The story takes place in April, 1883 in Stoke Moran. Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson proceed to solving the mystery. They are determined to solve this mystery, and they refuse to leave without the mystery solved. Immediately after Sherlock and Watson begin their investigation, Dr. Roylott commands they quit investigating and return to where they came from. Dr. Roylott refuses to unravel what he is hiding. One day, Dr. Roylott transports himself out of town and Sherlock and Watson attempt to search for clues throughout the bedroom. Sherlock and Watson examine a plethora of clues. They still do not have enough information and clues to …show more content…
This story was a foul play mystery. It was a foul play mystery because there were many false clues in the story that may have led readers to thinking different outcomes then the real one. Due to the events that occurred in this story, Helen Stoner will get married and live a happy life without having to deal with Dr. Roylott. From the moment that the mystery was solved, the tone shifted from challenging to uplifting and the mood shifted from petrified to happy. Sherlock Holmes was truly a catastrophic hero in this story, he made an impact on everyone and he certainly was not leaving Helen with the mystery
(The adventure of the speckled band) The two also differ in other ways, for example although Holmes is intellectually gifted he lacks the contact of friends, this shows him as a loner. On the other hand, Watson, being the average man, has friends and later in... ... middle of paper ... ... olmes gives us the information that Watson didn’t see and tells us the rest of the case. In my opinion, the best of the Sherlock Holmes stories is The Last
Holmes and Watson were to guard Helen from a mysterious whistle she heard in the early morning, every single morning. The whistle she heard was the same whistle that Julia (her sister) had heard when she came upon her fate. The night that they were going to investigate, they stayed in Helen’s room; Julia’s old room. They woke up to the whistle and Holmes smacked the snake in the face. The snake ended up going back into Dr. Roylott’s room and killing him by venom. Helen was saved by Holmes in the situation where she would have been murdered by her own father and let her be married with no interference. Holmes, however, could have done another action that did not include hitting the snake and making it bite Dr. Roylott. Holmes had banged the snake in the head, which caused it to be aggravated and bite the first person it saw. Holmes could not have predicted where Dr. Roylott was sitting in his
This shows as at the start. there is an air of panic as Watson and Holmes have been knocked up. as a young lady had arrived in a considerable state of excitement. The murder setting is also typical as it is in a large country manor. owned by the well-known Surry Family of the Roylotts of Stoke Moran.
With all of the women in Holmes’ life it would seem Holmes had every opportunity given to him to settle down and live a normal life. So why would he continue down the path he was? Out of all the women in Holmes’ life it was his second wife, Myrtle Z. Bellman’s father Holmes tried to swindle and kill, he was unsuccessful (America’s Serial Killers).
...he met the detective, fell victim to Moriarty’s games. “Moriarty is playing with your mind too. Can’t you see what’s going on!” (Sherlock). During Holmes’ last days before his faked suicide, he pleads with John to see reason through Jim’s manipulations, as does Desdemona with Othello’s accusations. Even Sherlock’s oldest friend Detective Inspector Greg Lestrade was doubting Holmes’ credibility.
The film adaptations of literary works can sometimes be a nightmare. However, they can also turn out better than the original work in some rare instances. In the case of The Speckled Band by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the movie was a better format for telling the murder mystery because of the movie’s ability to show rather than tell the audience what is happening, the clearer explanation of the plot, and the more in-depth development of the characters.
Grimesby Roylott. Holmes was only used to promise protection to Helen Stoner from her step-father. Although he hit the snake, it was out of self-defense to protect himself. When the snake reached Dr. Roylott’s chamber, Holmes had no possible way of knowing that Dr. Roylott would be bitten by it. Though it may have been difficult, Holmes could have thought for a small amount time before striking the swamp adder about what may occur. As a result, Helen could be happily married with the ultimate knowledge of the occurrences behind her step-father’s chamber door. Sherlock Holmes sensed the astounding completion behind this difficult case, even though it may have costed him his
Examine the role of Sherlock Holmes as a Detective in the Story Of The Speckled Band The creator of the very legendry stories of Sherlock Holmes was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Sir Arthur. As a child he was sent to a harsh, strict and then applied to study medicine. After qualifying, he travelled as a ships doctor, however he had very little success.
Doyle, Arthur Conan. “The Adventure of the Speckled Band”. Detective Fiction: Crime and Compromise. Eds. Dick Allen and David Chacko. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1974. 101-120. Print.
Throughout the story the mood changes from initially being anxious, when Helen arrives, to being petrified which occurs when Helen’s concerns are indeed verified, to finally happy when the main conflict is resolved through the death of Dr. Roylott. When Helen Stoner arrives in April, 1883, she informs Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson of her fear that she would meet an ending similar to that of her sister. Through the explanation of the suspicious events of Julia’s, Helen Stoner’s sister, death, Sherlock was able to concur that this was indeed a serious matter. Holmes grew suspicious of Dr. Roylott based upon the description provided by Helen. Dr. Roylott’s aggressive nature and past were exceptionally suspicious. Additionally, the bruises upon Helen’s wrist was one example of the abusive relationship that Dr.Roylott and Helen had. This is an example of a character versus character conflict that is both internal and external. The man versus man conflict between Dr.Roylott and Sherlock Holmes made Dr.Roylott an even greater suspect. Dr. Watson, an intelligent doctor, and Sherlock Holmes agreed that they should begin their investigation that
He believes that Openshaw can remove his danger by satisfying the sender of the letters. Yet, in this particular case Holmes oversees the danger and sends Openshaw home and dives directly to the mystery, “In all previous cases the superiority of Holmes has been evident, but in this case, Holmes is shown not to be infallible, and fails to bring the case to a conclusion” (“Colin Quarter” Letterpile.com). Holmes knew that Openshaw would be in danger but did not know he would be murdered shortly after leaving Holmes safety. This case hurt Holmes’s pride and his moral deeply because of how he failed. He cannot live with himself knowing the murderers of John Openshaw are unjustified so he must find them. Though Holmes has failed to keep his client alive, he plans on justifying the murderers because his failure has become a personal matter in which he must
In the short story “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, we, as readers, figure out how Sherlock Holmes solved the mystery. Sherlock Holmes is a detective who lives in England. Doctor Watson is a medical doctor, who aided Sherlock Holmes in solving cases. Helen Stoner is a wealthy woman, whose sister passed away two years prior to the story. Doctor Roylott is the step- father of Helen Stoner. The story mainly takes place in the Roylott Stoke Maron Manor in April 1883. Early one morning, Helen Stoner confronted Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson in their office. Helen asked Holmes and Watson to solve the mystery behind her sister, Julia Stoner’s, death. The main conflict is Helen Stoner feared for her life and
In the story “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” the author Conan Doyle portrays many different narrative techniques. He uses these techniques to provide meaning for the audience as well as help them visualize the situation that was being described. The different techniques used are narrative discourse, suspense, conflict, close, and focalization in his story. Narrative discourses are events, to describe a series of events that are contingent one on another. Typically focuses on one or more performers of actions. Personal experience can influence narrative discourse due to the explaining of significant events in the life of the narrator. Narrative discourse is made up of setting, developing
Likewise, changes have been made on the level of the character in pursuance of the strong bond between Holmes and Watson. For instance, due to plot change some character have been removed, but John H. Watson and Sherlock Holmes the heart of the whole story indeed are kept. For instance, Sherlock Holmes is portrayed as Watson describes him in the “he was as sensitive to flattery on the score of his art as any girl could be of her beauty” (Doyle 38). Also, Holmes calls himself a “consulting detective” just like the title he gave himself in the novel. Indeed, Holmes as one of the main characters of the story needs to show similar characteristics of the original Holmes, or else the show would have lost its meaning. Although Holmes’ deductive skills are shown pretty clearly in the show, his expertise in cigars are not mentioned as in the book the detective says he “‘can distinguish at a glance the ash of any known brand either of cigar or tobacco’” (Doyle 37). Yet the writers of the show, might reveal Holmes’ expertise later on in the show since they have the 60 different
“The Dying Detective” was dramatized by Michael and Mollie Hardwick. The short story became a theatre play and had an interesting take of Sherlock Holmes’s way to solve a mystery. One morning, Watson came to visit Sherlock since he worried for his dear friend after hearing he had fallen ill. He spoke of an illness from a type of plant- Watson had never been cognizant or aware of this illness. However, Sherlock had feigned his illness. He objected to any medical assistance from Watson. Instead, he demanded that he wanted Culverton Smith to treat him since he had experience in the study of plants. Sherlock did not wish for Smith to treat him. Instead it was a way to lure him and reveal his undoing. Smith was a man who caused another being’s death by the name of Victor Savage- his own cousin. Sherlock was determined to reveal his true colors with a very clever plan.